Question — Decretum of Gratian

Question V

English · Latin · Both

¶.

GRATIAN. Part I. What is asked in the fifth place—whether it is lawful for him to be in the church or to exercise the order which he obtained by his father's money—is determined by the authority of Urban, who, writing concerning simoniacs, says among other things, [in the Council of Piacenza, c. 5 and those following, and likewise in the Roman Council]:

Friedberg, col. 423/424

1.

C. I. Concerning little children who buy churches through their parents' covetousness.

Whoever, through their parents' covetousness, obtained churches or parts of churches through money while they were still little children, after they have wholly relinquished them, if they wish to live canonically in them, we concede out of mercy that they may remain there; nor do we remove them from sacred orders because of this deed, if they are otherwise found worthy. § 1. But those who, when they were of adult age, bought them by themselves, led by abominable covetousness, if they wish to live canonically in other churches, we permit out of great mercy that they minister there, their proper orders being preserved. But if perhaps they cannot be transferred to others and promise to live canonically in them, let them be content with minor orders and not approach sacred orders, the authority of the Apostolic See nevertheless being preserved in all things. § 2. Yet if any were catholicly ordained before the purchase, when they have relinquished the things they bought and have conducted a canonical life, let them be permitted in their own grades, unless perhaps the church is of such a kind that they ought to obtain the first place there. For we do not permit them to have the first, sole, or provost's place in churches they bought. Part II. GRATIAN. That he said this not to the prejudice of the canons but from a dispensation of mercy is gathered from an epistle of the same man sent to the priest Vitalis in these words:

Friedberg, col. 423/424

2.

C. II. Mercy can be shown to simoniacs by preserving their dignity if their life commends them.

Those who bought a church, if the person was of such a kind that his life commends him—namely, that he lives under a rule in a monastery or among canons—we concede, mercifully condescending, that he may minister in the office of his honor, yet without prejudice to the sacred canons. Part III. GRATIAN. From this authority, therefore, it is gathered that ignorance excuses such persons from guilt for the crime, as was said above, but not from the fruit of the purchase, since it is conceded that they may remain in the churches which they obtained by their parents' money only after they have wholly relinquished them and only out of mercy. From this it is apparent that, although the sin of simony was committed without their knowledge, they nevertheless cannot carry off the fruit of their father's purchase. But that they are excused from the crime is apparent from this: they are not removed from sacred orders because of this deed. For if they were participants in that crime, they could not ascend to sacred orders. The same must be understood concerning one who obtained the dignity of the priesthood through money given not to the bishop but to one of his chief men, while both the ordainer and the ordained were ignorant of this. Urban II writes to Albert, Bishop of Metz:

Friedberg, col. 423/424

3.

C. III. Concerning a certain man for whom the negligence of his parents gave money not to the bishop but to one of his chief men.

You indicated that the bearer of the present letter, through money given by the negligence of his parents not to the bishop but to one of his chief men, obtained the dignity of the priesthood against his will. Although the holy canons testify that he is to be deposed, nevertheless, because he committed this fault unknowingly and under compulsion, and because he voluntarily entreated that he be deposed from that order, applying the bowels of mercy from consideration of discretion—which is the mother of all virtues—rather than from the rigor of the canons, we counsel your fraternity that he may remain in that order; yet in such a way that, if the church which he served does not suffer a scarcity of priests, he shall remain suspended from the priestly office. But if perhaps the utility of the church requires that he assume the care of governance, let it be lawful for him, by concession of his bishop and obedience to the brethren, to exercise the priestly office.

Friedberg, col. 423/424