Part — Wouters, Manual of Moral Theology

Treatise III. On Those Things which Dispose Toward Human Acts, or on Habits

333.

I. The name habit is said to be derived from the verb to have, insofar as by this verb is indicated the manner in which something has itself in itself, either well or badly. A habit can be defined: A quality stable of itself, by which a subject is disposed well or badly, either according to itself or in order to operation. It is said:

  1. A quality stable of itself, i.e., a quality by its nature difficult to move, since its subject is of the immaterial order; and thus it is distinguished from a disposition, "to which it belongs according to its proper nature that it be easily lost, because it has a changeable cause, as sickness and health do" (St. Thomas, I-II, q. 49, a. 2, ad 3).

  2. By which a subject is disposed well or badly, i.e., according as the subject has a certain mode either fitting or unfitting to its nature.

  3. Either according to itself or in order to operation, i.e., either according to its essence, and it is called an entitative habit; or according to its powers, and it is called an operative habit (St. Thomas, I-II, q. 49).

II. In what follows we shall discuss only operative habits. But since the things to be said about the habits of virtues are easily applied to habit as such, it is pleasing to abstain here from further investigation of habit, but to insert it into those things which we shall present concerning virtues in general. And thus it will happen that we avoid saying the same things twice, and that we bring greater light to the virtues themselves.

Moreover, there will not be a special discussion of bad habits, partly because enough has been said about them above, and partly again because many things to be said about the habits of virtues are easily applied to bad habits.

III. Good operative habits are virtues and the gifts of the Holy Spirit.

Hence:

Within this part