Section — Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology
§ I. On the Power of the Supreme Pontiff
I. The Supreme Pontiff can dispense in all impediments of ecclesiastical law; indeed, since he himself is the legislator, he can validly dispense in them even without a cause. He cannot dispense in impediments of absolute divine law, whether natural or positive, for example in the impediment of impotence. Nevertheless, by vicarious power he can remove certain impediments of conditioned divine law, i.e., those arising from a human will, for example in vows, betrothals, and ratified marriage (St. Alphonsus VI, nn. 1118-1120).
II. In fact the Supreme Pontiff dispenses: 1° never in impediments concerning which it is doubted whether they are of divine law, namely lest he probably strike against a higher law. But the aforesaid impediments are: consanguinity in the direct line beyond the first degree (p. 645), and consanguinity in the first degree of the collateral line (p. 645). Moreover, the Church never dispenses in the impediment of the episcopate; scarcely ever in the impediments of the presbyterate, raptus, and public spouse-murder. In the others she dispenses more or less with difficulty according to the nature of the impediment, as will be explained later.
III. The Supreme Pontiff dispenses through different organs for different impediments, namely:
The Congregation of the Holy Office dispenses in the impediments of disparity of cult and mixed religion (canons 247, § 3; 249, § 1), and likewise in those things which perhaps concur with the aforesaid impediments.2 Moreover, it alone takes cognizance of those matters which, whether directly or indirectly, in law or in fact, turn upon the Pauline privilege (canon 247, § 3).
The Congregation of the Discipline of the Sacraments dispenses, for the external forum, in public impediments which are not occult in fact; likewise in public impediments which are occult in fact but exposed to danger of manifestation; likewise, according to the circumstances, in public impediments which are occult in fact and not exposed to danger of manifestation.
The Sacred Penitentiary dispenses for the internal forum in occult impediments; likewise, according to the circumstances, in public impediments which are occult in fact and not exposed to danger of manifestation;3 likewise it convalidates a dispensation granted by the Sacred Congregation of the Discipline of the Sacraments, but invalidly, because of a concealed circumstance which had necessarily to be manifested and which still remains occult. In addition, the Sacred Penitentiary is also the competent tribunal for the faithful of the oriental rites.4 Finally, recourse can also be had to the Sacred Penitentiary in the case in which the dispensation exceeds the ordinary faculties of the Major Penitentiary; for he can obtain extraordinary power from the Holy See.5
The Sacred Congregation of Propaganda Fide procures dispensations for each forum for places subject to it (cf. canon 252), although even in these places recourse can be had to the Sacred Penitentiary for the internal forum.
The Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Church "enjoys all the faculties which the other Congregations possess for Churches of the Latin rite, while nevertheless the right of the Congregation of the Holy Office remains intact according to the norm of canon 247" (canon 257, § 4).
In the case in which a twofold impediment, one public and one occult, stands in the way of marriage, or an occult circumstance which must necessarily be manifested, a twofold supplication is to be drawn up: one for the public impediment to the Congregation of the Discipline of the Sacraments, the other to the Sacred Penitentiary, as will be explained later.
1 Although an Ecumenical Council also enjoys the power of dispensing, no discussion is undertaken concerning it, because in fact it is not exercised by a Council.
2 Sacred Congregation of the Consistory, January 21, 1910 (A.A.S. 1910, p. 56).
3 Cf. Archiv fur katholisches Kirchenrecht, 1922, p. 1 sq.
4 Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Church, June 26, 1930 (A.A.S. 1930, p. 394).
5 Aertnys-Damen, II, n. 787.