Article — Billuart, Summa Summae · from Schola Thomistica
Whether it is of the necessity of salvation to believe something above natural reason, and what?
It has been necessary at all times, by necessity of means for salvation, to believe with supernatural faith, determinately and explicitly, these two things: namely, that God is the author of grace and the remunerator of glory.
Fuit omni tempore necessarium necessitate medii ad salutem credere fide supernaturali determinate et explicite haec duo : scilicet Deum esse authorem gratiae et remuneratorem gloriae.
Proof. from the Apostle, Heb., XI, 6, who says : Without faith it is impossible to please God. For he who comes to God must believe that he is, and is a remunerator to those who seek him. That the Apostle speaks of God and the remunerator in the supernatural order, namely, that he is the author of grace and the remunerator of glory, is evident : 1° because, when he says : he must believe, he speaks of supernatural faith, which he had defined shortly before, ibid., 1 : the substance of things to be hoped for, the evidence of things that appear not. For things to be hoped for surpass the grasp of human understanding, and things that appear not cannot be investigated by human reason. 2° Because afterwards, in the same chapter, 14, he says of Abraham that, together with the other holy Fathers, he desired a better country, that is, a heavenly one ; and of Moses, ibid., 26, that, despising the treasures of the Egyptians, he looked to the remunerator, namely the heavenly one.
Prob. ex Apostolo, Hebr., XI, 6, dicente : Sine fide impossible est placere Deo. Credere enim oportet accedentem ad Deum, quia est et inquirentibus se remunerator sit. Apostolum loqui de Deo et remuneratore in ordine supernaturali, scilicet quod sit author gratiae et remunerator gloriae, constat : 1° quia, cum dicit : Credere oportet, loquitur de fide supernaturali quam antea definierat, ibid., 1 : Rerum sperandarum substantia, argumentum non apparentium. Res enim sperandae humani ingenii captum superant, et res non apparentes humana ratione investigari non possunt. 2° Quia postea in eodem capite, 14, dicit de Abraham, quod cum aliis SS. Patribus, meliorem patriam, id est caelestem, appeteret, et de Moyse, ibid., 26, quod, thesauro Aegyptiorum contempto, aspiciebat in remuneratorem, utique caelestem.
It is urged by reason. According to the ordinary providence, it is necessary by necessity of means for salvation that man, who is governed by reason, know the ultimate end toward which he tends, and the means by which one arrives at it. The ultimate end toward which man tends is the fellowship of the glory of God ; the means by which one arrives at it are grace and the acts of the supernatural virtues of faith, hope, and love, elicited through grace. But man cannot know this end and these means by natural reason, but only by revelation ; for they are supernatural, nor does natural reason dictate that God wills to admit man into the fellowship of his glory, nor does it explain the means by which one arrives at it. Therefore.
Suadetur ratione. Secundum providentiam ordinariam, necessarium est necessitate medii ad salutem, quod homo, qui ratione regitur, cognoscat finem ultimum in quem tendit, et media quibus ad illum pervenitur. Finis ultimus in quem homo tendit, est consortium gloriae Dei ; media quibus ad illum pervenitur, sunt gratia et actus virtutum supernaturalium fidei, spei et amoris, per gratiam eliciti. Atqui hunc finem et haec media homo cognoscere non potest per rationem naturalem, sed per solam revelationem ; sunt enim supernaturalia, nec ratio naturalis dictat Deum velle admittere hominem ad consortium suae gloriae, neque explicat media quibus ad illud pervenitur. Ergo.
I say 2° : After the Gospel has been sufficiently promulgated, explicit faith in the Incarnation and the Trinity is necessary for all, by necessity of means, unto salvation.
Dico 2° : Post Evangelium sufficienter promulgatum, fides explicita Incarnationis et Trinitatis est omnibus necessaria necessitate medii ad salutem.
This opinion is more probable and more common. Understand, however, the necessity not from the nature of the thing, otherwise it would have been the same at all times, but from a necessity arising from the institution and will of God for this state of the law of grace.
