distinction — Decretum of Gratian
Distinction XLVI
GRATIAN. Part I. It follows: “not contentious.” For nothing is more shameless than the arrogance of the unlearned, who think garrulity is authority and, ready for quarrels, thunder proudly against subjects, which manifestly proceeds from the arrogance of pride. Hence Gregory writes in the Moralia, Book XXIII, part 5, chapter 12 [c. 13, §23 and 24, on c. 33 of Job]:
GRATIANUS. I. Pars. Sequitur: "Non litigiosum." Nichil est enim impudentius arrogancia rusticorum, qui garrulitatem auctoritatem putant, et parati ad lites in subiectos tumide intonant, quod ex arrogancia superbiae prouenire manifestum est. Unde Gregorius scribit in Moralibus, libro XXIII. parte 5. capitulo 12.: [c. 13. §. 23. et 24. ad c. 33. Iob.]
Friedberg, col. 167/168
C. I. The arrogant do not know how to present humbly the things they teach.
The teaching of the arrogant has this as its peculiar characteristic: they do not know how to present humbly what they teach, and they cannot minister rightly the right things they know. For in their words it is disclosed that, when they teach, they seem to themselves to reside as though upon a certain summit of loftiness, and they look down upon those whom they teach as though placed far beneath them in the depths; they deign to speak to them not by counseling but scarcely even by dominating. But the Lord rightly says to these through the Prophet: “You commanded them with austerity and with power.” For those command with austerity and power who hasten not to correct their subjects calmly by reasoning but to bend them harshly by dominating. On the contrary, true teaching flees this vice of exaltation in thought all the more vehemently, the more ardently it pursues with the darts of its words the very master of exaltation. For it guards against preaching by exalted morals the one whom it assails in the hearts of hearers with sacred discourses. Part II. GRATIAN. Behold why contentious persons are prohibited from being ordained bishops. There is also another cause of this prohibition. For contentious persons either reconcile to themselves the minds of princes by flatteries, or by disparaging their brethren impose upon them the mark of infamy, or, by sowing discord among brethren, never cease making seditions; all of these things are proved damnable in prelates.
Hence Gregory writes in the Moralia, Book XVIII, part 4, chapter 3 [on c. 27 of Job]:
C. I. Arrogantes nesciunt humiliter inferre que docent.
Hoc habet proprium doctrina arrogantium, ut humiliter nesciant inferre quod docent, et recta, que sapiunt, recte ministrare non possunt. In uerbis enim eorum proditur, quod, cum docent, quasi in quodam sibi uidentur summitatis culmine residere, eosque, quos docent, ut longe infra se positos uelut in imo respiciunt, quibus non consulendo, sed uix dominando dignantur loqui. Recte autem his per Prophetam Dominus dicit: "Vos autem cum austeritate inperabatis eis et cum potentia." Cum austeritate enim et potentia inperant, qui subditos suos non tranquille corrigere ratiocinando, sed aspere inflectere dominando festinant. At contra doctrina uera tanto uehementius hoc elationis uicium fugit per cogitationem, quanto ardentius suorum uerborum iaculis ipsum magistrum elationis insequitur. Cauet enim, ne eum moribus elatis predicet, quem in cordibus audientium sacris sermonibus insectatur. II. Pars. Gratian. Ecce, quare litigiosi prohibentur in episcopos ordinari. Est et alia causa huius prohibitionis. Litigiosi namque uel adulationibus animos principum sibi conciliant, uel fratribus suis detrahendo infamiae notam ingerunt, uel inter fratres discordiam seminando seditiones numquam facere cessant; que omnia in prelatis dampnabilia esse probantur.
Unde Gregorius scribit in Moralibus, in libro XVIII. parte 4. capitulo 3.: [ad cap. 27. Iob.]
Friedberg, col. 167/168
C. II. Concerning those who flatter sinners.
There are some who, while they extol the misdeeds of human beings with praises, increase the things they ought to have reproved. Hence it is said through the Prophet: “Woe to those who sew cushions beneath every elbow of the hand and make pillows beneath the head of every age.” For a cushion is placed beneath the elbow, or a pillow beneath the head of one lying down, for this purpose: that he may rest softly. Therefore, whoever flatters those acting badly places a cushion or pillow beneath the head or elbow of one lying down, so that the one who ought to have been corrected for a fault may, supported by praises, rest softly in it. §1. Hence again it is written: “He built the wall, but they plastered it.” For by the name of a wall the hardness of sin is designated. Therefore, to build a wall is for someone to construct against himself the obstacles of sin. But those who flatter persons committing sins plaster the wall, so that what those persons build by acting perversely the flatterers render, as it were, shining. §2. But just as a holy man does not judge evil things concerning the good, so he refuses to judge good things concerning the evil, saying: “Far be it from me that I should judge you righteous; until I fail, I will not depart from my innocence.” Hence it is also read in the Fourth Council of Carthage [c. 56]:
