Moral Theology: Its Method and Masters
St. Antoninus
Drawn from the authors' own words; every quotation links to its place.
Dominican · 1389–1459
In the Index: Antoninus; Antoninus, St.
In Prümmer's Catalogue and Haringer's Index
- “St. Antoninus, O.P. (1389-1459), archbishop of Florence, wrote among other things: 1. Summa theologica, which was published complete twenty times and according to a part six times. The better, though not more accurate, edition of this work is that which Petrus Ballerini prepared in the year 1740, 4 folio volumes, Verona. 2. Summula confessionis, called the Summa Defecerunt, often edited and translated, 1 volume in 4to, Venice 1538. Among the moralist authors of his time St. Antoninus seems to hold the first place, and it is not established that he favored Probabilism.” — Prümmer, Catalogue of authors
- [**: weighty, probabilist] “Antoninus, saint, of the Order of St. Dominic, Archbishop of Florence (his works have rather recently been reprinted at Verona by the care of the Ballerini. Whether more exactly and faithfully than before? Let others see. Thus Fr. Ant. Zacharias), born 1389, died 1459.” — Haringer's index of writers (Gury-Ballerini) (p. XII, sign read on the page)
His Moral System, as Our Authors Report It
Every report quoted in the author's own words and linked to its place; point at a name to see his words. Haringer's signs give St. Alphonsus's judgment as Haringer found it in St. Alphonsus's works (his notice, Gury-Ballerini, 1884, p. XI); a sign on a writer the 1884 editor added to the list is the editor's own, and is said to be his.
He wrote before the moral systems were formed (Medina first set out probabilism in 1577), so what is reported here is how each author reads the principles he followed, not a system he held. Our authors read him differently.
| Before the systems: cited for probabilism | |
|---|---|
| “Article III. The System of Probabilism is Vindicated … but that this contract is usurious is not clear, since wise men think things contrary to one another in matters of this sort."”Sabetti-Barrett cite him among the authorities for the substance of probabilism (Prümmer reads him the other way) | Sabetti-Barrett, Compendium, n. 61 |
| “But before Medina, the ancient doctors truly handed down probabilism in substance, and used it. And thus St. Antoninus, part 1, tit. 3, cap. 10, Sect. 10; p. 2, tit. 1, cap. 11, Sect. 28, says that there are contrary opinions among doctors especially in moral matter, and that anyone can follow any opinion, provided he forms for himself a good conscience, when no express authority and sufficient reason to the contrary is had.”Bucceroni: before Medina he held probabilism in substance | Bucceroni, Commentarii, n. 111 |
| “Antoninus, saint, of the Order of St. Dominic, Archbishop of Florence (his works have rather recently been reprinted at Verona by the care of the Ballerini. Whether more exactly and faithfully than before? Let others see. Thus Fr. Ant. Zacharias), born 1389, died 1459.”Haringer marks him **, giving St. Alphonsus's judgment of him (weighty and probabilist) | Haringer's index, Index of writers, p. XII |
| Before the systems: cited for the more probable opinion | |
| “This is especially true of St. Antoninus and of Ioannes Nider. - The first who seems to have expounded the principle of Probabiliorism clearly enough is Guilielmus Antisiodorensis, who flourished around the year 1230.”Prümmer: alleged by some as a favorer of probabilism, he rather favors probabiliorism | Prümmer, Manuale I, n. 345 |
| “Sometimes already St. Antoninus is cited by authors as a Probabilist, but altogether falsely. Rather, St. Antoninus favors Probabiliorism, saying: "With a good conscience someone can hold one part of some opinion and operate according to it, which namely has notably equal doctors for itself ... when ... he forms for himself a good conscience and credulity concerning that which he believes as concerning the more probable part" (S. theol.”Prümmer: he is sometimes cited as a probabilist, “altogether falsely”; he favors probabiliorism | Prümmer, Manuale I, n. 342 |
Where Our Authors Discuss Him
Each read in its full passage; the words quoted are the author's own. Where several authors say the same thing, one is quoted and the others follow “in nearly the same words”; point at a name to see his words.
