distinction — Decretum of Gratian
Distinction LXXIX
GRATIAN. Part I. The Apostolic Lord, however, is to be enthroned only by the Cardinals and religious clerics. Hence Pope Nicholas [II] says, [in the epistle in which he reports the synod held by him at Rome, c. 1]:
GRATIANUS. I. Pars. Apostolicus autem non nisi a Cardinalibus et religiosis clericis est intronizandus. Unde Nicolaus papa [II.] ait: [in epistola, qua sinodum a se Romae habitam refert, cap. 1.]
Friedberg, col. 275/276
C. I. Concerning one who is enthroned without the concordant election of the Cardinals.
If anyone is enthroned in the apostolic see without the concordant and canonical election of its Cardinals and thereafter of the religious clerics following them, let him be regarded not as Pope or Apostolic Lord, but as an apostate.
C. I. De eo qui sine concordi electione Cardinalium intronizatur.
Si quis apostolicae sedi sine concordi et canonica electione Cardinalium eiusdem ac deinde sequentium clericorum religiosorum intronizatur, non Papa uel Apostolicus, sed apostaticus habeatur.
Friedberg, col. 275/276
C. II. While the Pope survives, let no one dare to speak about the election of a future Pontiff without consulting him.
Likewise Pope Symmachus, [in the First Roman Synod, cc. 3 and 5]. If anyone, while the Pope survives, is convicted of furnishing favor to anyone in any manner for the Roman pontificate, let him be deprived of the honor of his place. And below: If any priest, deacon, or cleric, while the Pope is unharmed and without consulting him, shall attempt either to lend his subscription for the Roman pontificate, to promise written pledges, to furnish an oath, certainly to promise any support, or, with private meetings held concerning this cause, to deliberate or determine anything, let him be deprived of the dignity of his place or of communion. And below: Because of the hidden frauds and secret snares of conspiracies which the judgment of this severity pursues, if anyone brings to ecclesiastical notice the counsels of those who have acted contrary to this synod concerning the ambition for the pontificate, and convicts them by reasonable proof, although a participant in an action of this kind, let him not only be purged of every fault but also be raised up by a reward that is not unworthy.
C. II. Papa superstite, eo inconsulto de electione futuri Pontificis nemo audeat loqui.
Item Simacus Papa. [in Sinodo Romana I. cap. 3. et 5.] Si quis superstite Papa pro Romano Pontificatu cuiquam quolibet modo fauorem prestare conuincitur, loci sui honore priuetur. Et infra: Si quis presbiter, aut diaconus, aut clericus, Papa incolumi et eo inconsulto, aut subscriptionem pro Romano Pontificatu commodare, aut pitacia promittere, aut sacramentum prebere temptauerit, aut aliquod certe suffragium polliceri, uel de hac causa priuatis conuenticulis factis deliberare aliquid atque decernere presumpserit, loci sui dignitate, uel communione priuetur. Et infra: Propter occultas fraudes et coniurationum secretas insidias, quas sententia huius districtionis consequitur, si quis ad ecclesiasticam pertulerit noticiam consilia eorum, qui contra hanc sinodum de pontificali egerint ambitu, et rationabili probatione conuicerit, particeps actionis huiusmodi non solum purgatus ab omni culpa sit, sed etiam remuneratione, que non indigna sit, subleuetur.
Friedberg, col. 275/276
C. III. No one is to be promoted to the summit of the apostolate unless from among the Cardinals.
Likewise from the Council of Pope Stephen, [III]. It was fitting that this most sacred lady, our Roman Church, be duly ordered according to what was instituted by Blessed Peter and his successors, and that one of the cardinal priests or deacons be consecrated to the summit of the apostolate.
C. III. In apostolatus culmen nisi ex Cardinalibus non promoueatur.
Item ex Concilio Stephani Papae. [III.] Oportebat, ut hec sacrosancta domina nostra Romana ecclesia (iuxta quod a B. petro et eius successoribus institutum est) rite ordinaretur, et in apostolatus culmen unus de cardinalibus presbiteris aut diaconibus consecraretur.
Friedberg, col. 277/278
C. IV. On the same.
Likewise from the same. Let no layman, nor one from another order, ever presume to be promoted to the sacred pontifical honor unless, ascending through the distinct grades, he has been made a cardinal deacon or priest.
C. IV. De eodem.
Item ex eodem. Nullus umquam laicorum neque ex alio ordine presumat nisi per distinctos gradus ascendens diaconus aut presbiter factus fuerit cardinalis, ad sacrum pontificalem honorem promoueri.
