The Manuals Side by Side
The Juridic Effects of Delict
Each work's treatment of this topic, whole and in its own order, in its own column. Paragraph numbers link to the passage in its place in the manual. Back to the topic page.
Side by side within this topic Attempted Delict
Only one manual in the library treats this topic so far; there is nothing yet to set beside it.
Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology
Vol. II, Bk. IV, Tr. I, Dissertation II. On the Juridic Effects of Delict
I. From delict, with canon 2210 considered, there arises:
A penal action for declaring or inflicting a penalty and for seeking satisfaction.
A civil action for repairing damages, if the delict has inflicted damage on anyone. The canonists treat of these matters more broadly according to canons 1552-1959, on trials; only let canon 2210, § 2 be noted: The same judge in a criminal trial can at the instance of the injured party call the civil action to examination and define it.
II. All who concur in a delict according to the norm of canon 2209, §§ 1-3 (n. 849, 1, 2, 3), are held by obligation in solidum of repairing the expenses and damages which have befallen any persons whatever from the delict, although they have been condemned by the judge pro rata (canon 2211).