distinction — Decretum of Gratian
Distinction LXXXVI
GRATIAN. Part I. A bishop ought to be a teacher, lest the faults of his inferiors be poured back upon him who has received the office of teaching, which he does not know how to execute or neglects to execute. Hence Bishop Leo writes to the Bishop of Aquileia, [epistle III and LXXXIV, or LXVI]:
GRATIANUS. I. Pars. Doctorem autem episcopum oportet esse, ne inferiorum culpae in eum refundantur, qui docendi offitium accepit, quod exequi nescit uel negligit. Unde Leo Episcopus scribit Aquilegensi Episcopo: [epist. III. et LXXXIV. seu LXVI.]
Friedberg, col. 297/298
C. I. The faults of inferiors are imputed to the negligence of rulers.
The faults of the inferior orders are to be referred to no persons more than to idle and negligent rulers, who often nurture much pestilence while they dissemble from applying a more severe medicine.
C. I. Negligentiae rectorum inputantur culpae inferiorum.
Inferiorum ordinum culpae ad nullos magis referendae sunt, quam ad desides negligentesque rectores, qui multam sepe nutriunt pestilentiam, dum austeriorem dissimulant adhibere medicinam.
Friedberg, col. 297/298
C. II. Men are to be loved; sins are to be held in hatred.
Likewise Bishop Leo to Rusticus, Bishop of Narbonne, [epistle XC, or XCII, at the beginning]. Let sins, not men, be held in hatred; let the swollen with pride be corrected, and the weak tolerated; and what it is necessary to chastise more severely is not to be punished with the mind of one raging, but of one healing.
C. II. Homines sunt diligendi, peccata odio habenda.
Item Leo Episcopus Rustico Narbonensi Episcopo. [epist. XC. seu XCII. in princip.] Odio habeantur peccata, non homines; corripiantur tumidi, tolerentur infirmi; et quod seuerius castigare necesse est non seuientis plectatur animo, sed medentis.
Friedberg, col. 297/298
C. III. One who neglects to amend what he can has the guilt of the doer.
Likewise John VIII. Without doubt, he who neglects to amend what he can correct has the guilt of the doer. For it is written: “Not only those who do them, but also those who consent,” are judged to be participants. § 1. And he offers prosperous things to the Lord who drives adverse things from the afflicted. And to neglect to cast down the perverse when one can is nothing other than to foster them. Nor is he free from the scruple of hidden consent who ceases to oppose a manifest crime. And he proves that he hates vices who condemns those who err. Nor does he leave himself a place for straying who has not spared one who transgresses. And the first grade of innocence is to hate wicked things. And he opens wide an entrance to delinquents who joins consent with depravity. And it profits no one not to be punished for his own sin when he is to be punished for another’s sin. Part II. GRATIAN. But if anyone exceeds the measure in correcting, let him ask pardon not from his subjects but from the Lord. Hence Augustine, On the Life of Clerics:
C. III. Qui negligit emendare quod ualet, facientis culpam habet.
Item Iohannes VIII. Facientis proculdubio culpam habet, qui quod potest corrigere negligit emendare. Scriptum quippe est: "Non solum qui faciunt, sed etiam qui consentiunt," participes iudicantur. §. 1. Et libat Domino prospera, qui ab afflictis pellit aduersa. Et negligere, cum possit deturbare peruersos, nichil est aliud quam fouere. Nec caret scrupulo consensionis occultae, qui manifesto facinori desinit obuiare. Et probat se odisse uitia, qui condempnat errantes. Nec relinquit sibi locum deuiandi, qui non pepercerit excedenti. Et primus innocentiae gradus est odisse nefanda. Et latum pandit delinquentibus aditum, qui iungit cum prauitate consensum. Et nichil prodest alicui non puniri proprio, qui puniendus est alieno peccato. II. Pars. Gratian. Si autem in corripiendo quisque modum excesserit, non a subditis, sed a Domino ueniam petat. Unde Augustinus de uita clericorum:
Friedberg, col. 297/298
C. IV. One who exceeds the measure in correcting is not to ask pardon from his subjects.
When the necessity of discipline compels you to speak harsh words for restraining conduct, even if you yourselves perceive that you have exceeded the measure, it is not required of you that you ask pardon for yourselves from your subjects, lest, while humility is observed too greatly among those who ought to be subject, the authority of governing be broken. And yet pardon is to be sought from the Lord of all, who knows with what benevolence you love those whom perhaps you correct beyond what is just. Part III. GRATIAN. In the teaching of sacred Scripture, however, he ought to set authority before all else, not to make a display of skill in secular letters. For it is not the office of a bishop to expound grammar, lest the praises of Jupiter resound in the mouth of a pontiff.
