Article — Billuart, Summa Summae · from Schola Thomistica
On the acts required for the justification of the adult sinner
The Council of Trid., sess. VI, cap. 6, assigns six acts by which the adult sinner ought to be disposed for justification, namely the act of faith, of fear, of hope, of the love of God, of penance or contrition, finally the resolution of receiving the sacraments instituted for the remission of sins, of beginning a new life and keeping the divine commandments ; which resolution is included in contrition itself. The principal question concerns faith required for justification, against the heretics.
Concil. Trid., sess. VI, cap. 6, sex assignat actus quibus peccator adultus debeat disponi ad justificationem, scilicet actum fidei, timoris, spei, dilectionis Dei, poenitentiae seu contritionis, tandem propositum suscipiendi sacramenta instituta ad remissionem peccatorum, inchoandi novam vitam et mandata divina servandi ; quod propositum in ipsa contritione includitur. Praecipua quaestio est de fide requisita ad justificationem, contra haereticos.
The Lutherans and Calvinists distinguish a twofold faith.
Lutherani et Calvinistae distinguunt duplicem fidem.
The first they call historical, by which we believe all things contained in the sacred writings ; we call it Christian and Catholic. The second they call of the promises, by which we believe that God has promised the remission of sins. This second they subdivide into general and particular. General they call that by which we believe God has promised remission of sins and salvation to all believers in common; special they call that by which each one believes or confidently trusts his sins to be forgiven him on account of the merits of Christ. For this faith they badly confound with confidence, which belongs to hope and to the will, not to the intellect; for confidence, according to St. Thomas, is strengthened hope.
Primam vocant historicam, qua credimus omnia quae in sacris litteris continentur ; nos eam dicimus christianam et catholicam. Secundam vocant promissorum, qua credimus Deum promisisse remissionem peccatorum. Hanc secundam subdividunt in generalem et particularem. Generalem vocant qua credimus Deum omnibus credentibus in communi promisisse remissionem peccatorum et salutem ; specialem vocant qua unusquisque credit vel certo confidit peccata sibi esse remissa propter merita Christi. Hanc enim fidem male confundunt cum fiducia qua ad spem et voluntatem pertinet, non ad intellectum ; est enim fiducia, ex S. Thoma, spes roborata.
This faith or particular confidence therefore they contend is required for justification and that it alone justifies.
Hanc ergo fidem seu fiduciam particularem requiri ad justificationem et eam solam justificare contendunt.
[The tenor of this canon is : « If anyone shall have said that justifying faith is nothing else than trust in the divine mercy remitting sins because of Christ, or that it is this trust alone by which we are justified; let him be anathema. »]
[Hujus canonis tenor est : « Si quis dixerit, fidem justificantem nihil aliud esse quam fiduciam divinae misericordiae peccata remittentis propter Christum, vel eam fiduciam solam esse qua justificamur ; anathema sit. »]
It is proved 1° from most open testimonies of Scripture. Marc. last chapter, 15 and 16 : Preach the Gospel to every creature. He who shall have believed, namely the Gospel and the truths contained in it, shall be saved. Rom. X, 8 and 9 : This is the word which we preach; because if thou confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in thy heart that God hath raised him up from the dead, thou shalt be saved. Therefore Christ and his resurrection, not only the mercy of God remitting sins, are the object of saving faith. Joann., XI, 26 and 27, when the Lord had said to Martha : I am the resurrection and the life. He who believeth in me shall not die forever. She answers : Yea, Lord, I have believed that thou art Christ the Son of the living God, who art come into this world. Therefore the faith required for eternal life is to believe the divinity of the Word incarnate. John concludes thus at the last chapter of his Gospel, 31 : These things are written, that you may believe that Jesus is the Son of the living God, and that believing you may have life in his name. Therefore the same as before. I omit other very many testimonies of Scripture, lest I be too long.
