Title — 1917 Code of Canon Law
Title V: Of the Superior Having Coercive Power
Superseded as law in 1983 — read why this Code still matters. Each canon links to its 1983 counterpart.
English · Latin · Both
Can. 2220.§ 1. Those who have the power of making laws or imposing precepts can also attach penalties to a law or precept; those who have only judicial power can only apply legitimately established penalties according to the norm of law.
§ 2. The Vicar General without a special mandate does not have the power of inflicting penalties.
§ 1. Qui pollent potestate leges ferendi vel praecepta imponendi, possunt quoque legi vel praecepto poenas adnectere; qui iudiciali tantum, possunt solummodo poenas, legitime statutas, ad normam iuris applicare.
§ 2. Vicarius Generalis sine mandato speciali non habet potestatem infligendi poenas.
Censures and Ecclesiastical PenaltiesEcclesiastical Penalties in GeneralCited by 10 passages
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise II. On the Penalties of Delict, Dissertation I. On Penalties in General, Part II. On the Superior Having the Power of Punishing, n. 854
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise II. On the Penalties of Delict, Dissertation I. On Penalties in General, Part II. On the Superior Having the Power of Punishing, Section I. On the Superior Having Non-Judicial Jurisdiction, n. 855
- Marc, Institutiones Morales, Volume I, Supplement: Dispositions of the Code of Canon Law Which Pertain to Moral Theology, PART II: SECTION I, SECTION THIRD, TRACTATE II: On Ecclesiastical Censures and Penalties, Chapter I: On Censures in General, ¶ 1
- Prümmer, Manuale Theologiae Moralis, Volume III, Part II. On The Sacraments In General And In Particular, Treatise VI. On Ecclesiastical Penalties, Chapter I. On Ecclesiastical Penalties In General, Article II. On The Author And Subject Of An Ecclesiastical Penalty, n. 473
- Merkelbach, Pastoral Questions, IV. Questions Concerning the Minister of Penance and His Duties (1935), Concerning the Minister of Penance, Chapter V: Concerning the Abuse of the Power of the Confessor, Question Second: Concerning the Solicitation of a Penitent to Base Things, ¶ 3976
- Merkelbach, Summa Theologiae Moralis, Volume III. On the Sacraments (1962), Special Moral Theology: On the Sacraments, Treatise: On Penance, Fourth Part: On the Minister of Penance, Question Four: On the Abuse of the Power of the Minister, Article II: On the Solicitation of a Penitent to Shameful Things, n. 645
- Merkelbach, Summa Theologiae Moralis, Volume III. On the Sacraments (1962), Special Moral Theology: On the Sacraments, Treatise: On Penance, Fifth Part: On the Subject of Penance, Appendix: On the Penitential Rite, Indulgences, and Censures, Article III: On Censures, n. 681
- Sabetti-Barrett, Compendium of Moral Theology, Volume I (1929), Treatise III. On Laws, Part II. On the Principal Species of Laws, Chapter III. On Ecclesiastical Law, n. 110
- Sabetti-Barrett, Compendium of Moral Theology, Volume II (1929), Treatise XIX. On Delicts and Penalties, Chapter II. On Censures Considered in General, Article II. On the Principle or Author of Censures, n. 947
- Sabetti-Barrett, Compendium of Moral Theology, Volume II (1929), List of Canons, ¶ 5
Can. 2221.Those having legislative power can, within the limits of their jurisdiction, strengthen with a congruous penalty not only a law borne by themselves or by predecessors, but also, because of peculiar circumstances of things, a law, whether divine or ecclesiastical, borne by a superior power and in force in the territory, or aggravate a penalty established by law.
