distinction — Decretum of Gratian
Distinction LXI
GRATIAN. Part I. Likewise, laymen are not to be elected bishop, but are first to be tested through the individual orders. Hence Gregory to Brunhild, Queen of the Franks [Book VII of the Register, epistle 113]:
GRATIANUS. I. Pars. Item laici non sunt in episcopum eligendi, sed per singulos ordines prius sunt probandi. Unde Gregorius Brunichildae Reginae Francorum: [lib. VII. Reg. epist. 113.]
Friedberg, col. 227/228
C. I. Priests are not to be ordained from laymen.
Priestly office in your regions has, as we have learned, been brought into such canvassing that, what is exceedingly grave, priests are suddenly ordained from laymen.
C. I. Sacerdotes ex laicis non sunt ordinandi.
Sacerdotale offitium uestris in partibus in tanta (sicut didicimus) est ambitione perductum, ut sacerdotes, quod nimis graue est subito, ex laicis ordinentur.
Friedberg, col. 227/228
C. II. Concerning the same.
Likewise Pope Hormisdas to all the Bishops [established throughout Spain, epistle III, c. 1]. Care ought to be perspicacious in choosing or ordaining priests. For it is fitting that those who must preside over persons to be corrected be blameless. §1. One to whom the governance of the Church is entrusted ought to show his life by long testing.
C. II. De eodem.
Item Hormisda Papa omnibus Episcopis. [per Hispaniam constitutis, epist. III. c. 1.] In sacerdotibus eligendis uel ordinandis curam oportet esse perspicuam. Inreprehensibiles enim esse conuenit, quos preesse necesse est corrigendis. §. 1. Longa debet uitam suam probatione monstrare, cui gubernacula committuntur ecclesiae.
Friedberg, col. 227/228
[C. III. The same continuously in the same place.]
We do not deny that there are morals pleasing to God among laymen, but the institutes of the faithful seek for themselves tested soldiers. One ought to learn before teaching and to furnish to others from oneself, rather than receive, an example of religious conduct. It is fitting that one who must pray for the people be more corrected than the people. Let religious worship be handed on after long observance, so that he may shine; and let one who is to be instructed serve in clerical services, so that, when brought to the summit of the venerable grade, he may show what is the fruit of humility. §1. Nor do we prohibit only the consecration of laymen; rather, let no profane violator from among penitents even aspire to a grade of this kind. Let it be enough for him when he petitions that pardon is granted. With what conscience can one absolve a guilty person who knows that he confessed his own sins with the people as witness? For who who sees one lying prostrate a little before would venerate him as bishop? Bearing the stain of a memorable crime, he does not possess the shining dignity of the priesthood.
[C. III. Idem eodem loco continenter.]
Non negamus in laicis esse Deo placitos mores, sed milites suos probatos sibi querunt instituta fidelium. Discere quis debet antequam doceat, et exemplum religiosae conuersationis de se potius aliis prestare quam sumere. Emendatiorem esse conuenit populo, quem necesse est orare pro populo. Longa obseruatione religiosus cultus tradatur, ut luceat, et clericalibus obsequiis erudiendus inseruiat, ut, ad uenerandi gradus summa perductus, quis sit fructus humilitatis ostendat. §. 1. Nec tantum consecrare de laicis inhibemus, sed ne de penitentibus quidem quisquam ad huiusmodi gradum profanus temerator aspiret. Satis illi sit postulanti ueniam concedi; qua conscientia absoluat reum, qui se peccata sua populo scit teste confessum? Quis enim quem paulo ante iacentem uideat ueneretur antistitem? Perferens memorandi criminis labem non habet lucidam sacerdotii dignitatem.
Friedberg, col. 227/228
C. IV. Concerning the same.
Likewise Pope Innocent [to Aurelius, Bishop of Carthage, epistle XII]. It is wretched for one who was never a disciple to be made a master, and for one who had never served a priest in any grade to be made high priest.
C. IV. De eodem.
Item Innocentius Papa. [ad Aurelium Cartaginensem Episcopum, epist. XII.] Miserum est, eum fieri magistrum, qui numquam fuit discipulus; eumque summum sacerdotem fieri, qui in nullo gradu umquam obsecutus fuerat sacerdoti.
