The Manuals Side by Side

The Remedies of Sin

Each work's treatment of this topic, whole and in its own order, in its own column. Paragraph numbers link to the passage in its place in the manual. Back to the topic page.

Works

Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology

Vol. I, Bk. I, Tr. II, Diss. II, Pt. II, Sect. III, Ch. I, Article V. On the Remedies of Sins

n. ¶1.

Since it belongs to the scope of moral theology to provide that knowledge of sin which tends toward practice, and therefore also toward uprooting sin, it is of the highest importance to know the remedies of sin, by which both the inclination toward sin may be weakened, consent to it excluded, and the wound inflicted by it upon the soul repaired.

The principal remedies are:

n. 268.

I. Flight from occasions of sin. "He who loves danger will perish in it."1 "And if your hand or your foot scandalizes you, cut it off and cast it from you: it is good for you to enter into life maimed or lame, rather than having two hands or two feet to be cast into eternal fire. And if your eye scandalizes you, pluck it out and cast it from you: it is good for you with one eye to enter into life, rather than having two eyes to be cast into the hell of fire."2

1 Ecclus. 3:27.

2 Matt. 18:8-9.

n. 269.

II. Meditation, i.e., consideration of those things which pertain to the salvation of the soul. By this consideration ignorance is expelled, inadvertence is prevented, hatred of sin and love of virtue are promoted. That saying of St. Augustine is well known: "A thoughtful understanding is the beginning of every good." Now among those things which cohere with the loss of grace through sin, the punishment which God, so merciful, decrees in his justice against the sinner must be considered in the first place. Hence Sacred Scripture: "The fear of the Lord drives out sin."1 "Remember your last things, and you will not sin forever."2 Hence Christ himself turns man away from sin by the commemoration of punishments, as is clear from the text cited above. Therefore spiritual exercises, to be undertaken either privately or together with others, for example in a so-called retreat house, cannot be commended enough.

1 Ecclus. 1:27.

2 Ecclus. 7:40.

n. 270.

III. The exercise of those acts which are more opposed to the individual sins into which one has fallen or toward which one is inclined, whether acts of penance or of the virtues opposed to those sins. To this especially belongs the exercise of the love of God by repeated acts; its force efficaciously opposes every sin, and even the demons, who instigate to sin, greatly dread it, as St. Anthony the Great testifies: "Believe me, brethren, Satan greatly fears the vigils, prayers, fasts, voluntary poverty, mercy, and humility of the devout; but especially ardent love for Christ the Lord, by whose one sign of the Most Holy Cross, weakened, he flees."1 To this, finally, refer the things we noted above where we spoke of exercising the energy of the will (n. 50).

1 Breviarium Romanum, January 17 and November 2.

n. 271.

IV. Reception of the sacraments, as will be clearly evident from the treatise on the Sacraments.

n. 272.

V. Prayer, according to these words: "Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and you shall find; knock, and it shall be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it shall be opened."1 Now both by the voice of the Church and by the sayings of the Saints we are taught that the grace which we seek is to be sought especially through Mary, Mother of Mercy; she is the universal mediatrix of grace for us before Jesus.

1 Matt. 7:7-9.

Bucceroni, Commentaries (1910)

Ch. II, Article II: On Concubinage and Prostitution

n. 55.
  1. Note. "Remedies for those who are found in the proximate occasion especially of base sin are greater prayer, more frequent use of the Sacraments, daily renewal before an image of the Crucified of the promise of sinning no more and of avoiding being alone with one alone, fleeing from the sight of the accomplice, and similar things." L., l. 6, n. 455, 464.

Vermeersch, Theologia Moralis

Vol. I, Tr. V, Chapter II: The Extinction of Sin

n. 447.

— I. Extinction of mortal sin. 1. Necessity and things presupposed. Because sin remains in guilt, or moral imputability, there is place for its extinction. This can be had if the offender has offered a condign satisfaction, or if God has freely pardoned the fault to the penitent. But the extinction of mortal sin: a) supposes formal reconciliation with God, which succeeds to the state of enmity in which the sinner was miserably living; b) requires formal penance, or detestation of sin, so that only because of ignorance or forgetfulness is a virtual detestation accepted, which is contained in an act of perfect charity 1.

  1. Conditions. - For mortal sin, a mere man cannot offer condign satisfaction. Wherefore the restitution of grace and divine friendship with regard to us is always gratuitous. But divine goodness, accommodating itself to our condition as mutable men, is not only prepared to restore grace to the penitent, but itself invites and moves us to seek reparation.

  2. Modes. - Reparation is made outside and within the sacrament. Outside the sacrament it is made by perfect contrition. For when man retracts sin from the motive of love of God above all things, he has done whatever he was able to do. It is then not fitting for God to do less than pardon the offense. And so equality by this reason of proportionality is had, while pardon stands to that which befits God as contrition stands to those things which the sinner can do. Under this respect perfect contrition is said from the nature of the thing to expel the guilt of fault (C. Billot, op. c., p. 71).