Probatur 1° apertissimis Scripturae testimoniis. Marc. ultimo, 15 et 16 : Praedicate Evangelium omni creaturae. Qui crediderit, scilicet Evangelio et veritatibus in eo contentis, salvus erit. Rom. X, 8 et 9 : Hoc est verbum quod praedicamus, quia, si confitearis in ore tuo Dominum Jesum, et in corde tuo credideris quod Deus illum suscitavit a mortuis, salvus eris. Ergo Christus et ejus resurrectio, non sola misericordia Dei peccata remittentis, sunt objectum fidei salvantis. Joann., XI, 26 et 27, cum Dominus dixisset Marthae : Ego sum resurrectio et vita. Qui credit in me, non morietur in aeternum. Respondet illa : Utique, Domine, ego credidi quia tu es Christus Filius Dei vivi, qui in hunc mundum venisti. Ergo fides requisita ad vitam aeter nam, est credere divinitatem Verbi incarnati. Joannes cap. ult. sui Evangelii sic concludit, 31 : Haec scripta sunt, ut credatis quia Jesus est Filius Dei vivi, et ut credentes vitam habeatis in nomine ipsius. Ergo idem quod prius. Omitto alia bene multa Scripturae testimonia, ne longior sim.
It is proved 2° from tradition. The Church, as from the beginning so now, when she requires faith from those about to be baptized, requires no other than that by which we believe the articles of faith contained in the symbols, not truly that by which we believe or confidently trust our sins to be forgiven us. For who among the Apostles, or bishops, or other ministers ever taught one coming to him for justification thus : « Believe your sins to be forgiven you, and immediately they will be forgiven. » Such doctrine would indeed be absurd and offensive to pious ears.
Probatur 2° ex traditione. Ecclesia, ut ab initio ita nunc, cum fidem requirit a baptizandis, non aliam requirit quam illam qua credimus fidei articulis in symbolis contentis, non vero illam qua credimus seu confidimus peccata nobis esse dimissa. Quis enim unquam Apostolorum, aut episcoporum, aut caeterorum ministrorum, accedentem ad se causa justificationis, ita docuit : « Credе peccata tibi dimitti, et statim dimittentur. » Absurda sane et piarum aurium offensiva foret hujusmodi doctrina.
It is proved 3°. Faith rests upon the authority alone of God revealing, who can neither deceive nor be deceived. But nowhere is it revealed to me or to another particularly that sins are forgiven. Therefore I cannot believe this with certain faith.
Probatur 3°. Fides innititur sola authoritate Dei revelantis, qui nec fallere nec falli potest. Atqui nullibi revelatum est mihi aut alteri particulariter peccata esse remissa. Ergo id certa fide credere non possum.
It is proved 4°. Justifying faith must precede justification; for it is its cause. But that faith of the heretics does not precede, but follows justification, otherwise it would be false; for false is that faith by which I believe my sins forgiven, if they are not yet truly forgiven. If you say that by this faith it is not believed that sins are forgiven, but are being forgiven here and now, there always remains that that faith is posterior to that remission, because that present remission is the object of this faith; but act neither makes nor specifies its object, but supposes it and is specified by it.
Probatur 4°. Fides justificans praecedere debet justificationem ; est enim causa illius. Atqui fides illa haereticorum non praecedit, sed sequitur justificationem, alioquin esset falsa ; nam falsa fides est qua credo dimissa mihi esse peccata, si nondum sunt vere dimissa. Si dicas, hac fide non credi peccata esse dimissa, sed hic et nunc dimitti, semper manet quod illa fides sit posterior ista remissione, quia ista remissio praesens est objectum hujus fidei ; actus autem non facit nec specificat suum objectum, sed illud supponit et ab ipso specificatur.
I say 2° : Neither that special faith of recent heretics, which is vain and none, nor true Christian faith alone suffices for justification.
Dico 2° : Neque illa fides specialis recentium haereticorum, qua vana est et nulla, neque fides vera et christiana sola sufficit ad justificationem.