| “For to this belong both the Summa on Penitential Cases, by St. Raymond of Pennafort, and the Moral Mirror, which is ascribed to Vincent of Beauvais, and the Theological Summa and Confessional Summa, by St. Antoninus”His Summa, among the casuistic and confessional works | Marc, Institutiones I, n. 6In nearly the same words: Tanquerey, Fundamental Moral Theology, n. 42 |
| “St. Antoninus (d. 1459) treated moral theology separately from dogmatic theology” | Wouters, Manuale I, introduction, history |
| “Saint Antonin, Sylvester, Almaïn, an ancient Doctor of Paris, the learned Tostat, Gerson”Daniel reports that “Florimond du Plessis” cited him for Sirmond’s opinion on the precept of love | Daniel, Apology, ¶ 56 |
| “St. Antoninus is recounted as the first who applied this to these matters (Sum. p. I, t. 20), and indeed for positive laws”Merkelbach: St. Antoninus is said to be the first to apply 'in obscure matters we look at what is more like the truth' to questions of conscience | Merkelbach, Summa II, excursus on the moral systems |
| “He was followed by St. Antoninus of Florence, also a Dominican (+ 1459)”Koch-Preuss: he followed Peraldus, combining the systematic with the casuistic method | Koch-Preuss, Handbook I, history of moral theology |
| “besides St. Thomas, St. Bonaventure, St. Antoninus, or Scotus, whose authority indeed must be preferred to others”Konings: his authority is to be preferred to that of the other great theologians | Konings, Compendium, n. 57 |
Works Our Authors Used
- St. Antoninus, Order of Preachers, Archbishop of Florence, - Summa theologica; 4 vols. fol. (Verona, 1740). — Marc's list
- St. Antoninus, O.P., 1389-1459, Summa theologica, Verona. — Tanquerey's list
In the Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)
“St. Antoninus”, vol. 1, by Arthur Lawrence McMahon. Public domain; transcription from Wikisource.
Antoninus, Saint, Archbishop of Florence, b. at Florence, 1 March, 1389; d. 2 May, 1459; known also by his baptismal name Antonius (Anthony), which is found in his autographs, in some manuscripts, in printed editions of his works, and in the Bull of canonization, but which has been finally rejected for the diminutive form given him by his affectionate fellow-citizens. His parents, Niccolò and Thomasina Pierozzi, were in high standing, Niccolò being a notary of the Florentine Republic. At the age of fifteen (1404) Antoninus applied to Bl. John Dominic, the great Italian religious reformer of the period, then at the Convent of Santa Maria Novella in Florence, for admission to the Dominican Order. It was not until a year later that he was accepted, and he was the first to receive the habit for the Convent of Fiesole about to be constructed by Bl. John Dominic. With Fra Angelico and Fra Bartolommeo, the one to become famous as a painter, the other as a miniaturist, he was sent to Cortona to make his novitiate under Bl. Lawrence of Ripafratta. Upon the completion of his year in the novitiate, he returned to Fiesole, where he remained until 1409, when with his brethren, all faithful adherents of Pope Gregory XII, he was constrained by the Florentines, who had refused obedience, to take shelter in the Convent of Foligno. A few years later he began his career as a zealous promoter of the reforms inaugurated by Bl. John Dominic. In 1414 he was vicar of the convent of Foligno, then in turn sub-prior and prior of the convent of Cortona, and later prior of the convents of Rome (Minerva), Naples (Saint Peter Martyr), Gaeta, Sienna,and Fiesole (several times). From 1433 to 1446 he was vicar of the Tuscan Congregation formed by Bl. John Dominic of convents embracing a more rigorous discipline. During this period he established (1436) the famous convent of St. Mark in Florence, where he formed a remarkable community from the brethren of the convent of Fiesole. It was at this time also that he built with the munificent aid of Cosimo de'Medici, the adjoining church, at the consecration of which Pope Eugene IV assisted (Epiphany, 1441). As a theologian he took part in the Council of Florence (1439) and gave hospitality in St. Mark's to the Dominican theologians called to the council by Eugene IV.
Despite all the efforts of St. Antoninus to escape ecclesiastical dignities, he was forced by Eugene IV, who had personal knowledge of his saintly character and administrative ability, to accept the Archbishopric of Florence. He was consecrated in the convent of Fiesole, 13 march, 1446, and immediately took possession of the see over which he ruled until his death. As he had laboured in the past for the upbuilding of the religious life throughout his Order, so he henceforth laboured for it in his diocese, devoting himself to the visitation of parishes and religious communities, the remedy of abuses, the strengthening of discipline, the preaching of the Gospel, the amelioration of the condition of the poor, and the writing of books for clergy and laity. These labours were interrupted several times that he might act as ambassador for the Florentine Republic. Ill health prevented him from taking part in an embassy to the emperor in 1451, but in 1455 and again in 1458 he was at the head of embassies sent by the government to the Supreme Pontiff. He was called by Eugene IV to assist him in his dying hours. He was frequently consulted by Nicholas V on questions of Church and State, and was charged by Pius II to undertake, with several cardinals, the reform of the Roman Court. When his death occurred, 2 May, 1459, Pius II gave instructions for the funeral, and presided at it eight days later. He was canonized by Adrian VI, 31 May, 1523.
