Title — 1917 Code of Canon Law
Title XIII: Of Sentence
Superseded as law in 1983 — read why this Code still matters. Each canon links to its 1983 counterpart.
§ 1. The legitimate pronouncement by which the judge defines a cause proposed by litigants and treated in a judicial manner is a sentence; and it is called interlocutory if it settles an incidental cause, definitive if it settles the principal cause.
§ 2. The other pronouncements of the judge are called decrees.
§ 1. Legitima pronuntiatio qua iudex causam a litigantibus propositam et iudiciali modo pertractatam definit, sententia est: eaque interlocutoria dicitur, si dirimat incidentem causam; definitiva, si principalem.
§ 2. Ceterae iudicis pronuntiationes decreta vocantur.
§ 1. For the pronouncement of any sentence, moral certitude concerning the matter to be defined by the sentence is required in the mind of the judge.
§ 2. The judge must draw this certitude from the acts and proofs.
§ 3. The judge must estimate the proofs from his conscience, unless the law expressly establishes something concerning the efficacy of some proof.
§ 4. A judge who has not been able to form this certitude for himself is to pronounce that the right of the actor is not established and dismiss the defendant, unless there is question of a favorable cause, in which case pronouncement is to be made for it, and with the prescription of can. 1697, Sec. 2 saved.
§ 1. Ad pronuntiationem cuiuslibet sententiae requiritur in iudicis animo moralis certitudo circa rem sententia definiendam.
§ 2. Hanc certitudinem iudex haurire debet ex actis et probatis.
§ 3. Probationes autem aestimare iudex debet ex sua conscientia, nisi lex aliquid expresse statuat de efficacia alicuius probationis.
§ 4. Iudex qui eam certitudinem efformare sibi non potuit, pronuntiet non constare de iure actoris et reum dimittat, nisi agatur de causa favorabili, quo in casu pro ipsa pronuntiandum est, et salvo praescripto can. 1697, § 2.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1608
Sentence must be rendered by the judge when the discussion of the cause has been completed; and if the cause is more involved and more difficult by the mass of contentions or documents, a suitable interval of time can be interposed.
Sententia ferri a iudice debet, expleta causae disceptatione; et si causa sit implicatior et contentionum vel documentorum mole difficilior, interponi potest congruum temporis intervallum.
§ 1. In a collegial tribunal, the president of the college is to establish on what day and hour the judges are to come together to deliberate; and unless a particular cause persuades otherwise, the meeting is to be held in the very seat of the tribunal.
§ 2. On the day assigned for the meeting, the individual judges will bring their written conclusions on the merit of the cause, and the reasons, both in fact and in law, by which they have come to their conclusion; these conclusions are to be added to the acts of the cause, to be kept secret.
§ 3. When the conclusions of the individual judges have been brought forth in order, according to precedence, yet so that the beginning is always made by the ponens or relator of the cause, a moderate discussion is to be held under the guidance of the president of the tribunal, especially so that what must be established in the dispositive part of the sentence may be settled.
§ 4. In the discussion, however, it is permitted to each one to depart from his former conclusion.
§ 5. But if in the first discussion the judges are unwilling or unable to come to this sentence, the decision can be deferred to a new meeting, which however must not be postponed beyond a week.
§ 1. In tribunali collegiali, qua die et hora iudices ad deliberandum conveniant, collegii praeses constituat; et nisi peculiaris causa aliud suadeat, in ipsa tribunalis sede conventus habeatur.
§ 2. Assignata conventui die, singuli iudices scriptas afferent conclusiones suas in merito causae, et rationes tam in facto quam in iure, quibus ad conclusionem suam venerint: quae conclusiones actis causae adiungantur, secreto servandae.
§ 3. Prolatis ex ordine, secundum praecedentiam, ita tamen ut semper a causae ponente seu relatore initium fiat, singulorum conclusionibus, habeatur moderata discussio sub tribunalis praesidis ductu, praesertim ut constabiliatur quid statuendum sit in parte dispositiva sententiae.
§ 4. In discussione autem fas unicuique est a pristina sua conclusione recedere.
§ 5. Quod si iudices in prima discussione ad hanc sententiam devenire aut nolint aut nequeant, differri poterit decisio ad novum conventum; qui tamen ultra hebdomadam comperendinari non debet.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1609
If there is a single judge, it belongs to him alone to draw up the sentence; but in a collegial tribunal the prescription of can. 1584 is to be observed.
