distinction — Decretum of Gratian
Distinction XLIV
GRATIAN. Part I. When he is prohibited from being given to wine, he is by no means permitted to have intemperance of gluttony; for drunkenness is not prohibited while voracity is permitted. The Apostle numbers both among the works of darkness, writing to the Romans: “Not in revelings and drunkenness.” For the voracity of the belly easily provokes toward lust and dissolves every good work. Hence the belly and the genitals are near to one another, so that from the proximity of the members the alliance of the vices may be understood. Hence also Nebuzaradan, the chief of the cooks, is read to have destroyed the walls of Jerusalem, because the belly, which the multitude of cooks serves, levels the edifices of the virtues to the ground. Therefore, let a priest seek to live from the altar, not to live luxuriously. Hence Jerome says: “You, O priest, are permitted to live from the altar, not to live luxuriously.” §1. Revelings, moreover, are harmful not only to priests but also to laypeople, who think that they celebrate festive and solemn days worthily in no other way unless they serve revelings. Hence Augustine writes to Bishop Aurelius [epistle LXIV]:
GRATIANUS. I. Pars. Cum autem uinolentus esse prohibetur, gulae intemperantiam nequaquam habere permittitur; neque enim ebrietas prohibetur, et uoracitas permittitur. Utrumque enim inter opera tenebrarum Apostolus connumerat, scribens Romanis: "Non in comessationibus et ebrietatibus." Ventris namque ingluuies ad luxuriam facile prouocat, et omne bonum opus dissoluit. Unde uenter et genitalia sibimetipsis uicina sunt, ut ex uicinitate membrorum confederatio intelligatur uitiorum. Hinc etiam Nabusardan princeps cocorum muros Ierusalem destruxisse legitur, quia uenter, cui multitudo cocorum deseruit, edificia uirtutum ad solum redigit. Sacerdos itaque de altario uiuere, non luxuriari querat. Unde Ieronimus ait: "Tibi o sacerdos de altario uiuere, non luxuriari permittitur." §. 1. Sunt autem comessationes non solum sacerdotibus, sed etiam laicis noxiae qui festiuos et solempnes dies non aliter se digne celebrare putant, nisi comessationibus deseruiant. Unde Augustinus scribit ad Aurelium Episcopum: [epist. LXIV.]
Friedberg, col. 155/156
C. I. One must not give oneself to revelings and drunkenness.
Revelings and drunkenness are thought to be so conceded and lawful that in honor of the most blessed martyrs they are celebrated not only on solemn days—something that everyone who does not behold these things with fleshly eyes sees is to be lamented—but even daily. And a little later: Therefore, as I judge, these things are removed not harshly, not severely, not in an imperious manner, but more by teaching than by commanding, more by admonishing than by threatening. For one must act thus with a multitude. Severity, however, is to be exercised against the sins of a few. And if indeed we threaten, let it be done with sorrow, by threatening the future vengeance from the Scriptures, so that not we ourselves in our power but God in our discourse may be feared. Thus the spiritual, or those near to the spiritual, will first be moved, and by their authority and indeed very gentle but most persistent admonitions the remaining multitude may be broken.
C. I. Non est uacandum comessationibus et ebrietatibus.
Comessationes et ebrietates ita concessae putantur et licitae, ut in honorem beatissimorum martirum non solum per dies solempnes, (quod unus quisque non lugendum uideat, qui hec non carneis oculis inspicit?), sed etiam cotidie celebrentur. Et post pauca: Non ergo aspere, quantum estimo, non duriter, non modo imperiose ista tolluntur: magis docendo quam iubendo, magis monendo quam minando. Sic enim agendum est cum multitudine. Seueritas autem exercenda est in peccata paucorum. Et si quidem minamur, cum dolore fiat, de scripturis comminando uindictam futuram, ne nos ipsi in nostra potestate, sed Deus in nostro sermone timeatur. Ita prius mouebuntur spirituales uel spiritualibus proximi, quorum auctoritate et lenissimis quidem, sed instantissimis admonicionibus cetera multitudo frangatur.
