Part — Merkelbach, Summa Theologiae Moralis
Second Part: On Habits According to Moral Being, or On Acquired Virtues
¶1.
According to moral being, that is, in order to the ultimate end and the rule of morals, operative habits are good and are virtues, or evil and are vices, according as they are suitable or not suitable to rational nature and its ultimate end.1 Concerning vices enough has been said in the treatise on sins: for as many sins as there are diverse completed species, so many habits caused from them and inclining to them, or vices, can also be had. Therefore it remains that we speak specially of good habits and virtues.
1 Moral theology treats of the motion of the rational creature toward God. We approach God by acts of virtues. Therefore virtues pertain per se to moral theology, not to dogmatic theology.
Within this part
- Question One: On the Essence of Virtuenn. 576–581
- Question Two: On the Subject of Virtuenn. 582–586
Question Three: On the Distinction of Virtuesnn. 587–599
- Article I: On Intellectual Virtuesnn. 588–590
- Article II: On Moral Virtuesnn. 591–596
- Article III: On Cardinal Virtuesnn. 597–599
Question Four: On the Properties of Virtuesnn. 600–613
- Article I: On the Mean of Virtuenn. 600–603
- Article II: On the Connection of Virtuesnn. 604–606
- Article III: On the Equality of Virtuesnn. 607–611
- Article IV: On the Duration of Virtuesnn. 612–613