Question — Decretum of Gratian
Question II
GRATIAN. PART I. To these arguments: Even if these tithes were owed to you by right, as you assert, nevertheless an objection of thirty years imposes silence upon you. For every possession is removed by a prescription of thirty years, or of forty years, as are the possessions of religious houses, or of a hundred years, as are the estates of the holy Roman Church. Hence Pope Gelasius says, [to the Bishops of Sicily, letter II, c. 2]:
GRATIANUS. I. Pars. Ad hec: Decimationes istae, etsi uobis iure deberentur, ut asseritis, tamen tricennalis obiectio uobis silentium inponit. Omnis enim possessio tricennaria prescriptione tollitur, uel quadragenaria (sicut possessiones religiosarum domorum) uel centenaria, sicut predia sanctae Romanae ecclesiae. Unde Gelasius Papa ait: [Episcopis Siciliae. ep. II. c. 2.]
Friedberg, col. 719/720
C. I. Those things which are possessed by bishops for thirty years are claimed by them by right.
Let bishops claim by right for themselves the resources of the church, and also dioceses, which are possessed by some of them and which the law of thirty years has concluded, because the authority of our sons the princes has also issued in such a way that beyond thirty years no one is permitted to appeal concerning that which the period of the laws has excluded. GRATIAN. But they argue to the contrary: By the authority by which you impose silence upon us, by that authority we close your mouths. For the same Gelasius says: “By no presumption the status of parishes, etc.” Therefore, if a temporal objection cannot tear apart a diocese once constituted, it is evident that it will not protect you either, so that, by changing the status of our parish, you may claim for yourselves by a claimable usurpation tithes once lawfully assigned to us. But how these authorities are to be distinguished will be found in the cause concerning monks. PART II. § 1. Now it is asked concerning the right of conducting funerals: which of these churches has the right of burying these persons? As Jerome writes, married persons appear to be placed in one tomb. For he says:
C. I. Que triginta annis ab episcopis possidentur iure ab eis uendicantur.
Facultates ecclesiae, nec non et dioceses, que ab aliquibus possidentur episcopis, iure sibi uendicent, quod tricennalis lex conclusit, quia et filiorum nostrorum principum ita emanauit auctoritas, ut ultra XXX. annos nulli liceat pro eo appellare, quod legum tempus exclusit. Gratian. At illi econtra: Cuius auctoritate nobis silentium inponitis, eius auctoritate claudimus uestra ora. Ait enim idem Gelasius: "Nulla presumptione statum parrochiarum etc." Si ergo temporalis obiectio diocesim semel constitutam diuellere non potest, patet, quod nec uobis patrocinabitur, ut, statum nostrae parrochiae mutantes, decimationes quondam nobis legitime assignatas uindicabili usurpatione uobis uendicetis. Quomodo autem distinguendae sint hae auctoritates, in causa monachorum inuenietur. II. Pars. §. 1. Nunc queritur de iure funerandi, que harum ecclesiarum habeat ius tumulandi istos? Sicut Ieronimus scribit, coniugati in uno sepulcro uidentur esse ponendi. Ait enim:
Friedberg, col. 719/720
C. II. Children are to be placed in the tomb of their parents.
Hebron is said to be the city of three men, because three patriarchs were buried in it, in the double cave with their three wives, that is, Abraham and Sarah, Isaac and Rebecca, Jacob and Leah, besides Adam himself and Eve his wife. Tobias says to his son: “When God has received my soul, you shall bury my body, and you shall honor your mother all her days; and when she has completed her time, you shall bury her beside me in one tomb.” The same: § 1. Let one tomb join those whom one marriage joined, because they are one flesh, and let man not separate those whom God joined.
C. II. In sepulcro parentum filii sunt collocandi.
Ebron dicitur esse ciuitas trium uirorum, quia in ea sepulti sunt tres patriarchae, in spelunca duplici cum tribus uxoribus suis, id est Abraham et Sara, Ysaac et Rebecca, Iacob et Lia, preter ipsum Adam et Euam uxorem suam. Tobias dicit ad filium suum: "Cum acceperit Deus animam meam, corpus meum sepelies, et honorem habebis matri tuae omnibus diebus, et cum ipsa conpleuerit tempus suum, sepelies eam iuxta me in uno sepulcro." Idem: §. 1. Quos coniunxit unum coniugium coniungat unum sepulcrum, quia una caro sunt, et quos Deus coniunxit homo non separet.
Friedberg, col. 721/722
[C. III.]
Likewise Augustine. PART III. Let every woman follow her husband, whether in life or in death. Likewise Gregory: § 1. The sister of Saint Benedict was buried in the tomb which he had prepared for himself, so that burial might not separate the bodies of those whose mind had always been one in the Lord. GRATIAN. Likewise Joseph, dying in Egypt, asked his brothers that at the time of His visitation they should carry his bones with them and place them in the tomb of his fathers. § 1. Likewise, it was said to the prophet who, contrary to the command of the Lord, had eaten in Bethel after being forbidden: “Your corpse shall not be brought into the tomb of your fathers.” § 2. Likewise, it is read of certain persons in the Book of Kings: “He died and was laid with his fathers,” that is, in the tomb of his fathers. § 3. Likewise, in the New Testament it is read that blessed Philip built himself a tomb in which he and his daughters rested. § 4. Likewise, blessed Severus, Archbishop of Ravenna, ordered a tomb to be made, in which he placed himself, his wife, and his daughter. § 5. From all these examples it is gathered that the bodies of children are to be placed in the burial place of their parents. Therefore, because the parents of these persons are buried at the former churches, these persons also ought to be buried at the same churches. § 6. To the contrary, Adam, as you assert, was buried in the city of Arba. But were all his children buried there? So great a multitude of the human race could not so easily be enclosed in so small a tomb. § 7. Likewise Abraham was buried there. But were Ishmael and Midian and the others whom he begot from Keturah buried there? § 8. Likewise Isaac was placed there. But was Esau buried with him? § 9. Likewise Jacob was placed there. But was any of his sons besides Joseph buried with him? Rachel also is read to have been buried not in Hebron but near Bethlehem. From the example of these persons, therefore, it is evident that children are free to be buried in the tombs of their fathers, and they are free to find lodging elsewhere for their bodies according to the suitability of places and times. Therefore, by this example these persons are not compelled to be buried in the tombs of their fathers. § 10. Likewise, it is not permitted to change things defined by laws. But things not expressed by laws follow the judgment of human will. Yet it is defined by laws to whom tithes are to be paid, and therefore the giver is not permitted to change this. But where each person is to be buried is not expressed by laws, and therefore it rests in the will of the person to be buried. Hence blessed Gregory says:
[C. III.]