Hence Gregory writes to Bishop Desiderius, [book IX, epistle 48]:
C. IV. Veniam a subditis non petat qui in corripiendo modum excedit.
Quando necessitas disciplinae moribus cohercendis dicere uos dura uerba conpellit, si etiam ipsi modum uos excessisse sentitis, non a uobis exigitur, ut uobis a subditis ueniam postuletis, ne apud eos, quos oportet esse subiectos, dum nimium seruatur humilitas, regendi frangatur auctoritas. Et tamen petenda est uenia ab omnium Domino, qui nouit eos, quos plus iusto forte corripitis, quanta beneuolentia diligatis. III. Pars. Gratian. In doctrina uero sacrae scripturae debet auctoritatem preferre, non secularium litterarum peritiam ostentare. Non enim est episcopalis offitii grammaticam exponere, ne laudes Iouis personent ore pontificis.
Unde Gregorius scribit Desiderio Episcopo: [lib. IX. epist. 48.]
Friedberg, col. 297/298
C. V. A bishop ought to expound sacred Scripture, not grammar.
When many things had been reported to us concerning your studies, such gladness arose in our heart that we were quite unable to deny those things which your fraternity requests to be granted to it. But after these things it came to us—which we cannot recall without shame—that your fraternity expounds grammar to certain persons. We received this matter so grievously and rejected it so vehemently that we turned those things which had been said before into groaning and sorrow, because the praises of Christ do not fit in one mouth together with the praises of Jupiter. And consider how grave and wicked it is for bishops to sing what is not fitting even for a religious man. Part IV. GRATIAN. A priest also ought to be generous to those suffering need; otherwise he will bear the empty name of bishop. Hence Gregory writes, [book V, epistle 29], to Secundus, servant of God, among other things:
C. V. Sacram scripturam, non grammaticam debet episcopus exponere.
Cum multa nobis de uestris studiis fuissent nunciata, ita nostro cordi est nata leticia, ut negare ea, que sibi uestra fraternitas concedenda deposcit, minime ualeremus. Sed post hec peruenit ad nos, (quod sine uerecundia memorare non possumus) fraternitatem tuam grammaticam quibusdam exponere. Quam rem ita moleste suscepimus, ac sumus uehementius aspernati, ut ea, que prius dicta fuerant, in gemitum et tristiciam uerteremus, quia in uno se ore cum Iouis laudibus Christi laudes non capiunt. Et quam graue nefandumque sit episcopis canere, quod nec religioso conueniat, considera. IV. Pars. Gratian. Liberalem quoque necessitatem patientibus sacerdotem esse oportet; alias autem uacuum portabit nomen episcopi. Unde Gregorius scribit [lib. V. epist. 29.] Secundo seruo Dei inter cetera:
Friedberg, col. 299/300
C. VI. Without generosity the name of bishop is borne in vain.
Stir our brother Bishop Marianus with whatever words you can, because I suspect that he has fallen asleep. Tell him, therefore, that with his place he is to change his mind. Let him not believe that reading and prayer alone suffice for him, so that in seclusion he strives to make nothing fruitful from his hand; rather, let him have an open hand, come to the aid of those suffering need, and reckon another’s poverty as his own, because, if he does not have this, he holds the empty name of bishop. Part V. GRATIAN. But in generosity itself a measure of things and persons is to be applied: of things, so that not all things are bestowed upon one person, but certain things upon each, so that we may be able to profit more persons, according to that saying of the Prophet: “He dispersed, he gave to the poor”; of persons, so that first to the just, and then to sinners—to whom, nevertheless, we are prohibited from giving, not because they are men, but because they are sinners. Hence Augustine, On John, Part II:
C. VI. Sine liberalitate inane portatur nomen episcopi.
Fratrem nostrum Marianum episcopum uerbis, quibus uales, excita, quia eum obdormisse suspicor. Dic ergo illi, ut cum loco mutet et mentem. Non sibi credat solam lectionem sufficere et orationem, ut remotus nichil studeat de manu fructificare: sed largam manum habeat, necessitatem patientibus concurrat, alienam inopiam suam credat, quia, si hoc non habet, uacuum episcopi nomen tenet. V. Pars. Gratian. In ipsa autem liberalitate modus adhibendus est rerum et personarum: rerum, ut non omnia uni, sed singulis quedam prestentur, ut pluribus prodesse possimus, iuxta illud prophetae: "Dispersit, dedit pauperibus;" personarum, ut primum iustis, deinde peccatoribus: quibus tamen dare prohibemur, non quia homines sunt, sed quia peccatores. Unde Augustinus supra Iohannem parte II.:
Friedberg, col. 299/300
C. VII. It is a monstrous sin to give one’s property to actors.
To give one’s property to actors is a monstrous vice, not a virtue. And you know how frequent among such persons is fame accompanied by praise, because “the sinner is praised in the desires of his soul, and he who does unjust things is blessed.”
C. VII. Inmane peccatum est res suas istrionibus donare.
Donare res suas istrionibus uitium est inmane, non uirtus. Et scitis de talibus, quam sit frequens fama cum laude, quia, "laudatur peccator in desideriis animae suae, et qui iniqua gerit benedicitur."
Friedberg, col. 299/300
C. VIII. Those who give anything to hunters sin gravely.
The same, on Psalm CII, [at the verse, “Who works mercies”]. Why do those who give to hunters give? Let them tell me: why do they give to a hunter? They love this in him, wherein he is most wicked; they feed this in him and clothe this in him—wickedness itself, made public by spectacles before all. Why do those who give to actors and those who give to prostitutes give? Do they not also give to human beings? Yet there they regard not the nature that is God’s work, but the wickedness that is man’s work.
C. VIII. Grauiter delinquunt qui uenatoribus aliquid donant.
Idem in Psalmo CII. [ad uers. Faciens misericordias.] Qui uenatoribus donant, quare donant? dicant mihi, quare dant uenatori? Hoc in illo amant, in quo nequissimus est hoc in illo pascunt, hoc in illo uestiunt, ipsam nequitiam publicam spectaculis omnium. Qui donant istrionibus qui donant meretricibus, quare donant? numquid non et ipsa hominibus donant: Non tamen naturam ibi attendunt operis Dei, sed nequitiam operis humani.
Friedberg, col. 299/300
[C. IX.]
Likewise. One who gives to a hunter gives not to a man but to a most wicked art. For if he were only a man and were not a hunter, you would not give to him: in him you honor vice, not nature.
[C. IX.]
Item. Qui uenatori, donat, non homini donat, sed arti nequissimae. Nam si homo tantum esset, et uenator non esset, non ei donares: honoras in eo uitium, non naturam.
Friedberg, col. 299/300
[C. X.]
The same, on Psalm CXLVII. Men see hunters and are delighted: woe to the wretched, if they do not correct themselves. For those who see a hunter and are delighted will see the Savior and be grieved.
[C. X.]
Idem in Psalmo CXLVII. Vident homines uenatores, et delectantur: ue miseris, si non se correxerint. Qui enim uident uenatorem et delectantur, uidebunt Saluatorem et contristabuntur.
Friedberg, col. 299/300
[C. XI.]
Likewise Jerome, on Psalm XC, [at the verse, “I will hope in the Lord”]. Esau was a hunter because he was a sinner. And we do not find at all in the holy Scriptures any holy hunter; we find holy fishermen.
[C. XI.]
Item Ieronimus in Psalmo XC. [ad uers. Sperabo in Domino] Esau uenator erat, quoniam peccator erat. Et penitus non inuenimus in scripturis sanctis sanctum aliquem uenatorem: piscatores inuenimus sanctos.
Friedberg, col. 299/300
[C. XII.]
Likewise Ambrose, in a homily, [XXXIII, On Lent]. What does it profit to fast in one’s entrails and to luxuriate in hunts? To abstain from foods, but to wander in sins?
[C. XII.]
Item Ambrosius in omelia. [XXXIII. de Quadragesima] Quid prodest ieiunare uisceribus, et luxuriari uenatibus? abstinere a cibis, errare peccatis?