Est probabilior et communior. Intellige tamen de necessitate non ex natura rei, alioquin eadem fuisset omni tempore, sed de necessitate ex institutione et voluntate Dei pro hoc statu legis gratiae.
[It is said, « after the Gospel has been sufficiently promulgated, » because it is supposed that before the said promulgation implicit faith in these mysteries was commonly sufficient, from the Apostle, Gal., III, 23 : But before faith came, we were kept under the law shut up, unto that faith which was to be revealed. I said « commonly, » that is, for the lesser and the common people. For it seems that the greater, that is, priests and doctors, who offered the sacrifices prefiguring Christ and expounded the prophecies concerning Christ to come, were bound, at least by necessity of precept, to know in some way the sacred significance of these things.]
[Dicitur, « post Evangelium sufficienter promulgatum, » quia supponitur, ante dictam promulgationem, fidem implicitam horum mysteriorum fuisse communiter sufficientem, ex Apostolo, ad Galat., III, 23 : Prius autem quam veniret fides, sub lege custodiebamur conclusi in eam fidem qua revelanda erat. Dixi « communiter, » id est minoribus et communi populo. Videtur enim quod maiores, seu sacerdotes et doctores, offerentes sacrificia praefigurativa Christi, et explicantes prophetias de Christo venturo, tenebantur saltem necessitate praecepti aliquo modo harumce rerum sacrarum significationem cognoscere.]
Proof of the first part. 1° From Scripture. Christ, John., III, 14 and 15, says : As Moses lifted up the serpent in the desert, so must the Son of man be lifted up, that whosoever believeth in him may not perish, but may have life everlasting. Now the looking upon the serpent was a means necessary to bodily health. Therefore also faith in Christ unto spiritual health. But that he speaks of explicit faith is clear from what he subjoins there : He that, he says, believeth in him is not judged ; but he that doth not believe is already judged, because he doth not believe in the name of the Only-begotten Son of God. τὸ ὄνομα designates the person ; τὸ τοῦ ὀνόματος of the Only-begotten Son of God distinguishes him from the other persons. Therefore he speaks of explicit faith, and indeed of faith absolutely necessary ; because he who does not believe is already judged.
Prob. prima pars. 1° Ex Scriptura. Christus, Ioann., III, 14 et 15, dicit : Sicut Moyses exaltavit serpentem in deserto, ita exaltari oportet Filium hominis, ut omnis qui credit in ipsum, non pereat, sed habeat vitam aeternam. Atqui aspectus serpentis erat medium necessarium ad sanitatem corporalem. Ergo et fides in Christum ad sanitatem spiritualem. Ipsum autem loqui de fide explicita, patet ex his quae ibidem subdit : Qui, inquit, credit in eum, non iudicatur ; qui autem non credit, iam iudicatus est, quia non credit in nomine Unigeniti Filii Dei. τὸ ὄνομα designat personam ; τὸ τοῦ ὄνόματος Unigeniti Filii Dei distinguit a caeteris personis. Ergo loquitur de fide explicita, et quidem absolute necessaria ; quia qui non credit, iam iudicatus est.
John., XIV, 1, Christ says : You believe in God ; believe also in me. Where he demands equal faith in himself as in God. Now explicit faith concerning God is necessary by necessity of means. Therefore also concerning Christ. Many other similar passages are read in the Gospel and in the Epistles of Paul.
Ioann., XIV, 1, Christus dicit : Creditis in Deum, et in me credite. Ubi parem exigit fidem de seipso ac de Deo. Atqui fides explicita de Deo est necessaria necessitate medii. Ergo et de Christo. Plura alia similia leguntur in Evangelio et in Epistolis Pauli.
Proof 2° from the Fathers and the Council of Trent. St. Augustine, book de Corrept. et Gratia, c. 7, n. 11 : « From this damnation, he says, they will not deliver themselves who can say they have not heard the Gospel. » Where he speaks of explicit faith, since he speaks of the faith of the Gospel, and asserts a necessity absolute and inexcusable, even from invincible ignorance, which implies necessity of means.