[Thus it was defined by Trid., sess. VI, can. 9 : « If anyone shall have said that the impious is justified by faith alone, so as to understand that nothing else is required which cooperate toward obtaining the grace of justification, and that it is in no way necessary that he be prepared and disposed by the motion of his own will; let him be anathema. »]
This definition is against the Lutherans and Calvinists, whom Simon Magus had gone before, by the testimony of Irenaeus, lib. I de Haeres., c. 20, who relates that Peter, John, James and Jude wrote their epistles against this error.
Haec definitio est contra Lutheranos et Calvinistas, quibus praeiverat Simon Magus, teste Irenaeo, lib. I de Haeres., c. 20, qui refert Petrum, Joannem, Jacobum et Judam suas epistolas contra hunc errorem scripsisse.
It is proved from these holy Apostles who wrote expressly against this error. St. James, I, 14 : What shall it profit, my brethren, if anyone say he have faith, but have not works? Shall faith be able to save him?... And 17 : Faith, if it have not works, is dead in itself. Which after he had proved with many arguments, he concludes the chapter thus, 24 and 26 : You see that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only... For even as the body without the spirit is dead, so also faith without works is dead. These things are peremptory, nor do they need glossing.
Probatur ex his SS. Apostolis qui ex professo scripserunt contra hunc errorem. S. Jacobus, I, 14 : Quid proderit, fratres mei, si fidem quis dicat se habere, opera autem non habeat ? Numquid poterit fides salvare eum ?... Et 17 : Fides, si non habet opera, mortua est in semetipsa. Quod postquam multis probavit, concludit caput sic, 24 et 26 : Videtis quoniam ex operibus justificatur homo, et non ex fide tantum... Sicut enim corpus sine spiritu mortuum est, ita et fides sine operibus mortuum est. Haec sunt peremptoria, nec indigent glossa.
St. Peter, II Epist., c. 1, 10, after exhorting to various good works, concludes : Wherefore, brethren, labor the more that by good works you make sure your calling and election. Faith therefore does not suffice, if works be wanting.
S. Petrus, II Epist., c. 1, 10, postquam hortatus est ad varia bona opera, concludit : Quapropter, fratres, magis satagite ut per bona opera certam vestram vocationem et electionem faciatis. Fides ergo non sufficit, si desint opera.
These things are so open against the present error that the heretics denied these epistles to be canonical, which nevertheless the Church acknowledges as canonical in several councils, lastly in Trident., sess. IV.
Haec tam sunt aperta contra praesentem errorem, ut haeretici negaverint has epistolas esse canonicas, quas tamen pro canonicis agnoscit Ecclesia in pluribus conciliis, ultimo in Trident., sess. IV.
But also openly St. Paul, in whom the innovators badly confide, combats this error. I Cor., XII, 2 : If, he says, I should have all faith, so that I could move mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. Galat., V, 6 : In Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith that worketh by charity. Rom., II, 3 : Not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.
Sed et aperte S. Paulus, cui male confidunt novatores, hunc errorem debellat. I Cor., XII, 2 : Si, inquit, habuero omnem fidem, ita ut montes transferam, charitatem autem non habuero, nihil sum. Galat., V, 6 : In Christo Jesu neque circumcisio aliquid valet, neque praeputium, sed fides quae per charitatem operatur. Rom., II, 3 : Non auditores legis justi sunt apud Deum, sed factores legis justificabuntur.
Finally Christ everywhere in the Gospel commends good works as necessary for justification and salvation. Matth., V, 16 : So let your light shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father who is in heaven. And below, 20 : Unless your justice abound more than that of scribes and pharisees, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. And cap. VII, 19 : *Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit shall be cut down and cast into the fire. Cap. XIX, 16 and 17, to him asking : What good shall I do, that I may have life everlasting? He says not : « Only believe ; » but : If thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. And finally cap. XXVIII, 19 and 20, he not only admonishes the Apostles to preach faith and baptize, but also wills that they teach to keep all things whatsoever he commanded.
