Title — Decretals of Gregory IX
Title III: On Married Clerics
Chapter I
Latin source headnote: A marriage contracted by a cleric existing in sacred orders does not hold; it is otherwise in minor orders, but then he is compelled to relinquish his benefice.
Alexander III.
But if any of those clerics themselves below the subdiaconate have taken wives, you shall compel them by ecclesiastical severity to relinquish ecclesiastical benefices, if they have any, and to retain their wives. But if they are known perhaps to have taken wives in the subdiaconate and other higher orders, take care to compel them by a sentence of suspension and excommunication, appeal being set aside, to dismiss the wives and do penance for the offense, by our authority.
DE CLERICIS CONIUGATIS.
Matrimonium contractum per clericum exsistentem in sacris non tenet; secus in minoribus; sed tunc cogitur dimittere beneficium.
Alexander III.
Si qui autem clericorum ipsorum infra subdiaconatum acceperint uxores, ipsos ad relinquenda beneficia ecclesiastica, si qua habent, et retinendas uxores suas districtione ecclesiastica compellatis. Sed si forte in subdiaconatu et aliis superioribus ordinibus uxores accepisse noscuntur, eos uxores dimittere, et poenitentiam agere de commisso auctoritate nostra per suspensionis et excommunicationis sententiam appellatione postposita compellere procuretis.
Chapter II
Latin source headnote: A married man is not promoted to an ecclesiastical administration, order, or benefice unless he promises chastity and is not a bigamist.
The same, to the Bishop of Hereford.
Indeed, concerning clerics of the lower orders who, constituted in marriage, have for a long time held ecclesiastical benefices by grant of your predecessors, of which they cannot be deprived without great danger and shedding of blood, we have thought that this answer should be given to your fraternity: that, because a nation and a barbarous people and a multitude are involved there, you should tolerate under dissimulation their possession of the ecclesiastical benefices held for so long. Take more attentive care that henceforth a married cleric not be admitted to ecclesiastical benefices, sacred orders, or ecclesiastical administrations, unless perhaps he should vow perpetual chastity and had had one wife, and a virgin.
Coniugatus ad administrationem et ad ordinem ecclesiasticum vel beneficium non promovetur, nisi castitatem promittat, et non sit bigamus.
Idem Herfordensi Episcopo.
Sane +de clericis inferiorum ordinum, qui in coniugio constituti diu ecclesiastica beneficia ex concessione praedecessorum tuorum habuerunt, a quibus sine magno discrimine ac effusione sanguinis non possunt privari, fraternitati tuae id duximus respondendum, ut, quia ibi natio et gens barbara et multitudo in causa est, eos sub dissimulatione sustineas ecclesiastica beneficia tamdiu habita possidere; Provideas attentius, ne deinceps clericus coniugatus ad ecclesiastica beneficia, vel sacros ordines aut administrationes ecclesiasticas admittatur, nisi forte castitatem voveret perpetuam, et qui unicam et virginem habuisset uxorem.
Chapter III
Latin source headnote: If a beneficed cleric in minor orders contracts marriage, he is deprived of the benefice, and what he gave to the church is restored to him. This it says, and in this last point there is a noteworthy and highly citable case.
The same, to the Bishop of Veroli.
What by you—(And below:) For the future, because the diligence of your fraternity seeks to know whether clerics constituted below the order of subdeacon, who, overcome by the vice of the flesh and unable to contain themselves, take wives, ought canonically to be despoiled of ecclesiastical benefice: we wish you to hold with undoubted truth that, since they cannot at the same time devote themselves to pleasures and carnal desires and to divine and ecclesiastical services, they are, because of their uncleanness, unworthy to handle ecclesiastical sacraments and are without doubt to be deprived of ecclesiastical benefices. Indeed, if they are known to have conferred upon the churches to which they had been attached anything from their own possessions or other goods, when they have been separated from the ministry and benefice of those churches, dominion and ownership ought by the direct way to return to them freely and without any contradiction.
Si clericus in minoribus beneficiatus matrimonium contrahat, privatur beneficio, et quod dedit ecclesiae sibi restituitur. H. d. et in hoc ultimo est casus not. et multum allegabilis.
Idem Verulanensi Episcopo.