Friedberg, col. 227/228
C. V. Concerning the same.
Likewise Bishop Leo [to the African Bishops, epistle LXXXV, otherwise LXXXVII, c. 1]. We marvel that, among you, either the presumption of those canvassing or popular tumult has prevailed so greatly by occasion of the disturbed time that the pastoral summit and governance of the Church were entrusted to all manner of unworthy persons established far outside priestly merit. This is not to take counsel for the people, but to harm them; not to furnish governance, but to increase peril. For the integrity of those presiding is the salvation of their subjects, and where obedience is unharmed, there the form of doctrine is sound. §1. But primacy, etc. And below. §2. But if in any grades of the Church care is to be taken providently and knowingly that in the house of the Lord nothing be disordered and nothing inverted, how much more must one labor that there be no error in the election of the one who is established above all grades? For the state and order of the Lord’s whole household will totter if what is required in the body is not found in the head. Where is that precept of the blessed Apostle Paul sent forth through the Spirit of God, by which in the person of Timothy the whole number of Christ’s priests is instructed and from there it is said to each one of us: “Impose hands hastily upon no one, nor communicate in the sins of others”? What is it to impose hands hastily? etc. And below. §3. For just as one who maintains right judgment in choosing a priest acquires for himself the fruit of a good work, so one who elevates an unworthy man into the college of his own dignity afflicts himself with grave loss. For what is contained in general institutes is not to be passed over in the person of anyone, nor is that honor to be thought lawful which was conferred contrary to the precepts of divine law. §4. Deservedly the venerable sanctions of the blessed Fathers, when they spoke of the election of priests, judged only those fit for sacred administrations whose whole age, from the beginnings of boyhood to more perfect years, had run through the periods of ecclesiastical discipline, so that prior life might furnish testimony for each one, and there can be no doubt concerning the advancement of one to whom the reward of a higher place is owed for many labors, chaste morals, and vigorous acts. §5. For if it is unworthy to attain the honors of the world without the support of time and without the merit of labor, and those whom proofs of probity do not aid are accustomed to be marked for canvassing, how diligent and how prudent must the dispensation of divine gifts and heavenly dignities be?
C. V. De eodem.
Item Leo Episcopus. [ad Episcopos Africanos, epist. LXXXV. al. LXXXVII. c. 1.] Miramur tantum apud uos per occasionem temporis impacati aut ambientium presumptionem aut tumultum ualuisse popularem, ut indignis quibusque et longe extra sacerdotale meritum constitutis pastorale fastigium et gubernatio ecclesiae crederetur. Non est hoc consulere populo, sed nocere, nec prestare regimen sed augere discrimen. Integritas enim presidentium salus est subditorum, et ubi est incolumitas obedientiae, ibi sana est forma doctrinae. §. 1. Principatus autem, etc. et infra. §. 2. Quod si in quibuslibet ecclesiae gradibus prouidenter scienterque curandum est, ut in domo Domini nichil sit inordinatum nichilque preposterum, quanto magis elaborandum est, ut in electione eius, qui supra omnes gradus constituitur, non erretur? Nam totius familiae Domini status et ordo nutabit, si quod requiritur in corpore non inuenitur in capite. Ubi est illa B. Pauli apostoli per Spiritum Dei emissa preceptio? qua in persona Timothei omnium sacerdotum Christi numerus eruditur, et inde unicuique nostrum dicitur: "Manus cito nemini inposueris, neque communices peccatis alienis." Quid est cito manus inponere? etc. et infra. §. 3. Sicut enim boni operis sibi conparat fructum, qui rectum tenet in eligendo sacerdote iudicium, ita graui semetipsum afficit dampno, qui ad suae dignitatis collegium sublimat indignum. Non enim in cuiusquam persona pretermittendum est quod institutis generalibus continetur, nec putandus est honor ille legitimus, qui fuerit contra diuinae legis precepta collatus. §. 4. Merito Patrum beatorum uenerabiles sanctiones, cum de sacerdotum electione loquerentur, eos demum sacris amministrationibus idoneos censuerunt, quorum omnis etas a puerilibus exordiis usque ad perfectiores annos per disciplinae ecclesiasticae stipendia cucurrisset, ut unicuique testimonium prior uita preberet, nec potest de eius prouectione dubitari, cui pro laboribus multis, pro moribus castis, pro actibus strenuis celsioris loci premium debetur. §. 5. Si enim ad honores mundi sine suffragio temporis, sine merito laboris indignum est peruenire, et notari ambitus solent, quos probitatis documenta non adiuuant, quam diligens et quam prudens habenda est dispensatio diuinorum munerum et celestium dignitatum?