In the sacrament sin is taken away ex opere operato, provided that, through at least imperfect contrition, the sinner has removed the obstacle of affection to sin.

But because mortal sin induces a stain distinct from habitual fault only by reason, the pardon of sin can take place by way of washing away the stain, as in Baptism, or by way of remission of fault, as in the sacrament of Penance.

  1. Effects. - Remission or washing away of sin must remove both elements of habitual sin: the imputation of sin and the consequent aversion of God. The aversion of God is taken away by the infusion of grace.

Once the friendship of God has been restored, the punishment of loss, which corresponded to violated friendship or to the aversion of God, is necessarily taken away. The punishment of sense as eternal is also necessarily taken away. For the eternity of the punishment of sense depended on the eternal punishment of loss; all eternity of punishment was founded in the permanent perversion of order, which has ceased; and it is repugnant that someone should at the same time, from grace, have a right to eternal beatitude and be obliged to pay eternal punishment for sin. But just as a friend, although he restores the old friendship, can demand compensation for the harm brought, so God can demand painful compensation for satisfaction unduly sought outside himself. And so temporal punishment to be paid will not rarely remain. But this, since it is to be tolerated patiently from a friend, or is undertaken by the man himself for spontaneous expiation, is less involuntary, and thus it preserves the notion of punishment only in a diminished way.

1 Moreover, an act of charity is by its nature such that a man who becomes conscious of a grave offense of God, from that love spontaneously and necessarily breaks forth into formal detestation of sin.

n. 448.

— II. Extinction of venial sin. Contrary to what we were saying about mortal sin, the extinction of venial sin:

  1. As to necessary conditions:

a) Does not of itself suppose any reconciliation properly so called, since it has not made man an enemy of God. Of itself, I say, because if it has been committed by a man constituted outside the state of grace, it will not be taken away before grace has been restored; b) It does require that the affection to that sin be taken away; but because of that virtual retraction, it does not seem to require a formal detestation of penance. Thus also among human friends, the guilty party of an action slightly displeasing can indeed ask and obtain formal pardon; but he can also repair the fault by a good affection and action, and the other friend can forget the fault, without formal conversation about that matter; c) The retraction of venial sin is not contained virtually in every act of charity, even perfect charity, since this can be composed with venial sin.

And so the reason why, outside the sacrament, perfect contrition is required for the remission of mortal sin, that is, the necessity of recovering the principle of reparation, or charity, here plainly fails, since the principle of charity subsists. Only the use of the principle of charity is required.

  1. Which use? A twofold use can be had:

a) He who has sinned can have recourse to the sacrament of penance, which will directly remit the sin, if the obstacle of affection to sin has been taken away at least by attrition;

b) A just man also who has sinned venially can obtain pardon ex opere operantis, through a fervent act either of formal penance, or of goodness contrary to the disordered act, by which therefore it is virtually retracted.

All those acts are imperatively acts of charity.

For one sinning venially has neglected the law of present charity, and thus has created some difficulty, some obstacle, to the fervor of charity. It is necessary to remove this by the strong impulse or effort of a good act (Cf. S. Th., De malo, q. 7 art. 11, c.).

  1. That remission, which ought to restore no habit, is a mere non-imputation of the past sin.

Once the fault itself has been remitted, the debt of punishment is not yet extinguished. But, besides the use of indulgences, that debt can be redeemed through the compensation of all good works, especially alms.

  1. And so to the question whether, outside the sacrament of penance, an act of perfect contrition is required for the remission of venial sin, or whether attrition suffices, no simple affirmative or negative response can be given. Contrition is required in a man who is in the state of sin; attrition suffices in the just man, and therefore suffices because the state of justice denotes the principle of charity, with which existing, venial sin is simply and intrinsically reparable. Yet, as has been explained, formal attrition itself does not seem necessary.
n. 449.

— According to St. Thomas, those who depart from this life with venial sins not retracted obtain remission of the fault through an act of charity toward God, repugnant to those venial sins; but since they cannot merit absolution or remission of punishment, they have every punishment to be paid, unless it is lightened by the suffrages of the living or by intercession, for example, of the B. V. M.

n. 450.

Summary

— I. The extinction of mortal sin supposes formal reconciliation with God, and requires formal penance, so that only because of ignorance or forgetfulness of sin does the virtual penance suffice which is contained in an act of perfect charity. Since man cannot make condign satisfaction, the restitution of grace and friendship is always, with regard to us, gratuitous. Outside the sacrament it follows perfect contrition, by which man does whatever he himself can; or in the sacrament grace is restored through the sacrament itself, provided that the obstacle of grace has been taken away at least by attrition. But it is made in baptism by way of washing away the stain, in penance by way of remission of fault. Pardon, however, takes away aversion from God by the infusion of grace and at the same time takes away the imputation of sin. Once the friendship of God has been restored, the punishment of loss, which corresponded to aversion, and the eternal punishment of sense, which depended on the punishment of loss, are necessarily taken away. Temporal punishment can remain, but no longer punishment properly so called, since it is to be paid patiently by a friend.