Item Augustinus. III. Pars. Unaqueque mulier sequatur uirum suum, siue in uita siue in morte. Item Gregorius: §. 1. Soror sancti Benedicti sepulta est in sepulcro, quod ipse sibi preparauerat, ut quorum mens una fuit semper in Domino, eorum quoque corpora sepultura non separaret. Gratian. Item Ioseph, moriens in Egypto, rogauit fratres suos, ut tempore suae uisitationis ossa sua secum deferrent, et in sepulcro patrum suorum ea collocarent. §. 1. Item, dictum est Prophetae, qui contra preceptum Domini prohibitus comederat in Bethel: "Non inferetur cadauer tuum in sepulcro patrum tuorum." §. 2. Item. De nonnullis legitur in libro Regum: "Obiit et appositus est ad patres suos," hoc est in sepulcro patrum suorum. §. 3. Item. In nouo testamento legitur B. Philippus edificasse sibi sepulcrum, in quo ipse et filiae eius quieuerunt. §. 4. Item. B. Seuerus Rauennatum archiepiscopus tumulum fieri iussit, in quo se, et uxorem, et filiam collocauit. §. 5. His omnibus exemplis colligitur, quod in sepultura parentum corpora filiorum collocanda sunt. Quia ergo parentes istorum apud priores ecclesias sepulti sunt, et hi apud easdem debent tumulari. §. 6. Econtra Adam, ut asseritis, in ciuitate Arbeae tumulatus est. Sed numquid omnes filii eius sepulti sunt ibi? tanta multitudo humani generis tam breui tumulo non tam facile posset includi. §. 7. Item Abraham ibi sepultus est. Sed numquid Ismahel, et Madai, et alii, quos de Cethura genuit, ibi sepulti sunt? §. 8. Item Ysaac ibi positus est. Sed numquid Esau cum eo tumulatus est? §. 9. Item Iacob ibi collocatus est. Sed numquid aliquis filiorum eius preter Ioseph cum eo sepultus est? Rachel quoque non in Ebron, sed iuxta Bethleem tumulata legitur. Exemplo igitur istorum liquet, quod liberum est filiis sepeliri in sepulcris patrum suorum, et liberum est eis alibi pro locorum et temporum oportunitate corpori suo hospitium inuenire. Non ergo hoc exemplo isti coguntur sepeliri in sepulcris patrum suorum. §. 10. Item, que legibus diffinita sunt mutare non licet. Que autem legibus expressa non sunt arbitrium secuntur humanae uoluntatis. At legibus diffinitum est, quibus decimae sint persoluendae, et ideo danti mutare non licet. Ubi autem quisque tumulandus sit, legibus expressum non est, et ideo in uoluntate tumulandi consistit. Unde B. Gregorius ait:
Friedberg, col. 721/722
C. IV. The last will of the deceased ought to be observed. The last will of the deceased is to be preserved in every way.
PART IV. GRATIAN. This is to be understood concerning a free man and not concerning a slave. For a slave cannot compose the written instrument of a testament. Hence Pope Gelasius writes to Bishop Honorius:
C. IV. Ultima uoluntas defuncti seruari debet. Ultima uoluntas defuncti modis omnibus conseruetur.
IV. Pars. Gratian. Quod de libero et non de seruo intelligendum est. Seruus enim testamenti paginam condere non potest. Unde Gelasius Papa scribit Honorio Episcopo:
Friedberg, col. 721/722
C. V. A slave cannot make a testament.
We also wish it not to escape your sincerity that it has been reported to us that Ampliatus the leaseholder—who is established not only to be a slave of the church, but to be so entangled in accounts from many years that, even if he were freeborn, he would in every way be held liable until he had rendered all the accounts—has endeavored with rash daring to compose the written instrument of a testament, although all his peculium is not doubted to be bound by the laws to ecclesiastical right. Therefore let your fraternity oppose these presumptions in our place, and permit absolutely nothing to be done by any surreption. And if by chance anything human should befall him, since he is said to be advanced in years, let your unanimity immediately command, without delay, that his substance be delivered under a faithful inventory only to those sons of his to whom the patrimony is proved to have been committed, until he is compelled to render the lord’s portions unimpaired for all the periods during which he is known to have administered this patrimony. PART V. GRATIAN. Therefore, because according to Gregory the last will of the deceased is to be preserved, their bodies are to be buried according to the will of these persons, not according to the judgment of your disposition. Likewise it is read in the Council of Tribur:
C. V. Seruus testamentum facere non potest.
Illud etiam sinceritatem tuam uolumus non latere, ad nos fuisse perlatum, quod Ampliatus conductor, quem non solum seruum constat esse ecclesiae, sed ita rationibus a multis temporibus inplicatum, ut, etiam si esset ingenuus, donec ratiocinia cuncta deduceret, modis omnibus obnoxius haberetur, ausu temerario molitus fuerit paginam condere testamenti, cuius omne peculium ecclesiastico iuri legibus non dubitetur obstrictum. Quapropter his presumptionibus uice nostra tua fraternitas contradicat, nec fieri prorsus aliqua subreptione permittat. Ac si eidem quicquam humanitus forte contigerit, quia grandeuus esse memoratur mox eius sine dilatione substantiam precipiat unanimitas tua filiis eius dumtaxat, quibus patrimonium probatur esse conmissum, sub fideli descriptione contradi, donec temporibus uniuersis, quibus hoc patrimonium gubernasse cognoscitur, partes dominicas reddere cogatur indempnes. V. Pars. Gratian. Quia ergo secundum Gregorium ultima uoluntas defuncti conseruanda est, pro istorum uoluntate corpora eorum sunt tumulanda, non pro arbitrio uestrae dispositionis. Item in Triburiensi Concilio legitur:
Friedberg, col. 721/722
C. VI. Where each person ought to choose burial for himself.
Wherever the possibility of times or places permits, let burials be celebrated at the greater church where the seat of the bishop is. But if this appears difficult because of the harshness of the time or place, let him be buried at the church where a religious congregation of religious canons, monks, or nuns dwells in common. But if this also appears unsuitable, where anyone paid tithes while alive, there let him be buried when dead. GRATIAN. Therefore, because he paid the tithe to us while alive, he is also to be buried among us when dead. Likewise, if anyone should cross from province to province and establish a domicile for himself there, having been freed from the authority of the former judge, he would be subjected to the jurisdiction of that judge in whose province he chose a seat for himself. Therefore, because these persons passed from your diocese into ours, having been freed from your authority, they are subjected to our right. Therefore the right of conducting their funerals is ours. But that statement of Pope Melchiades is objected:
C. VI. Ubi quisque eligere sepulturam sibi debet.
Ubicumque temporum uel locorum facultas tulerit, apud maiorem ecclesiam, ubi sedes est episcopi, sepulturae celebrentur. Si autem propter temporis uel loci asperitatem hoc difficile uisum fuerit, apud ecclesiam, quo religiosorum canonicorum, uel monachorum, uel sanctimonialium religiosa congregatio communiter degerit, sepeliatur. Si autem et hoc ineptum uisum fuerit, ubi quis decimas persoluebat uiuus, ibi sepeliatur mortuus. Gratian. Quia ergo decimam nobis persoluebat uiuus, et apud nos sepeliendus est mortuus. Item, si quis de prouincias ad prouinciam transiret, et ibi domicilium sibi collocaret, liber factus a ditione prioris iudicis, iurisdictioni illius iudicis subiceretur, in cuius prouincia sedem sibi eligeret. Quia ergo isti a uestra diocesi in nostram transierunt, liberi a uestra ditione nostro iuri subiciuntur. Nostrum ergo est ius funerandi eos. Sed obicitur illud Melciadis Papae:
Friedberg, col. 721/722
C. VII. It is not permitted by one’s own rashness to forsake the burial place of one’s parents.
It pleased the great council in all respects that no one, by the rashness of his own judgment, take care to resort for the sake of burial to any church other than the one to which the usage of his ancient parents is reported to be subject by canonical institution, unless, hindered by illness, he has advanced into another region for any business. In addition to these things, if any prelate strives to act against them, let him know that he subjects himself to the ecclesiastical bond. GRATIAN. But it is one thing not to follow the usage of one’s ancient parents from the pride of rashness, and another to choose a new burial place for oneself on a reasonable occasion. One strives against the authority of Pope Melchiades who, led by pride or hatred, or enticed by vain persuasions or various little gifts, disdains to follow the burial place of his parents. But according to Gregory, one who for a certain reason seeks a new lodging for his body has a free last will. § 1. Or, as certain persons distinguish, the last will of each person is free not in choosing burial for himself but in making a testament. Hence it is also called a testament, because by it each person freely testifies what he wishes to be done with his own goods after his death. § 2. But the will of the testator does not appear free when, according to Augustine, a testamentary distribution of resources ought to be made according to the number of children; for example, if anyone has one son, let him reckon Christ as another; but if two, let him make Christ the third, and so in order. And according to Leo, each person is ordered to leave half of the things which he bequeaths to Christ to the church at which he received the sacraments of the faith. But that statement of Augustine is not the statement of one commanding but of one dissuading, lest anyone in anger disinherit his son and leave the whole to Christ. For he says in his second sermon on the life of clerics:
C. VII. Propria temeritate sepulturam parentum relinquere non licet.
Placuit per omnia magno concilio, ut nullus proprii arbitrii temeritate aliam ecclesiam, nisi cui usus antiquorum parentum canonica institutione subiacere perhibetur, sepulturae causa adire procuret, nisi infirmitatis causa prepeditus in aliam fuerit regionem quolibet negotio progressus. Ad hec, si quis prelatus contra hec agere sategerit, ecclesiastico uinculo se subdi cognoscat. Gratian. Sed aliud est ex temeritatis superbia usum antiquorum parentum non sequi, atque aliud rationabili occasione nouam sibi sepulturam eligere. Contra Melciadis Papae auctoritatem nititur qui superbia uel odio ductus, siue uanis persuasionibus aut uariis munusculis illectus, sepulturam suorum parentum sequi contempnit. Secundum Gregorium autem liberam habet ultimam uoluntatem qui certae rationis causa nouum suo corpori querit hospitium. §. 1. Vel, ut quidam distinguunt, libera est ultima uoluntas cuiusque, non in sepultura sibi eligenda, sed in testamento conficiendo. Unde et testamentum appellatur, quia eo libere quisque testatur quid post suum decessum de propriis rebus fieri uelit. §. 2. Sed non uidetur libera testatoris uoluntas, cum secundum Augustinum pro numero filiorum debeat fieri testamentaria distributio facultatum, ueluti, si quis habet unum filium, Christum putet alterum; si uero duos, Christum faciat tertium, et sic per ordinem. Et secundum Leonem quisque medietatem eorum, que Christo testatur, ecclesiae iubetur relinquere, apud quam fidei sacramenta suscepit. Sed illud Augustini non est iubentis, sed dehortantis, ne quis iratus filium suum exheredaret, atque totum Christo relinqueret. Ait enim in II. sermone de uita clericorum:
Friedberg, col. 723/724
C. VIII. A portion of the inheritance is to be offered to God according to the number of children.
If anyone is angry with his son and, dying, disinherits him, if he were living, would I not appease him? Ought I not reconcile his son to him? How, therefore, do I wish him to have peace with his son when I covet his inheritance? But plainly let him do as I have often exhorted. He has one son: let him reckon Christ as another; he has two: let him reckon Christ as the third; he has ten: let him make Christ the eleventh, and I receive it. GRATIAN. By this authority, of course, a measure is fixed for the testator, not one which he is compelled to discharge but one which he is prohibited from exceeding. PART VI. § 1. But those who are unwilling to render the offerings of the deceased are to be excommunicated.
Hence in the Fourth Council of Carthage, [c. 95]:
C. VIII. Pro numero filiorum pars hereditatis Deo offeratur.
Si quis irascitur filio suo, et moriens exheredat eum, si uiueret, non eum placarem? non ei filium reconciliare deberem? Quomodo ergo uolo ut cum filio suo habeat pacem, cuius appeto hereditatem? Sed plane sic faciat quod sepe hortatus sum. Unum filium habet: putet Christum alterum; duos habet: putet Christum tertium; decem habet: faciat Christum undecimum, et suscipio. Gratian. Hac nimirum auctoritate mensura testatori prefigitur, non quam cogatur exsoluere, sed quam prohibetur transscendere. VI. Pars. §. 1. Oblationes uero defunctorum qui reddere noluerint excommunicentur.
Unde in Cartaginensi Concilio IV.: [c. 95.]
Friedberg, col. 723/724
C. IX. Let those who deny offerings of the deceased to churches be excommunicated.
Let those who either deny offerings of the deceased to churches or render them with difficulty be excommunicated as murderers of the needy.
C. IX. Excommunicentur qui defunctorum oblationes ecclesiis negant.
Qui oblationes defunctorum aut negant ecclesiis, aut difficulter reddunt, tanquam egentium necatores excommunicentur.
Friedberg, col. 723/724
C. X. Let those faithless persons who retain offerings of the deceased be cast out of churches.
Likewise from the Council of Vaison, [I, c. 4]. Those who retain the offerings of the deceased and delay delivering them to churches are to be cast out of the church as faithless persons, because it is certain that this provocation of divine piety reaches even to the emptying of the faith, since both the faithful departing from the body are defrauded of the fulfillment of their vows and the poor of the solace of food and necessary support. Therefore such persons are to be regarded as murderers of the needy and as not believing the judgment of God. Hence one of the Fathers also inserted this into his writings, in a fitting judgment, in which he says: “To seize something from a friend is theft, but to defraud the church is sacrilege.”
C. X. Ut infideles eiciantur ab ecclesiis, qui oblationes retinent defunctorum.
Item ex Concilio Varensi. [I., c. 4.] Qui oblationes defunctorum retinent, et ecclesiis tradere demorantur, ut infideles sunt ab ecclesia abiciendi, quia usque ad exinanitionem fidei peruenire certum est hanc pietatis diuinae exacerbationem, quia et fideles de corpore recedentes uotorum plenitudine et pauperes consolatu alimoniae et necessaria sustentatione fraudantur. Hii ergo tales quasi egentium necatores, nec credentes iudicium Dei habendi sunt. Unde et quidam Patrum hoc scriptis suis inseruit, congruente sententia, qua ait: "Amico quippiam rapere furtum est, ecclesiae uero fraudare sacrilegium est."
