Moral Theology: Its Method and Masters
Eusebius Amort
Drawn from the authors' own words; every quotation links to its place.
Canon Regular · 1692–1775
In the Index: Amort
In Prümmer's Catalogue and Haringer's Index
- “Amort, Eusebius, Canon Regular of the Lateran, German (1692-1775), already before St. Alphonsus taught the system of Aequiprobabilism. He published several moral works; his work Theologia eclectica moralis et scholastica, under the auspices of Benedict XIV, was published at Augsburg in the year 1752, 4 volumes in folio.” — Prümmer, Catalogue of authors
- [**: weighty, probabilist] “Amort Eusebius, German, regular canon of Polling and of St. John Lateran, theologian of the Bishop of Augsburg, often praised by St. Alphonsus as a man thoroughly known everywhere for his various and learned works. He committed his moral and scholastic theology to type only after it had first been reviewed by Benedict XIV. He excellently defended probabilism, but in practical questions he was much more severe than St. Alphonsus; born 1692, died 1775.” — Haringer's index of writers (Gury-Ballerini) (p. XII, sign read on the page)
His Moral System, as Our Authors Report It
Every report quoted in the author's own words and linked to its place; point at a name to see his words. Haringer's signs give St. Alphonsus's judgment as Haringer found it in St. Alphonsus's works (his notice, Gury-Ballerini, 1884, p. XI); a sign on a writer the 1884 editor added to the list is the editor's own, and is said to be his.
Our authors disagree. Probabilist: Marc, Konings, Haringer's index, Tanquerey. Equiprobabilist: Koch-Preuss, Noldin, McHugh-Callan, Prümmer, Slater, Merkelbach.
Tanquerey (n. 405) holds that equiprobabilism "does not differ substantially from moderate probabilism", and Marc (n. 86) that the moderate probabilists "agree in substantial matters with the equiprobabilists".
| Probabilist | |
|---|---|
| Counted among them by 3 of our authors | Marc, Institutiones I, n. 91; Konings, Compendium, n. 79; Tanquerey, Fundamental Moral Theology, n. 396 |
| “Amort Eusebius, German, regular canon of Polling and of St. John Lateran, theologian of the Bishop of Augsburg, often praised by St. Alphonsus as a man thoroughly known everywhere for his various and learned works. He committed his moral and scholastic theology to type only after it had first been reviewed by Benedict XIV. He excellently defended probabilism, but in practical questions he was much”Haringer marks him **, giving St. Alphonsus's judgment of him (weighty and probabilist) | Haringer's index, Index of writers, p. XII |
| “He excellently defended probabilism”Haringer: he excellently defended probabilism | Haringer's index, Index of writers, p. XII |
| Equiprobabilist | |
| Counted among them by 3 of our authors | Koch-Preuss, Handbook I, the moral systems; Slater, Short History, ¶ 89; Merkelbach, Summa II, excursus on the moral systems |
| “there were some theologians (Amort, Rassler, Ant. Mayr) who already before St. Alphonsus set forth the system of probabilism in an equiprobabilistic formula”Noldin: before St. Alphonsus he set forth probabilism in an equiprobabilistic formula | Noldin, Summa I, n. 250 |
| “As for Equiprobabilism, it is first seen in the writings of Christopher Rassler (about 1713) and of Eusebius Amort (1692-1775)”McHugh-Callan, giving the probabilists' answer: equiprobabilism is first seen in his writings | McHugh-Callan, Moral Theology I, n. 719 |
| “Before St. Alphonsus this system was held by Eusebius Amort, Rassler, Antonius Mayr, and certain others; Billuart, O. Pr. (+ 1757), already attempts to solve the arguments of the Equiprobabilists. - Besides the Redemptorists, Konings, Marc, Ter Haar, Aertnys, Wouters, and also several others adopted this system, for example Scavini, Gousset, Pruner, Muller, Simar, etc., and from the Order of Preachers Moran, Saralegui, Beaudouin, etc.”Prümmer: he held equiprobabilism before St. Alphonsus | Prümmer, Manuale I, n. 341 |
| “already before St. Alphonsus taught the system of Aequiprobabilism”Prümmer: an equiprobabilist before St. Alphonsus | Prümmer, Catalogue of authors |
| Rigid in his opinions | |
| “in practical questions he was much more severe than St. Alphonsus”Haringer: in practical questions much more severe than St. Alphonsus | Haringer's index, Index of writers, p. XII |
Where Our Authors Discuss Him
Each read in its full passage; the words quoted are the author's own. Where several authors say the same thing, one is quoted and the others follow “in nearly the same words”; point at a name to see his words.