Legislativam habentes potestatem, possunt intra limites suae iurisdictionis, non solum legem a se vel a decessoribus latam, sed etiam, ob peculiaria rerum adiuncta, legem tam divinam, quam ecclesiasticam a superiore potestate latam, in territorio vigentem, congrua poena munire aut poenam lege statutam aggravare.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1315
Censures and Ecclesiastical PenaltiesEcclesiastical Penalties in GeneralCited by 4 passages
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise II. On the Penalties of Delict, Dissertation I. On Penalties in General, Part II. On the Superior Having the Power of Punishing, Section I. On the Superior Having Non-Judicial Jurisdiction, n. 855
- Marc, Institutiones Morales, Volume I, Supplement: Dispositions of the Code of Canon Law Which Pertain to Moral Theology, PART I, TRACTATE II: On Laws, ¶ 2
- Marc, Institutiones Morales, Volume I, Supplement: Dispositions of the Code of Canon Law Which Pertain to Moral Theology, PART II: SECTION I, SECTION THIRD, TRACTATE II: On Ecclesiastical Censures and Penalties, Chapter I: On Censures in General, ¶ 1
- Sabetti-Barrett, Compendium of Moral Theology, Volume I (1929), Treatise III. On Laws, Part II. On the Principal Species of Laws, Chapter III. On Ecclesiastical Law, n. 110
Can. 2222.§ 1. Although a law has no sanction attached, nevertheless the legitimate Superior can punish its transgression, even without a previous threat of penalty, by some just penalty, if perhaps scandal has been given or the special gravity of the transgression bears it; otherwise the accused cannot be punished unless he had first been warned with a threat of a latae or ferendae sententiae penalty in the case of transgression, and nevertheless violated the law.
§ 2. Likewise the same legitimate Superior, although it is only probable that a delict was committed or the penal action of a certainly committed delict has prescribed, has not only the right but also the office of not promoting a cleric whose suitability is not established, and, for avoiding scandal, of prohibiting to the cleric the exercise of sacred ministry or even of removing the same from office according to the norm of law; which things in the case do not have the character of a penalty.
§ 1. Licet lex nullam sanctionem appositam habeat, legitimus tamen Superior potest illius transgressionem, etiam sine praevia poenae comminatione, aliqua iusta poena punire, si scandalum forte datum aut specialis transgressionis gravitas id ferat; secus reus puniri nequit, nisi prius monitus fuerit cum comminatione poenae latae vel ferendae sententiae in casu transgressionis, et nihilominus legem violaverit.
§ 2. Pariter idem legitimus Superior, licet probabile tantum sit delictum fuisse commissum aut delicti certe commissi poenalis actio praescripta sit, non solum ius, sed etiam officium habet non promovendi clericum de cuius idoneitate non constat, et, ad scandalum evitandum, prohibendi clerico exercitium sacri ministerii aut etiam eundem ab officio, ad normam iuris, amovendi; quae in casu non habent rationem poenae.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1399
Censures and Ecclesiastical PenaltiesEcclesiastical Penalties in GeneralCited by 10 passages
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise I. On Delicts, Dissertation I. On Delict Considered in Itself, Part I. Summary Exposition, n. 846
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise II. On the Penalties of Delict, Dissertation I. On Penalties in General, Part II. On the Superior Having the Power of Punishing, Section I. On the Superior Having Non-Judicial Jurisdiction, n. 855
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise II. On the Penalties of Delict, Dissertation I. On Penalties in General, Part III. On the Subject Liable to the Power of Punishing, n. 859
- Marc, Institutiones Morales, Volume I, Supplement: Dispositions of the Code of Canon Law Which Pertain to Moral Theology, PART II: SECTION I, SECTION THIRD, TRACTATE II: On Ecclesiastical Censures and Penalties, Chapter I: On Censures in General, ¶ 2
- Marc, Institutiones Morales, Volume I, Supplement: Dispositions of the Code of Canon Law Which Pertain to Moral Theology, PART II: SECTION I, SECTION THIRD, TRACTATE II: On Ecclesiastical Censures and Penalties, Chapter II: On the Various Species of Censure, ¶ 2
- Merkelbach, Summa Theologiae Moralis, Volume II. On the Moral Virtues (1935), Special Moral Theology: On Moral Virtues, Treatise: On the Cardinal Virtue of Justice and on the Annexed Virtues, First Part: On Justice in General, Chapter II: On Right, Question Five: On the Acquisition of Right and Dominion, Article IV: On Prescription, n. 234
- Sabetti-Barrett, Compendium of Moral Theology, Volume I (1929), Treatise III. On Laws, Part II. On the Principal Species of Laws, Chapter III. On Ecclesiastical Law, n. 110
- 1917 Code of Canon Law, Book Four: Of Processes, Part One: Of Trials, can. 1554
- 1917 Code of Canon Law, Book Four: Of Processes, Part One: Of Trials, Section I: Of Trials in General, Title V: Of Actions and Exceptions, Chapter VII: Of the Extinction of Actions, can. 1704
- 1917 Code of Canon Law, Book Four: Of Processes, Part One: Of Trials, Section II: Of Particular Norms To Be Observed in Certain Trials, Title XIX: Of Criminal Judgment, Chapter IV: Of the Instruction of the Criminal Process and of the Constitution of the Defendant, can. 1956
Can. 2223.§ 1. In applying penalties a judge cannot increase a determinate penalty, unless extraordinary aggravating circumstances require it.