Tandem Christus in Evangelio ubique commendat bona opera ut necessaria ad justificationem et salutem. Matth., V, 16 : Sic luceat lux vestra coram hominibus, ut videant opera vestra bona, et glorificent Patrem vestrum qui in coelis est. Et infra, 20 : Nisi abundaverit justitia vestra plusquam scribarum et pharisaeorum, non intrabitis in regnum coelorum. Et cap. VII, 19 : *Omnis arbor quae non facit fructum bonum, excidetur et in ignem mittetur. Cap. XIX, 16 et 17, interroganti : Quid boni faciam, ut habeam vitam aeternam ? Non ait : « Crede tantum ; » sed : Si vis ad vitam ingredi, serva mandata. Et denique cap. XXVIII, 19 et 20, non solum monet Apostolos ut fidem praedicent et baptizent, sed etiam vult ut doceant servare omnia quae ipse mandavit.
Now certain heretics answer, oppressed by these testimonies, that the faith which they say suffices for justification is not faith alone, but faith joined with good works, not indeed that these good works cooperate toward justification, but because they accompany justifying faith like its signs, or as properties and fruits following from it. Whence they say that by the foregoing testimonies of Scripture those are condemned who formerly said that dead faith alone, void of good works, suffices for salvation; but not those who attribute this indeed to faith alone, but to living faith, active and attended by good works.
Respondent nunc quidam haeretici, his testimoniis oppressi, fidem quam dicunt sufficere ad justificationem, non esse fidem solam, sed fidem junctam bonis operibus, non quidem quod haec bona opera cooperentur ad justificationem, sed quia comitantur fidem justificantem velut ejus signa, vel ut proprietates et fructus ex ea sequentes. Unde dicunt, prefatis Scripturae testimoniis damnari eos qui olim dicebant solam fidem mortuam et bonis operibus vacuam sufficere ad salutem ; at non eos qui id tribuunt quidem soli fidei, sed fidei vivae, activae et bonis operibus stipatae.
On the contrary 1°. This response, varnished and devised for softening the horror of this monstrous error, openly fights with the principles of the heretics. For they teach : 1° that man, while justified through faith, is not truly made just, but only reputed, nor any of his works good, but all mortal sins, although they are not imputed to him because of Christ. With what face then do they say that not faith alone, but faith joined with good works justifies, since according to them there exist no good works? 2° They teach that man once justified through faith cannot fall from justice by any crime. So Calvin, lib. III Institut., cap. 2, § 11, and Luther in Sermon upon these words : So God loved, etc., excepting only incredulity. And thus once justified through faith, although he become thief, homicide, adulterer, sodomite, he remains just. Therefore faith justifies without good works, nay with evil and most evil ones; which is the ancient heresy condemned in the Scriptures. Whence Luther, on cap. 11 ad Galat., expressly says : « Faith without and before charity justifies. » And tom. I disput. : whether works justify ? proposit. 3, he says : « Faith, unless it be without even the lesser works, does not justify, nay it is not faith. » And therefore the stricter Lutherans ingenuously confess that good works are in no way required for justifying faith.
Sed contra 1°. Haec responsio fucata et ad emolliendum horrorem immanis hujus erroris excogitata, aperte pugnat cum principiis haereticorum. Nam illi docent : 1° hominem, dum per fidem justificatur, non vere fieri justum, sed reputari tantum, nec ulla ejus opera esse bona, sed omnia esse peccata mortalia, quamvis ei non imputentur propter Christum. Qua fronte ergo dicunt, non solam fidem, sed fidem junctam bonis operibus justificare, cum secundum illos nulla sint bona opera ? 2° Docent hominem semel per fidem justificatum, nullo flagitio a justitia excidere posse. Ita Calvinus, lib. III Institut., cap. 2, § 11, et Lutherus in Serm. super haec verba : Sic Deus dilexit, etc., excipiens tantum incredulitatem. Sicque semel justificatus per fidem, quamvis fiat fur, homicida, adulter, sodomita, remanet justus. Ergo fides justificat sine bonis operibus, imo cum malis et pessimis ; quod est antiqua haeresis in Scripturis damnata. Unde Lutherus, in cap. 11 ad Galat., expresse dicit : « Fides sine et ante charitatem justificat. » Et tom. I disput. : an opera justificent ? proposit. 3, ait : « Fides, nisi sit sine ullis etiam minoribus operibus, non justificat, imo non est fides. » Et ideo rigidiores Lutherani ingenue fatentur, bona opera nullatenus requiri ad fidem justificantem.
