Article — Billuart, Summa Summae · from Schola Thomistica
Various questions on the transmission of original sin briefly resolved
You will ask 1° what sin of Adam was the cause of the traduction of original sin.
Petes 1° quodnam Adae peccatum fuerit causa traductionis peccati originalis.
I answer. More probably, with the Author1, that it was the first, not because it was such, but because it was first: because that sin of Adam was the cause of the traduction of original sin through which he lost original justice to be transfused into posterity. But whatever sin had been first, whether of deed or of will, by it he would have lost original justice, namely by losing sanctifying grace, which was the root of original justice, or at least was contained in it. Therefore. 1 In II Sentent., dist. 33, in secunda expositione textus, post q. 2; 2 2ae, q. 163, a. 3, ad 2. — 2. Hic q. 81, a. 1, c.
Resp. probabilius, cum Authore1, fuisse primum, non quia tale, sed quia primum : quia illud peccatum Adae fuit causa traductionis peccati originalis, per quod amisit justitiam originalem transfundendam in posteros. Atqui quodcumque peccatum fuisset primum, sive operis, sive voluntatis, per illud amisisset justitiam originalem, amittendo scilicet gratiam sanctificantem quae erat radix justitiae originalis, aut saltem in ea includebatur. Ergo. 1 In II Sentent., dist. 33, in secunda expositione textus, post q. 2; 2 2ae, q. 163, a. 3, ad 2. — 2. Hic q. 81, a. 1, c.
You will ask 2° whether other sins of the first parent or of proximate parents are traduced into posterity.
Petes 2° utrum alia primi parentis vel proximorum parentum peccata traducantur in posteros.
I answer. Negatively2, because the first sin of Adam is traduced into posterity insofar as he was constituted by God the moral head of all posterity, as to the conservation or loss of original justice. But proximate parents are not thus constituted moral head of their stock, and Adam himself by the first sin had fallen from the dignity of headship. Therefore. 2 Hic q. 81, a. 1, c.
Resp. negative2, quia in tantum peccatum primum Adae traducitur in posteros, in quantum erat a Deo constitutus caput morale omnium posterorum, quantum ad conservationem aut amissionem justitiae originalis. Atqui proximi parentes non ita sunt constituti caput morale suae stirpis, et ipse Adam per primum peccatum a dignitate capitis exciderat. Ergo. 2 Hic q. 81, a. 1, c.
Hence this proposition is condemned: « Every crime is of such condition that it can infect its author and all posterity in the manner in which the first transgression infected them. » It is number 52 among the Baians condemned by St. Pius V, October 1, 1567.
Hinc damnata est haec propositio : « Omne scelus est ejus conditionis, ut suum authorem et omnes posteros eo modo inficere possit, quo infecit prima transgressio. » Est 52 inter Baianas a S. Pio V, 1 octobris 1567 damnatas.
You will ask 3° whether, if Adam had not sinned and Eve had sinned, posterity would have contracted original sin.
Petes 3° utrum si, Adamo non peccante, Eva peccasset, posteri contraxissent peccatum originale.
I answer. Negatively1. 1 Ibid., a. 2, c. — 2. Ibid., in arg. Sed contra.
Resp. negative1. 1 Ibid., a. 2, c. — 2. Ibid., in arg. Sed contra.
It is proved 1°. The Apostle, Rom., v, 12, says: By one man sin entered into this world. But if a woman were to transmit original sin to offspring, it ought rather to have been said, by two men, since both sinned, or rather by the woman, who sinned first2. Therefore. 2 Ibid., in arg. Sed contra.
Prob. 1°. Apost., Rom., v, 12, dicit : Per unum hominem peccatum in hunc mundum intravit. Atqui, si foemina peccatum originale in prolem transmitteret, magis dicendum fuisset, per duos homines, cum ambo peccaverint, vel potius per mulierem, quae primo peccavit2. Ergo. 2 Ibid., in arg. Sed contra.
It is confirmed. In the same place, verses 18 and 19, the Apostle says that through the offense of one, through the disobedience of one, sin entered into the world; and there he always compares one with one, namely Adam with Christ. Therefore the same as before.
Confirmatur. Ibidem, 18 et 19, dicit Apostolus : Per unius delictum, per unius inobedientiam, peccatum in mundum intrasse, et semper illic comparat unum uni, scilicet Adamum Christo. Ergo idem quod ante.
2° Adam alone, and not Eve, was constituted moral head of posterity, as to the conservation or loss of original justice. Consequently the sin of Adam was capital, but the sin of Eve personal. Therefore.
2° Solus Adam, et non Eva, constitutus fuit caput morale posterorum, quantum ad conservationem vel amissionem justitiae originalis. Consequenter peccatum Adae fuit capitale, peccatum autem Evae personale. Ergo.