Friedberg, col. 227/228
C. VI. None are to be chosen for the episcopate except those commended by an approved life.
Likewise from the Council of Laodicea [c. 12]. A bishop ought not to be established in the primacy of a church apart from the judgment of the metropolitans and neighboring bishops. Nor shall any be elected except those whom a life long known and approved commends, and likewise if they have been proved in the word of faith and in right reason through their conduct.
C. VI. Non sunt eligendi ad episcopatum, nisi quos probabilis uita commendat.
Item ex Concilio Laudicensi. [c. 12.] Episcopum non oportet preter iudicium metropolitanorum et finitimorum episcoporum constitui ad ecclesiae principatum. Nec eligantur nisi hi, quos multo ante nota probabilisque uita commendat, et nichilominus si in sermone fidei et recta ratione per suam conuersationem probati fuerint.
Friedberg, col. 229/230
C. VII. Concerning the same.
Likewise Celestine to all the orthodox [to the Bishops of Apulia and Calabria, epistle III, c. 2]. What will it profit clerics to have served through the individual periods of service and spent their whole life in the Lord’s camp, if those who are to be priests are sought from the laity—persons who, serving the world and knowing nothing of the whole ecclesiastical order, strive with immoderate cupidity to leap across into another’s honor by an excessively hasty leap and, with reverence for ecclesiastical discipline trampled, to pass into another kind of life? Therefore, dearest brothers, it is necessary that we oppose such persons, and by these decrees we admonish your fraternity that no one admit a layman to clerical order and permit that to be done by which he both deceives the layman and generates for himself causes by which he is made guilty under the established decretals.
C. VII. De eodem.
Item Celestinus omnibus orthodoxis. [ad Episcopos Apuliae et Calabriae, epist. III. cap. 2.] Quid proderit per singula stipendia clericos militasse et omnem egisse in dominicis castris etatem, si hii, qui futuri sunt sacerdotes, ex laicis requirantur, qui uacantes seculo et omnem ecclesiasticum ordinem nescientes saltu prepropero in alienum honorem ambiunt inmoderata cupiditate transscendere, et in aliud uitae genus (calcata reuerentia ecclesiasticae disciplinae) transire? Talibus itaque, fratres karissimi, necesse est obuiemus, hisque fraternitatem uestram decretis commonemus, ne quis laicum ad clericatus ordinem admittat, et sinat fieri unde et illum decipiat, et sibi causas generet, quibus reus constitutorum decretalium fiat.
Friedberg, col. 229/230
C. VIII. The governance of the Church is not to be entrusted to the untaught and inexperienced.
Likewise Leo [I, epistle LXXXV, otherwise LXXXVII, c. 1, to the African Bishops]. We establish that apostolic and canonical decrees be violated in no respect, and that the Church of the Lord not be entrusted for governance to those who, ignorant of lawful institutes and knowing nothing of all humility, do not wish to take their increase from the lowest things but to have their beginning from the highest, since it is exceedingly unjust and absurd that the inexperienced be preferred to masters, the new to the ancient, and the untaught to the meritorious. GRATIAN. By all these authorities laymen are prohibited from being elected to the episcopate. Part II. §1. To the contrary, blessed Nicholas was elected bishop from the laity; blessed Severus was assumed from wool-working to the archiepiscopate; blessed Ambrose, when he was not yet baptized, was elected archbishop. §2. But it must be known that ecclesiastical prohibitions have their own causes, and when these cease, the prohibitions themselves also cease. For the cause why a layman should not be elected bishop was this: lay life, not instructed in ecclesiastical disciplines in order, does not know how to furnish others examples of religion that it has not learned in itself by experience. Therefore, when any layman by the merit of his perfection surpasses clerical life, his election can be held valid by the example of blessed Nicholas, Severus, and Ambrose.