C. II. De his, qui peccantibus adulantur.
Sunt nonnulli, qui, dum malefacta hominum laudibus efferunt, augent que increpare debuerunt. Hinc enim per Prophetam dicitur: "Vae qui consuunt puluillos sub omni cubito manus, et faciunt ceruicalia sub capite uniuersae etatis." Ad hoc quippe sub cubito puluillus uel ceruical sub capite iacentis ponitur, ut molliter quiescatur. Quisquis ergo male agentibus adulatur, puluillum uel ceruical sub capite uel cubito iacentis ponit, ut qui corripi ex culpa debuerat, in ea fultus laudibus molliter quiescat. §. 1. Hinc rursum scriptum est: "Ipse edificabat parietem, illi autem liniebant eum." Parietis quippe nomine peccati duricia designatur. Edificare ergo parietem est contra se quempiam obstacula peccati construere. Sed parietem liniunt, qui peccata perpetrantibus adulantur, ut, quod illi peruerse agentes edificant, ipsi adulantes quasi nitidum reddant. §. 2. Sed sanctus uir sicut mala de bonis non estimat, ita iudicare bona de malis recusat, dicens: "Absit a me, ut iustos uos iudicem: donec deficiam, non recedam ab innocentia mea." Hinc etiam in Concilio Cartaginensi IV. [c. 56.] legitur:
Friedberg, col. 167/168
C. III. Let a cleric who is a flatterer or betrayer be degraded from office.
Let a cleric who is found to devote himself to flatteries and betrayals be degraded from office.
C. III. Adulator uel proditor clericus ab offitio degradetur.
Clericus, qui adulationibus et prodicionibus uacare deprehenditur, degradetur ab offitio.
Friedberg, col. 167/168
C. IV. Let those who cast unproved accusations against their brethren be excommunicated by the bishop.
Likewise [from the same Council, c. 55]. Let the bishop excommunicate accusers of the brethren; and if they amend the vice, let him receive them into communion, but not into the clergy.
C. IV. Excommunicentur ab episcopo, qui fratribus non probanda obiciunt.
Item. [ex eodem Concilio, c. 55.] Accusatores fratrum episcopus excommunicet, et si emendauerint uicium, recipiat eos ad communionem, non ad clerum.
Friedberg, col. 167/168
C. V. Let an abusive cleric be removed from office; let a buffoon who envies the advancement of his brethren not be promoted.
Likewise from the same [Council, c. 57]. Let an abusive cleric, especially among priests, be compelled to ask pardon. If he is unwilling, let him be degraded and never recalled to office without satisfaction.
C. V. Remoueatur ab offitio clericus maledicus; scurra fratrum a profectibus inuidens non promoueatur.
Item ex eodem. [Concilio, c. 57.] Clericus maledicus (maxime in sacerdotibus) cogatur ad postulandam ueniam. Si noluerit, degradetur, nec umquam ad offitium absque satisfactione reuocetur.
Friedberg, col. 167/168
C. VI. Concerning the same.
Likewise [from the same Council, c. 60]. An irreverent cleric and jester with shameful words is to be withdrawn from office.
C. VI. De eodem.
Item. [ex eodem Concilio, c. 60.] Clericum scurrilem et uerbis turpibus ioculatorem ab offitio retrahendum.
Friedberg, col. 167/168
C. VII.
Likewise [from the same, c. 54]. Let a cleric who envies the advancement of his brethren not be promoted while he remains in the vice.
C. VII.
Item. [ex eodem c. 54.] Clericus inuidens fratrum profectibus, donec in uicio est, non promoueatur.
Friedberg, col. 167/168
C. VIII. Those who devote themselves to seditions are not to be ordained.
Likewise [from the same, c. 67]. We establish that seditious persons are never to be ordained clerics, just as neither usurers nor avengers of their own injuries are to be ordained.
C. VIII. Non sunt ordinandi, qui sedicionibus uacant.
Item. [ex eodem, c. 67.] Sedicionarios statuimus numquam ordinandos clericos, sicut nec usurarios, uel iniuriarum suarum ultores.
Friedberg, col. 169/170
C. IX. Clerics are by no means permitted to exact usury.
Likewise from the Council of Laodicea [c. 5]. Part III. Ministers of the altar, or those established in priestly order, are not permitted to lend at interest or to receive usury or profits that are called sesquiples.
C. IX. Usuras exigere clericis minime licet.
Item ex Concilio Laudicensi. [c. 5.] III. Pars. Non licet fenerari ministris altaris, uel in sacerdotali ordine constitutis uel usuras, uel lucra, que sescupla dicuntur, accipere.
Friedberg, col. 169/170
C. X. Let a cleric be a lender at interest neither in his own name nor another’s.
Likewise Pope Leo [to the Bishops throughout Campania, epistle I, c. 4]. Let no cleric attempt to practice lending at interest in another’s name, just as he may not in his own. For it is unbecoming to expend and practice one’s own crime for the advantages of others. But we ought to regard and practice only this interest: that we may be able to receive from the Lord, who bestows things that remain manifoldly and perpetually, what we mercifully give here.
C. X. Nec suo nomine, nec alieno clericus fenerator existat.
Item Leo Papa. [Episcopis per Campaniam, epist. I. c. 4.] Sicut non suo, ita nec alieno nomine aliquis clericorum exercere fenus attemptet. Indecens enim est crimen suum commodis alienis inpendere et exercere. Fenus autem hoc solum aspicere et exercere debemus, ut quod hic misericorditer tribuimus, a Domino, (qui multipliciter et in perpetuum mansura tribuit), recipere ualeamus.
Friedberg, col. 169/170