Friedberg, col. 723/724
C. XI. Let those who have presumed to retain things offered to churches or left by testament be excommunicated.
Likewise from the Council of Agde, [c. 4]. Let clerics or secular persons who persist in retaining the offerings of parents, whether donated or left by testament, or who have believed that what they themselves donated to churches or monasteries is to be taken away, just as the holy synod has established, be excluded from the churches as murderers of the poor until they restore them. § 1. But if any cleric has committed theft against the church, let foreign communion be assigned to him. PART VII. GRATIAN. It is likewise asked whether anything is to be exacted for the burial of the dead. Concerning these matters Gregory writes thus in the Register to Januarius, Bishop of Sardinia:
C. XI. Qui oblata ecclesiis aut testamento relicta retinere presumpserint excommunicentur.
Item ex Concilio Agatensi. [c. 4.] Clerici uel seculares, qui oblationes parentum aut donatas, aut testamento relictas retinere perstiterint, aut id, quod ipsi donauerint ecclesiis uel monasteriis, crediderint auferendum, sicut sinodus sancta constituit, uelut necatores pauperum quousque reddant ab ecclesiis excludantur. §. 1. Si quis autem clericus furtum ecclesiae fecerit, peregrina ei tribuatur conmunio. VII. Pars. Gratian. Item queritur, an pro sepultura mortuorum aliquid sit exigendum? De his ita scribit Gregorius in Registro, Ianuario, Episcopo Sardiniae:
Friedberg, col. 723/724
C. XII. No gift is to be exacted for burial.
Nereida, a most illustrious woman, complained to us that your fraternity wished to exact solidi from her for the burial of her daughter. But after, by God’s authorship, we attained the honor of the episcopate, we altogether forbade this vice also from our church, and we did not permit it to be usurped again through a depraved custom, mindful that when Abraham requested from the sons of Ephron, that is, from the sons of Seor, a tomb at a price for burying the body of his wife, he refused to accept a recompense, lest he appear to have obtained profit from a corpse. Therefore, if a pagan man was of such great consideration, how much more ought we, who are called priests, not to do this? Hence I admonish that this vice of avarice not be presumed to be attempted again against others. § 1. But if at any time you permit someone to be buried in your church, if indeed his parents, kinsmen, or heirs should spontaneously wish to offer anything for lights, we do not forbid it to be accepted. But we altogether prohibit anything from being requested or exacted, lest—something exceedingly irreligious—the church be said, which God forbid, to be venal, or you appear to rejoice in human deaths if you endeavor to seek gain in any way from their corpses.
C. XII. Pro sepultura nichil muneris exigendum est.
Questa est nobis Nereida clarissima femina, quod ab ea solidos pro filiae suae sepultura fraternitas uestra exigere uelit. Hoc autem uicium et nos, postquam, Deo auctore ad episcopatus honorem accessimus, de ecclesia nostra omnino uetuimus, et per prauam denuo consuetudinem nequaquam usurpari permisimus, memores, quia dum Abraham a filiis Ephron, hoc est a filiis Seor, sepulcrum precio ad humandum corpus coniugis postularet, premium accipere rennuit, ne commodum uideretur de cadauere consecutus. Si ergo tantae considerationis paganus uir fuit, quanto magis nos, qui sacerdotes dicimur, hoc facere non debemus? Unde hoc auaritiae uicium ne in alienis denuo temptari presumatur, ammoneo. §. 1. Sed si quando aliquem in ecclesia uestra sepeliri conceditis, siquidem parentes ipsius, proximi uel heredes pro luminaribus sponte quid offerre uoluerint, accipere non uetamus. Peti uero aut aliquid exigi omnino prohibemus, ne (quod ualde irreligiosum est) aut uenalis (quod absit) dicatur ecclesia, aut uos de humanis uideamini mortibus gratulari, si ex eorum cadaueribus studetis querere quolibet modo conpendium.
Friedberg, col. 723/724
C. XIII. Even when compelled, we ought not to accept a price for burial.
Likewise Jerome on Genesis. After Ephron was overcome by the price, so that he sold the tomb and accepted silver, although Abraham compelled him, the letter waw, which among them is read as o, was removed from his name, and instead of Ephron he was called Ephran, Scripture signifying that he was not of consummate and perfect virtue, who was able to sell the memorial of the dead. § 1. Therefore let those who voluntarily sell tombs and are not compelled to accept a price, but extort something from the unwilling, know that their name is changed and something of their merit perishes, since even he who accepted unwillingly is secretly reproved.
C. XIII. Etiam coacti de sepultura precium accipere non debemus.
Item Ieronimus super Genesim. Postquam precio uictus est Ephron, ut sepulcrum uenderet et acciperet argentum, licet cogente Abraham, uau littera, que apud illos pro o legitur, ablata est de eius nomine, et pro Ephron appellatus est Ephran, significante scriptura, non eum fuisse consummatae perfectaeque uirtutis, qui potuerit uendere memoriam mortuorum. §. 1. Sciant igitur qui sepulcra uendunt uoluntarie, nec coguntur ut accipiant precium, sed a nolentibus quicquam extorquent, mutari nomen suum, et perire quiddam de merito eorum, cum etiam ille reprehendatur occulte, qui inuitus accepit.
Friedberg, col. 725/726
C. XIV. Concerning the same.
Likewise from the Council of Tribur, [c. 16]. For it is written in the ecclesiastical book: “Do not withhold grace from the dead, knowing that we shall all die.” And likewise: “All things which have sprung from earth shall be turned back into earth.” Why do you sell earth to earth? Remember that you are earth and shall return to earth, and that death is to be yours and draws near, even if it delays. Recall that the earth belongs not to man but, as the Psalmist commemorates, “The earth is the Lord’s, and its fullness.” If you sell the earth, you will be held guilty of invasion of property. Freely you received from God; freely give on His behalf. Therefore let it be forbidden to absolutely all Christians to sell earth to the dead and to deny the burial that is owed, unless perhaps the kinsmen and friends of the deceased should wish freely to give something for the sake of the man’s name and the redemption of his soul.
C. XIV. De eodem.
Item ex Concilio Triburiensi. [c. 16.] In ecclesiastico namque libro scriptum est: "Mortuo non prohibeas gratiam, sciens, quia omnes moriemur." Et item: "Omnia, que de terra orta sunt, in terram conuertentur." Quid terra terram uendis? memento, quod terra es, et in terram reuerteris, et quoniam mors tibi futura est, et appropiat, et si tardat. Recordare, quia non hominis terra est, sed, ut Psalmista conmemorat: "Domini est terra, et plenitudo eius." Si terram uendis, inuasione rei reus teneberis. Gratis accepisti a Deo, gratis da pro eo. Quare interdictum sit omnibus omnino Christianis terram mortuis uendere, et debitam sepulturam denegare, nisi forte proximi et amici defuncti propter nomen et redemptionem animae uiri gratis aliquid dare uelint.
