Title — 1917 Code of Canon Law
Title XV: Of Judged Matter and of Restitution in Integrum
Superseded as law in 1983 — read why this Code still matters. Each canon links to its 1983 counterpart.
English · Latin · Both
Can. 1902.A judged matter is had:
1° By a double conforming sentence.
2° By a sentence not appealed within the useful time; or one which, although appealed before the judge from whom appeal is taken, was deserted before the judge to whom appeal is made.
3° By a single definitive sentence from which appeal is not given according to the norm of can. 1880.
Res iudicata habetur:
1° Duplici sententia conformi;
2° Sententia intra utile tempus non appellata; aut quae, licet appellata coram iudice a quo, deserta fuit coram iudice ad quem;
3° Sententia definitiva unica, a qua non datur appellatio ad normam can. 1880.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1641
Cited by 4 passages
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise I. On Delicts, Dissertation I. On Delict Considered in Itself, Part I. Summary Exposition, n. 846
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise I. On Delicts, Dissertation II. On the Juridic Effects of Delict, n. 850
- Sabetti-Barrett, Compendium of Moral Theology, Volume I (1929), Treatise III. On Laws, Part II. On the Principal Species of Laws, Chapter III. On Ecclesiastical Law, n. 110
- 1917 Code of Canon Law, Book Five: Of Delicts and Penalties, Part One: Of Delicts, Title II: Of the Imputability of a Delict, of Causes Aggravating or Diminishing It, and of the Juridical Effects of a Delict, can. 2210
Can. 1903.Causes concerning the status of persons never pass into a judged matter; but from a double conforming sentence in these causes it follows that a further proposition must not be admitted unless new and likewise grave arguments or documents have been brought forth.
Nunquam transeunt in rem iudicatam causae de statu personarum; sed ex duplici sententia conformi in his causis consequitur, ut ulterior propositio non debeat admitti, nisi novis prolatis iisdemque gravibus argumentis vel documentis.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1643-44
Cited by 5 passages
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise I. On Delicts, Dissertation II. On the Juridic Effects of Delict, n. 850
- Vermeersch, Theologia Moralis, Volume III: On Persons, the Sacraments, and the Precepts and Censures of the Church (1922-23), Book II: On the Sacraments, Treatise VIII: On Matrimony, Title X: On Matrimonial Causes, n. 840
- Sabetti-Barrett, Compendium of Moral Theology, Volume I (1929), Treatise III. On Laws, Part II. On the Principal Species of Laws, Chapter III. On Ecclesiastical Law, n. 110
- 1917 Code of Canon Law, Book Four: Of Processes, Part One: Of Trials, Section II: Of Particular Norms To Be Observed in Certain Trials, Title XX: Of Matrimonial Causes, Chapter VI: Of Appeals, can. 1989
- 1917 Code of Canon Law, Book Five: Of Delicts and Penalties, Part One: Of Delicts, Title II: Of the Imputability of a Delict, of Causes Aggravating or Diminishing It, and of the Juridical Effects of a Delict, can. 2210
Can. 1904.§ 1. A judged matter is held true and just by a presumption of law and by law, and cannot be impugned directly.
§ 2. It makes law between the parties and gives an exception for impeding the new introduction of the same cause.
§ 1. Res iudicata praesumptione iuris et de iure habetur vera et iusta nec impugnari directe potest.
§ 2. Facit ius inter partes et dat exceptionem ad impediendam novam eiusdem causae introductionem.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1642
Cited by 6 passages
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise I. On Delicts, Dissertation II. On the Juridic Effects of Delict, n. 850
- Tanquerey, Volume II. Fundamental Moral Theology; the Virtues and Precepts, Fundamental Moral Theology (Volume II), On Laws, n. 277
- Vermeersch, Theologia Moralis, Volume I: Fundamental Theology (1922), Treatise III: On Laws, Chapter IV: The Divisions of Laws, n. 178
- Merkelbach, Summa Theologiae Moralis, Volume I. On Principles (1935), General Moral Theology, Treatise: On Laws in General, Section C: On the Laws Which Rule Supernatural Acts, Sixth Part: On Ecclesiastical Law, Second Question: On the Power or Obligation of Ecclesiastical Law, Article II: On the Quality and Extension of the Obligation of Preceptive Law, n. 345
- Sabetti-Barrett, Compendium of Moral Theology, Volume I (1929), Treatise III. On Laws, Part II. On the Principal Species of Laws, Chapter III. On Ecclesiastical Law, n. 110
- 1917 Code of Canon Law, Book Five: Of Delicts and Penalties, Part One: Of Delicts, Title II: Of the Imputability of a Delict, of Causes Aggravating or Diminishing It, and of the Juridical Effects of a Delict, can. 2210
Can. 1905.§ 1. Against a sentence against which the ordinary remedy of appeal or complaint of nullity is not available, there is given the extraordinary remedy of restitution in integrum within the limits of can. 1687, 1688, provided that the evident injustice of the judged matter is manifestly established.