| “Amort (1775)”Vermeersch names him among the distinguished theologians of the age before St. Alphonsus, an age he calls morbid | Vermeersch, Theologia moralis I, n. 20 |
| “For those heretics, deceitfully simulating great piety and a singular fervor for protecting moral science, brought it about that in France, Italy, and other provinces they drew many learned men to their side: among whom were also Peter Collet (the celebrated continuator of Honore Tournely), Louis Habert, and Natalis Alexander, who, although they rejected other errors of the Jansenists, nevertheless accommodated themselves in many things to their immoderate rigor. Indeed there were not lacking those who defended more benign opinions, such as Louis Abelly, Eusebius Amort, Castropalaus, Gobat, Roncaglia, Cardenas, Viva, Lacroix, Sporer, Reiffenstuel, Reuter, Voit, Holzmann, Elbel, Mazzotta, etc., without however being able wholly to repress the swelling rigor of doctrine.”Marc names him among those who defended more benign opinions against the rigor of the Jansenist age | Marc, Institutiones I, n. 6 |
| “Hist., p. 35. b) Among theologians who opposed probabiliorism, very many teach that, in a conflict of opinions, the certainly or notably more probable one is to be followed. … The same teach Ferdinand Rebellus, S.J.; Antonius Perez, O.S.B.; Martinus a Prado, O.P.; Franciscus de Arauxo, O.P.; Antonius Cotonius, O.M.; Passerini de Sextula, O.P.; Esparza, S.J.; Terillus, S.J.; Gabriel Daniel, S.J.; Christ. Rassler, S.J.; Benedict Schmier, O.S.B.; Ant. Mayr, S.J.; Eusebius Amort; Jos. Biner, S.J.; and several others.”Marc names him among those who, against the probabiliorists, teach that the certainly or notably more probable opinion must be followed | Marc, Institutiones I, n. 100 |
| “a moderate and eclectic probabilist, very learned” | Tanquerey, Fundamental Moral Theology, n. 54 |
| “Eusebius Amort (+ 1775)”Koch-Preuss name him among those who, after Trent, joined a systematic exposition with its defense against the Reformers | Koch-Preuss, Handbook I, history of moral theology |
Works Our Authors Used
- Eusebius Amort, Canon Regular Lateran. - Theologia moralis et scholastica; 4 tomes fol. (Augsburg, 1752). — Marc's list
- Amort, De origine, progressu, valore ac fructu Indulgentiarum, 1735. — Tanquerey's list
In the Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)
“Eusebius Amort”, vol. 1, by Thomas Joseph Shahan. Public domain; transcription from Wikisource.
Amort, Eusebius, philosopher and theologian, b. at Bibermühle in Bavaria, 15 November, 1692; d. at Polling, 5 February, 1775. He was educated by the Jesuits at Munich and at an early age joined the Canons Regular in the convent of Polling, where he spent most of his life as a teacher of philosophy, theology, and canon law, a tireless student in many departments of ecclesiastical lore, and an investigator of natural phenomena. He was foremost among the German theologians of the eighteenth century as a guide and an inspirer of ecclesiastical youth, and may be considered a model of lifelong devotion to all the sciences that befit an ecclesiastic. As early as 1722 he founded, and with some interruptions carried on for several years, an influential review, "Parnassus Boicus, oder Neueröffneter Musenberg." An academy formed by him at Polling became in time the model on which was based the Academy of Sciences of Munich. He spent the years 1733–35 at Rome, whence he returned to Bavaria enriched with precious knowledge acquired by intense study in the libraries of the Eternal City and by intercourse with many learned men. Thenceforth he counted among his correspondents such scholars as Benedict XIII and Benedict XIV, Father Concina, Cardinals Leccari, Galli, Orsi, St. Alphonsus Liguori, and others. For a period of forty years his pen was never idle, and from it unceasingly poured forth learned volumes and brochures filled with rare and choice learning.
