Article — Billuart, Summa Summae · from Schola Thomistica
Whether there is venial sin distinct from mortal by its own nature?
Mortal sin is called that which brings death to the soul, depriving it of grace, and it is worthy of eternal punishment. Venial sin, strictly taken, is called that which does not exclude from the subject the principle of pardon, which is grace.
Peccatum mortale dicitur quod mortem animae adfert, privando eam gratia, et est aeternae poenae dignum. Peccatum veniale stricte sumptum dicitur quod non excludit a subjecto principium veniae, quod est gratia.
The heretics of later times, Wiclef, Luther, Melancthon, Calvin, etc., taught that all sins are mortal by their nature and are of themselves onto death of the soul and eternal punishment; but in fact do not inflict these upon the predestined and the faithful, from the mercy of God; and thus venial sin is not distinguished from mortal sin by its nature, but either from a law or mercy enacted by God, or from the condition of the sinning person.
Haeretici posteriorum temporum, Wicleffus, Lutherus, Melancthon, Calvinus, etc., docuerunt omnia peccata ex natura sua esse mortalia et esse ex se mortis animae et poenae aeternae illativa; de facto autem non inferre praedestinatis et fidelibus, ex Dei misericordia, sicque veniale non distingui a mortali ex natura sua, sed vel ex statuta a Deo lege seu misericordia, vel ex conditione personae peccantis.
I say: There are given venial sins distinct from mortals by their own nature, not only from the condition of the sinner or from the mercy of God1. 1 Here q. 88, a. 1 and 2, c.
Dico : Dantur peccata venialia, non solum ex conditione peccantis aut ex Dei misericordia, sed ex natura sua a mortalibus distincta1. 1 Hic q. 88, a. 1 et 2, c.
It is proved 1° from Scripture. In various places of Scripture, some sins, without any respect to persons, are compared to most light things, others to most grave things: thus Matth., XXIII, 24, some are compared to a gnat, others to a camel; Luc., VI, 41, some to a mote, others to a beam; I Cor., III, 12, some to hay and stubble built upon the foundation which is Christ. But, if all sins were of themselves mortal, some would be ill compared to those minute things, while others are compared to most grave things; for that ought not to be called minute and light which inflicts of itself death of the soul and eternal hell. Therefore, as neither can a mote of itself blind, nor a gnat suffocate, nor hay or straw overthrow the foundation; so neither do sins compared to those minute things kill by their nature, and constitute the guilty one in eternal death.
Probatur 1° ex Scriptura. In variis Scripturae locis, quaedam peccata, sine ullo respectu ad personas, comparantur rebus levissimis, quaedam gravissimis : sic Matth., XXIII, 24, quaedam comparantur culici, quaedam camelo; Luc., VI, 41, quaedam festucae, quaedam trabi; I Cor., III, 12, quaedam foeno et stipulae superedificatis fundamento quod est Christus. Atqui, si omnia peccata ex se essent mortalia, quaedam male compararentur istis rebus minutis, dum alia comparantur rebus gravissimis; non enim minutum et leve dici debet quod mortem animae et gehennam aeternam ex se infert. Sicut ergo nec festuca ex se excaecare potest, nec culex suffocare, nec foenum aut palea fundamentum evertere; ita nec peccata istis rebus minutis comparata ex natura sua occidunt, et aeterna morte reum constituunt.
It is proved 2°. The council of Trent defined the same truth session VI, chapter 11, canons 7, 23 and 25, and session XIV, chapter 5: read1. And finally the Sovereign Pontiffs St. Pius V and Greg. XIII condemned this proposition: « There is no sin venial by its nature, but every sin merits eternal punishment. » It is the 20th among the Baianists. 1 Sess. VI, cap. 11: « Although in this mortal life however holy and just men may be, they sometimes fall into at least light and daily sins, which are also called venial, they do not therefore cease to be just. » — Can. 7: « If anyone shall say that all works done before justification, in whatever manner they are done, are truly sins, or merit the hatred of God...; let him be anathema. » — Can. 23: « If anyone shall say that a man once justified can sin no more, nor lose grace, and therefore that he who falls and sins was never truly justified, or, on the contrary, that he can avoid during his whole life all sins, even venial ones, except by a special privilege of God, as the Church holds concerning blessed Virgin ; let him be anathema. » — Can. 25: « If anyone shall say that in every good work the just man sins at least venially, or, what is more intolerable, mortally, and therefore merits eternal punishments, and that only on this account he is not damned, because God does not impute those works to damnation ; let him be anathema. » — Sess. XIV, cap. 5: « From these things it is gathered that penitents must recount in confession all mortal sins of which, after diligent examination of themselves, they have knowledge, even if those sins be most hidden and committed only against the two last precepts of the Decalogue, which sometimes wound the soul more gravely and are more dangerous than those which are committed openly ; for venial sins, whereby we are not excluded from the grace of God and into which we fall more frequently, although rightly and usefully and without all presumption they may be said in confession, as the practice of pious men demonstrates, can nevertheless be passed over without fault, and be expiated by many other remedies. »