§ 2. But injustice is not considered manifestly established unless:
1° The sentence rests on documents which afterward were detected to be false.
2° Documents afterward were discovered which peremptorily prove new facts requiring a contrary decision.
3° The sentence was brought forth from the fraud of a party to the damage of the other.
4° A prescription of law was evidently neglected.
§ 1. Adversus sententiam contra quam non suppetat ordinarium remedium appellationis aut querelae nullitatis, datur remedium extraordinarium restitutionis in integrum intra fines can. 1687, 1688, dummodo de evidenti iniustitia rei iudicatae manifesto constet.
§ 2. De iniustitia autem manifesto constare non censetur, nisi:
1° Sententia documentis innitatur, quae postea fuerint falsa deprehensa;
2° Postea detecta fuerint documenta, quae facta nova et contrariam decisionem exigentia peremptorie probent;
3° Sententia ex dolo partis prolata fuerit in damnum alterius;
4° Legis praescriptum evidenter neglectum fuerit.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1645
Cited by 3 passages
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise I. On Delicts, Dissertation II. On the Juridic Effects of Delict, n. 850
- Sabetti-Barrett, Compendium of Moral Theology, Volume I (1929), Treatise III. On Laws, Part II. On the Principal Species of Laws, Chapter III. On Ecclesiastical Law, n. 110
- 1917 Code of Canon Law, Book Five: Of Delicts and Penalties, Part One: Of Delicts, Title II: Of the Imputability of a Delict, of Causes Aggravating or Diminishing It, and of the Juridical Effects of a Delict, can. 2210
Can. 1906.For granting restitution in integrum, the competent judge is the judge who rendered the sentence, unless it is petitioned because of a prescription of law neglected by the judge; in that case the tribunal of appeal grants it.
Ad restitutionem in integrum concedendam competens est iudex qui sententiam tulit, nisi ea petatur ex neglecto a iudice praescripto legis; quo in casu eam concedit tribunal appellationis.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1646
Cited by 3 passages
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise I. On Delicts, Dissertation II. On the Juridic Effects of Delict, n. 850
- Sabetti-Barrett, Compendium of Moral Theology, Volume I (1929), Treatise III. On Laws, Part II. On the Principal Species of Laws, Chapter III. On Ecclesiastical Law, n. 110
- 1917 Code of Canon Law, Book Five: Of Delicts and Penalties, Part One: Of Delicts, Title II: Of the Imputability of a Delict, of Causes Aggravating or Diminishing It, and of the Juridical Effects of a Delict, can. 2210
Can. 1907.§ 1. A petition for restitution in integrum suspends the execution of a sentence not yet begun.
§ 2. If, however, there is a suspicion from probable indications that the petition was made to weave delays for execution, the judge can decree that the sentence be committed to execution, yet with a suitable caution assigned to the one petitioning restitution so that, if he is restored in integrum, he may be made indemnified.
§ 1. Petitio restitutionis in integrum sententiae exsecutionem nondum inceptam suspendit.
§ 2. Si tamen suspicio sit ex probabilibus indiciis petitionem factam esse ad moras exsecutioni nectendas, iudex decernere potest ut sententia exsecutioni demandetur, assignata tamen restitutionem petenti idonea cautione ut, si restituatur in integrum, indemnis fiat.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1647
Cited by 3 passages
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise I. On Delicts, Dissertation II. On the Juridic Effects of Delict, n. 850
- Sabetti-Barrett, Compendium of Moral Theology, Volume I (1929), Treatise III. On Laws, Part II. On the Principal Species of Laws, Chapter III. On Ecclesiastical Law, n. 110
- 1917 Code of Canon Law, Book Five: Of Delicts and Penalties, Part One: Of Delicts, Title II: Of the Imputability of a Delict, of Causes Aggravating or Diminishing It, and of the Juridical Effects of a Delict, can. 2210