It has been truly said that his seventy volumes, if distributed in an orderly collection, would resemble a general encyclopedia. As a philosopher, he is best known by his solid work "Philosophia Pollingana" (Augsburg, 1730) and by his "Wolfiana Judicia de philosophiâ et Leibnitianâ physicâ" (Frankfurt, 1736). As a dogmatic theologian and Christian apologist he won applause by his "Demonstratio critica religionis catholicæ nova, modesta, facilis" etc. (Venice, 1744), written to promote the reunion of the Protestant sects with the Catholic Church, and by his "De origine, progressu, valore et fructu indulgentiarum accurata notitia historica, dogmatica, critica" (Augsburg, 1735). His most extensive work, "Theologia eclectica, moralis et scholastica," published at Augsburg (1752) in four folio volumes, and later at Bologna (1753) in twenty-four octavo volumes, merited the honour of a revision by Benedict XIV. He wrote also "Theologia moralis inter rigorem et laxitatem media" (Augsburg, 1739), "Ethica Christiana" (Augsburg, 1758), and other moral treatises. St. Alphonsus Liguori admired his theological prudence, and Gury calls him a "probabilista moderatus doctrinâ et sapientia clarus"; others (e.g. Toussaint) accuse him of an inclination to rigorism in practice. He translated into Latin the "Dictionnaire des cas de conscience" of Pontas (Venice, 1733), but modified its Gallican tone and rigoristic views.
Of his canonical works the most important is his "Vetus Disciplina canonicorum et regularium" (Venice, 1748), "Elementa juris canonici veteris et moderni" (Ulm, 1757), both valuable for their wealth of historical material. In the latter he defends ecclesiastical jurisdiction against the attacks of contemporary jurists and statesmen. The best known of his works is entitled "De revelationibus, visionibus et apparitionibus privatis regulae tutæ ex Scripturâ, Conciliis, Sanctis Patribus aliisque optimis auctoribus collectæ, explicatæ atque exemplis illustratæ (Augsburg, 1744). It was directed against the "Mystic City of God," the famous work of the Spanish Franciscan nun, Maria de Agreda, and brought him into conflict with several of her Franciscan defenders. This learned scholar found time to prepare for the people a number of devotional works. His prayer-books, "Kurz und Gut" and "Brevier eines guten Christen," went through many editions. He also compiled select lives of the saints and wrote a German treatise (Venice, 1756) on the invocation of the saints, besides a smaller and a larger catechism. In the discussions waged during the first half of the eighteenth century concerning the authorship of the "De Imitatione Christi," Amort stood forth as an ardent supporter of the claims of Thomas à Kempis, though his seven works on the subject, praised for their "rare learning and judicious temper," failed to silence the Benedictine champions of Jean Gersen. The more important are: "Scutum Kempense" (Cologne, 1725); "Plenâ et succinctâ informatio de statu totius controversiae" (Augsburg, 1725), and "Certitudo moralis pro Th. Kempensi" (Ratisbon, 1764). On his portrait by Jungwirth was engraved "Litterarum maxime sacrarum per Bavariam restaurator eximius." The visitor to Bibermühle may now contemplate a marble monument in honour of a theologian in whom industry, erudition, critical skill, and piety were united in a high degree.
De Feller, Biogr. Univ. (Paris, 1845), III, 45; Westermayr, in Kirchenlex., I, 754–757; Toussaint, in Dict. de theol. cath., I, 1115–17; Hist. polit. Blätter, LXXVI, 107; Hurter, Nomenclator (Innsbruck, 1895), III, 201; Baader, Das gelehrte Bayern (Nuremberg, 1804), I, 20.
Thomas J. Shah.