Part — Vermeersch, On Chastity

Part Two: Casuistry

222.

The argument of the second part.

222. - We call the second part casuistic because, in setting it forth, being less solicitous concerning the higher end and the universal direction of life, we have chiefly in mind to investigate what of moral goodness or guilt each particular case contains or introduces. Yet neither here will it be permissible for us to omit controversies and neglect efficacious demonstrations. Wherefore the appellation casuistic applies to the matters to be treated rather than to the method.

¶1241.

Rationale of the order.

Moreover, we shall arrange the argument by this rationale: in the first section we shall treat of the venereal acts of those to whom mutual carnal intercourse is permissible from their state, or of the venereal acts of spouses; but in the third section we shall treat of the venereal acts of those to whom every carnal intercourse is forbidden, or of the venereal acts of those who are not spouses.

¶1242.

For it seems to us that we must begin from lawful acts, not unlawful ones.

¶1243.

Moreover, between the first and third sections, that is, in the second section, we shall place the special question concerning the betrothed, who, since they are on the way to marriage, are situated in a certain mixed condition.

¶1244.

In the third section, we shall treat first of consummated sins and then of nonconsummated sins, for the latter are known better from the former.

¶1245.

Consummated sins will again be divided into sins according to nature and sins against nature.

¶1246.

But of nonconsummated sins, some can be exterior, others interior.

¶1247.

Thus far concerning direct lust; a chapter concerning indirect lust will follow it.

¶1248.

Finally, by the chapter which we judge to conduce most to practice, and which treats of masked lust, we shall place an end upon the work.

Within this part