Prob. 2° ex Patribus et concil. Trid. S. Augustinus, lib. de Corrept. et Gratia, c. 7, n. 11 : « Ab hac damnatione, inquit, non se liberabunt, qui poterunt dicere se non audivisse Evangelium. » Ubi loquitur de fide explicita, quia loquitur de fide Evangelii, et necessitatem adstruit absolutam atque inexcusabilem, etiam ex ignorantia invincibili, quod importat necessitatem medii.
St. Thomas, here art. 7, c, where at the beginning he speaks of what is necessary by necessity of means, concludes thus at the end : « After the time of revealed grace, both the great and the small are held to have explicit faith concerning the mysteries of Christ. » And still more expressly in III Sentent., dist. 25, q. 2, a. 2, quaestiunc. 2 : « After the coming of Christ, he says, all, both great and small, are held to believe explicitly ; and if anyone should lack instruction, God would reveal it to him, unless he remained behind through his own fault. » Therefore he plainly holds that explicit faith is necessary by necessity of means, and not merely of precept ; otherwise, if one lacked instruction, he would be excused from its precept : which the holy Doctor does not admit, but recurs to the extraordinary means of revelation, which then would be owed.
S. Thomas, hic a. 7, c, ubi initio loquitur de eo quod est necessarium necessitate medii, in fine sic concludit : « Post tempus gratiae revelatae, tam maiores quam minores tenentur habere fidem explicitam de mysteriis Christi. » Et adhuc expressius in III Sentent., dist. 25, q. 2, a. 2, quaestiunc. 2 : « Post adventum Christi, inquit, omnes tam maiores quam minores tenentur ad credendum explicite, et si aliquis instructionem non haberet, Deus ei revelaret, nisi ex culpa sua remaneret. » Ergo aperte sentit fidem explicitam esse necessariam necessitate medii, et non tantum praecepti ; alias, si instructione careat, excusaretur ab eius praecepto : quod non admittit S. Doctor, sed recurrit ad medium extraordinarium revelationis, quod tunc esset debitum.
Trent, sess. VI, cap. 6, treating of the disposition to justification and of the things that are to be believed for it, says : « They are disposed unto that justice itself when, roused by divine grace and aided, receiving faith by hearing, they are moved freely toward God, believing to be true what has been divinely revealed and promised ; and this above all, that the impious man is justified by God through his grace, through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus. » Further, if it is necessary « above all » to believe this concerning redemption through Christ, therefore nothing is more necessary. Therefore this explicit faith concerning the redemption of Christ is to be placed among the first things to be believed, and necessary before the others, consequently by necessity of means.
Trid., sess. VI, cap. 6, agens de dispositione ad iustificationem et de iis quae ad illam sunt credenda, dicit : « Disponuntur autem ad ipsam iustitiam, dum excitati divina gratia et adiuti, fidem ex auditu concipientes, libere moventur in Deum, credentes vera esse quae divinitus revelata et promissa sunt ; atque illud in primis, a Deo iustificari impium per gratiam eius, per redemptionem quae est in Christo Iesu. » Porro, si sit necessarium « in primis » hoc credere de redemptione per Christum, ergo nihil magis necessarium. Ergo haec fides explicita de Christi redemptione est inter prima credibilia reponenda, et prae caeteris necessaria, consequenter necessitate medii.
Proof 3° by reason. A more perfect faith of the Incarnation is required in the new law, in which this mystery has been accomplished and revealed, than in the old law, in which it was veiled. Now in the old law implicit faith of the Incarnation was necessary by necessity of means. Therefore in the new law explicit faith is necessary. — Proof of the minor, 1° from the Apostle, Gal., II, 16, who says : A man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ. 2° Just as the redemption of Christ is necessary, so also is faith in him ; for through faith redemption is applied, according to that, Rom., III, 22 : The justice of God, through the faith of Jesus Christ, unto all and upon all who believe in him. Now the redemption of Christ is and was necessary to all, at whatever time, by necessity of means unto salvation, as the Apostle teaches, Rom., V, 18 : As by the offense of one, unto all men to condemnation ; so by the justice of one, unto all men unto the justification of life. Therefore.