Friedberg, col. 157/158
C. II. None of the clerics or continent persons is permitted to enter taverns.
Likewise from the Council of Laodicea [c. 24]. Clerics serving from priests down to subdeacons, and thereafter all of ecclesiastical order down to ministers, or readers, or exorcists, or ostiaries, or psalmists, or even those who are in a profession of continence, ought not to enter taverns.
C. II. Nulli clericorum aut continentium licet tabernas intrare.
Item ex Concilio Laudicensi. [c. 24.] Non oportet clericos seruientes a presbiteris usque ad subdiaconos et deinceps ordinis ecclesiastici omnes usque ad ministros, aut lectores, aut exorcistas, aut hostiarios, aut psalmistas, aut etiam eos, qui in proposito continentiae sunt, tabernas intrare.
Friedberg, col. 157/158
C. III. Let a cleric who wishes to keep a tavern or workshop be deposed.
Likewise from the Sixth Synod [c. 9]. No cleric is permitted to keep a tavern or workshop. For if he is prohibited from entering a tavern of this kind, how much more from ministering to others in it? But if anyone does such a thing, let him either cease or be deposed.
C. III. Deponatur clericus, qui tabernas aut ergasterium habere uoluerit.
Item ex VI. Sinodo. [cap. 9.] Nulli licet clerico tabernam aut ergasterium habere. Si enim huiusmodi tabernam ingredi inhibetur, quanto magis aliis ministrare in ea? Si quis uero tale quid fecerit, aut cesset, aut deponatur.
Friedberg, col. 157/158
C. IV. Unless compelled by necessity, clerics are not to enter taverns.
Likewise from the Third Council of Carthage [c. 27]. Let clerics not enter taverns for the sake of eating or drinking unless compelled by the necessity of travel.
C. IV. Nisi necessitate compulsi clerici tabernas non ingrediantur.
Item ex Concilio Cartaginensi III. [c. 27.] Clerici edendi uel bibendi causa tabernas non ingrediantur, nisi peregrinationis necessitate compulsi.
Friedberg, col. 157/158
C. V. A bishop who is occupied with banquets is to be corrected.
Likewise Gregory to Bishop Natalis [Book II of the Register, indiction X, epistle 14]. Part II. From many persons coming from your city, dearest brother, I learned that, having abandoned pastoral care, you are occupied only with banquets. I would not believe the things heard unless I proved them by the evidence of your actions. For the fact that you by no means devote yourself to reading, by no means watch over exhortation, but are ignorant even of the very practice of ecclesiastical order, is testified by the fact that you do not know how to preserve reverence toward those under whom you are placed.
C. V. Corripiendus est episcopus, qui conuiuiis occupatur.
Item Gregorius Natali Episcopo. [lib. II. Reg. Indict. X. epist. 14.] II. Pars. Multis ab urbe tua uenientibus, frater karissime, didici, pastorali cura derelicta solis te conuiuiis occupatum. Que audita non crederem, nisi hec actionum tuarum experimentis approbarem. Nam quia nequaquam lectioni studeas, nequaquam exortationi inuigiles, sed ipsum quoque usum ecclesiastici ordinis ignores, hoc est in testimonium, quod eis, sub quibus positus es, seruare reuerentiam nescis.
Friedberg, col. 157/158
C. VI. Concerning the same.
Likewise to the same [Book II, epistle 37]. Your fraternity rightly praises in its letters banquets that are held with the intention of expending charity. Yet it must be known that they truly proceed from charity when the life of no absent person is bitten in them, no one is reproved in mockery, and in them not the empty tales of secular affairs but the words of sacred reading are heard; when the body is served no more than necessary, but only its infirmity is refreshed, so that it may be maintained for the exercise of virtue. Therefore, if you do these things at your banquets, I confess that you are masters of those who abstain.
[PALEA.
C. VI. De eodem.
Item ad eundem. [ib. II. epist. 37.] Conuiuia, que ex intentione impendendae karitatis fiunt, recte uestra fraternitas in suis epistolis laudat. Sed tamen sciendum est, quia tunc ex karitate ueraciter prodeunt, cum in eis nulla absentium uita mordetur, nullus ex irrisione reprehenditur, nec in eis inanes secularium negotiorum fabulae, sed uerba sacrae lectionis audiuntur; cum non plus, quam necesse est, seruitur corpori, sed sola eius infirmitas reficitur, ut ad usus exercendae uirtutis habeatur. Hec itaque si uos in uestris conuiuiis agitis, abstinentium, fateor, magistri estis.