Probatur 2°. Concilium Trident. eamdem veritatem definivit sess. VI, cap. 11, can. 7, 23 et 25, et sess. XIV, cap. 5 : lege1. Et tandem SS. Pontifices S. Pius V et Greg. XIII damnarunt hanc propositionem : « Nullum est peccatum natura sua veniale, sed omne peccatum meretur poenam aeternam. » Est 20a inter Baïanas. 1 Sess. VI, cap. 11 : « Licet enim in hac mortali vita quantumvis sancti et justi in levia saltem et quotidiana, quae etiam venialia dicuntur, peccata quandoque cadant, non propterea desinunt esse justi. » — Can. 7 : « Si quis dixerit, opera omnia quae ante justificationem fiunt, quacumque ratione facta sint, vere esse peccata, vel odium Dei mereri...; anathema sit. » — Can. 23 : « Si quis hominem semel justificatum dixerit amplius peccare non posse, neque gratiam amittere, atque ideo eum qui labitur et peccat nunquam vere fuisse justificatum, aut contra posse in tota vita peccata omnia, etiam venialia, vitare, nisi ex speciali Dei privilegio, quemadmodum de beata Virgine tenet Ecclesia ; anathema sit. » — Can. 25 : « Si quis in quolibet bono opere justum saltem venialiter peccare dixerit, aut, quod intolerabilius est, mortaliter, atque ideo poenas aeternas mereri, tantumque ob id non damnari, quia Deus ea opera non imputet ad damnationem; anathema sit. » — Sess. XIV, cap. 5 : « Ex his colligitur, oportere a poenitentibus omnia peccata mortalia, quorum post diligentem sui discussionem conscientiam habent, in confessione recenseri, etiam si occultissima illa sint et tantum adversus duo ultima Decalogi praecepta commissa, quae nonnunquam animam gravius sauciant et periculosiora sunt iis quae in manifesto admittuntur ; nam venialia, quibus a gratia Dei non excludimur et in qua frequentius labimur, quamquam recte et utiliter citraque omnem praesumptionem in confessione dicantur, quod piorum hominum usus demonstrat, taceri tamen citra culpam, multisque aliis remediis expiari possunt. »
It is proved by a manifold reason. The first is founded in Scripture. According to Scripture, God does not impute nor punish sins otherwise than they deserve of themselves, as is clear from that Psal., LXI, 13: For thou wilt render to every man according to his works. And II Cor., V, 10: That every one may receive the proper things of the body, according as he hath done. Therefore, if there are sins which God does not punish with eternal punishment, they do not merit it of themselves.
Probatur ratione multiplici. Prima est fundata in Scriptura. Juxta Scripturam, Deus non imputat nec punit peccata aliter quam ex se mereantur, ut patet ex illo Psal., LXI, 13 : Quia tu reddes unicuique juxta opera sua. Et II Cor., V, 10 : Ut referat unusquisque propria corporis, prout gessit. Ergo, si sint peccata quae non punit Deus poena aeterna, eam ex se non merentur.
The second. Sin is a certain infirmity of the soul, according to that Psal., VI, 3: Have mercy on me, O Lord, for I am weak. Therefore, as there are certain infirmities of the body mortal of themselves, others not, so also infirmities of the soul.
Secunda. Peccatum est quaedam animi infirmitas, juxta illud Psal., VI, 3 : Miserere mei, Domine, quoniam infirmus sum. Ergo, sicut sunt quaedam infirmitates corporis ex se mortales, quaedam non, ita infirmitates animae.
The third. Among friends there are light offenses which by their nature, and not only from the favor of the friend, do not dissolve friendship. Therefore similarly toward God. Will anyone believe that a just man and friend of God, by the nature of an idle word or superfluous laughter, incurs the hatred of God and liability to eternal gehenna?
Tertia. Inter amicos sunt offensae leves, quae ex natura sua, et non solum ex gratia amici, non dissolvunt amicitiam. Ergo similiter erga Deum. Equis credat hominem justum et amicum Dei, ex natura verbi otiosi, aut risus superflui, incurrere odium Dei et aeternae gehennae reatum ?
The fourth, special against the heretics. Adam, David and St. Peter were faithful and predestined. Yet nevertheless certain of their sins were truly mortal, and reckoned and imputed as such, namely the eating of the forbidden fruit in Adam, adultery in David, denial of Christ in St. Peter. Nor indeed do I think anyone denies that Adam, David and St. Peter lost by these sins the friendship of God and incurred liability to eternal punishment, until they were expiated by penance. Of the sin of Adam so understand Ambros., book de Paradiso, c. 9, and Aug., book XIII de Civit., c. 12. Of the adultery of David so judges the same Aug., in Psal. L. Of the sin of St. Peter similarly understands the same Aug., tract. 66 in Ioann., n. 2, where of St. Peter he says: « He died denying, and rose again weeping. » Therefore venial sins are not distinguished from mortals by the sole condition of the sinner.
Quarta, specialis contra haereticos. Adam, David et S. Petrus erant fideles et praedestinati. Atqui tamen quaedam eorum peccata vere fuerunt mortalia, et ut talia reputata et imputata, scilicet esus fructus vetiti ab Adamo, adulterium in Davide, negatio Christi in S. Petro. Neque enim puto quemquam negare Adamum, Davidem et S. Petrum per haec peccata amisisse amicitiam Dei et incurrisse reatum poenae aeternae, donec per poenitentiam expiarentur. De peccato Adae sic intelligunt Ambros., lib. de Paradiso, c. 9, et Aug., lib. XIII de Civit., c. 12. De adulterio Davidis sic censet idem Aug., in Psal. L. De peccato S. Petri similiter intelligit idem Aug., tract. 66 in Ioann., n. 2, ubi de S. Petro dicit : « Mortuus est negando, et revixit plorando. » Ergo venialia non distinguuntur a mortalibus ex sola conditione peccantis.
It is confirmed. Dignity of person does not diminish, but augments sin, as St. Thomas proves above q. 73, a. 10, c, and we from him in the same place. Therefore sin is not venial because it is committed by a faithful man or one predestined.
Confirmatur. Dignitas personae non minuit, sed auget peccatum, ut probat S. Thomas supra q. 73, a. 10, c, et nos ex ipso ibidem. Ergo peccatum non est ideo veniale, quia committitur a fideli vel praedestinato.