Chapter — 1917 Code of Canon Law
Chapter VII: Of Cases Excepted from the Rules Handed Down Thus Far
Superseded as law in 1983 — read why this Code still matters. Each canon links to its 1983 counterpart.
When from a certain and authentic document, which is subject to no contradiction or exception, it has been established concerning the existence of the impediment of disparity of cult, order, solemn vow of chastity, bond, consanguinity, affinity, or spiritual relationship, and at the same time with equal certitude it has appeared that dispensation concerning these impediments was not given, in these cases, the solemnities recounted thus far having been omitted, the Ordinary, the parties having been cited, will be able to declare the nullity of the marriage, with the intervention nevertheless of the defender of the bond.
Cum ex certo et authentico documento, quod nulli contradictioni vel exceptioni obnoxium sit, constiterit de exsistentia impedimenti disparitatis cultus, ordinis, voti sollemnis castitatis, ligaminis, consanguinitatis, affinitatis aut cognationis spiritualis, simulque pari certitudine apparuerit dispensationem super his impedimentis datam non esse, hisce in casibus, praetermissis sollemnitatibus hucusque recensitis, poterit Ordinarius, citatis partibus, matrimonii nullitatem declarare, cum interventu tamen defensoris vinculi.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1686
Against this declaration the defender of the bond, if he has prudently considered that the impediments of which in can. 1990 are not certain or that dispensation concerning them probably intervened, is held to make recourse to the judge of second instance, to whom the acts are to be transmitted and who is to be warned in writing that there is question of an excepted case.
Adversus hanc declarationem defensor vinculi, si prudenter existimaverit impedimenta de quibus in can. 1990 non esse certa aut dispensationem super eisdem probabiliter intercessisse, provocare tenetur ad iudicem secundae instantiae, ad quem acta sunt transmittenda quique scripto monendus est agi de casu excepto.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1687
The judge of the other instance, with the intervention of the defender of the bond alone, will decree in the same manner of which in can. 1990 whether the sentence is to be confirmed, or rather whether one must proceed in the cause according to the ordinary course of law; in which case he remits it to the tribunal of first instance.
Iudex alterius instantiae, cum solo interventu defensoris vinculi, decernet eodem modo de quo in can. 1990, utrum sententia sit confirmanda, an potius procedendum in causa sit ad ordinarium tramitem iuris; quo in casu eam remittit ad tribunal primae instantiae.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1688