§ 2. If a law in establishing a ferendae sententiae penalty uses facultative words, it is committed to the prudence and conscience of the judge to inflict it, or, if the penalty was determinate, to temper it.
§ 3. But if the law uses preceptive words, ordinarily the penalty is to be inflicted; but it is committed to the conscience and prudence of the judge or Superior:
1° To defer the application of the penalty to a more opportune time, if from too hasty punishment of the accused greater evils are foreseen as about to come.
2° To abstain from inflicting the penalty, if the accused has been perfectly amended and has repaired scandal, or has been sufficiently punished or is foreseen to be punished by penalties sanctioned by civil authority.
3° To temper a determinate penalty, or to employ in place of it some penal remedy or impose some penance, if a circumstance is given notably diminishing imputability, or if amendment of the accused or chastisement inflicted by civil authority is indeed had, but the judge or Superior besides considers some milder punishment opportune.
§ 4. To declare a latae sententiae penalty is generally committed to the prudence of the Superior; but either at the instance of an interested party, or when the common good so requires, a declaratory sentence must be given.
§ 1. In poenis applicandis iudex nequit poenam determinatam augere, nisi extraordinaria adiuncta aggravantia id exigant.
§ 2. Si lex in statuenda poena ferendae sententiae facultativis verbis utatur, committitur prudentiae et conscientiae iudicis eam infligere, vel, si poena fuerit determinata, temperare.
§ 3. Si vero lex utatur verbis praeceptivis, ordinarie poena infligenda est; sed conscientiae et prudentiae iudicis vel Superioris committitur:
1° Poenae applicationem ad tempus magis opportunum differre, si ex praepropera rei punitione maiora mala eventura praevideantur;
2° A poena infligenda abstinere, si reus perfecte fuerit emendatus, et scandalum reparaverit, aut sufficienter punitus sit vel puniendus praevideatur poenis auctoritate civili sanctis;
3° Poenam determinatam temperare vel loco ipsius aliquod remedium poenale adhibere aut aliquam poenitentiam iniungere, si detur circumstantia imputabilitatem notabiliter minuens, vel habeatur quidem rei emendatio aut inflicta a civili auctoritate castigatio, sed iudex vel Superior opportunam praeterea ducat mitiorem aliquam punitionem.
§ 4. Poenam latae sententiae declarare generatim committitur prudentiae Superioris; sed sive ad instantiam partis cuius interest, sive bono communi ita exigente, sententia declaratoria dari debet.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1343-45, 1348-49
Censures and Ecclesiastical PenaltiesEcclesiastical Penalties in GeneralCited by 10 passages
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise II. On the Penalties of Delict, Dissertation I. On Penalties in General, Part II. On the Superior Having the Power of Punishing, Section II. On the Superior Having Judicial Jurisdiction, n. 856
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise II. On the Penalties of Delict, Dissertation I. On Penalties in General, Part III. On the Subject Liable to the Power of Punishing, n. 858
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise II. On the Penalties of Delict, Dissertation II. On Penalties in Species, Part III. On Penal Remedies and Penances, Section I. On Penal Remedies, n. 892
- Tanquerey, Volume II. Fundamental Moral Theology; the Virtues and Precepts, On Ecclesiastical Censures, n. 1202
- Marc, Institutiones Morales, Volume I, Supplement: Dispositions of the Code of Canon Law Which Pertain to Moral Theology, PART II: SECTION I, SECTION THIRD, TRACTATE II: On Ecclesiastical Censures and Penalties, Chapter I: On Censures in General, ¶ 2
- Merkelbach, Summa Theologiae Moralis, Volume I. On Principles (1935), General Moral Theology, Treatise: On Laws in General, Section C: On the Laws Which Rule Supernatural Acts, Sixth Part: On Ecclesiastical Law, Second Question: On the Power or Obligation of Ecclesiastical Law, Article III: On the Quality and Extension of the Obligation of Penal Law, n. 349
- Merkelbach, Summa Theologiae Moralis, Volume I. On Principles (1935), General Moral Theology, Treatise: On Laws in General, Section C: On the Laws Which Rule Supernatural Acts, Sixth Part: On Ecclesiastical Law, Second Question: On the Power or Obligation of Ecclesiastical Law, Article III: On the Quality and Extension of the Obligation of Penal Law, n. 351
- Sabetti-Barrett, Compendium of Moral Theology, Volume I (1929), Treatise III. On Laws, Part II. On the Principal Species of Laws, Chapter III. On Ecclesiastical Law, n. 110
- Sabetti-Barrett, Compendium of Moral Theology, Volume II (1929), Treatise XIX. On Delicts and Penalties, Chapter I. On Delicts and Penalties in General, n. 943, Q. 7
- 1917 Code of Canon Law, Book Five: Of Delicts and Penalties, Part Two: Of Penalties, Section I: Of Penalties in General, Title VI: Of the Subject Liable to Coercive Power, can. 2232
Can. 2224.§ 1. Ordinarily there are as many penalties as delicts.
