Chapter — 1917 Code of Canon Law

Chapter I: Of the Competent Forum

Superseded as law in 1983 — read why this Code still matters. Each canon links to its 1983 counterpart.

English · Latin · Both

Can. 1961.

Causes concerning merely civil effects of marriage, if they are conducted principally, pertain to the civil magistrate according to the norm of can. 1016; but if incidentally and accessorily, they can also be known and defined by the ecclesiastical judge from his proper power.

1983 Code correlation: can. 1672

Cited by 4 passages

Can. 1962.

Matrimonial causes pertaining to those persons of whom in can. 1557, Sec. 1, n. 1, that Sacred Congregation or that Tribunal or that special Commission will exclusively know, to which the Supreme Pontiff has delegated them in each case; causes of dispensation concerning a ratified and non-consummated marriage, the Sacred Congregation of the Discipline of the Sacraments; but causes which refer to the Pauline privilege, the Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office.

1983 Code correlation: can. 1698

Cited by 2 passages

Can. 1963.

§ 1. Wherefore no inferior judge can instruct a process in causes of dispensation concerning a ratified marriage unless the Apostolic See has given him faculty.

§ 2. If, however, a competent judge by his own authority has conducted a judgment concerning a null marriage from the head of impotence and from it proof has emerged not of impotence but of a marriage not yet consummated, all the acts are to be transmitted to the Sacred Congregation, which will be able to use them for rendering a sentence concerning the ratified and non-consummated marriage.

1983 Code correlation: can. 1681, 1699

Cited by 2 passages

Can. 1964.

In other matrimonial causes the competent judge is the judge of the place in which the marriage was celebrated or in which the convened party, or, if one party is non-Catholic, the Catholic party, has domicile or quasi-domicile.

1983 Code correlation: can. 1673

Cited by 2 passages

Can. 1965.

If a marriage is accused from defect of consent, the judge is to take care before all things that by opportune warnings he induce the party whose consent is affirmed to be lacking to renew consent; if from defect of substantial form or from a diriment impediment which can and usually is dispensed, he is to strive to induce the parties to renew consent in legitimate form or to petition dispensation.

1983 Code correlation: can. 1676

Cited by 1 passage