Friedberg, col. 725/726
C. XV. Concerning the same.
Likewise from the Council of Vaison. It is to be commanded according to the authority of the canons that they exact no gift for tombs and for persons to be buried, unless perhaps the one who is buried, while living, ordered something from his goods to be bestowed upon the church in whose churchyard he is buried, or even after his death those to whom the making of his alms was committed should wish spontaneously to give something from his goods; and nevertheless nothing shall in any way be exacted from them by the priests or by those who preside over the places and villages. § 1. It is also to be forbidden according to the institutions of our predecessors that persons be buried in no way in the church, but in the churchyard, or in the portico, or in the exedrae of the church. But within the church, or near the altar where the body and blood of the Lord are confected, let them in no way be buried.
C. XV. De eodem.
Item ex Concilio Varensi. Precipiendum est secundum canonum auctoritatem, ut de sepulcris et hominibus sepeliendis nichil muneris exigant, nisi forte qui sepelitur uiuens iusserit ecclesiae, in cuius atrio sepelitur, aliquid de suis rebus tribuere, aut etiam post mortem illius, quibus conmissum est eius elemosinam facere, de rebus illius aliquid sponte dare uoluerint; et tamen nullatenus a presbiteris illis aliquid exigatur, siue ab illis, qui locis et uillis presunt. §. 1. Prohibendum est etiam secundum maiorum instituta, ut in ecclesia nullatenus sepeliantur, sed in atrio, aut in porticu, aut in exedris ecclesiae. Infra ecclesiam uero, aut prope altare, ubi corpus Domini et sanguis conficitur, nullatenus sepeliantur.
Friedberg, col. 725/726
C. XVI. Those whose sins have not been forgiven are not helped after death by sacred places.
Likewise Augustine. PART VIII. Those whose sins have not been forgiven cannot be helped after death by sacred places, because, if those whom graver sins weigh down cause themselves to be buried in sacred places, it remains that they be judged for their own presumption, since the sacred places do not free them, but the guilt of rashness accuses them.
C. XVI. A sacris locis non iuuantur post mortem, quibus peccata dimissa non sunt.
Item Augustinus. VIII. Pars. Quibus peccata dimissa non sunt, a sacris locis post mortem adiuuari non possunt, quia quos peccata grauiora deprimunt, si in sacris locis se sepelire faciunt, restat, ut de sua presumptione iudicentur, quatinus eos sacra loca non liberant, sed culpa temeritatis accusat.
Friedberg, col. 725/726
C. XVII. To whom it is profitable to be buried in a church.
Likewise Gregory, [book IV of the Dialogues, c. 50]. When grave sins do not weigh them down, then it profits the dead if they are buried in churches, because, whenever their kinsmen come to those same sacred places, they also behold the burial place of their own, remember them, and pour out prayers to the Lord for them. For the bodies of those whom grave sins weigh down are placed in churches for a greater accumulation of condemnation rather than for their release.
C. XVII. Quibus prosit in ecclesia sepeliri.
Item Gregorius. [lib. IV. Dial. c. 50.] Cum grauia peccata non deprimunt, tunc prodest mortuis, si in ecclesiis sepeliantur, quia eorum proximi, quociens ad eadem sacra loca ueniunt, suorum quoque sepulturam aspiciunt, recordantur et preces pro eis Domino fundunt. Nam quos peccata grauia deprimunt ad maiorem cumulum dampnationis potius quam ad solutionem eorum corpora in ecclesiis ponuntur.
Friedberg, col. 725/726
C. XVIII. Who may be buried in a church.
Likewise from the Council of Mainz, [I, c. 52]. Let no dead person be buried within a church unless bishops, abbots, worthy priests, or faithful laymen. GRATIAN. But what profits the dead from being buried beside a church, and what reaches them, Augustine shows in the book On the Care to Be Taken for the Dead, [last chapter], saying:
C. XVIII. Qui sepeliantur in ecclesia.
Item ex Concilio Magunciensi. [I. c. 52.] Nullus mortuus infra ecclesiam sepeliatur, nisi episcopi, aut abbates, aut digni presbiteri, uel fideles laici. Gratian. Quid uero mortuis prosit iuxta ecclesiam sepeliri quidue ad eos perueniat, Augustinus in libro de agenda cura pro mortuis [cap. ult.] ostendit, dicens.
Friedberg, col. 727/728
C. XIX. Why the dead are buried beside a church.
Let us not think that anything reaches the dead for whom we take care except that which we solemnly supplicate for them by the sacrifices either of the altar, of prayers, or of alms, although these do not profit all for whom they are done, but only those who, while they live, cooperate so that they may profit them. But because we do not discern who they are, it is fitting that these things be done for all the regenerated, so that none of those to whom these benefits can and ought to reach may be passed over. For it is better that these things be superfluous to those whom they neither harm nor profit than that they be wanting to those whom they profit. § 1. Nevertheless, each person acts more diligently for his own necessary ones, so that the like may be done for him by his own. § 2. But whatever is expended upon burying the body is not a safeguard of salvation but an office of humanity, according to the affection by which no one ever hates his own flesh. Hence it is fitting that one take whatever care he can for the flesh of his neighbor when he who took care of it has departed from it. And if those who do not believe the resurrection of the flesh do these things, how much more ought those who believe to do them, so that an office of this kind expended upon the body—yet upon it as one that will rise again and remain in eternity—may also be in some manner a testimony of the same faith. § 3. But as to the fact that each person is buried at the memorials of the martyrs, this alone appears to me to profit the deceased: that, by commending him also to the patronage of the martyrs, the affection of supplication for him may be increased. GRATIAN. To the contrary Jerome, [on the Epistle to the Galatians, c. 6, upon the words “Each shall bear his own burden”]:
C. XIX. Quare mortui iuxta ecclesiam sepeliantur.
Non estimemus ad mortuos, pro quibus curam gerimus, peruenire, nisi quod pro eis siue altaris, siue orationum, siue elemosinarum sacrificiis solempniter supplicamus, quamuis non omnibus prosint pro quibus fiunt, sed his tantum, pro quibus dum uiuunt, cooperantur ut prosint. Sed quia non discernimus, qui sint, oportet ea pro regeneratis omnibus facere, ut nullus eorum pretermittatur, ad quos hec beneficia possint et debeant peruenire. Melius enim supererunt ista his, quibus nec obsunt, nec prosunt, quam eis deerunt, quibus prosunt. §. 1. Diligentius tamen facit quisque pro necessariis suis, quo pro illo fiat similiter a suis. §. 2. Corpori autem humando quicquid inpenditur non est presidium salutis, sed humanitatis offitium, secundum affectum, quo nemo umquam carnem suam odio habet. Unde oportet, ut quam potest pro carne proximi curam gerat, cum ille inde recesserit, qui gerebat. Et si hec faciunt qui carnis resurrectionem non credunt, quanto magis debent facere qui credunt? ut corpori, sed tamen ut resurrecturo et in eternitate mansuro, inpensum huiusmodi offitium sit etiam quodammodo eiusdem fidei testimonium. §. 3. Quod uero quisque apud memorias martirum sepelitur, hoc tantum michi uidetur prodesse defuncto, ut conmendans eum etiam martirum patrocinio affectus supplicationis pro illo augeatur. Gratian. Contra Ieronimus: [in epistolam ad Galat. c. 6. ad ea uerba: Unusquisque onus suum.]