C. VIII. Rudibus et inperitis gubernacula ecclesiae non sunt committenda.
Item Leo. [I., epist. LXXXV. al. LXXXVII. c, 1. ad Episcopos Africanos.] Statuimus ne in aliquo apostolica et canonica decreta uiolentur, et his regenda ecclesia Domini credatur, qui legitimarum institucionum nescii, et totius humilitatis ignari, non ab infimis sumere incrementum, sed a summis uolunt habere principium, cum ualde iniquum sit absurdumque, ut inperiti magistris noui antiquis rudes preferantur emeritis. Gratian. His omnibus auctoritatibus laici prohibentur in episcopatum eligi. II. Pars. §. 1. Econtra B. Nicolaus ex laico est electus in episcopum, B. Seuerus ex lanificio assumptus est in archiepiscopum, B. Ambrosius, cum nondum esset baptizatus, in archiepiscopum est electus. §. 2. Sed sciendum est, quod ecclesiasticae prohibitiones proprias habent causas, quibus cessantibus cessant et ipsae. Ut enim laicus in episcopum non eligeretur, hec causa fuit, quia uita laicalis ecclesiasticis disciplinis per ordinem non erudita nescit exempla religionis de se prestare aliis, que in se ipsa experimento non didicit. Cum ergo quilibet laicus merito suae perfectionis clericalem uitam transscendit, exemplo B. Nicolai et Seueri et Ambrosii eius electio potest rata haberi.
Friedberg, col. 229/230
[C. IX.] Hence the same Ambrose in the epistle [LXXXII]
to the people of Vercelli [says concerning himself]: “A neophyte is prohibited from being ordained, lest he be lifted up by pride. But if the humility fitting for the priesthood is not lacking, where the cause does not adhere, the vice is not imputed. Therefore, the western bishops approved my ordination by judgment, and the eastern bishops also by example.”
[C. IX.] Unde idem Ambrosius in epistola [LXXXII.]
ad Vercellenses. [ait de se ipso] "Neophitus prohibetur ordinari, ne extollatur superbia Sed si non deest humilitas competens sacerdotio, ubi causa non adheret, uicium non inputatur. Ordinationem itaque meam occidentales episcopi iudicio, orientales etiam exemplo probarunt."
Friedberg, col. 229/230
C. X. A scholasticus from the forum or a man from an administration can be requested as bishop.
Likewise that statement of the Council of Sardica is objected [c. 13]. Bishop Hosius said: And I judge this also necessary, that it be treated most diligently: if perhaps either a rich man or a scholasticus from the forum or a man from an administration has been requested as bishop, let him not be ordained before he has first discharged the function of reader and the office of deacon or priest, and thus let him ascend through the individual grades, if he is worthy, to the summit of the episcopate. Part III. GRATIAN. But it is one thing to be requested, another to be elected. One bound by the obligations of the curia is requested from the emperor; a cleric of another city, from his own bishop. But no one is elected unless established in sacred orders. For an election is made with the solemnity of a decree strengthened by the subscriptions of all; but a request is made by a simple petition. Blessed Gregory indicates this distinction in the Register [Book II, epistle 19], writing to a certain Bishop:
C. X. Scolasticus ex foro aut ex administratione potest postulari episcopus.
Item obicitur illud Sardicensis Concilii: [c. 13.] Osius episcopus dixit: Et hoc necessarium arbitror, ut diligentissime tractetur, si forte aut diues, aut scolasticus de foro aut ex administratore episcopus fuerit postulatus, ut non prius ordinetur, nisi ante lectoris munere, et offitio diaconi aut presbiteri fuerit perfunctus, et ita per singulos gradus (si dignus fuerit) ascendat ad culmen episcopatus. III. Pars. Gratian. Sed aliud est postulari, aliud eligi. Postulatur nexibus curiae adstrictus ab inperatore, clericus alterius ciuitatis a suo episcopo; sed non eligitur aliquis nisi in sacris ordinibus constitutus. Fit enim electio cum solempnitate decreti omnium subscriptionibus roborati: postulatio uero simplici peticione. Quam distinctionem B. Gregorius innuit in registro [lib. II. epist. 19.] scribens cuidam Episcopo:
Friedberg, col. 229/230
C. XI. The election of a bishop ought to be made with the solemnity of a decree strengthened by the subscriptions of all.