The literary productions of St. Antoninus, while giving evidence of the eminently practical turn of his mind, show that he was a profound student of history and theology. His principal work is the "Summa Theologica Moralis, partibus IV distincta", written shortly before his death, which marked a new and very considerable development in moral theology. It also contains a fund of matter for the student of the history of the fifteenth century. Sowell developed are its juridical elements that it has been published under the title of Juris Pontificii et Cæsarei Summa". An attempt was lately made by Crohns (Die Summa theologica des Antonin von Florenz und die Schätzung des Weibes im Hexenhammer, Helsingfors, 1903) to trace the fundamentals principles of misogony, so manifest in the "Witchhammer" of the German Inquisitors, to this work of Antoninus. But Paulus (Die Verachtung der Frau beim hl. Antonin, in Historisch-Politische Blätter, 1904, pp. 812–830) has shown more clearly than several others, especially the Italian writers, that this hypothesis is untenable, because based on a reading of only a part of the "Summa" of Antoninus. Within fifty years after the first appearance of the work (Venice, 1477), fifteen editions were printed at Venice, Spires, Nuremberg, Strasburg, Lyons, and Basle. Other editions appeared in the following century. In 1740 it was published at Verona in 4 folio volumes edited by P. Ballerini; and in 1841, at Florence by Mamachi and Remedelli, O.P.
Of considerable importance are the manuals for confessors and penitents containing abridgments, reproductions, and translations from the "Summa" and frequently published in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries under the name of St. Antoninus. An unsuccessful attempt has been made to show that he was not the author of the Italian editions. At the most it should be granted that he committed to others the task of editing one or two. The various editions and titles of the manuals have caused confusion, and made it appear that there were more than four distinct works. A careful distinction and classification is given by Mandonnet in the "Dictionnaire de théologie catholique". Of value as throwing light upon the home life of his time are his treatises on Christian life written for women of the Medici family and first published in the last century under the titles:—(1) "Opera a ben vivere ... Con altri ammaestramenti", ed. Father Palermo, one vol. (Florence, 1858) (2) "Regola di vita cristiana", one vol. (Florence, 1866). His letters (Lettere) were collected and edited, some for the first time by Tommaso Corsetto, O.P., and published in one volume, at Florence, 1859.
Under the title, "Chronicon partibus tribus distincta ab initio mundi ad MCCCLX" (published also under the titles "Chronicorum opus" and "Historiarum opus"), he wrote a general history of the world with the purpose of presenting to his readers a view of the workings of divine providence. While he did not give way to his imagination or colour facts, he often fell into the error, so common among the chroniclers of his period, of accepting much that sound historical criticism has since rejected as untrue or doubtful. But this can be said only of those parts in which he treated of early history. When writing of the events and politics of his own age he exercised a judgment that has been of the greatest value to later historians. The history was published at Venice, 1474–79, in four volumes of his "Opera Omnia" (Venice, 1480; Nuremberg, 1484; Basle, 1491; Lyons, 1517, 1527, 1585, 1586,1587). A work on preaching (De arte et vero modo praedicandi) ran through four editions at the close of the fifteenth century. The volume of sermons (Opus quadragesimalium et de sanctis sermonum, sive flos florum) is the work of another, although published under the name of St. Antoninus.
Unedited chronicles of the convents of St. Mark, Florence and St. Dominic, Fiesole; Quétif and Echard, SS. Ord. Præd.; Touron, Histoire des hommes illustres de l'ordre de S. Dominique; Maccarani, Vita di S. Antonino (Florence, 1708); Bartoli, Istoria dell' arcivescovo S. Antonino e de suoi più illustri discepoli (Florence, 1782); Moro, Di S. Antonino in relazione alla riforma cattolica nel sec. XV (Florence, 1899); Schaube, Die Quellen der Weltchronik des heiligen Antoninus (Hirschberg, 1880).
A. L. McMahon.