You will ask 4° whether, if Adam had not sinned, and some one of his posterity, for instance Cain, had sinned, the posterity of Cain would have contracted original sin.
Petes 4° utrum si, non peccante Adamo, aliquis ex ejus posteris, puta Cain, peccasset, posteri Caini contraxissent peccatum originale.
It is commonly answered negatively, for the same reason, because namely Adam alone, and not Cain or another of Adam's posterity, was constituted moral head of all men, as to the conservation or loss of original justice.
Respondetur communiter negative, propter eamdem rationem, quia scilicet solus Adam, et non Cain, aut alter ex Adae posteris, erat constitutus caput morale omnium hominum, quantum ad conservationem aut amissionem justitiae originalis.
You will ask 5° whether, if Adam alone had sinned after his son was born, that son and his posterity would have contracted original sin.
Petes 5° utrum, si Adam solum post natum filium peccasset, iste filius et ejus posteri contraxissent peccatum originale.
I answer. More probably negatively: because neither that son nor his posterity would have been in the loins of Adam when he sinned, nor consequently would they be propagated seminally from sinful Adam. But those alone contract original sin who were in the loins of Adam while he sinned, and are propagated seminally from him as sinner. Add that this son would already have been just; but justice once possessed is not lost except by one's own will.
Resp. probabilius negative : quia nec iste filius, nec ejus posteri fuissent in lumbis Adae quando peccabat, nec consequenter propagarentur seminaliter ab Adam peccatore. Illi autem soli contrahunt peccatum originale, qui erant in lumbis Adam, dum peccabat, et ab eo peccatore seminaliter propagantur. Adde quod iste filius jam esset justus, justitia autem semel habita non perditur nisi propria voluntate.
You will ask 6° whether all men contract original sin.
Petes 6° utrum omnes homines contrahant peccatum originale.
I answer. 1. It is of faith that all men whatsoever, propagated seminally from Adam, special privilege set aside, contract original sin.
Resp. 1. De fide est omnes omnino homines ab Adam seminaliter propagatos, secluso speciali privilegio, contrahere peccatum originale.
It is proved 1° from that Rom., V, 12: In whom all have sinned. 2° Because otherwise not all would need the redemption which is through Christ; which is erroneous. 3° Because human nature deprived of original justice is traduced into all, in which deprivation, as voluntary in the head, original sin consists, as we shall say presently. 4° It is evident from the perpetual practice of the Church, which is wont, and is most solicitous, that infants of all, both of the faithful and of the just, be baptized, lest they be damned forever. Finally all that we have brought forward in proof of the existence of original sin proves this.
Probatur 1° ex illo Rom., V, 12 : In quo omnes peccaverunt. 2° Quia alioquin non omnes indigerent redemptione quae est per Christum; quod est erroneum. 3° Quia traducitur in omnes natura privata justitia originali, in qua privatione, ut voluntaria in capite, consistit peccatum originale, ut dicemus modo. 4° Patet ex perpetua praxi Ecclesiae, quae solet et maxime sollicita est ut infantes quorumcumque et fidelium et justorum baptizentur, ne in aeternum damnentur. Tandem id probant quaecumque protulimus in probationem existentiae peccati originalis.
I said 1° : « Into all propagated seminally from Adam, » that Christ might be excepted, who was conceived not of virile seed, but by mystical breathing, and thus, since he was not contained in the loins of sinning Adam, did not sin in him.
Dixi 1° : « In omnes ex Adam seminaliter propagatos, » ut exciperetur Christus, qui non ex virili semine, sed mystico spiramine fuit conceptus, sicque cum non contineretur in lumbis Adae peccantis, in ipso non peccavit.
I said 2° : « Special privilege set aside, » because many piously hold that blessed Mary was immune, not indeed from the obligation of contracting, but from the actual contraction of original sin. But in this matter Mother Church has defined nothing1, but leaves each free to embrace whichever opinion he wills, forbidding under pain of excommunication either party to presume to note the other with error or heresy. 1 Ibid., a. 3, c. — 2. This truth, as defined by Pius IX to be of faith, we shall prove shortly.
Dixi 2° : « Secluso speciali privilegio, » quia multi pie sentiunt B. V. Mariam fuisse immunem, non quidem a debito contrahendi, sed ab actuali contractione peccati originalis. Verum hac in re nihil definivit Mater Ecclesia1, sed cuique liberum relinquit amplecti quam voluerit sententiam, vetans sub excommunicatione ne alterutra pars alteram errore vel haeresi notare praesumat. 1 Ibid., a. 3, c. — 2. Veritatem hanc, ut de fide definitam a Pio IX, mox probabimus.