§ 2. If nevertheless, because of the number of delicts, there would be an excessive accumulation of penalties to be inflicted, it is left to the prudent judgment of the judge either to inflict the graver penalty of all, with some penance or penal remedy added if the matter bears it, or to moderate the penalties within equitable limits, with account taken of the number and gravity of the delicts.
§ 3. If a penalty has been constituted both for an attempted delict and for a consummated delict, once this has been admitted, only the penalty established for the consummated delict must be inflicted.
§ 1. Ordinarie tot poenae quot delicta.
§ 2. Si tamen propter numerum delictorum nimius esset poenarum infligendarum cumulus, prudenti iudicis arbitrio relinquitur aut poenam omnium graviorem infligere, addita, si res ferat, aliqua poenitentia vel remedio poenali, aut poenas intra aequos terminos moderari, habita ratione numeri et gravitatis delictorum.
§ 3. Si poena constituta sit tum in conatum delicti tum in delictum consummatum, hoc admisso, infligi tantum debet poena in consummatum delictum statuta.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1346
Censures and Ecclesiastical PenaltiesEcclesiastical Penalties in GeneralCited by 2 passages
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise II. On the Penalties of Delict, Dissertation I. On Penalties in General, Part II. On the Superior Having the Power of Punishing, Section II. On the Superior Having Judicial Jurisdiction, n. 856
- Sabetti-Barrett, Compendium of Moral Theology, Volume I (1929), Treatise III. On Laws, Part II. On the Principal Species of Laws, Chapter III. On Ecclesiastical Law, n. 110
Can. 2225.If a penalty is declared or inflicted by judicial sentence, the prescriptions of the canons concerning the pronouncement of judicial sentence are to be observed; but if a latae or ferendae sententiae penalty has been inflicted by way of a particular precept, it is ordinarily to be declared or imposed in writing or before two witnesses, with the causes of the penalty indicated, with the prescription of can. 2193 preserved.
Si poena declaretur vel infligatur per sententiam iudicialem, serventur canonum praescripta circa sententiae iudicialis pronuntiationem; si vero poena latae vel ferendae sententiae inflicta sit ad modum praecepti particularis, scripto aut coram duobus testibus ordinarie declaretur vel irrogetur, indicatis poenae causis, salvo praescripto can. 2193.
Censures and Ecclesiastical PenaltiesEcclesiastical Penalties in GeneralCited by 5 passages
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise II. On the Penalties of Delict, Dissertation I. On Penalties in General, Part II. On the Superior Having the Power of Punishing, Section I. On the Superior Having Non-Judicial Jurisdiction, n. 855
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise II. On the Penalties of Delict, Dissertation I. On Penalties in General, Part II. On the Superior Having the Power of Punishing, Section II. On the Superior Having Judicial Jurisdiction, n. 856
- Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology, Volume II, Book IV. On the Sanction of Christian Life, or on Ecclesiastical Penalties, Treatise II. On the Penalties of Delict, Dissertation I. On Penalties in General, Part III. On the Subject Liable to the Power of Punishing, n. 857
- Marc, Institutiones Morales, Volume I, Supplement: Dispositions of the Code of Canon Law Which Pertain to Moral Theology, PART II: SECTION I, SECTION THIRD, TRACTATE II: On Ecclesiastical Censures and Penalties, Chapter I: On Censures in General, ¶ 2
- Sabetti-Barrett, Compendium of Moral Theology, Volume I (1929), Treatise III. On Laws, Part II. On the Principal Species of Laws, Chapter III. On Ecclesiastical Law, n. 110