Prob. 3° ratione. Perfectior fides Incarnationis requiritur in nova lege, in qua istud mysterium est peractum et revelatum, quam in veteri lege, in qua erat velatum. Atqui in veteri lege fides implicita Incarnationis erat necessaria necessitate medii. Ergo in nova lege est necessaria fides explicita. — Prob. min. 1° ex Apostolo, Galat., II, 16, dicente : Non iustificatur homo ex operibus legis, nisi per fidem Iesu Christi. 2° Sicut necessaria est redemptio Christi, ita et fides illius ; per fidem enim applicatur redemptio, iuxta illud, Rom., III, 22 : Iustitia Dei per fidem Iesu Christi, in omnes et super omnes qui credunt in eum. Atqui redemptio Christi est et fuit omnibus, pro quovis tempore, necessaria necessitate medii ad salutem, ut docet Apostolus, Rom., V, 18 : Sicut per unius delictum in omnes homines in condemnationem, sic per unius iustitiam in omnes homines in iustificationem vitae. Ergo.
The second part follows from the first. Because explicit faith of the Incarnation, namely that the Son of God was incarnate and conceived by the Holy Spirit, cannot be had without explicit faith of the Trinity. Add that the Incarnation is only a secondary object of our faith, while the Trinity is the primary object. Therefore, if in the new law explicit faith of the secondary object is required, with stronger reason that of the primary object.
Secunda pars sequitur ex prima. Quia non potest haberi fides explicita Incarnationis, nempe quod Filius Dei sit incarnatus et conceptus de Spiritu sancto, absque fide explicita Trinitatis. Adde quod Incarnatio sit tantum obiectum secundarium fidei nostrae, Trinitas autem primarium. Ergo, si in nova lege requiratur fides explicita obiecti secundarii, a fortiori obiecti primarii.
Both parts are confirmed by the Symbol of St. Athanasius received by the Church, where, after the holy Doctor expounded the mysteries of the Trinity and the Incarnation, he concludes : « This is the Catholic faith, which unless each one believe faithfully and firmly, he cannot be saved. »
Utraque pars confirmatur ex Symbolo sancti Athanasii ab Ecclesia recepto, ubi cum S. Doctor explicuit mysteria Trinitatis et Incarnationis, concludit : « Haec est fides catholica, quam nisi quisque fideliter firmiterque crediderit, salvus esse non poterit. »
I said : « After the Gospel has been sufficiently promulgated ; » because, from the advent of Christ until the sufficient promulgation of the Gospel, the same thing must be judged as concerning the time preceding the Incarnation, namely, that implicit faith concerning Christ sufficed ; since what has not been sufficiently promulgated ought not to be considered a means necessary to salvation. For that repugns the goodness of God and his gentle providence, as Bernard argues, epist. 77. Yet those to whom the Gospel had been promulgated in particular were bound by precept to explicit faith. When, however, the Gospel was sufficiently promulgated for all, it is uncertain. It is probable that this happened around the fortieth year after the ascension of Christ, when the temple of Jerusalem and the republic of the Jews were overthrown by the Romans.
Dixi : « Post Evangelium sufficienter promulgatum ; » quia, ab adventu Christi usque ad sufficientem Evangelii promulgationem, idem censendum est ac de tempore praecedente Incarnationem, scilicet satis fuisse fidem implicitam de Christo ; quia non debet reputari medium ad salutem necessarium, quod non est sufficienter promulgatum. Id namque repugnat Dei bonitati et suavi eius providentiae, ut arguit Bernardus, epist. 77. Ii tamen quibus erat in particulari promulgatum Evangelium, tenebantur ex praecepto ad fidem explicitam. Quando autem sufficienter fuit pro omnibus promulgatum Evangelium, incertum est. Probabile est id contigisse quadragesimo circiter anno post Christi ascensionem, quando templum Hierosolymitanum et respublica Iudaeorum per Romanos fuerunt subversa.