Friedberg, col. 727/728
C. XX. After death the prayers of the living do not profit.
In the present age we know that we can help one another either by prayers or by counsels. But when we have come before the tribunal of Christ, neither Job nor Daniel nor Noah will be able to entreat for anyone, but each shall bear his own burden. GRATIAN. But this is to be understood concerning the impenitent, of whom the Prophet says: “He shall not give his propitiation to God, nor the price of the redemption of his soul, and therefore a brother shall not redeem him, but he shall labor forever and shall live unto the end.” But it cannot be understood concerning others.
Hence Gregory to Archbishop Boniface:
C. XX. Post mortem orationes non prosunt uiuentium.
In presenti seculo scimus siue orationibus siue consiliis inuicem posse nos adiuuari. Cum autem ante tribunal Christi uenerimus, nec Iob, nec Daniel, nec Noe rogare posse pro quoquam, sed unumquemque portare onus suum. Gratian. Verum hoc de inpenitentibus accipiendum est, de quibus propheta: "Non dabit Deo placationem suam, nec precium redemptionis animae suae, et ideo frater non redimet eum, sed laborabit in eternum, et uiuet in finem." De aliis autem intelligi non potest.
Unde Gregorius Bonifatio Archiepiscopo:
Friedberg, col. 727/728
C. XXI. The good works of the living profit those who died in penitence.
For you are known to have consulted concerning those who are dying, whether it is permitted that offerings be offered for them. Holy church holds thus: that each person offer offerings for the truly Christian dead and that the priest make commemoration of them; and although we are all subject to sins, it is fitting that a priest make commemoration and intercede for the Catholic dead. Nevertheless it shall not be permitted to do any such thing for the impious, although they had been Christians.
C. XXI. In penitencia defunctis bona prosunt uiuentium.
Pro obeuntibus quippe consuluisse cognosceris, si liceat pro eis oblationes offerri. Sancta sic tenet ecclesia, ut quisque pro mortuis uere Christianis offerat oblationes, atque presbiter eorum faciat memoriam, et quamuis peccatis omnes subiaceamus, congruit, ut sacerdos pro mortuis catholicis memoriam faciat et intercedat; non tamen pro inpiis (quamuis Christiani fuerint) tale quid agere licebit.
Friedberg, col. 727/728
C. XXII. The souls of the dead are released in four ways.
The same. The souls of the deceased are released in four ways: either by the offerings of priests, or by the prayers of saints, or by the alms of dear ones, or by the fasting of kinsmen. § 1. But the care of the funeral, the condition of burial, and the pomp of the obsequies are consolations of the living rather than aids of the dead. If a costly burial profits an impious man, a cheap burial or none will harm a pious man. § 2. Yet the bodies of the deceased, and especially of the righteous, are not therefore to be despised and cast away. § 3. There it is also salutarily learned how great the recompense can be for the alms which we furnish to the living and sentient, if even that which the diligence of duty renders to the limbs of men devoid of life does not perish before God.
C. XXII. Quatuor modis soluuntur animae mortuorum.
Idem. Animae defunctorum quatuor modis soluuntur, aut oblationibus sacerdotum, aut precibus sanctorum, aut karorum elemosinis, aut ieiunio cognatorum. §. 1. Curatio uero funeris, conditio sepulturae, pompa exequiarum, magis sunt uiuorum solatia quam subsidia mortuorum. Si aliquid prodest inpio sepultura preciosa, oberit pio uilis aut nulla. §. 2. Nec ideo tamen contempnenda sunt corpora et abicienda defunctorum, maximeque iustorum. §. 3. Ubi et illud salubriter discitur, quanta possit esse remuneratio pro elemosinis, quas uiuentibus et sentientibus exhibemus si neque hoc apud Deum perit, quod exanimis hominum membris offitii diligentia persoluitur.
Friedberg, col. 727/728
C. XXIII. Before the day of judgment the dead are aided by sacrifices and alms.
Likewise Augustine in the Enchiridion, [cc. 109 and 110]. The time placed between the death of a man and the final resurrection contains souls in hidden receptacles, according as each is worthy either of rest or of distress, on account of what it obtained in the flesh while it lived. Nor is it to be denied that the souls of the deceased are relieved by the piety of their living kin when the sacrifice of the Mediator is offered for them or alms are made in the church. But these things profit those who, when they lived, merited that afterward these things could profit them. § 1. For there is a certain manner of living neither so good that it does not require these things after death nor so evil that these things do not profit it after death. But there is a manner so good that it does not require these things, and there is again a manner so evil that it cannot be aided by them when this life has passed. Therefore every merit is acquired here by which someone can be relieved or burdened after this life. And a little later: § 2. When sacrifices of the altar or of any alms whatsoever are offered for all the baptized, they are thanksgivings for the very good, propitiations for those who are not very evil, and for the very evil, even if they are no aid to the dead, nevertheless they are consolations of the living. But for those whom they profit, they profit either so that there may be full remission or certainly so that the condemnation itself may be made more tolerable.
PART IX. GRATIAN. But concerning the observance of the third, seventh, thirtieth, or fortieth day, it is asked whence it took its origin. Ambrose in the book On the Death of Emperor Theodosius:
C. XXIII. Ante diem iudicii sacrificiis et elemosinis mortui iuuantur.
Item Augustinus in Enchiridion. [c. 109. et 110.] Tempus, quod inter hominis mortem et ultimam resurrectionem interpositum est, animas abditis receptaculis continet, sicut queque digna est uel requie, uel erumpna, pro eo quod sortita est in carne dum uiueret. Neque negandum est, defunctorum animas pietate suorum uiuentium releuari, cum pro illis sacrificium mediatoris offertur, uel elemosinae fiunt in ecclesia. Sed eis hec prosunt, qui, cum uiuerent, hec sibi ut postea possent prodesse meruerunt. §. 1. Est enim quidam uiuendi modus, nec tam bonus, ut non requirat ista post mortem, nec tam malus, ut ei ista post mortem non prosint. Est uero talis in bono, ut hec non requirat, et est rursus talis in malo, ut nec his ualeat, cum hec uita transierit, adiuuari. Quocirca omne hic meritum conparatur, quo possit post uitam releuari quispiam uel grauari. Et post pauca: §. 2. Cum sacrificia altaris siue quarumcumque elemosinarum pro baptizatis omnibus offeruntur, pro ualde bonis gratiarum actiones sunt, pro non ualde malis propiciationes sunt, pro ualde malis, etiam si nulla sunt adiumenta mortuorum, tamen uiuorum consolationes sunt. Quibus autem prosunt aut ad hoc prosunt, ut sit plena remissio, aut certe, ut tollerabilior fiat ipsa dampnatio.