And although Paul V, by decree of the universal Inquisition in 1617, to avoid scandals, quarrels and dissensions, forbade that the party affirming blessed Mary to have been conceived in original sin should be defended in public sermons, lectures and public acts, and Gregory XV by a decree likewise of the universal Inquisition in 1622 extended this to private conversations and writings, nevertheless from this silence the same Gregory XV, by the constitution Eximii given July 28, 1622, excepts the Friars Preachers, and grants them that they may freely and lawfully treat among themselves of this matter and expound their own opinion, in these words: « Of our own motion and from certain knowledge and mature deliberation, to all and singular the Friars of the said ORDER OF PREACHERS we grant and impart, by apostolic authority, by the tenor of these presents, license that henceforth in whatsoever their private conversations or conferences, among themselves only, and not among others or with others, they may freely and lawfully be able to discuss and treat of the matter of the same Conception of blessed Mary ever Virgin, without incurrence of any of the penalties contained in the said decrees: decreeing that the aforesaid Friars can and ought by no means to be molested, disturbed or disquieted by anyone, by whatever authority concerning this matter. » This constitution is found in the Bullarium of the Order of Friars Preachers, tom. vi, pag. 13.
Et quamvis Paulus V, decreto universalis Inquisitionis 1617, ad evitanda scandala, jurgia et dissensiones, prohibuerit ne pars affirmans B. Virginem fuisse conceptam in peccato originali in publicis concionibus, lectionibus et actibus publicis defenderetur, atque id Gregorius XV, decreto pariter universalis Inquisitionis 1622, extenderit ad privata colloquia et scripta, ab hoc tamen silentio idem Greg. XV, constitutione Eximii data 28 Julii 1622, excipit Fratres Praedicatores, conceditque illis ut libere et licite possint inter se de hac materia tractare et propriam sententiam explicare, his verbis : « Motu proprio et ex certa scientia ac matura deliberatione nostra, omnibus et singulis dicti ORDINIS PREDICATORUM FRATRIBUS, ut de caetero in quibuscumque privatis eorum colloquiis seu conferentiis, inter se dumtaxat, et non inter alios aut cum aliis, de materia ejusdem Conceptionis B. Maria Virginis disserere et tractare, absque ullo poenarum in dictis decretis contentarum incursu, libere et licite possint et valeant, apostolica authoritate, tenore praesentium, licentiam concedimus et impartimur : decernentes Fratres praefatos a quoquam quavis authoritate desuper molestari, perturbari vel inquietari nullatenus posse aut debere. » Haec constitutio habetur in Bullario Ordinis Fratrum Praedicatorum, tom. vi, pag. 13.
You will ask 7° whether, if someone were formed miraculously from human flesh, he would contract original sin.
Petes 7° utrum, si aliquis ex humana carne miraculose formaretur, contraheret peccatum originale.
I answer. Negatively: because those alone contract original sin who descend originally from Adam according to seminal reason, or drawn originally from Adam by virtue of seed, and not merely according to bodily substance. But this man would not descend from Adam according to seminal reason, but only according to bodily substance; for he would not be made by the active virtue of seed, but by divine virtue. Therefore.
Resp. negative : quia illi soli contrahunt peccatum originale, qui originaliter descendunt ab Adam secundum seminalem rationem, seu virtute seminis originaliter ab Adam deducti, et non tantum secundum corpulentam substantiam. Atqui iste homo non descenderet ab Adam secundum seminalem rationem, sed tantum secundum corpulentam substantiam; non enim esset factus per virtutem activam seminis, sed per divinam virtutem. Ergo.
The major is proved. The sin of Adam is traduced into posterity insofar as they are his sons, or insofar as they are moved from him by generation, that is, insofar as he moves them so as to be generated. But to move by generation is proper to the active virtue which is in the seed. Therefore. Whence the council of Trent, session VI, chapter 3, says: « Unless men were born propagated from the seed of Adam, they would not be born unjust. »
Prob. maj. Peccatum Adae traducitur in posteros in quantum sunt ejus filii, seu in quantum ab eo moventur per generationem, hoc est, in quantum eos movet ut generentur. Atqui movere per generationem, est proprium virtutis activae quae est in semine. Ergo. Unde concilium Trid., sess. vi, cap. 3, dicit : « Nisi homines ex semine Adae propagati nascerentur, non nascerentur injusti. »
Nevertheless this man ought to be baptized, not that he might be cleansed from original sin, but that he might obtain sanctifying grace, become a member of Christ, and have a right to the kingdom of heaven, according to that of John, III, 5 : Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
Deberet tamen iste homo baptizari, non ut mundaretur a peccato originali, sed ut consequeretur gratiam sanctificantem, fieret membrum Christi, et haberet jus ad regnum coelorum, juxta illud Joann., III, 5 : Nisi quis renatus fuerit ex aqua et Spiritu sancto, non potest introire in regnum Dei.