Against 2°. Scripture attributes no less to good works the office of justifying and saving than to faith, as appears from the places cited and many others. Therefore, if faith cooperates toward justification, so also works.
Contra 2°. Scriptura non minus tribuit munus justificandi et salvandi bonis operibus, quam fidei, ut patet ex locis citatis et aliis pluribus. Ergo, si fides cooperetur justificationi, ita et opera.
The heretics argue especially from the Apostle, who, as it seems to them, is wholly intent upon asserting that faith suffices for justification without works. Rom., II, 28, he says : We conclude a man to be justified by faith, without the works of the law. Ibid., IV, 2 : If Abraham were justified by works, he hath glory, but not before God. Galat., II, 16 : Knowing that man is not justified by the works of the law. Philipp., III, 9 : That I may be found in him, not having my justice, which is of the law, but that which is of faith.
Arguunt praecipue haeretici ex Apostolo, qui, ut ipsis videtur, totus est ut asserat ad justificationem sufficere fidem sine operibus. Rom., II, 28, ait : Arbitramur justificari hominem per fidem, sine operibus legis. Ibid., IV, 2 : Si Abraham ex operibus justificatus est, habet gloriam, sed non apud Deum. Galat., II, 16 : Scientes quod non justificatur homo ex operibus legis. Philipp., III, 9 : Ut inveniar in illo, non habens meam justitiam, quae ex lege est, sed eam quae est ex fide.
I answer 1°. Suppose the Apostle taught that faith without any works suffices for justification, this would by no means profit the heretics ; because the Apostle understands Christian and Catholic faith, by which we believe the divinity of the Word incarnate, his resurrection and other mysteries contained in the Scriptures, not truly that ridiculous faith or confidence by which heretics believe their sins forgiven them.
Resp. 1°. Esto Apostolus doceret, fidem sine ullis operibus sufficere ad justificationem, id nullatenus prodesset haereticis ; quia Apostolus intelligit fidem christianam et catholicam, qua credimus divinitatem Verbi incarnati, ejus resurrectionem et alia mysteria in Scripturis contenta, non vero illam fidem ridiculam seu fiduciam qua haeretici credunt peccata sibi esse dimissa.
I answer 2°. The Apostle excludes only works which either precede faith or, after faith is had, are done without the grace of faith, that is, works which proceed from the powers alone of nature and free will, such as were certain honest works of natural justice. So Augustine (?) de Libero arb., c. 7, n. 18 : « Men, he says, not understanding what the Apostle himself says : We conclude a man to be justified by faith, without the works of the law, thought him to say that faith suffices for man, even though he live badly and have no good works. Far be it that the vessel of election so thought ! »
Resp. 2°. Apostolum solum excludere opera quae vel ante fidem vel post habitam fidem, sed sine fidei gratia fiunt, id est, opera quae ex solis viribus naturae et liberi arbitrii procedunt, qualia erant quaedam honesta justitiae naturae. Ita Augustinus (?) de Libero arb., c. 7, n. 18 : « Homines, inquit, non intelligentes quod ait ipse Apostolus : Arbitramur justificari hominem per fidem, sine operibus legis, putaverunt eum dicere, sufficere homini fidem, etiamsi male vivat et bona opera non habeat. Quod absit ut sentiret vas electionis ! »
You press on. Abraham and the Galatians were already reborn and worked from faith, at that time of which the Apostle speaks. Nevertheless he excludes their works. Therefore.