Quod a te (Et infra:) De cetero, quia fraternitatis tuae quaerit industria, Utrum clerici infra subdiaconatus ordinem constituti, qui carnis devicti vitio continere non valentes uxores accipiunt, ecclesiastico bene ficio canonice debeant spoliari : id volumus te indubitata veritate tenere, quod, quum simul voluptatibus et carnalibus desideriis, ac divinis et ecclesiasticis obsequiis vacare non valeant, ob immunditiam suam ecclesiasticis sacramentis indigni tractandis, et ecclesiasticis procul dubio beneficiis sunt privandi. Sane si ecclesiis, quibus intitulati fuerant, de possessionibus aut aliis bonis suis aliqua contulisse noscuntur, quum ab earundem ecclesiarum ministerio fuerint et beneficio sequestrati, ad ipsos recta via dominium ac proprietas libere debent et absque ulla contradictione redire.
Chapter IV
Latin source headnote: After penance has been completed, bishops dispense with priests who have contracted marriage in fact.
The same.
Indeed, those priests who contract nuptials, which are to be called not nuptials but rather concubinages, will be able, after long penance and a praiseworthy continent life, to be restored to their office and, by indulgence of their bishop, to have its exercise.
Peracta poenitentia dispensant episcopi cum sacerdotibus, qui matrimonium de facto contraxerunt.
Idem.
Sane sacerdotes illi, qui nuptias contrahunt, quae non nuptiae, sed contubernia sunt potius nuncupanda, post longam poenitentiam et vitam laudabilem continentes officio suo restitui poterunt, et ex indulgentia sui episcopi eius exsecutionem habere.
Chapter V
Latin source headnote: Benefices that a cleric had at the time of contracting marriage are to be taken away from him; but those knowingly conferred afterward by the bishop cannot be taken away by the same bishop, but by a superior. This it says.
Innocent III, to the Bishop of Norwich.
Ensnared by diverse deceits, they endeavor to serve God and mammon, although according to evangelical truth no one can serve two masters, because, if he loves one, he will hold the other in hatred, or, having despised one, will sustain the other. We have learned that certain clerics of your diocese who have contracted marriage solemnly in the sight of the Church contend that they may retain ecclesiastical benefices, in whose manner of life the harp agrees badly with the psaltery. Since, therefore, a husband thinks how he may please his wife and for that reason is less able to think about the things that are God's, since, as though divided in two, he does not have full power over himself so as to serve more fully him from whom he receives a stipend, by the authority of the present letters we command your fraternity that, supported by our authority, you deprive clerics of this kind of the ecclesiastical benefices they have obtained in your diocese, with appeal removed, especially since the substance of ecclesiastical property is accustomed to perish through such men; unless perhaps you knowingly conferred ecclesiastical benefices upon such men, in which case we decree that they are to be despoiled of them not by you but by a superior. [Let no one therefore, etc. Given at Ferentino, on the twelfth day before the Kalends of July, 1203.]
Auferenda sunt clerico beneficia, quae habebat tempore contracti matrimonii; collata vero postmodum scienter per episcopum per eundem auferri non possunt, sed per superiorem. H. d.
Innocentius III. Norvicensi Episcopo.
Diversis fallaciis +circumventi Deo et mammonae famulari conantur, quum tamen secundum evangelicam veritatem nemo possit duobus dominis deservire, quoniam, si unum dilexerit, alium habebit exosum, aut uno contempto alium sustinebit. Accepimus autem, quod quidam clerici tuae dioecesis, qui solenniter in conspectu ecclesiae matrimonium contraxerunt, ecclesiastica beneficia detinere contendunt, in quorum conversatione cithara cum psalterio male concordat. Quum ergo vir cogitet, quomodo placere possit uxori, et ideo minus quae Dei sunt valeat cogitare, quum quasi divisus in duo plenam sui non habeat potestatem, ut ei, a quo stipendium recipit, plenius famuletur, fraternitati tuae auctoritate praesentium mandamus, quatenus huiusmodi clericos beneficiis ecclesiasticis, quae in tua dioecesi sunt adepti, auctoritate nostra suffultus prives appellatione remota, praesertim quum rerum ecclesiasticarum substantia per tales soleat deperire; nisi forte tu talibus scienter contuleris ecclesiastica beneficia, quibus eos non per te, sed per supe riorem decernimus spoliandos. [Nulli ergo etc. Dat. Ferentini Xll. Kal. Iul. 1203.]
Chapter VI
Latin source headnote: The son of a Greek priest, begotten of a wife, is lawfully promoted among the Latins if scandal does not stand in the way. This it says, and it is a noteworthy case.
The same, to the Archbishop of Acerenza.
