A Topic of Moral Theology
Mistake in contracts
Substantial mistake voids; accidental mistake does not.
The works themselves ask 3 questions under this heading — see them together with their answers.
In the index as Error (Error) · Fear (Metus) · Contract · Contracts · Fraud · Consent · Ignorance · Stole fees (Jura Stolae) · Annulment · Deceit · Null contract · Rescindable Contract · Rescission · Act · Betrothals (Sponsalia) · Deception · Defect · Deliberation · Error of one causing damage · Fiction of law · Fraud in a contract (Dolus in contractu) · Inadvertence · Mistake in contract · Vices
In the manuals
Read the manuals side by side → — each work's whole treatment in its own column
A Manual of Moral Theology for English-Speaking Countries
Vol. I, Bk. VII, Pt. I, Chapter II. On Consent, nn. 1, 2 & 3 (3 passages — hover a number to read it)
Manual of Moral Theology (Manuale Theologiae Moralis)
Vol. I, Bk. II, Tr. II, Diss. I, Pt. VII, Sect. I, Ch. II, Art. I, § IV, Point II, I. Error, nn. 836 & 837 (2 passages — hover a number to read it)
Compendium of Moral Theology of Fr. John Peter Gury, S.J., with the Notes of Antonio Ballerini, S.J.
Vol. I, Treatise On Contracts, First Part. On Contracts i…, Ch. I, Art. III, § II, Point I. On Error, nn. 775, 776, 777, 778 & 779 (16 passages — hover a number to read it)
Synopsis of Moral and Pastoral Theology
Vol. III, Contracts, and the Obligat…, On the Virtue of Justice (…, Part II — Chapter I: On Contracts in General, nn. 625, 626, 627, 628 & 629 (5 passages — hover a number to read it)
Manuale Theologiae Moralis
Vol. II, Tr. XI, Sect. I, Q. IV, Ch. I, Art. II, § 3. On Legitimate Consent, n. 257 — 257. a) On error and fraud. Error is a judgment discordant with objective truth. Error which has place in contracts can be either substantial or accidental, according as it concerns either the very substance of the contr… Read in context →
Theologia Moralis Sancti Alphonsi: Reduced into a Compendium
Vol. I, TREATISE ON CONTRACTS, FIRST PART: ON CONTRACTS I…, Ch. I, Art. III, § II. On Defects Opposed to Consent, nn. ¶1, ¶2, ¶848, ¶849, ¶850, ¶851, ¶852, ¶3, ¶853, ¶854, ¶855, ¶856 & ¶857 (13 passages — hover a number to read it)
Summa Theologiae Moralis
Vol. II, Special Moral Theology: On…, Treatise: On the Cardinal …, Third Part: Concerning Com…, Sect. C, Ch. I, Question Two: On Consent Required for Contract, nn. 458, 459 & 460 (25 passages — hover a number to read it)
Compendium of Moral Theology
Vol. I, Tr. IX, Pt. I, Ch. II, Art. III, § II. On Those Things which Can Vitiate Consent, nn. ¶1, 491, 492 & 493 (4 passages — hover a number to read it)
Christian Theology, Dogmatic and Moral, in Compendium
Diss. III, Chapter II — On the various contracts, n. V — V. QUESTION II. Whether guile makes a contract void? ANSWER. Guile is taken for deceit, or for fraud, or for craft, by which one deceives another. Error, or guile, which precedes or accompanies a contract, if it be conce… Read in context →
Palladium Theologicum, Tome V: On the Virtues
Tr. II, Disputation I: On Contract…, Question III: How error, or fraud, vitiates a contract, nn. 1–28 (28 passages)
Treated under the broader heading Consent in contracts — Noldin, Summa of Moral Theology · Marc, Institutiones Morales — these works do not divide the matter as finely as we do here, so their treatment stands one heading up (ed.)