Part — Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology

Dissertation II. On the Sacrament of Penance

¶1.

(St. Thomas, part 3, questions 84-90; Supplement, questions 1-28; St. Alphonsus, Theologia moralis, book VI, nn. 425-705; Homo Apostolicus, treatise 16.)

287.

Before we speak of the sacrament of Penance, it is pleasing to premise certain things concerning the power of the Church to remit sins. And we do this both for the sake of completeness, and so that the connection of the whole theological doctrine on this matter may be clear; since the very use of the power to be explained constitutes the form of the sacrament, so that, once that power has been explained, we shall pass by a natural path to explaining the sacrament of Penance itself. Therefore let these points be set down:

I. Christ granted to the Apostles the power of remitting sins. This is of faith from these words of the Council of Trent: "If anyone says that those words of the Lord Savior, 'Receive the Holy Spirit; whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them; and whose sins you shall retain, they are retained,' are not to be understood of the power of forgiving and retaining sins in the sacrament of Penance, as the Catholic Church has always understood from the beginning, but twists them, contrary to the institution of this sacrament, to the authority of preaching the Gospel: let him be anathema."1

II. The power of remitting and retaining sins differs from the power of baptizing. For the former, as we shall immediately say, is judicial, and therefore does not regard any except subjects, that is, the baptized, or those upon whom the power of baptizing has already been exercised. It is added that the power of baptizing cannot be exercised again upon the same person; otherwise than the power of remitting sins.

III. The power of remitting sins is judicial. This is of faith from the Council of Trent: "If anyone says that the sacramental absolution of the priest is not a judicial act, but a bare ministry of pronouncing and declaring that sins have been forgiven to the one confessing... let him be anathema."2 And indeed three things are required for judicial power: 1. that the power be instituted by the supreme prince of the society; 2. that through it the application of law to a particular case be made; 3. that the application be made according to the merit of the cause. And all these things concur in the power of remitting and retaining sins. For: 1. the said power was instituted by Christ, the Prince of the Church (n. I); 2. through it the application of the divine law to a particular case is made, by which God has established that through his ministers he at one time remits, at another time retains, the sins of the baptized; 3. this application is made according to the merit of the cause, namely in such a way that the ministers remit or retain sins not according to their own whim, but according to the conditions required by Christ.

IV. The power of remitting sins extends itself to all sins of the baptized. This is clear from the breadth of Christ's words which were cited above. I said, however, of the baptized, because this power, as judicial, can be exercised upon subjects alone, that is, the baptized. For the rest, it is clear from elsewhere that sins committed before Baptism are remitted through Baptism (n. 61).

V. The power of remitting and retaining sins is perpetual in the Church. This is clear: 1. from the immutability with which Christ willed his Church to be furnished; 2. from the fact that until the end of the world there will exist sinners to be reconciled in the Church.

VI. The Church is bound to use the power explained, so that it is not lawful arbitrarily to repel anyone rightly disposed from the benefit of pardon to be obtained through the power of the keys. Theologians dispute concerning the right, for the public good, of repelling certain sinners in determinate cases; just as there also exists a controversy among dogmatic-historical writers concerning the existence of a universal discipline of excluding certain kinds of sin from pardon to be obtained through the ministry of the keys.3

With these points premised, we shall speak first of the sacrament of Penance considered in itself, then of the ministration, and then of the reception of the sacrament of Penance.

1 Session 14, canon 3.

2 Session 14, canon 9.

3 Ned. Kath. Stemmen, 1909, p. 304 sq.

Within this part