causa — Decretum of Gratian
Causa XV
GRATIAN. A certain cleric is said to have fallen into a carnal crime before he obtained the priestly blessing. But after he attained the priesthood, having been turned to madness, he killed a certain man. Upon recovering his health, however, he is accused before the bishop by the woman with whom he is said to have fallen. The bishop examines the case on Sunday. The priest denies the crime charged against him; he seeks the patronage of certain clerics for himself, but they furnish patronage to him not without a price. At last the bishop extorts a confession by tortures; finally, alone and without a synodal hearing, he strikes him with a sentence. (QUESTION I.) It is asked whether things done with an alienated mind are to be imputed. (QUESTION II.) Second, whether clerics are permitted to exact gifts for patronage furnished. (QUESTION III.) Third, whether he is to be condemned from the confession of the woman. (QUESTION IV.) Fourth, whether his case is to be ventilated on Sunday. (QUESTION V.) Fifth, whether compurgation is to be offered to him when he denies the charge. (QUESTION VI.) Sixth, whether his confession is to be extorted by tortures. (QUESTION VII.) Seventh, whether a bishop is able to condemn a priest without a synodal hearing. (QUESTION VIII.) Eighth, if he has confessed spontaneously or has been convicted by others that he sinned before ordination, whether he is permitted to exercise the office of the order received.
GRATIANUS. Clericus quidam crimine carnis lapsus esse perhibetur ante, quam sacerdotalem benedictionem consequeretur. Postquam uero sacerdotium adeptus est, in furorem uersus quendam interfecit. Recuperata uero sanitate apud episcopum accusatur ab ea, cum qua lapsus esse dicitur. Episcopus autem die dominico causam examinat. Sacerdos inficiatur crimen sibi illatum; quorundam clericorum sibi patrocinia querit; illi uero non sine precio sibi patrocinantur; tandem episcopus questionibus confessionem extorquet; demum solus et absque sinodali audientia illum sententia ferit. (Qu. I.) Queritur autem, an ea, que mente alienata fiunt, sint inputanda? (Qu. II.) Secundo, an pro inpensis patrociniis liceat clericis munera exigere? (Qu. III.) Tertio, an ex mulieris confessione iste sit condempnandus? (Qu. IV.) Quarto, an die dominico eius causa sit uentilanda? (Qu. V.) Quinto, an sibi neganti purgatio sit deferenda? (Qu. VI.) Sexto, an eius confessio cruciatibus sit extorquenda? (Qu. VII.) Septimo, an absque sinodali audientia episcopus ualeat sacerdotem dampnare? (Qu. VIII.) Octauo, si sponte confessus aut ab aliis conuictus fuerit, quod ante ordinationem peccauerit, an suscepti ordinis offitium sibi exequi liceat?
Friedberg, col. 743/744