When it had formerly come to our hearing that the canons of Anglona had elected the beloved son, the cantor of Tricarico, as their pastor, we gave you a mandate that, after examining the election and the person more diligently, if you found the election canonical and the person suitable, you should confirm the election itself by apostolic authority, proceeding as metropolitan in the other matters. Although it was established for you in other respects concerning the canonical form of the election and the suitability of the person, it nevertheless moved you, and induced you to consult us, that, since his father was a Greek and, according to the rite of the Greeks, had taken a wife while constituted in minor orders, he had begotten the cantor himself of a lawful wife while in the priesthood. We therefore, considering that the Eastern Church did not admit the vow of continence, because Easterners contract marriage in minor orders and in higher orders make use of a marriage already contracted, command your fraternity by apostolic writings that, unless the custom of the region opposes this because Greeks of this kind live among the Latins, if no other canonical impediment stands in the way, you proceed without hesitation to the confirmation and consecration of the same cantor. [Given at Ferentino, on the Nones of September, 1203.]
Filius sacerdotis Graeci, ex uxore genitus, licite inter Latinos promovetur, si scandalum non obsistat. H. d. et est casus notabilis.
Idem Archerontino Archiepiscopo.
Quum olim ad nostram audientiam pervenisset, quod canonici Anglorienses dilectum filium cantorem Tricaricensem sibi elegerant in pastorem, +tibi dedimus in mandatis, ut, examinata electione diligentius et persona, si electionem canonicam et personam idoneam invenires, electionem ipsam auctoritate apostolica confirmares, sicut metropolitanus in ceteris processurus. Licet autem tibi de forma electionis canonicae ac idoneitate personae in aliis constitisset, movit te tamen, et ad nos consulendos induxit, quod, quum pater eius Graecus fuerit, et iuxta ritum Graecorum uxorem duxerit in minoribus ordinibus constitutus, cantorem ipsum ex uxore legitima in sacerdotio suscepisset. Nos igitur attendentes, quod orientalis ecclesia votum continentiae non admisit, quoniam orientales in minoribus ordinibus contrahunt, et in superioribus utuntur matrimonio iam contracto, fraternitati tuae per apostolica scripta mandamus, quatenus, nisi pro eo, quod inter Latinos Graeci huiusmodi conversantur, regionis consuetudo repugnet, si aliud canonicum non obsistat, ad confirmationem et consecrationem eiusdem cantoris sine dubitatione procedas. [*Dat. Ferentini Non. Sept. * 1203.]
Chapter VII
Latin source headnote: A married cleric who is not beneficed is not compelled to wear the tonsure.
The same, to the Bishop of Poitiers.
John, son of A., has shown us by complaint that, although he long ago took a lawful wife and begot sons and daughters of her, because he had previously been ordained an acolyte, you endeavor to compel him to wear the clerical tonsure, from which scandal could be generated between him and his wife, although according to the custom of your land married clerics are not compelled against their will to wear the tonsure. Therefore, because a man ought to think how he may please his wife, and the same man, even when tonsured, cannot enjoy clerical privilege, by the authority of the present letters we command that you no longer molest him concerning tonsure of this kind, provided that he receives no ecclesiastical benefice by reason of which he is bound to wear the clerical tonsure, because, since he must involve himself in secular business, the tonsure of one conducting secular affairs would indeed seem to redound to the reproach of our ministry.
Clericus coniugatus non beneficiatus non cogitur deferre tonsuram.
Idem Episcopo Pictaviensi.
Ioannes filius A. nobis conquerendo monstravit, quod tu eum, quanquam iam dudum uxorem legitimam duxerit, et f i lios et filias susceperit ex eadem, pro eo, quod prius in acolythum fuerat ordinatus, compellere niteris, ut tonsuram deferat clericalem, ex qua inter ipsum et uxorem suam posset scandalum generari, quum de consuetudine terrae tuae clerici uxorati non cogantur inviti portare tonsuram. Quoniam igitur virum oportet, quomodo uxori placeat, cogitare, et idem etiam tonsuratus non potest privilegio clericali gaudere, praesentium auctoritate mandamus, quatenus ipsum super tonsuratione huiusmodi de cetero non molestes, dummodo nullum percipiat beneficium ecclesiasticum, cuius ratione teneatur clericalem deferre tonsuram, quia, quum eum oporteat saecularibus negotiis immisceri, tonsura ipsius saecularia exercentis videretur profecto in ministerii nostri vituperium redundare.
Chapter VIII
Latin source headnote: Married men are not admitted to ecclesiastical dignities, and they are compelled to relinquish those that they have.
The same.
Since the adornment—(And below: [Cf. c. 15, On the Sons of Priests, I. 15.]) You are henceforth not to admit those who are publicly married to ecclesiastical dignities, those being relinquished by them which they cannot retain without a depraved example and grave scandal. Their sons also, etc. (Cf. c. 15, On the Sons of Priests, I. 15.) [Given at Rome, at Saint Peter's, on the sixth day before the Ides of January, in the ninth year, 1207.]
