Moral Theology: Its Method and Masters
Camargo, Ign.
Drawn from the authors' own words; every quotation links to its place.
Jesuit · 1650–1722
Dates differ: Prümmer 1650–1722; Haringer ?–1702.
In Prümmer's Catalogue and Haringer's Index
- “Camargo, Ign., S.J., Spanish (1650-1722), most sharply attacked Probabilism in the work entitled Regula honestatis moralis, Naples 1702, 1 folio volume.” — Prümmer, Catalogue of authors
- [+*: rigid] “Camargo (De) Ignatius, S.J. (Rule of Moral Uprightness), died 1702.” — Haringer's index of writers (Gury-Ballerini) (p. XV, sign read on the page)
the scan's text layer reads "**"; the page has the dagger and asterisk (read at 300 dpi)
His Moral System, as Our Authors Report It
Every report quoted in the author's own words and linked to its place; point at a name to see his words. Haringer's signs give St. Alphonsus's judgment as Haringer found it in St. Alphonsus's works (his notice, Gury-Ballerini, 1884, p. XI); a sign on a writer the 1884 editor added to the list is the editor's own, and is said to be his.
| Probabiliorist | |
|---|---|
| Counted among them by one of our authors | Noldin, Summa I, n. 231 |
| Rigid in his opinions | |
| “Camargo (De) Ignatius, S.J. (Rule of Moral Uprightness), died 1702.”Haringer marks him +*, giving St. Alphonsus's judgment of him (rigid) | Haringer's index, Index of writers, p. XV |
Where Our Authors Discuss Him
Each read in its full passage; the words quoted are the author's own. Where several authors say the same thing, one is quoted and the others follow “in nearly the same words”; point at a name to see his words.
| “and Fr. Camargo attests that about seventy Probabilists”Concina cites his witness that about seventy probabilists held, before the decree, that a judge may use the less probable opinion | Concina, Compendium II, diss. II, ch. V, n. IV |
| “And it is my pleasure to confirm this by the authority of a Theologian of the illustrious Society of Jesus, Fr. Ignacio de Camargo, book 2, controversy 4, article 6, number 530, saying: This is Ignorantism — that is, the doctrine of the sins of ignorance among the recent Probabilists — of which you know not whether it be the parent of Probabilism, or its nursling, or its son, or its companion, or its full brother.”Concina quotes him on “Ignorantism, Probabilism, and Philosophism” | Concina, Compendium II, diss. II, ch. VIII, n. XIX |
| “Fr. Étienne de Camps published a book entitled Quaestio Facti, in which he frees the Society from the note of defending Probabilism as its own. The same was done by Fabri, Daniel, Moya, Gonzalez, Camargo.”Concina: he denied that probabilism is the Society’s own doctrine | Concina, Compendium II, diss. II, ch. IX, n. X |
No article in the Catholic Encyclopedia (1913).