Si unicus sit iudex, ipsius tantum est sententiam exarare; in tribunali vero collegiali servetur praescriptum can. 1584.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1610
§ 1. The sentence must:
1° Define the controversy conducted before the tribunal; that is, absolve or condemn the defendant as regards the petitions or accusations brought forth against him, with a suitable response given to each doubt, or article of the controversy.
2° Determine, at least insofar as it is lawful and the matter permits, what the condemned party must give, do, furnish, or suffer, or from what he must abstain; and likewise in what manner, place, or time the obligation must be fulfilled.
3° Contain the reasons or motives, as they are called, both in fact and in law, on which the dispositive part of the sentence rests.
4° Establish concerning the expenses of the lawsuit.
§ 2. In a collegial tribunal the motives are to be taken by the drafter from those things which the individual judges brought forward in the discussion, unless it has been predefined by the greater part of the judges themselves what motives are to be brought forth.
§ 1. Sententia debet:
1° Definire controversiam coram tribunali agitatam; hoc est reum absolvere vel condemnare quod attinet ad petitiones vel accusationes adversus eum prolatas, data singulis dubiis, seu controversiae articulis, congrua responsione;
2° Determinare (saltem quatenus fas sit et materia patiatur), quid pars damnata dare, facere, praestare, aut pati debeat, aut a quo abstinere; itemque quo modo, loco vel tempore obligatio implenda sit;
3° Continere rationes seu motiva quae dicuntur, tam in facto quam in iure, quibus dispositiva sententiae pars innititur;
4° Statuere de litis expensis.
§ 2. In tribunali collegiali motiva ab extensore desumantur ex iis quae singuli iudices in discussione attulerunt, nisi ab ipsa iudicum maiore parte praefinitum fuerit quaenam sint motiva proferenda.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1610-11
§ 1. The sentence must be rendered with the divine Name always invoked at the beginning.
§ 2. Then it must express in order who the judge or tribunal is; who the actor, defendant, procurator are, with names and domicile duly designated; the promoter of justice, and the defender of the bond, if they have had a part in the judgment.
§ 3. Afterward it must report briefly the species of fact together with the conclusions of the parties.
§ 4. After these things let there follow the dispositive part of the sentence, with the reasons on which it rests having been premised.
§ 5. Let it be closed with the indication of the day and place in which it was drawn up and with the signature of the judge, or of all the judges if there were several, and of the notary.
§ 1. Sententia ferri debet, divino Nomine ab initio semper invocato.
§ 2. Dein exprimat oportet ex ordine qui sit iudex aut tribunal; qui sit actor, reus, procurator, nominibus et domicilio rite designatis, promotor iustitiae, defensor vinculi, si partem in iudicio habuerint.
§ 3. Referre postea debet breviter facti speciem cum partium conclusionibus.
§ 4. Hisce subsequatur pars dispositiva sententiae, praemissis rationibus quibus innititur.
§ 5. Claudatur cum indicatione diei et loci in quibus exarata est et cum subscriptione iudicis vel omnium iudicum, si plures fuerint, et notarii.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1612
The rules placed above have place especially in bringing forth a definitive sentence; but they are also applied, insofar as the different matter permits, in bringing forth an interlocutory sentence.
Regulae superius positae locum habent potissimum in proferenda sententia definitiva; sed applicantur etiam, quantum diversa res patitur, in proferenda interlocutoria.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1613
A sentence, drawn up in this manner, is to be published as soon as possible.
Sententia, hac ratione redacta, quamprimum publicetur.
1983 Code correlation: can. 1614
Publication of the sentence can be made in three ways: either by citing the parties to hear the reading of the sentence solemnly made by the judge sitting for the tribunal; or by denouncing to the parties that the sentence is in the chancery of the tribunal, and that faculty is given to them to read the same and request a copy of it; or finally, where the practice is in force, by transmitting a copy of the sentence to the parties through public carriers according to the norm of can. 1719.
Publicatio sententiae fieri potest tribus modis, vel citando partes ad audiendam sententiae lectionem sollemniter factam a iudice pro tribunali sedente; vel partibus denuntiando sententiam esse penes cancellariam tribunalis, unaque facultatem ipsis fieri eandem legendi et eiusdem exemplar petendi; vel tandem, ubi usus viget, sententiae exemplar transmittendo ad partes per publicos tabellarios ad normam can. 1719.