[I say 3° : Explicit faith of each mystery is necessary by necessity of means, not only unto the second salvation, namely glorification, but also unto the first, namely justification.
[Dico 3° : Fides explicita utriusque mysterii est necessaria necessitate medii, non solum ad secundam salutem, scilicet glorificationem, sed etiam ad primam, scilicet iustificationem.
Proof. 1° from Holy Scripture. John., III, 14 and 15, cited in the proof of the first part of the second conclusion. Mark., XVI, 15 and 16 : Preach the Gospel to every creature. He who believes and is baptized shall be saved ; but he who does not believe shall be condemned. John., III, 36, Christ not only says that he who does not believe the Son shall not see life, but adds that the wrath of God abides upon him, that is, that he remains a sinner and unjust.
Prob. 1° ex S. Scriptura. Ioann., III, 14 et 15, cit. in prob. prima partis secundae conclusionis. Marc., XVI, 15 et 16 : Praedicate Evangelium omni creaturae. Qui crediderit et baptizatus fuerit, salvus erit ; qui vero non crediderit, condemnabitur. Ioann., III, 36, Christus non solum dicit quod qui incredulus est Filio, non videbit vitam, sed addit quod ira Dei manet super eum, id est quod remanet peccator et iniustus.
Proof 2° from the Tridentine passage cited there, where there is question, not only of glorification, but also and especially of justification. To this accords the response of the Congr. of the Holy Office, which, being asked : « Whether an adult who was in the article of death, and who promised that, after recovering his health, he would learn the truths of the faith, could be baptized, » replied on May 10, 1703 : « The promise does not suffice ; but the missionary is bound to explain to the adult, even though moribund, provided he is not altogether incapable, the mysteries of faith which are necessary by necessity of faith, such as above all the mysteries of the Trinity and the Incarnation. »
Prob. 2° ex loco Tridentini ibidem citato, ubi agitur, non solum de glorificatione, sed etiam et praecipue de iustificatione. Cui consonat responsum Congr. S. Officii, quae interrogata : « Utrum adultus qui in mortis articulo versaretur, quique promitteret fore ut, post recuperatam sanitatem, fidei veritates addisceret, baptizari posset, » rescripsit die 10 maii 1703 : « Non sufficere promissionem; sed missionarium teneri adulto, etiam moribundo, qui incapax omnino non sit, explicare mysteria fidei quae sunt necessaria necessitate fidei, ut sunt praecipue mysteria Trinitatis et Incarnationis. »
Proof 3° by reason. The just man is an adoptive son of God and heir of glory. Therefore, if implicit faith suffices for justification, it suffices also for glory ; which the adversaries do not admit.
Prob. 3° ratione. Iustus est filius Dei adoptivus et haeres gloriae. Ergo, si fides implicita sufficiat ad iustificationem, sufficit etiam ad gloriam ; quod non admittunt adversarii.
Several cases are objected in which implicit faith of the Incarnation and the Trinity seems to suffice for salvation. 1° A boy nourished in the woods, or among barbarous nations, if he follows the guidance of right reason in the flight of evil and the pursuit of good, will be saved, according to St. Thomas. 2° If a boy, when he has attained the age of reason, is not instructed concerning the aforementioned mysteries, provided he converts to God, he will be justified. 3° Some are so rude and stupid that they cannot apprehend these mysteries by concept. The same must be said of the deaf and mute from birth. Yet salvation cannot be said to be impossible to them : otherwise God would not provide sufficiently for them.