Instas. Abraham et Galatae jam renati erant et operabantur ex fide, eo tempore de quo loquitur Apostolus. Attamen tur ex fide, eo tempore de quo loquitur Apostolus. Attamen excludit eorum opera. Ergo.
I answer. Given the major, I deny the minor. That he excludes their works which were done from the grace of faith, I deny; that they were done before faith, or which after faith was had were not done from the grace of faith, I concede. For nothing hinders that he who has faith sometimes fail to work from faith, as while he sins or performs a morally good work without relation to God.
Resp. Data maj., dist. min. Excludit eorum opera quae fiebant ex gratia fidei, nego ; qua facta fuerant ante fidem, vel quae post fidem habitam non fiebant ex gratia fidei, conc. Nihil obstat enim quod qui habet fidem, aliquando non operetur ex fide, ut dum peccat aut facit opus morale bonum sine relatione ad Deum.
To the other arguments which heretics object, take the following general solutions. The first is : justification is attributed to faith as its beginning and root, yet not excluding other works disposing toward it. So Trid., sess. VI, cap. 81. The second : there must be understood living faith, which worketh through charity, as the Apostle speaks ad Galat., V, 6. Third : by faith are sometimes understood those things which are contained in the Gospel or evangelical doctrine, doing those things which according to this doctrine are to be done. Fourth : when works are excluded, must be understood works done before faith or without the grace of faith, not truly works which are done from the grace of faith itself, as I explained above ; or works of the Mosaic law, or external works, when that power of executing them is wanting. 1 We said at the beginning of the preceding article, from the council of Trid., sess. VI, « But whereas the Apostle says that man is justified by faith and freely, those words are to be understood in that sense which the perpetual consent of the Catholic Church held and expressed : namely that we are therefore said to be justified by faith, because faith is the beginning of human salvation, the foundation and root of all justification, without which it is impossible to please God and to come to the fellowship of his children; but we are said to be justified freely, because nothing of those things which precede justification, whether faith or works, merits the grace itself of justification; for if it be grace, now it is not of works : otherwise, as the same Apostle says, grace is no more grace. »
Ad alia argumenta quae objiciunt haeretici, accipe sequentes generales solutiones. Prima est : justificatio fidei tribuitur tamquam ejus initio et radici, non tamen excludendo alia opera ad eam disponentia. Ita Trid., sess. VI, cap. 81. Secunda : intelligenda est fides viva, quae per charitatem operatur, ut loquitur Apostolus ad Galat., V, 6. Tertia : per fidem aliquando intelliguntur ea quae in Evangelio seu doctrina evangelica continentur, faciendo ea quae secundum hanc doctrinam sunt facienda. Quarta : quando excluduntur opera, intelligenda sunt opera ante fidem vel sine fidei gratia facta, non vero opera quae ex ipsa fidei gratia fiunt, ut explicui supra ; vel opera legis Mosaica, vel opera externa, quando deest potentia illa exsequendi. 1 Diximus initio articuli praeced., ex concilio Trid., sess. VI, « Cum vero Apostolus dicit, justificari hominem per fidem et gratis, ea verba in eo sensu intelligenda sunt quem perpetuus Ecclesiae catholicae consensus tenuit et expressit : ut scilicet per fidem ideo justificari dicamur, quia fides est humanae salutis initium, fundamentum et radix omnis justificationis, sine qua impossibile est placere Deo et ad filiorum ejus consortium pervenire ; gratis autem justificari dicamur, quia nihil eorum quae justificationem praecedunt, sive fides, sive opera, ipsam justificationis gratiam promeretur ; si enim gratia est, jam non ex operibus : alioquin, ut idem Apostolus inquit, gratia jam non est gratia. »