[PALEA.
Friedberg, col. 157/158
C. VII. Likewise from the Council of Nantes.
Let none of the priests, when he has gathered at the annual day, the thirtieth, seventh, or third day of any deceased person, or when priests have gathered at a collection by any invitation, presume in any way to become intoxicated, nor, having been entreated, to drink for love of the saints or of the soul itself, or to compel others to drink, or to gorge himself at another’s entreaty. Nor let him presume to make disorderly applause and laughter, to recount empty tales there, or to sing; or permit shameful entertainments to be performed before him either by a bear or by dancing women; nor consent that masks of demons be carried before him, because this is diabolical and prohibited by the sacred canons.]
[PALEA
C. VII. Item ex Concilio Nanetensi.
Nullus presbiterorum, quando ad anniuersarium diem, trigesimum, aut septimum, uel tertium alicuius defuncti, aut quacumque uocatione ad collectam presbiteri conuenerit, se inebriare ullatenus presumat, nec precatus amore sanctorum uel ipsius animae bibere, aut alios ad bibendum cogere, uel se aliena precatione ingurgitare; nec plausus et risus inconditos, et fabulas inanes ibi referre, aut cantare presumat, aut turpia ioca uel urso, uel tornatricibus ante se fieri patiatur; nec laruas demonum ante se ferri consentiat, quia hoc diabolicum est et a sacris canonibus prohibitum. ]
[PALEA
Friedberg, col. 157/158
C. VIII. Concerning the same.
Likewise from the same. When priests gather at any banquet, let one who is their prior begin a verse before the table and bless the food. Then let them sit according to order, one offering honor to another; and let them bless the food and drink by turns, and let one of their clerics read something from holy Scripture. And after the refreshment, let them similarly say a holy hymn after the example of the Lord, as he is read to have done at the supper; and let all priests conduct themselves in such a way, especially in places of this kind, that their ministry may not be reviled.]
[PALEA
C. VIII. De eodem.
Item ex eodem. Quando autem conuenerint presbiteri ad aliquod conuiuium, aliquis prior illorum uersum ante mensam incipiat et cibum benedicat. Et tunc secundum ordinem sedeant, alter alteri honorem prebentes; et per uices cibum et potum benedicant, et aliquis de illorum clericis aliquid de sancta scriptura legat. Et post refectionem similiter sanctum ymnum dicant ad exemplum Domini, sicut in cena fecisse legitur, et sic se contineant omnes presbiteri, maxime in talibus locis, ut non uituperetur ministerium illorum. ]
[PALEA
Friedberg, col. 157/158
C. IX. Concerning the same.
Likewise from the same. When priests gather together at the Kalends, after the divine mystery has been completed, for a necessary conference, let them sit there at the tables not as though for a full refreshment but as though for a breakfast, lest through such dishonorable banquets they burden one another, because this is unbecoming and burdensome. Often, moreover, when they return late to the church they obtain greater loss from reproof, contracted from the burden they impose upon one another, than the profit they make there. For concerning an assembly of this kind Paul reproves the Corinthians, who came together to eat the Lord’s supper in an unfitting manner. So also those who come together for the Lord’s supper, that is, for a conference upon the word, under that pretext, while in truth they unite for the sake of the belly, are held reprehensible before God and human beings. And therefore, when all things have been completed, let those who wish break bread with charity in the house of their brother together with the brethren, and let each cause each to drink, and especially let them not touch the cup beyond a third time; and so let them return to the churches.]