Obiiciuntur plures casus in quibus videtur sufficere ad salutem fides implicita Incarnationis et Trinitatis. 1° Puer enutritus in silvis, aut inter barbaras nationes, si sequatur ductum rectae rationis in fuga mali et prosecutione boni, secundum D. Thomam salvabitur. 2° Si puer, cum instans rationis attigerit, non instruatur de mysteriis praefatis, dummodo convertatur ad Deum, iustificabitur. 3° Sunt adeo rudes et stupidi, ut non valeant conceptu apprehendere haec mysteria. Idem dicendum de surdis et mutis a nativitate. Non tamen dici potest salutem illis esse impossibilem : alioquin Deus non satis illis provideret.
I answer. to the 1st, with St. Thomas, de Verit., q. 14, a. 11, ad 1 : « If one so nourished followed the guidance of natural reason in the desire of good and the flight of evil, it is most certainly to be held that God would reveal to him, either by internal inspiration, the things necessary to be believed, or would direct to him some preacher of the faith, as he sent Peter to Cornelius, Acts., x. »
Resp. ad 1um, cum D. Thoma, de Verit., q. 14, a. 11, ad 1 : « Si aliquis taliter nutritus, ductum naturalis rationis sequeretur in appetitu boni et fugam mali, certissime est tenendum quod et Deus vel per internam inspirationem revelaret ea quae sunt ad credendum necessaria, vel aliquem fidei praedicatorem ad eum dirigeret, sicut misit Petrum ad Cornelium, Act., x. »
I answer. to the 2nd. The age of reason is moral, having some duration, within which the boy can be instructed, whether by God, or by an angel, or by a man. These extraordinary instructions ought not to be called miraculous, because they follow naturally from the will of God to save men.
Resp. ad 2um. Instans rationis est morale, habens aliquam durationem, in qua sive a Deo, sive ab angelo, sive ab homine potest puer instrui. Quae extraordinariae instructiones non debent dici miraculosae, quia consequuntur naturaliter ad voluntatem Dei salvandi homines.
I answer. to the 3rd. Intelligence is not required for faith, but assent, nor is anyone so stupid that, helped by the aid of grace, he could not apprehend the mysteries of the Incarnation and the Trinity at least confusedly and as to their substance. But if you deny this, those are to be numbered among infants and the insane who, without actual faith, by habitual faith alone received in baptism, are saved.]
Resp. ad 3um. Non requiritur ad fidem intelligentia, sed assensus, nec ullus est adeo stupidus qui, auxilio gratiae adiutus, non possit mysteria Incarnationis et Trinitatis saltem in confuso et quoad substantiam apprehendere. Quod si neges, ii sunt adnumerandi inter infantes et amentes, qui sine fide actuali, per solam fidem habitualem in baptismo susceptam salvantur.]
From what has been said you will gather that those who are ignorant of the aforesaid mysteries of the Incarnation and the Trinity as to their substance, even if invincibly, are incapable of absolution, and that all confessions made in this ignorance are null and to be repeated, nor does it suffice ever to have believed them, if they are now in fact unknown.
Ex dictis colliges, eos qui praefata mysteria Incarnationis et Trinitatis quoad substantiam ignorant, etiamsi invincibiliter, esse absolutionis incapaces, et omnes confessiones in hac ignorantia factas, esse nullas et iterandas, neque sufficere ea aliquando credidisse, si de facto nunc ignorentur.
(To this tend the following propositions condemned by Innocent XI on March 2, 1679 : « Man is capable of absolution, however greatly he may labor under ignorance of the mysteries of faith, and even if, through negligence, even culpable negligence, he does not know the mystery of the most holy Trinity and the Incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ, » n. 64. — « It suffices to have believed those mysteries once, » n. 65.]
(Huc faciunt propositiones sequentes damnatae ab Innocentio XI, die 2 martii 1679 : « Absolutionis capax est homo, quantumvis laboret ignorantia mysteriorum fidei, et etiamsi per negligentiam etiam culpabilem nesciat mysterium sanctissimae Trinitatis et Incarnationis Domini nostri Iesu Christi, » n. 64. — « Sufficit illa mysteria semel credidisse, » n. 65.]