II. The extinction of venial sin neither supposes formal reconciliation nor seems to require formal detestation of penance. Yet, since it can be reconciled with charity itself, not every act of charity, even perfect charity, contains its virtual retraction. To extinguish venial sin there is required a certain use of the principle of charity, whether sacramental or extrasacramental, which then is made through a fervent act either of formal penance or of goodness contrary to the disordered act. For, while one sinning venially has neglected the law of present charity, he has created some obstacle to the fervor of charity, which he must remove by the contrary effort of a good act.

But the remission of venial sin is a mere non-imputation, which nevertheless does not necessarily take away the debt of punishment.

Those dying with venial sins not retracted obtain, through a contrary act of charity toward God, remission of fault, the whole debt of punishment remaining.

Merkelbach, Pastoral Questions

Merkelbach, Pastoral Questions, I. Questions Concerning Ch…, On Chastity and Lust, Question Seven: Concerning the Causes and Remedies of Lust

n. ¶452.

III. Remedies. 1. Some are natural or hygienic as to the body: wholesome diet, frugal nourishment, sufficient, not consisting too much in meat and sweets, but rather comprising light foods, of easy digestion, not exciting, which in small volume provide sufficient nutrition; abstinence from very alcoholic drinks and in the evening from meats; a hard bed, not softer bedding; clothing not warmer, adhering to the legs, compressing the genitals, which renders the body too delicate; lying not on the back: since the dorsal position excites the genital nerves, lying should be lateral, and indeed on the right side; an ordered life, with a determined hour for rising and lying down; bodily labor or the intellectual labor of intense study; cleanliness of the body, especially of the genitals, especially in a girl, from frequent cold washing, for example morning and evening; honorable games by which the body is exercised even to fatigue, so that sleep immediately rushes in and the imagination does not excite dreams; evacuation of the urinary bladder before lying down. There are besides medicines and drugs by which nervous erections, if they are very frequent, vehement, and abnormal, are repressed by the counsel of a physician, for example pills from lupulin, hyoscine and bromide, camphor, adalin for treating masturbators; likewise sometimes hypnotism; likewise for girls, partial amputation of the clitoral organ,2 which nevertheless is held illicit by some, because such amputation, which these call notable, can be done only for the direct good of the whole body. In infants sometimes worms infect the anus, which are the cause of nervous excitation, against which a medicinal remedy is usually employed.

2 Antonelli, o. c., tom. I, n. 614-618, notes: "A twofold remedy can be provided, that is, hygienic and mechanical. The principal hygienic rule is: to distract the mind and exercise the body even to fatigue; hence frequent, indeed daily prolonged walks, gymnastics, journeys, cold baths of the sea in summer time and daily very brief washing of the whole body with common water, to imbue mind and spirit with the best ideas. When the body is tired in the evening, sleep invades quickly until morning. Let the bed be hard; sleep should not be taken lying on the back; first thing in the morning, scarcely has sleep been shaken off, it is necessary to rise quickly; in the evening partial cold baths, hip-baths, contribute much; before they go to bed, let them take a cup from whey of milk or from a decoction of barley. If nervous excitation brings on vehement erections, washings of camphorated oil around the genitals or a sponge or compress of cold water with vinegar over the genitals provide very good effects. To all these things there must be added the continued vigilance of parents or institutions and the will in young persons of this kind of correcting themselves from this vice.

n. ¶453.
  1. Others are psychological as to the senses: to distract the mind, to nourish excellent ideas; to struggle against passions; to restrain the imagination; not to confuse pleasure with happiness; to avoid depraved companions as well as solitude; in the morning, once sleep has been shaken off, to rise at once; to mortify the senses, for example by moderate subtraction of food or sleep, indeed by chastisement of the body and scourges, provided they are not prolonged for a long time and do not excite concupiscence more, as easily happens if they are applied to the thighs or loins, a fortiori if to the genitals.
n. ¶454.
  1. Others are moral as to the soul. a. Remote ones are: a generous spirit which removes egoism and prefers urbanity to one's own convenience; cultivation of sincerity; confidence in parents, confessor, superiors; magnanimity in the noble destination of life; modesty of eyes and gesture; humility and piety toward God present, Christ suffering, the Blessed Virgin, the Guardian Angel, and so forth; frequent reception of the sacraments and immediate confession after a fall; great esteem for purity and horror of vice, for inculcating which the vigor of the chaste and the sadness of the impure can be effective.
n. ¶455.

b. Proximate ones are either negative: flight from occasions, namely to avoid vain loves, frivolous readings, spectacles, excessive contact and immoderate frequentations with persons of the other sex, and dances;

n. ¶456.

or positive: to strengthen the will so that, pleasure having been despised, apt remedies are strenuously employed; frequently to renew the resolution of living chastely; with firm and tranquil soul to propose the rejection of temptation and flight from every relapse; to trust in the divine help of grace; to resist immediately and strongly. Sometimes marriage is an efficacious remedy.3

3 Compare Saint Francis de Sales, Introduction a la Vie Devote, p. III, c. XVI and XVIII.