C. IX. De eodem.
Item ex eodem. Quando presbiteri per calendas simul conueniunt post peractum diuinum misterium ad necessariam collationem, non quasi ad plenam refectionem, sed quasi ad prandium ibi ad tabulas resideant, ne per talia inhonesta conuiuia se inuicem grauent, quia indecens est et onerosum. Sepe etiam tarde ad ecclesiam redeuntes maius damnum de reprehensione consequuntur, quod de grauedine mutua contrahunt, quam lucrum ibi faciant. Nam de huiusmodi conuentu Paulus Corinthios reprehendit, qui inconuenienter cenam dominicam manducare conueniebant. Sic et qui ad cenam dominicam, id est ad collationem uerbi, sub occasione conueniunt, et ex ueritate uentris causa coniunguntur, reprehensibiles coram Deo et hominibus habentur. Et ideo peractis omnibus, qui uoluerint panem cum caritate in domo fratris sui simul cum fratribus frangant, et singuli singulos bibere faciant, et maxime ultra tertiam uicem poculum non contingant, et sic ad ecclesias redeant. ]
Friedberg, col. 159/160
C. X. Christians are not to celebrate banquets from contributions.
Likewise from the Council of Laodicea [c. 55]. Part III. Ministers of the altar or any clerics, or even Christian laypeople, ought not to celebrate banquets from contributions, which the common people call drinking parties.
C. X. Christiani ex simbolis conuiuia non celebrent.
Item ex Concilio Laudicensi. [c. 55] III. Pars. Non oportet ministros altaris uel quoslibet clericos, aut etiam laicos Christianos ex simbolis, que uulgus comissalia appellat, conuiuia celebrare.
Friedberg, col. 159/160
C. XI. A reading from the sacred Scriptures is always to be mingled with priestly banquets.
Likewise from the Third Council of Toledo [c. 7]. For reverence toward God and the priests, the universal synod established that, because idle tales are frequently accustomed to be interposed at tables, a reading from the divine Scriptures should be mingled with every priestly banquet. For through this both souls are built up toward the good and unnecessary tales are prohibited.
C. XI. Sacrarum scripturarum lectio sacerdotalibus conuiuiis semper admisceatur.
Item ex Concilio Tolletano III. [c. 7.] Pro reuerentia Dei et sacerdotum id uniuersa constituit sinodus, ut (quia solent crebro mensis ociosae fabulae interponi) in omni sacerdotali conuiuio lectio diuinarum scripturarum misceatur. Per hoc enim et animae edificantur ad bonum, et fabulae non necessariae prohibentur.
Friedberg, col. 159/160
C. XII. Clerics are permitted neither to hold banquets from contributions nor to eat before the third hour of the day.
Likewise from the Council of Pope Martin [cc. 61 and 66]. Let priests or clerics, or even religious laypeople, not be permitted to hold banquets from contributions. §1. Nor ought clerics or religious laypeople to enter banquets before the sacred third hour of the day, nor at any time ought clerics to eat bread unless a hymn has been said, and after food to return thanks to God the author. GRATIAN. Therefore, if revelings are damnable for laypeople, much more are they imputed to priests unto Gehenna. For a fat belly, as Jerome says, generates a gross understanding, whereas priestly understanding ought, on the contrary, to be watchful and subtle; and therefore those subject to the vice of gluttony ought not to be anointed as priests. For those, as Gregory says in the Moralia, who are still subject to the warfare of vices ought by no means to preside over the teaching of others through the practice of preaching.
C. XII. De confertis nec conuiuia facere, nec ante horam diei tertiam clericis comedere licet.
Item ex Concilio Martini Papae. [c. 61. et 66.] Non liceat sacerdotes uel clericos, sed nec religiosos laicos conuiuia facere de confertis. §. 1. Nec oportet clericos uel laicos religiosos ante sacram horam diei tertiam inire conuiuia, neque aliquando clericos, nisi ymno dicto edere panem, et post cibos gratias auctori Deo referre. Gratian. Si ergo laicis comessationes dampnabiles sunt, multo magis sacerdotibus inputantur ad gehennam. Venter enim pinguis (ut ait Ieronimus) crassum sensum generat, cum sacerdotalis sensus econtra uigil debeat esse et tenuis; atque ideo edacitatis uitio obnoxii in sacerdotes ungi non debent. Hi enim (ut ait Gregorius in Moralibus), qui adhuc uiciorum bello subiacent, nequaquam per predicationis usum preesse magisterio ceterorum debent.
Friedberg, col. 159/160