Question — Decretum of Gratian
Question IV
GRATIAN. Part I. Concerning the fourth question, Pope Fabian established, [letter II to the Eastern Bishops], saying:
GRATIANUS. I. Pars. De quarta uero questione Fabianus Papa [epist. II. ad Episcopos orientales] constituit, dicens:
Friedberg, col. 541/542
C. I. No one can be accuser and witness or judge at the same time.
Let no one ever presume to be accuser and judge or witness at the same time, because in every judgment it is always necessary that there be four persons: namely, chosen judges, suitable accusers, fitting defenders, and lawful witnesses. Judges, however, ought to use equity; witnesses, truth; accusers, intention toward enlarging the case; defenders, mitigation toward diminishing the case.
C. I. Accusator, testis uel iudex aliquis simul esse non potest.
Nullus umquam presumat accusator simul esse et iudex uel testis, quoniam in omni iudicio quatuor personas semper esse necesse est, id est iudices electos, et idoneos accusatores, defensores congruos atque legitimos testes. Iudices autem debent uti equitate, testes ueritate, accusatores intentione ad amplificandam causam, defensores extenuatione ad minuendam causam.
Friedberg, col. 541/542
C. II. No one can bear two persons in a case.
Likewise Pope Damasus, [letter IV, c. 7]. Let no one be introduced personally into a case, but let accusers and accused persons be heard with equal reason, according to what order requires. But let accusers and judges not be the same persons; rather, let accusers be separate, judges separate, witnesses separate, and accused persons separate, each one in his own order. Part II. § 1. Let a formal inscription always be made so that the calumniator may receive retaliation, because before an inscription no one ought to be judged or condemned, since even the laws of the world maintain these same things. GRATIAN. In book IX of the Code, under the title On Accusations, [law 7]; in the book of the Code On Adulteries, [law 6]; under the title On Cattle Thieves, [sole law]. § 1. Sometimes an accusation can also be made without a formal inscription. “For it is not unknown that those things which are reported to governors by officials can be weighed even without the formalities of accusations.” § 2. Likewise, [Code, On Adulteries, law 6]. If a husband wishes to accuse his wife of adultery by a husband's right, that is, within sixty available days, he can make her a defendant from suspicion alone and is not held by the bond of a formal inscription. § 3. Likewise, [Code, On Cattle Thieves, sole law]. An accusation concerning a driven-away animal is presented not only with formal inscriptions but also without that observance. § 4. Likewise, [Code, On Accusations, law 8]. If anyone thinks that he has suffered an injury from another and wishes to bring a complaint, let him not run to the stationarii, but approach the authority of the governor, either offering written petitions or lodging his complaints in the official records. § 5. But in other criminal cases it is fitting that formal inscriptions be set forth first, which designate, namely, the magnitude of the crime and the time, so that the fitting authority of the laws may terrify either party. Part III. GRATIAN. An accuser or witness ought not to be produced from the household of the judge either, lest the judge fall into a cause of suspicion. Hence Pope Nicholas, [to Emperor Michael, in the letter which begins, “We had proposed”]:
C. II. Quilibet in causa duas personas gerere non ualet.
Item Damasus Papa. [epist. IV. c. 7.] Nullus introducatur personaliter ad causam, sed accusatores et accusati equa audiantur ratione, iuxta quod ordo exigit. Accusatores uero et iudices non iidem sint, sed per se accusatores, per se iudices, per se testes, per se accusati, unusquisque in suo ordine. II. Pars. §. 1. Inscriptio semper fiat ut talionem calumpniator recipiat, quia ante inscriptionem nemo debet iudicari uel dampnari, cum et seculi leges hec eadem retineant. Gratian. Codice libro IX. titulo de accusationibus. [l. 7.] Codice libro de adulteriis, [l. 6.] titulo de abigeis. [l. unica] §. 1. Aliquando etiam sine inscriptione accusatio fieri potest. "Ea enim, que per officiales presidibus nunciantur, et citra solempnia accusationum posse perpendi incognitum non est." §. 2. Item: [Codice de adulteriis, l. 6.] Si maritus iure mariti, hoc est infra sexaginta dies utiles, adulterium uxoris suae accusare uoluerit, quam ex suspicione sola ream facere ualet, non continetur uinculo inscriptionis. §. 3. Item: [Cod. de abigeis, l. unica] Abacti animalis accusatio non solum cum inscriptionibus, sed etiam sine ea obseruatione proponitur. §. 4. Item: [Cod. de accusat. l. 8.] Si quis se iniuriam ab aliquo passum putauerit, et querelam deferre uoluerit, non ad stationarios decurrat, sed presidialem adeat potestatem, aut libellos offerens, aut querelas suas apud acta deponens. §. 5. In aliis autem criminalibus causis dignum est, ut inscriptiones preponantur, que magnitudinem uidelicet criminis tempusque designent, ut alterutram partem digna legum possit terrere auctoritas. III. Pars. Gratian. De domo etiam iudicis accusator uel testis produci non debet, ne in causam suspicionis incidat iudex. Unde Nicolaus Papa: [ad Michaelem Inp., epistola, cuius initium est: "Proposueramus."]
Friedberg, col. 541/542
C. III. A judge from whose household either the accuser or a witness is produced will fall under the charge of suspicion.
Contrary to ecclesiastical custom and the venerable laws, an accuser is produced from the imperial household, and one who can be commanded to give false testimony is employed. The judges become suspect, and wolves become guardians.
C. III. Suspicionis incidet in crimen iudex, de cuius domo uel accusator uel testis producitur.
Contra ritum ecclesiasticum, contraque uenerandas leges producitur accusator de inperialibus edibus, et cui inperari potest ad falsum dicendum testimonium adhibetur. Fiunt suspecti iudices, et lupi custodes.
Friedberg, col. 541/542