Article — Billuart, Summa Summae · from Schola Thomistica
Whether in the justification of the ungodly sins are truly destroyed and taken away, and not only covered?
I say: In the justification of a sinner his sins are not only covered, or not imputed, but are truly remitted, blotted out and taken away. This is against the Lutherans and Calvinists.
Dico : In justificatione peccatoris ejus peccata non solum teguntur, seu non imputantur, sed vere remittuntur, delentur et auferuntur. Est contra Lutheranos et Calvinistas.
It is proved 1° in the most formal terms of Scripture. Psal. L, 3: Blot out my iniquity. And 11: Blot out all my iniquities. Isa., XLIII, 25: I am he that blots out thy iniquities for my sake. Osee, XIV, 3: Take away all iniquity. Michaeae, VII, 18: What God is like to thee, who takes away iniquity? Joann., I, 29: Behold the Lamb of God, behold him who takes away the sin of the world.
Probatur 1° formalissimis terminis Scripturae. Psal. L, 3 : Dele iniquitatem meam. Et 11 : Omnes iniquitates meas dele. Isa., XLIII, 25 : Ego sum ipse qui deleo iniquitates tuas propter me. Osee, XIV, 3 : Omnem aufer iniquitatem. Michaeae, VII, 18 : Quis Deus similis tui, qui aufers iniquitatem ? Joann., I, 29 : Ecce Agnus Dei, ecce qui tollit peccatum mundi.
It is proved 2° by other terms of Scripture. Man is inwardly stained and defiled by sin, as we said of sins, and all agree. But, according to Scripture, man in his justification is cleansed, washed, purged and sanctified from his sins. Psal. L, 9: Thou shalt wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow. Ezech., XXXVI, 25: I will pour upon you clean water, and you shall be cleansed from all your filthiness. I Joann., I, 7: The blood of Jesus Christ, his Son, cleanses us from all sin. But if sins be only covered, it is said falsely that man is cleansed, washed, purged from them, etc.
Probatur 2° aliis terminis Scripturae. Homo per peccatum interius maculatur et inquinatur, ut diximus de peccatis, et omnes conveniunt. Atqui, juxta Scripturam, homo in sua justificatione a peccatis mundatur, lavatur, purgatur et sanctificatur. Psal. L, 9 : Lavabis me, et super nivem dealbabor. Ezech., XXXVI, 25 : Effundam super vos aquam mundam, et mundabimini ab omnibus inquinamentis vestris. I Joann., I, 7 : Sanguis Jesu Christi, Fili ejus, emundat nos ab omni peccato. Si autem peccata solum tegantur, falso dicitur homo ab iis mundari, lavari, purgari, etc.
For who would say that a man stained with filth is clean and washed, because he covers the filth with a cloak?
Quis enim dicat hominem sordibus inquinatum, esse mundum et ablutum, quia sordes pallio tegit ?
[It is proved 3° from the council of Trent, session V, canon 5, where it is said: « If anyone denies that by the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ which is conferred in baptism the guilt of original sin is remitted; or even asserts that the whole of that which has the true and proper nature of sin is not taken away, but says that it is only erased or not imputed; let him be anathema. » And in session VI, chapter 7, it is taught that « justification is not only the remission of sins, but also the sanctification and renewal of the interior man through the voluntary reception of grace and gifts: whence man becomes just from unjust, and friend from enemy. » Moreover this renewal of the interior man cannot consist in the fact that sin is only erased and not imputed, because then sin would truly remain in the soul, which would not be renewed from within, and man would not be truly just, but would be held as just only extrinsically, nor could he become the friend of God.]
[Probatur 3° ex concilio Trid., sess. V, can. 5, ubi dicitur : « Si quis per Jesu Christi Domini nostri gratiam quae in baptismate confertur, reatum originalis peccati remitti negat ; aut etiam asserit non tolli totum id quod veram et propriam peccati rationem habet, sed illud dicit tantum radi aut non imputari ; anathema sit. » Et sess. VI, cap. 7, docetur quod « justificatio non est sola peccatorum remissio, sed et sanctificatio et renovatio interioris hominis per voluntariam susceptionem gratiae et donorum : unde homo ex injusto fit justus, et ex inimico amicus. » Porro haec renovatio interioris hominis non potest consistere in eo quod peccatum radatur tantum et non imputetur, quia tunc peccatum revera maneret in anima, quae intrinsecus non renovaretur, et homo non esset vere justus, sed tantum extrinsece ut justus haberetur, et non posset Dei amicus fieri.]
It is proved 4° from Augustine. The holy Doctor, lib. I ad Bonif. contra duas epist. Pelag., c. 13, n. 26, answering the Pelagians who said that Catholics teach baptism does not take away crimes but erases them, and their roots remain, replies: « We say that baptism gives the pardon of all sins and takes away crimes, not erases them. » And Enarrat. II in Psal. XXXI, n. 9, expounding those words: Blessed are they whose iniquities are remitted, and whose sins are covered, on which the heretics chiefly rely, says: « Do not so understand what he said: « sins are covered, » as if they were there and alive. » Ibid. n. 12: « Let God cover the wounds; do not you. For if you wish to cover it out of shame, the physician will not cure it. Let the physician cover and cure; for the plaster covers. Under the physician's covering the wound is healed; under the covering of the wounded man the wound is concealed. » Therefore thus, according to Augustine, God covers wounds, that by covering he may heal them, like a physician who covers a wound with a plaster and heals it. Which is plainly decisive against the heretics. See other Fathers, if you please, in Bellarmine, lib. II de Justif., c. 8.
Probatur 4° ex Augustino. S. Doctor, lib. I ad Bonif. contra duas epist. Pelag., c. 13, n. 26, Pelagianis dicentibus Catholicos docere baptismum non auferre crimina, sed radere, et eorum radices remanere, respondet : « Dicimus baptisma dare omnium indulgentiam peccatorum et auferre crimina, non radere. » Et Enarrat. II in Psal. XXXI, n. 9, exponens illa verba : Beati quorum remissae sunt iniquitates, et quorum tecta sunt peccata, quibus maxime confidunt haeretici, ait : « Nec sic intelligatis quod dixit : « peccata cooperta sunt, » quasi ibi sint et vivant. » Ibid. n. 12 : « Deus tegat vulnera, noli tu. Nam, si tu tegere volueris erubescens, medicus non curabit. Medicus tegat et curet ; emplastro enim tegit. Sub tegmine medici sanatur vulnus, sub tegmine vulnerati celatur vulnus. » Sic igitur, juxta Augustinum, Deus tegit vulnera, ut tegendo sanet sicut medicus qui emplastro tegit vulnus et sanat. Quod plane decretorium est contra haereticos. Alios Patres vide, si lubet, apud Bellarminum, lib. II de Justif., c. 8.
It is proved 5° from absurdities. If in the justification of the impious sins remain and are only covered, and not blotted out and destroyed, it follows 1° that man will be at once just and unjust: just, because he is justified; unjust, because he remains in sin, which is essentially injustice. 2° It follows that God loves sinners as his friends, and in order to eternal beatitude, against that word of Sap., XIV, 9: To God the wicked and his wickedness are hateful.
Probatur 5° ab absurdis. Si in justificatione impii peccata remaneant et solum tegantur, non vero deleantur et destruantur, sequitur 1° quod homo erit simul justus et injustus : justus, quia justificatur ; injustus, quia remanet in peccato, quod est essentialiter injustitia. 2° Sequitur quod Deus diligat peccatores ut amicos suos, et in ordine ad aeternam beatitudinem, contra illud Sap., XIV, 9 : Odio sunt Deo impius et impietas ejus.