Friedberg, col. 277/278
C. V. Let a bishop, monk, or layman who invades the Roman Church and breaks into the grade of her sons be anathematized.
Likewise from the same. If anyone from among bishops, monks, or laymen, breaking contrary to the institutes of the canons and holy Fathers into the grade of the sons of the holy Roman Church, that is, of the cardinal priests and deacons, shall presume to enter it; and if anyone from among the aforesaid shall attempt to invade this apostolic see and shall wish to ascend to the supreme pontifical honor, let a perpetual anathema be made against him and those favoring him. And below: § 1. If anyone presumes to resist the priests and primates of the Church or all the clergy in electing a Roman Pontiff for themselves according to canonical tradition, let him be anathema.
C. V. Anathematizetur episcopus uel monachus uel laicus Romanam ecclesiam inuadens, et in gradum filiorum eius prorumpens.
Item ex eodem. Si quis ex episcopis, uel monachis, uel laicis contra canonum et sanctorum Patrum instituta prorumpens in gradum filiorum sanctae Romanae ecclesiae, id est presbiterorum cardinalium et diaconorum ire presumpserit, et hanc apostolicam sedem inuadere quilibet ex supradictis temptauerit, et ad summum pontificalem honorem ascendere uoluerit, ipsi et sibi fauentibus fiat perpetuum anathema. Et infra: §. 1. Si quis resistere presumpserit sacerdotibus atque primatibus ecclesiae, uel cuncto clero ad eligendum sibi Romanum Pontificem secundum canonicam tradicionem, anathema sit.
Friedberg, col. 277/278
C. VI. Let him be anathema who presumes to contradict the canonical election of the Roman Pontiff.
Likewise from the Council of Pope Leo, [IV]. If anyone presumes to oppose the priests, the noble primates, or all the clergy of this holy Roman Church in the election of the Roman Pontiff, as is read to have been enacted in the council of the most blessed Popes Boniface and Stephen, let him be anathema.
C. VI. Anathema sit, qui canonicae electioni Romani pontificis contradicere presumpserit.
Item ex Concilio Leonis Papae. [IV.] Si quis sacerdotibus, seu primatibus nobilibus, seu cuncto clero huius sanctae Romanae ecclesiae, electionem Romani pontificis contradicere presumpserit, sicut in concilio beatissimi Bonifatii et Stephani Papae legitur statutum, anathema sit.
Friedberg, col. 277/278
C. VII. No bishop’s election is to be made until after the third day following the burial of the other.
Likewise from the Council of Boniface, [Pope III]. Part II. While the Roman Pontiff or the bishop of his city is living, let no one presume to speak or make parties for himself until the third day after his burial, when the clergy and sons of the Church have been assembled; and then let the election be made. Part III. GRATIAN. But it is asked: if two men have been ordained through the temerity of the contenders, which of them is to be preferred to the other? Concerning them Honorius Augustus writes as follows to Pope Boniface:
C. VII. Nullius episcopi fiat electio, nisi post diem tercium depositionis alterius.
Item ex Concilio Bonifatii. [Papae III.] II. Pars. Nullus Pontifice Romano uiuente aut episcopo ciuitatis suae presumat loqui, aut partes sibi facere, nisi tercio die depositionis eius, adunato clero et filiis ecclesiae, et tunc electio fiat. III. Pars. Gratian. Sed queritur, si duo temeritate concertantium ordinati fuerint, quis eorum alteri sit preferendus? De his ita scribit Honorius Augustus ad Bonifatium Papam:
Friedberg, col. 277/278
C. VIII. If two have been ordained through the temerity of the contenders.
If perhaps two men have been ordained contrary to divine law through the temerity of the contenders, we permit neither of them to be the future priest; rather, we judge that he alone is to remain in the apostolic see whom divine judgment and the consent of the whole body shall elect from the number of the clerics by a new ordination. Part IV. GRATIAN. This chapter, however, is not to be understood of one who, when one man has been ordained through apostasy, is enthroned in the apostolic see by the Cardinals and religious clerics, even if that apostate has violently held the chair of Blessed Peter in such a way that a canonical election cannot be made within the City. Hence Pope Nicholas [II, in the Roman Council] enacted, saying:
C. VIII. Si temeritate concertantium duo fuerint ordinati.
Si duo forte contra fas temeritate concertancium fuerint ordinati, nullum ex eis futurum sacerdotem permittimus, sed illum solum in sede apostolica permansurum censemus, quem ex numero clericorum noua ordinatione diuinum iudicium et uniuersitatis consensus elegerit. IV. Pars. Gratian. Hoc autem capitulum non de eo intelligendum est, qui uno per apostasiam ordinato a Cardinalibus et religiosis clericis apostolicae sedi intronizatur, etiamsi ille apostaticus ita cathedram B. Petri uiolenter tenuerit, ut canonica electio intra Urbem fieri non ualeat. Unde Nicolaus papa [II. in Concilio Romano] statuit, dicens:
Friedberg, col. 277/278
C. IX. Concerning one who is ordained by money or popular tumult, not by canonical election.
If anyone is enthroned in the apostolic see by money, human favor, popular tumult, or military tumult, without the canonical and concordant election of the Cardinals and the religious clerics following them, let him be regarded not as the Apostolic Lord but as an apostate; and let it be permissible for the Cardinals and other God-fearing clerics and laymen to anathematize the invader and drive him from the apostolic see with human aid. But if they are unable to accomplish this within the City, having assembled by apostolic authority outside the City in whatever place pleases them, let them make the election, with authority granted to the elected man to govern and dispose the affairs and advantage of the holy Roman Church according to the character of the time, as though he had been enthroned. Part V. GRATIAN. The election of the Roman Pontiff, however, ought also to be made with the deliberation of his predecessor. Hence Symmachus says, [in the First Roman Synod, c. 4]:
C. IX. De eo, qui pecunia uel populari tumultu, non canonica electione ordinatur.
Si quis pecunia uel gratia humana, aut populari tumultu seu militari, sine canonica et concordi electione cardinalium, et sequentium religiosorum clericorum fuerit apostolicae sedi intronizatus, non Apostolicus, sed apostaticus habeatur, liceatque cardinalibus et aliis clericis timentibus Deum et laicis inuasorem anathematizare et humano auxilio a sede apostolica pellere. Quod si intra Urbem perficere nequiuerint, apostolica auctoritate extra urbem congregati in loco, quo eis placuerit, electionem faciant, concessa electo auctoritate regendi et disponendi res et utilitatem sanctae
Romanae ecclesiae iuxta qualitatem temporis, quasi intronizatus sit. V. Pars. Gratian. Electio uero Romani pontificis etiam cum deliberatione predecessoris fieri debet. Unde Simacus ait: [in Sinodo Romana I. cap. 4.]
Friedberg, col. 277/278
C. X. If the Pope is unable to determine concerning the election of his successor.
If the Pope’s passing occurs unexpectedly, so that he cannot first determine concerning the election of his successor as was approved above, then, if the election of the whole ecclesiastical order has come together upon one man, let the elected man be consecrated bishop. But if, as is customary, the interests of those among whom the contest arises begin to be diverse, let the judgment of the greater number prevail; yet in such a way that one who, captured by a promise, determined concerning the election by a judgment that was not upright is to lack the priesthood. Part VI. GRATIAN. As was shown above, the election of supreme priests ought to be made by Cardinals and religious clerics, but their removal is reserved to divine judgment. Hence Pope Anacletus says, [to the Bishops of Italy, epistle II, c. 2]:
C. X. Si Papa de electione sui successoris decernere non poterit.
Si transitus Papae inopinatus euenerit, ut de sui electione successoris, ut supra placuit, non possit ante decernere, siquidem totius in unum conuenerit ecclesiastici ordinis electio, consecretur electus episcopus. Si uero, ut fieri solet, studia ceperint esse diuersa eorum, de quibus certamen emerserit, conuincat sententia plurimorum: sic tamen, ut sacerdotio careat, qui captus promissione non recto iudicio de electione decreuerit. VI. Pars. Gratian. Sicut supra monstratum est, electio summorum sacerdotum a Cardinalibus et religiosis clericis debet fieri: eiectio uero eorum diuino iudicio est reseruata. Unde Anacletus Papa ait: [ad Episcopos Italiae, epist. II. cap. 2.]
Friedberg, col. 279/280
C. XI. The Lord has reserved to himself the removal of supreme priests.
The Lord has reserved to himself the removal of supreme priests, although he granted their election to good priests and spiritual peoples.
C. XI. Summorum sacerdotum eiectionem sibi Dominus reseruauit.
Eiectionem summorum sacerdotum sibi Dominus reseruauit, licet electionem eorum bonis sacerdotibus et spiritualibus populis concessisset.
Friedberg, col. 279/280