Question — Decretum of Gratian
Question IV
GRATIAN. Part I. That which was asked in the fourth place—whether a bishop is to be condemned by the testimony of two persons—is proved by the authority of many. For, as is read in the Gospel of John, Christ says to the Jews: “It is written in your law that the testimony of two men is true.” From this he consequently argues against them, saying: “If the testimony of two men is true, why do you not receive my testimony and that of the Father?” Likewise Paul in the Epistle to the Corinthians: “In the mouth of two or three witnesses every word shall stand.” Likewise in the Epistle to the Hebrews: “Anyone transgressing the law of Moses, convicted by two or three witnesses, was stoned without mercy.”
GRATIANUS. I. Pars. Quod uero quarto loco querebatur: An duorum testimonio episcopus sit condempnandus? multorum auctoritate probatur. Sicut enim in euangelio Iohannis legitur, ait Christus ad Iudeos: "In lege uestra scriptum est, quoniam duorum hominum testimonium uerum est." Hinc consequenter argumentatur contra eos, dicens: "Si testimonium duorum hominum uerum est, quare testimonium meum et patris non accipitis?" Item Paulus in epistola ad Corintios: "In ore duorum uel trium testium stabit omne uerbum." Item in epistola ad Ebreos: "Quis preuaricans legem Moisi, duobus uel tribus testibus conuictus, sine miseratione lapidabatur."
Friedberg, col. 465/466
C. I. By how many witnesses each cleric ought to be convicted.
Likewise from the Second Council of Braga, [c. 8]. It was resolved that, if anyone assails any cleric with the stain of fornication, two or three testimonies shall be required from him according to the precept of the Apostle Paul. But if he has not been able to prove by testimonies what he said, the accuser shall receive the excommunication of the accused. GRATIAN. Part II. From the foregoing, therefore, it is gathered that a bishop can be convicted and condemned by the testimony of two or three persons. Pope Sylvester, however, sitting in a general synod, said to the contrary:
C. I. Quot testibus quisque clericorum conuinci debeat.
Item ex Concilio Bracarensi II. [c. 8.] Placuit, ut si quis aliquem clericorum maculatione fornicationis inpetit, secundum preceptum Pauli apostoli duo uel tria testimonia requirantur ab illo. Quod si non potuerit datis testimoniis approbare quod dixit, excommunicationem accusati accusator accipiat. II. Pars. Gratian. Ex premissis itaque colligitur, quod duorum uel trium testimonio episcopus potest conuinci et dampnari. Porro Siluester papa in generali sinodo residens dixit econtra:
Friedberg, col. 465/466
C. II. By how many witnesses a bishop, a priest, or the other clerics are to be convicted.
A prelate shall not be condemned except with seventy-two witnesses. A cardinal priest, however, shall not be deposed except with sixty-four witnesses; a cardinal deacon of the city of Rome shall not be condemned except with twenty-seven witnesses. A subdeacon, acolyte, exorcist, lector, or doorkeeper shall not be condemned except with seven witnesses. The witnesses and accusers, however, shall be without any infamy.
C. II. Quot testibus episcopus, uel presbiter uel reliqui clerici sint conuincendi.
Presul non dampnetur nisi cum LXXII. testibus. Presbiter autem cardinalis nisi in LXIV. testibus non deponatur; diaconus cardinalis urbis Romae nisi in XXVII. testibus non condempnabitur. Subdiaconus, acolitus, exorcista, lector, hostiarius nisi in septem testibus non condempnabitur. Testes autem et accusatores sine aliqua sint infamia.
Friedberg, col. 465/466
C. III. Bishops are not to be condemned except under seventy-two witnesses.
Likewise Leo IV, [in a letter to the Bishops of Britain]. We judge that there can never be any condemnation of bishops unless either before the lawful number of bishops—which is constituted by twelve bishops—or certainly after the sentence has been proved by seventy-two suitable witnesses, who are such as are also able to accuse. § 1. And first they shall furnish oaths upon the four sacred Gospels of Christ that they utter nothing false, as blessed Sylvester handed down to us and as the holy Roman Church appears to maintain. And if, among the men whom they have said are to be condemned, there shall be a bishop who has petitioned that his case be heard in the presence of the bishop of the Roman See, no one shall presume to give a final sentence upon him, but we decree that he shall be heard in every respect. GRATIAN. But this is understood either by a special privilege concerning the clerics of the Roman Church, or on account of the shamelessness of certain persons who, although they are not of approved life and knowledge, suddenly leap forward into the accusation of the ministers of God. But those whose life is so praiseworthy that it appears worthy of imitation by all, and concerning whose assertion no doubt can arise: by the testimony of two or three such witnesses anyone can lawfully be convicted and condemned.
C. III. Episcopi non nisi sub LXXII. testibus condempnandi sunt.
Item Leo IV. [in epistola Episcopis Britanniae] Nullam dampnationem episcoporum umquam esse censemus, nisi aut ante legitimum episcoporum numerum (qui fit per duodecim episcopos), aut certe probata sententia per LXXII. idoneos testes, qui tales sint qui et accusare possint. §. 1. Et prius ad sacra Christi quatuor euangelia sacramenta prestent, quod nil falsum depromant, sicut nobis B. Siluester tradidit, et Romana sancta uidetur ecclesia tenere. Et si inter eos, quos dampnandos esse dixerint homines, fuerit episcopus, qui suam causam in presentia Romanae sedis episcopi petierit audiri, nullus super illum finitiuam presumat dare sentenciam, sed omnino eum audiri decernimus. Gratian. Sed hoc uel speciali priuilegio de clericis Romanae ecclesiae intelligitur, uel propter inprobitatem quorumdam, qui, cum non sint spectatae uitae et scientiae, in accusatione ministrorum Dei repente prosiliunt. Quorum uero uita adeo laudabilis est, ut omnibus imitanda apareat, de quorum assertione nulla dubitatio nasci poterit, eorum testimonio duorum uel trium testium quilibet iure conuinci et dampnari poterit.
Friedberg, col. 465/466