When the bishop has been requested, let him come to us to be consecrated with the solemnity of a decree strengthened by the subscriptions of all and with the testimony of your Charity’s letters. GRATIAN. Thus blessed Ambrose, before receiving baptism, was requested by the emperor, not elected. Part IV. GRATIAN. Likewise, clerics of one church are not to be preferred in an election to those who serve well in their own church. Hence Pope Celestine [to the Bishops of Gaul, epistle II, c. 4]:
C. XI. Electio episcopi debet fieri cum solempnitate decreti omnium subscriptionibus roborati.
Episcopus, dum fuerit postulatus, cum solempnitate decreti omnium subscriptionibus roborati, et dilectionis tuae testimonio litterarum ad nos sacrandus occurrat. Gratian. Sic B. Ambrosius ante susceptum baptisma ab inperatore postulatus, non electus est. IV. Pars. Gratian. Item clerici unius ecclesiae non sunt preferendi in electione his, qui bene militant in propria ecclesia. Unde Celestinus Papa: [ad Episcopos Galliae, epist. II. c. 4.]
Friedberg, col. 231/232
C. XII. Foreigners shall not be preferred to those who have merited well in their own churches.
Nor shall outsiders, strangers, and those previously unknown be preferred to those who have merited well in their own churches, to the exclusion of those who worthily receive the testimony of their own citizens.
C. XII. Extranei emeritis in suis ecclesiis non preponantur.
Nec emeritis in suis ecclesiis peregrini et extranei, et qui ante ignorati sunt, ad exclusionem eorum, qui bene ciuium suorum merentur testimonium, preponantur.
Friedberg, col. 231/232
C. XIII. Concerning the same.
Likewise [the same epistle, c. 5]. Let no bishop be given to the unwilling. Only then let another be elected from another church, if from the clergy of that city for which a bishop is to be ordained no worthy person—which we do not believe will happen—can be found. For those men must first be rejected, so that some from other churches may deservedly be preferred. Let each person have the fruit of his service in the church in which he has spent his life through all the offices. Let another by no means creep into another’s periods of service, nor let one dare to claim for himself the reward owed to another. Let clerics have the faculty of resisting if they see themselves overburdened, and let them not fear to reject one whom they see thrust upon them from the side. For although they do not have a reward as their due, they ought to have free judgment concerning the one who is to rule them.
[PALEA.
C. XIII. De eodem.
Item. [eadem epist. c. 5.] Nullus inuitis detur episcopus. Tunc alter de altera ecclesia eligatur, si de ciuitatis ipsius clero, cuius est episcopus ordinandus, nullus (quod euenire non credimus) dignus poterit reperiri. Primum enim illi reprobandi sunt, ut aliqui de alienis ecclesiis merito preferantur. Habeat unusquisque suae fructum miliciae in ecclesia, in qua suam per omnia offitia transegit etatem. In aliena stipendia minime alter obrepat, nec alii debitam alter audeat sibi uendicare mercedem. Sit facultas clericis renitendi, si se uiderint pregrauari, et quem sibi ingeri ex transuerso uiderint non timeant refutare. Qui etsi non debitum premium, uel liberum de eo, qui eos recturus est, debent habere iudicium.
[PALEA.
Friedberg, col. 231/232
C. XIV.
In the ordination of a provost, this principle shall always be considered: that the one be established whom the whole congregation in concord, according to the fear of God, or even a part of the congregation, although small, has chosen by sounder counsel. The one to be ordained shall be chosen by merit of life and wisdom, even if he was last in the order of the congregation. But if even the whole congregation—God forbid—by common counsel chooses a person consenting to its vices, and the vices themselves in any way become known to the bishop to whose diocese that place belongs, or to other neighboring provosts or Christians, let them prohibit the consent of the depraved from prevailing and establish a worthy steward for the house of God. ]
C. XIV.
In ordinatione prepositi illa semper consideretur ratio, ut hic constituatur, quem sibi omnis concors congregatio secundum timorem Dei siue etiam pars congregationis (quamuis parua) saniori consilio elegerit. Vitae autem merito et sapientia eligatur qui ordinandus est, etiamsi ultimus fuerit in ordine congregationis. Quod si etiam omnis congregatio uiciis suis (quod absit) consentientem personam pari consilio elegerit, et uicia ipsa aliquatenus in notitiam episcopi, ad cuius diocesin pertinet locus ipse, uel ad alios uicinos prepositos uel Christianos claruerint, prohibeant prauorum preualere consensum, et domui Dei constituant dignum dispensatorem. ]
Friedberg, col. 231/232
C. XV. Concerning the same.
Likewise Gregory to the citizens of Naples [Book VIII of the Register, epistle 40]. Let it belong to your zeal to provide also another who is suitable, so that, if perhaps Peter, whom you assert was elected by you, does not appear fit for this order, there may be one to whom your election can turn. For it will be a grave reproach to that clergy if, should this man perhaps not be approved, they say that they have no other who ought to be elected.
