Title — Decretals of Gregory IX

Title III: On Clandestine Betrothal

English · Latin · Both

1.

Chapter I

Latin source headnote: A clandestine marriage is not presumed; rather, the burden of proving it rests upon the one alleging it.

From the Council of Arles.

If anyone has secretly betrothed a woman and the woman or the man denies a betrothal of this kind, proof rests upon the man alone.

2.

Chapter II

Latin source headnote: Those who contracted marriage clandestinely, if one or both deny it and lawful proof thereof does not appear, are not compelled by the Church to cohabit; and, if they make it public, it will be approved as though done in the sight of the Church, unless a reasonable cause exists which impedes it. This is what it says by adhering to the letter.

Alexander III, to the Bishop of Beauvais.

As to what was signified to us on your part, that we ought to dispense concerning clandestine marriages, we do not see what dispensation is to be applied concerning them. For if marriages are contracted so secretly that lawful proof thereof does not appear, those who contract them are not in any way to be compelled by the Church. But if the persons contracting wish to make this public, unless a reasonable and lawful cause hinders it, they are to be received and approved by the Church as though contracted from the beginning in the sight of the Church. But if any, etc. (cf. c. 9, Which Sons IV. 17.)

3.

Chapter III

Latin source headnote: When marriages are to be contracted, edicts ought to be proposed publicly in the church by priests, with a term assigned within which anyone who wishes to impede may oppose an impediment; and, if there is a probable conjecture of an impediment, the marriage is to be prohibited until cognizance is taken concerning this. This first, as far as § “But if anyone.” — (But if anyone, etc.:) If a marriage has been contracted in a prohibited degree clandestinely or contrary to the prohibition mentioned above, even by those ignorant of the impediment, those born of that marriage are illegitimate. The same applies if both parents know the impediment to the marriage, although they contract in the sight of the Church. This is what it says as far as § “Indeed.” Abbas. — (Indeed, etc.:) A priest who contemns prohibiting forbidden marriages, and any cleric, even a regular, who was present, are suspended from benefice for three years and, if the fault demands, are punished even more gravely; the contracting persons themselves acting contrary to this chapter are also otherwise lawfully to be punished, and the same applies to those denouncing calumniously. This is what it says as far as the end. Abbas.

Innocent III, in the General Council.

Since the prohibition of conjugal union has been revoked in the last three degrees, we wish it to be strictly observed in the others. Whence, adhering to the footsteps of our predecessors, we prohibit clandestine marriages altogether, prohibiting also that any priest presume to be present at such marriages. Therefore, extending generally to other places a special custom of certain places, we establish that, when marriages are to be contracted, they are to be publicly announced in the churches by priests, with a suitable term fixed in advance, so that within it whoever wishes and is able may oppose a lawful impediment; and the priests themselves are nonetheless to investigate whether any impediment stands in the way. But when a probable conjecture against the union to be contracted appears, the contract is to be expressly prohibited until it is established by manifest proofs what ought to be done concerning it.

§ 1. But if anyone presumes to enter clandestine or prohibited marriages of this kind in a prohibited degree, even ignorantly, let the offspring received from such a union be considered altogether illegitimate, to have no assistance from the ignorance of the parents, since by contracting thus they appear not to be devoid of knowledge, or at least to be affecters of ignorance. In like manner let the offspring be considered illegitimate if both parents, knowing a lawful impediment, presume to contract despite every prohibition, even in the sight of the Church.

§ 2. Indeed, if a parochial priest contemns prohibiting such unions, or any person, even a regular, presumes to be present at them, let him be suspended from office for three years, to be punished more gravely if the quality of the fault demands it. But suitable penance is also to be enjoined upon those who have presumed to be joined in such manner even in a permitted degree. But if anyone maliciously objects an impediment in order to impede a lawful union, he will not escape canonical punishment.

Cited by 3 passages