IX. Pars. Gratian. De obseruatione autem tertii, septimi, tricesimi uel quadragesimi diei queritur, unde exordium sumpserit? Ambrosius in libro de obitu Theodosii Inperatoris:
Friedberg, col. 727/728
C. XXIV. Why certain days are observed in the commemoration of the dead.
Because some have been accustomed to observe the third day, others the seventh, others the thirtieth, and others the fortieth in the offices of the dead, let us consider what the reading teaches. “When Jacob died,” it says, “Joseph commanded his servants the embalmers that they should bury him, and the embalmers buried Israel, and forty days were fulfilled. For thus the days of burial are numbered. And he mourned him for seven days.” Therefore that solemn observance which the reading prescribes is to be followed. But it is also written in Deuteronomy: “The children of Israel mourned Moses for thirty days, and the days of mourning were completed.” Therefore each observance has authority, by which the necessary office of piety is fulfilled. PART X. GRATIAN. But Cyprian forbids mourning and being sorrowful both for our own death and for that of others, saying:
C. XXIV. Quare certi dies in mortuorum conmemoratione seruentur.
Quia alii tertium diem, alii septimum, alii tricesimum, alii quadragesimum obseruare consueuerunt in offitiis mortuorum, quid doceat lectio consideremus. "Defuncto, inquit, Iacob, precepit Ioseph pueris suis sepultoribus, ut sepelirent eum, et sepelierunt sepultores Israel, et repleti sunt quadraginta dies. Sic enim dinumerantur dies sepulturae. Et luxit eum septem diebus." Hec ergo sequenda sollempnitas, quam prescribit lectio. Sed etiam in Deuteronomio scriptum est: "Quia planxerunt filii Israel Moysen triginta diebus, et consummati sunt dies luctus." Utraque ergo obseruatio habet auctoritatem, qua necessarium pietatis inpletur offitium. X. Pars. Gratian. Lugere autem et tristari tam pro nostra quam pro aliorum morte Ciprianus prohibet dicens.
Friedberg, col. 729/730
C. XXV. We ought to be sorrowful neither for our own death nor for that of others.
How preposterous and how perverse it is that, when we ask that the will of God be done, when He calls and summons us from this world, we do not immediately obey the command of His will, but resist and struggle, and after the manner of obstinate servants are brought to the sight of the Lord with sadness and grief, departing from here by the bond of necessity, not by the obedience of will, and wish to be honored with heavenly rewards by Him to whom we come unwillingly. The same: § 1. To us also, the least and last, how often has it been revealed, how frequently and manifestly has it been commanded by God’s condescension that I should testify continually and preach publicly that brothers set free from the world by the Lord’s summons are not to be mourned, since we know that they are not lost but sent ahead, that in departing they precede us, as those setting out, as those sailing, are accustomed to do.
C. XXV. Nec pro nostra, nec pro morte aliorum tristari debemus.
Quam preposterum est quamque peruersum, ut cum Dei uoluntatem fieri postulemus, quando euocat nos et accersit de hoc mundo, non statim uoluntatis eius inperio pareamus, obnitimur et reluctamur, et peruicacium more seruorum ad conspectum Domini cum tristitia et merore perducimur, exeuntes istinc necessitatis uinculo, non uoluntatis obsequio, et uolumus ab eo premiis celestibus honorari, ad quem uenimus inuiti. Idem: §. 1. Nobis quoque ipsis minimis et extremis quociens reuelatum est, quam frequenter atque manifeste de Dei dignatione preceptum est, ut contestarer assidue, ut publice predicarem, fratres non esse lugendos accersione dominica de seculo liberatos, cum sciamus non amitti, sed premitti, recedentes precedere, ut proficiscentes, ut nauigantes solent.
Friedberg, col. 729/730
C. XXVI. Mourning the dead occurs from faintheartedness.
Likewise John Chrysostom, on the Epistle to the Hebrews. Wherever we may be buried, the earth is the Lord’s and its fullness. Let that, namely, which ought to be done be accomplished. But to mourn, deplore, and lament those who depart from this life occurs from faintheartedness.
GRATIAN. But this is understood of despair concerning the future resurrection. Hence the Apostle also does not say simply, “We do not wish you to be ignorant concerning those who sleep, that you may not be sorrowful,” but adds, “as also the others who have no hope.” For we are not prohibited from mourning the dead from an affection of piety and a regard for humanity, just as we read that some of the saints expended pious tears upon the obsequies of others. Hence Pope Anastasius also, [letter II to Nerius]:
C. XXVI. Ex pusillanimitate mortuos lugere contingit.
Item Iohannes Crisostomus, in epistola ad Ebreos. Ubicumque sepeliamur, Domini est terra et plenitudo eius. Scilicet quod oportet fieri efficiatur. Lugere autem et deplorare et lamentari eos, qui de hac uita decedunt, ex pusillanimitate contingit.
Gratian. Hoc autem ex desperatione futurae resurrectionis intelligitur. Unde et Apostolus non simpliciter ait: "Nolumus uos ignorare de dormientibus, ut non contristemini," sed addidit: "sicut et ceteri, qui spem non habent." Pietatis namque affectu et humanitatis intuitu mortuos lugere non prohibemur, sicut nonnullos sanctorum aliorum exequiis pias lacrimas inpendisse legimus. Hinc etiam Anastasius Papa: [ep. II. ad Nerianum]
Friedberg, col. 729/730
C. XXVII. Those who have hope of the future resurrection ought not to be excessively sorrowful concerning the dead.
Perhaps those who do not know another life, who do not trust that the passage from this world is to something better, have a just excuse for prolonged grief. But we who believe and teach this ought not to be excessively sorrowful concerning the dying, lest that which among others bears the appearance of piety should rather be a fault in us. For it is in some manner a kind of distrust to lament, contrary to that which each person preaches, while loving justice, as the Apostle says: “But we do not wish you to be ignorant concerning those who sleep, that you may not be sorrowful as also the others who have no hope.”
C. XXVII. Qui spem futurae resurrectionis habent de mortuis nimium tristari non debent.
Habent forsitan illi iustam longi doloris excusationem, qui uitam alteram nesciunt, qui de hoc seculo ad melius esse transitum non confidunt. Nos autem, qui hoc credimus et docemus, contristari nimium de obeuntibus non debemus, ne quod apud alios pietatis tenet speciem, hoc magis nobis in culpa sit. Nam diffidentiae quodammodo genus est contra hoc, quod quisque predicat, querere, iustitiam amans, dicente Apostolo: "Nolumus autem uos ignorare de dormientibus, ut non contristemini, sicut et ceteri, qui spem non habent."