C. XV. De eodem.
Item Gregorius ciuibus Neapolim. [I. VIII. Reg. epist. 40.] Studii uestri sit, etiam alium, qui aptus sit, prouidere ut, si forte Petrus, quem a uobis electum asseritis, huic ordini non uideatur ydoneus, sit, in quo uestra declinari possit electio. Nam graue cleri illius erit obprobrium, ut, si hic fortasse probatus non fuerit, alium se dicant qui eligi debeat non habere.
Friedberg, col. 231/232
C. XVI. Concerning the same.
Likewise Gregory in the Register [Book XI, epistle 16]. A report directed to us disclosed the death of Victor, bishop of the city of Palermo. Therefore we solemnly delegate the work of visitation of the destitute church to your fraternity. And so let your fraternity hasten to go to the aforesaid church and take care by continual exhortations to admonish the clergy and people of that same church that, with partisanship removed, by one and the same consent they should seek to have set over them as priest one who can be found worthy of so great a ministry and is by no means rejected by the venerable canons. §1. We also admonish your fraternity not to permit anyone from another church to be elected unless perhaps among the clerics of that city in which you exercise the office of visitation no one worthy of the episcopate—which we do not believe will happen—can be found. Before all things, you will provide that laypersons of whatever merit of conduct do not presume to aspire, lest they both fail to obtain the effect of their own will and you—God forbid—incur peril to your order. But whatever monasteries are established in that parish, we grant shall be under your care and ordering until its own bishop has been ordained there.
C. XVI. De eodem.
Item Gregorius in Registro. [I. XI. epist. 16.] Obitum Victoris Panormitanae ciuitatis antistitis directa relatio patefecit. Quapropter uisitacionis destitutae ecclesiae fraternitati tuae operam solempniter delegamus. Et ideo fraternitas tua ad predictam ecclesiam ire properet et assiduis adhortationibus clerum plebemque eiusdem ecclesiae ammonere festinet, ut, remoto studio, uno eodemque consensu talem preficiendum sibi expetant sacerdotem, qui tanto ministerio ualeat dignus reperiri, et a uenerandis canonibus nullatenus respuatur. §. 1. Commonemus etiam fraternitatem tuam, ut nullum de altera eligi permittas ecclesia, nisi forte inter clericos ipsius ciuitatis, in qua uisitacionis inpendis offitium, nullus ad episcopatum dignus (quod euenire non credimus) poterit inueniri, prouisurus ante omnia, ne ad cuiuslibet conuersationis meritum laicae personae aspirare presumant, ne et illi suae uoluntatis effectum non inueniant et tu in periculum ordinis tui (quod absit) incurras. Monasteria autem, si qua sunt in ipsius constituta parrochia, sub tua cura dispositioneque, quousque illic proprius fuerit ordinatus episcopus, esse concedimus.
Friedberg, col. 231/232
C. XVII. Concerning the same.
Likewise Pope Pelagius [II] to Eucarpus, Bishop of Messina. We enjoin upon you the visitation of the church of Catania, whose bishop we learned from a report received from the clergy to have passed from this light. For it is impossible for us to entrust the causes that pertain to the Lord to anyone else in that province, at least in the regions of Syracuse, unless perhaps through you God should now will to choose in the church of Catania such a one concerning whose conscience we can be secure, so that we may remove these labors a little from you. Therefore, let your Charity proceed immediately to the aforesaid church of Catania and, with God’s aid, compel and persuade them to elect a man from the clergy who has neither wife nor children nor any crime hostile to the canons; and immediately transmit him to the city of Rome with the decree and the testimony of your report.