Uxorati non admittuntur ad ecclesiasticas dignitates, et coguntur dimittere quas habent.
Idem.
Quum decorem (Et infra: [cf. c. 15. de fil. presb. I. 15.]) Eos, qui sunt publice uxorati, non admittatis de cetero ad ecclesiasticas dignitates, dimissis ab eis, quas non possunt sine pravo exemplo et gravi scandalo retinere. Filiis quoque etc. (cf. c. 15. *de fil. presb. I. * 15.) [Dat. Rom. ap. S. Petr. VI. Id. Ian. Ao. IX. 1207.]
Chapter IX
Latin source headnote: Married clerics do not enjoy clerical privilege in their property.
Honorius III, to H., formerly Queen of the English.
It was proposed before us on your behalf that some learned men of your land, having laid aside clerical habit and tonsure, publicly take wives, being solicitous about the things of this world and how they may please their wives, who, although they apply themselves to commerce and other secular business, nevertheless, so that they may defraud you of customary dues and owed services, resume the discarded tonsure, under pretext of which they may be excused as clerics from things of this kind, although they serve not the Lord but rather the world, as do other married men. Certain men also, after receiving the first tonsure, similarly contract marriage and wear the same tonsure so that under the same pretext they may be excused from the aforesaid things, and the venerable brother the bishop and the beloved sons the dean, archdeacon, and chapter of Le Mans endeavor to favor them as clerics in the withdrawal of your services, to your prejudice and burden. Since, therefore, the things that are Caesar's are to be rendered to Caesar and the things that are God's to God, and publicly married men are not ecclesiastical men while they thus entangle themselves in secular business, we have thought that it should be tolerated with equanimity if you exact from such men the owed dues and customary services as from other married men and receive them from the same, since the tonsure which they appear to have resumed or received not on account of religion but fraudulently to withdraw services ought not to furnish them protection in these matters.
Clerici coniugati in rebus suis non gaudent privilegio clericali.
Honorius III. H. quondam Reginae Anglorum.
Ex parte tua fuit propositum coram nobis, quod nonnulli literati terrae tuae, habitu et tonsura clericali rel ictis, publice ducunt uxores, +de his, quae huius mundi sunt solliciti, et quomodo uxoribus placeant, exsistentes, qui, licet negotiationibus et aliis saecularibus insistant negotiis, ut tamen consuetis iustitiis et debitis obsequiis te defraudent, tonsuram resumunt abiectam, +qua ipsius praetextu ab huiusmodi ut clerici excusentur, quanquam non militent Domino, sed potius mundo, ut ceteri uxorati. Quidam etiam accepta prima tonsura similiter contrahunt, et eandem tonsuram deferunt, ut eodem praetextu e xcusari valeant a praedictis, +et venerabilis frater episcopus et dilecti filii decanus, archidiaconus et capitulum Cenomanenses ipsos tanquam clericos in subtractione servitiorum tuorum fovere nituntur in tuum praeiudicium et gravamen. Quum igitur reddenda sint quae sunt Caesaris Caesari, et quae sunt Dei Deo, et publice uxorati viri ecclesiastici non exsistant, dum se sic saecularibus negotiis implicant, aequanimiter duximus tolerandum, si a talibus iustitias debitas velut ab aliis uxoratis exigas et servitia consueta, et recipias ab eisdem quum tonsura quam non obtentu religionis sed in fraudem subtrahendi servitia resumpsisse vel accepisse videntur in his sibi non debeat patrocinium impertiri.
Chapter X
Latin source headnote: If a cleric in minor orders serves as a soldier, he is not to be compelled to wear the tonsure or clerical habit.
The same.
That your consultation may be satisfied briefly, we answer that R., a knight of your diocese, who, as he humbly confessed to you, formerly, when he was constituted in a younger age, when he knew how to read or sing but little, received only the tonsure and clerical crown, which he is ashamed to wear among soldiers and laypersons, is not to be compelled to wear clerical habit.
Si clericus in minoribus militet, non est cogendus deferre tonsuram vel habitum clericalem.
Idem.
Ut consultationi tuae breviter satisfiat, respondemus, quod R. miles tuae dioecesis, qui, sicut tibi humiliter est confessus, olim, quum in minori esset constitutus aetate, quum modicum sciret legere vel cantare, tonsuram tantum et coronam clericalem assumpsit, quam gestare inter milites et laicos erubescit, non est cogendus deferre habitum clericalem.