Friedberg, col. 729/730
C. XXVIII. Concerning the same.
Likewise from the Third Council of Toledo, [c. 22]. Those who depart from this life by divine summons ought to be carried to the tomb only with psalms and the voices of those singing psalms. But let it suffice that the service of divine canticles is expended upon the bodies of Christians in hope of the resurrection. The holy Apostle forbids us to mourn the deceased, saying: “But concerning those who sleep, I do not wish you to be sorrowful, as also the others who have no hope.” And the Lord did not weep for the dead Lazarus, but wept for him who was to be raised again to the miseries of this life. If a bishop can forbid this to all Christians, let him not delay to act. Nevertheless, we judge that it ought in no way to be done otherwise for religious persons. For thus the bodies of deceased Christians ought to be buried throughout the whole world. PART XI. GRATIAN. It is also asked concerning the dead whether they know the things which are done here by the living. Isaiah says in the person of the afflicted people: “Abraham our father did not know us.” Augustine also testifies to the same in the book On the Care to Be Taken for the Dead, saying, [c. 15]:
C. XXVIII. De eodem.
Item ex Concilio Tolletano III. [c. 22.] Qui diuina uocatione ab hac uita recedunt, cum psalmis tantummodo et psallentium uocibus debent ad sepulcrum deferri. Sufficiat autem, quod in spe resurrectionis Christianorum corporibus famulatus diuinorum inpenditur canticorum. Prohibet nos sanctus Apostolus lugere defunctos, dicens: "De dormientibus autem nolo uos contristari, sicut et ceteri, qui spem non habent." Et Dominus non fleuit mortuum Lazarum, sed ad huius uitae erumpnas plorauit resuscitandum. Si autem potest hoc episcopus omnibus Christianis prohibere, non moretur agere. Religiosis tamen omnino aliter fieri non debere censemus. Sic enim Christianorum per omnem mundum humari oportet corpora defunctorum. XI. Pars. Gratian. De mortuis etiam queritur, utrum sciant ea, que hic a uiuis geruntur? Ysaias ex persona populi afflicti ait: "Abraham pater noster nesciuit." Augustinus quoque in libro de agenda cura pro mortuis illud idem testatur, dicens: [c. 15.]
Friedberg, col. 729/730
C. XXIX. The dead do not know of themselves the things which are done here.
It must be confessed that the dead indeed do not know what is done here while it is done here; but afterward they hear from those who proceed from here to them by dying—not indeed all things, but those things which these are permitted to remember and which it is fitting that those to whom they report them should hear. The dead can also hear something from the angels who are present at the things which are done here, according as He to whom all things are subject judges that each of them ought to hear. § 1. Many also believe that some of the dead come to the living, just as, conversely, divine Scripture testifies that Paul was caught up from the living into paradise. PART XII. GRATIAN. But concerning those who are suspended on gibbets, it is asked whether they are to be buried beside a church. Concerning them it was established thus in the Council of Mainz, [II, under Rabanus, c. 27]:
C. XXIX. Mortui ex se nesciunt que hic geruntur.
Fatendum est, nescire quidem mortuos quid hic agatur, sed dum hic agitur; postea uero audire ab eis, qui hinc ad eos moriendo pergunt, non quidem omnia, sed que sinuntur etiam isti meminisse et que illos quibus hec indicant, oportet audire. Possunt et ab angelis, qui rebus, que hic aguntur, presto sunt, audire aliquid mortui, quod unumquemque illorum audire debere iudicat cui cuncta subiecta sunt. §. 1. Multi quoque ad uiuos aliquos ex mortuis uenire credunt, sicut e contrario Paulum ex uiuis in paradisum raptum esse diuina scriptura testatur. XII. Pars. Gratian. De his autem, qui in patibulis suspenduntur, queritur, an iuxta ecclesiam sint sepeliendi? De quibus in Magonciensi Concilio [II. sub Rab ano, c. 27.,] ita statutum est:
Friedberg, col. 729/730
C. XXX. Communion is not to be denied to those who are suspended on gibbets.
It was asked by some brothers concerning those who are suspended on gibbets for their crimes after confession made to God, whether their corpses are to be carried to churches, offerings are to be offered for them, and Masses are to be celebrated, or not. To them we respond: If communion is to be given at the end, according to the precepts of the canons, to all who make pure confession of their sins and worthily repent, why do the canons interdict communion or burial to those who have paid the final penalty for their sins and confess or desire to confess? For it is written: “God does not judge twice for the same thing.”
C. XXX. Non est deneganda communio his, qui in patibulis suspenduntur.
Quesitum est ab aliquibus fratribus de his, qui in patibulis suspenduntur pro suis sceleribus post confessionem Deo peractam, utrum cadauera eorum ad ecclesias deferenda sint, et oblationes pro eis offerendae, et missae celebrandae, an non? Quibus respondemus, si omnibus de peccatis suis puram confessionem agentibus et digne penitentibus communio in fine secundum canonum precepta danda est, cur canones communionem uel sepulturam eis interdicunt, qui pro peccatis suis penam extremam persoluerunt et confitentur, uel confiteri desiderant? Scriptum est enim: "Non iudicat Deus bis in id ipsum."
Friedberg, col. 731/732
[PALEA. C. XXXI.
Thieves and robbers, if they are killed while stealing or plundering, it has seemed good that prayer not be made for them. If, after being captured or wounded, they have confessed to a priest or deacon, we do not deny them communion.]
[PALEA.
[PALEA. C. XXXI.
Fures et latrones, si in furando aut depredando occidantur, uisum est pro eis non orandum. Si conprehensi aut uulnerati presbitero uel diacono confessi fuerint, communionem eis non negamus. ]
[PALEA.
Friedberg, col. 731/732
C. XXXII. Concerning the same.
Likewise from the Council of Orléans. If a thief or robber caught in plunder can be captured without killing, and nevertheless he is killed, because they were created in the image of God and baptized in His name, their killers shall not enter the church for forty days. Clothed in woolen garments, let them abstain from foods and drinks which are forbidden, from the marriage bed, from the sword, and from riding. On Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday let them use in turn and temperately some kind of legumes or vegetables, fruits, and small fish, with moderate beer.
But if it is proved by truthful witnesses that, without premeditation of hatred, in freeing themselves and their own they killed members of the devil who could not be captured, we do not impose penance for homicide upon them, unless they themselves should wish to do something that belongs to humanity. But if he is a priest, let him not be deposed; nevertheless let him do penance all the days of his life.]
C. XXXII. De eodem.
Item ex Concilio Aurelianensi. Si fur aut latro captus in preda absque occisione potest conprehendi, et tamen interficitur, quia ad imaginem Dei creati et in nomine eius baptizati sunt, interfectores eorum quadraginta diebus non intrent ecclesiam. Lanea ueste induti ab escis et potibus, qui interdicti sunt, a toro, a gladio, ab equitatu se abstineant. In tertia, quinta feria et sabbato aliquo genere leguminum uel olerum, et pomis, paruisque pisciculis, cum mediocri cereuisia uicissim utantur et temperate.
Sin autem a ueridicis conprobatur testibus, quod sine odii meditatione se suaque liberando diaboli membra interfecerint, et capi non poterant, penitenciam pro homicidio eis non iniungimus, nisi ipsi uoluerint aliquid quod humanitatis est facere. At si presbiter est, non deponatur; cunctis tamen diebus uitae suae penitenciam agat. ]
Friedberg, col. 731/732