C. XVII. De eodem.
Item Pelagius Papa [II.] Eucarpo Messanensi Episcopo. Cathenensis ecclesiae uisitacionem tibi iniungimus, cuius episcopum de hac luce transiisse suscepta cleri relatione didicimus. Inpossibile enim est, ut nos in prouincia illa dumtaxat in Siracusanis partibus alii cuilibet causas, que ad Dominum pertinent, committamus, nisi forte talem per te Deus nunc in Cathenensi ecclesia eligere uoluerit, de cuius conscientia possimus esse securi, ut a te labores istos paululum remouere possimus. Mox ergo dilectio tua ad supradictam Cathenensem ecclesiam pergat, et hominem de clero, qui nec uxorem habeat, nec filios, nec crimen aliquod canonibus inimicum, eligi cum Dei auxilio conpellat atque suadeat; et statim eum ad urbem Romam cum decreto et testificatione relationis tuae transmitte.
Friedberg, col. 233/234
C. XVIII. One who is elected bishop shall not be guilty of crimes that the sacred law punishes by death.
Likewise Gregory to Bishop Passivus [Book X, epistle 13]. Your fraternity well knows for how long Aprutium has been destitute of pastoral solicitude; there we long sought who ought to be ordained and were by no means able to find anyone. But because Opportunus has been greatly praised to me in his morals, zeal for psalmody, and love of prayer, and is said to lead a religious life in every way, we wish your fraternity to cause him to come to you and to admonish him concerning his soul, so that he may grow in good pursuits. And if no crimes meet him that are to be punished by death according to the rule of sacred law, then he is to be exhorted either to become a monk or to be made a subdeacon by you; and after a little time, if it pleases God, he himself ought to be promoted to pastoral care. GRATIAN. One to whom a visitation is enjoined shall not permit anything concerning the property of that church to be presumed by anyone. Hence Gregory [to Bishop Gaudentius, Book IV, epistle 12]:
C. XVIII. Qui in episcopum eligitur, non sit reus criminum, que sacra lex morte punit.
Item Gregorius Passiuo Episcopo. [lib. X. epist. 13.] Bene nouit fraternitas tua, quam longo tempore Aprutium pastorali sit sollicitudine destitutum; ubi diu quesiuimus, quis ordinari debuisset, et nequaquam potuimus inuenire. Sed quia Opportunus mihi in moribus suis, in psalmodiae studio, in amore orationis ualde laudatus, religiosam uitam omnimodo dicitur agere, hunc uolumus fraternitas uestra ad se faciat uenire, et de anima sua admoneatur, quatenus in bonis studiis crescat. Et si nulla ei crimina, que per legis sacrae regulam morte mulctanda sunt, obuiant, tunc hortandus est, ut uel monachus, uel a uobis subdiaconus fiat; et post aliquantulum temporis, si Deo placuerit, ipse ad pastoralem curam debeat promoueri. Gratian. Cui autem uisitacio iniungitur, nichil de rebus eiusdem ecclesiae a quoquam presumi patiatur. Unde Gregorius: [Gaudentio Episc., I. IV. epist. 12.]
Friedberg, col. 233/234
C. XIX. One to whom visitation of a church has been enjoined shall not permit anything concerning its property to be presumed by anyone.
Since Festus, bishop of the church of Capua, passed from this light while situated in the city of Rome, it was our care—which is expended upon all churches—to direct the present writings to your fraternity, so that you may approach as visitor of the church mentioned, yet in such a way that you permit nothing concerning promotions of clerics, revenue, ornaments and ministries, or whatever can belong to the aforesaid place, to be presumed by anyone. Rather, it is fitting that you exhibit all vigilance and caution concerning the clergy and people of that church, so that they ought diligently and devoutly to serve in vigils and ecclesiastical service.
C. XIX. Non patiatur a quoquam presumi de rebus ecclesiae, cui eius uisitatio fuerit iniuncta.
Quoniam Festus Capuanae ecclesiae episcopus in Romana ciuitate positus de hac luce migrauit, curae nobis fuit (que uniuersis ecclesiis inpenditur, fraternitati tuae presentia scripta dirigere, ut memoratae ecclesiae uisitator accedas, sic tamen, ut nichil de prouectionibus clericorum, redditu, ornatu ministeriisque, uel quicquid prefati loci esse poterit, a quoquam presumi patiaris; sed omnem uigilantiam atque cautelam circa clerum plebemque eiusdem ecclesiae exhibere te conuenit, ut in uigiliis obsequioque ecclesiastico sedule ac deuote debeant seruire.
Friedberg, col. 233/234