Friedberg, col. 299/300
[C. XIII.]
Likewise. Do you think, brothers, that he fasts who at first dawn does not keep vigil at the church, does not seek out the holy places of the blessed martyrs, but rises, gathers his servants, arranges nets, brings forth dogs, and traverses glades and forests? He drags his servants with him, I say, who perhaps are hastening rather to church, and by his pleasures he heaps up the sins of others, not knowing that he will be guilty both for his own transgression and for the destruction of his servants.
[C. XIII.]
Item. An putatis illum ieiunare, fratres, qui primo diluculo non ad ecclesiam uigilat non beatorum martirum sancta loca perquirit, sed surgens congregat seruulos, disponit retia, canes producit, saltus siluasque perlustrat? Seruulos, inquam, secum pertrahit, fortasse magis ad ecclesiam festinantes, et uoluptatibus suis peccata accumulat aliena, nesciens reum se futurum tam de suo delicto, quam de perdicione seruorum.
Friedberg, col. 299/300
C. XIV. What things are to be observed in generosity.
Likewise Ambrose, in the book On Duties. It is not enough to will well, but also to do well. Nor, again, is it enough to do well unless it proceeds from a good source, that is, from a good will. Likewise: § 1. Perfect generosity is commended by faith, cause, place, and time, so that first you act toward the household of faith. It is a great fault if, with your knowledge, a believer is in need; if you know him to be without means, to endure hunger, to suffer distress—especially one who is ashamed to be in need—if he has fallen into a case involving either the captivity of his own people or calumny, and you do not help; if he is in prison and is tortured by pains and punishments and, being just, on account of some debt—for although mercy is owed to all, more is owed to the just; if in the time of his affliction he obtains nothing from you; if, in the time of danger when he is being dragged to death, your money has more value with you than the life of one about to die: it is no light sin.
C. XIV. Que sint in liberalitate seruanda.
Item Ambrosius in libro de offitiis. Non satis est bene uelle, sed etiam bene facere. Nec satis est iterum bene facere, nisi id ex bono fonte, hoc est ex bona uoluntate proficiscatur. Item: §. 1. Perfecta liberalitas fide, causa, loco, tempore commendatur, ut primum opereris circa domesticos fidei. Grandis culpa, si sciente te fidelis egeat, si scias eum sine sumptu esse, famem tollerare, erumpnam perpeti, qui presertim egere erubescit, si in causam ceciderit aut captiuitatis suorum, aut calumpniae, et non adiuues, si sit in carcere et penis et suppliciis et propter debitum aliquod iustus excrucietur, (nam etsi omnibus debetur misericordia, iusto amplius), si tempore suae afflictionis nichil a te inpetret, si tempore periculi, quo rapitur ad mortem, plus apud te pecunia tua ualeat quam uita morituri, non est leue peccatum.
Friedberg, col. 299/300
[C. XV.]
Likewise. The Lord does not will resources to be poured out all at once, but to be dispensed—unless perhaps as Elisha, who killed his oxen and fed the poor from what he had, so that he might be held by no domestic care, but, all things having been left behind, might give himself to prophetic instruction.
[C. XV.]
Item. Dominus non uult simul effundi opes, sed dispensari, nisi forte, ut Helyseus, qui boues suos occidit, et pauit pauperes ex eo, quod habuit, ut nulla cura teneretur domestica, sed relictis omnibus in disciplinam se propheticam daret.
Friedberg, col. 301/302
[C. XVI.]
Likewise. That generosity is also to be approved whereby you do not despise those near to you by kinship, if you know them to be in need. For it is better that you yourself come to the aid of your own, who are ashamed to request expense from others or to ask anyone for relief of their need. Yet they ought not to wish to become richer from that which you are able to confer upon the needy; for nature furnishes a cause, not favor. For you did not dedicate yourself to God for this purpose, that you make your own people rich, but that you acquire eternal life for yourself by the fruit of good work and redeem your sins by the price of compassion. Do they think that they ask little? They seek your price; they strive to take away the fruit of your life, and they accuse you because you have not made them rich, when they wish to defraud you of the reward of eternal life.
[C. XVI].
Item. Est etiam illa probanda liberalitas, ut proximos seminis tui ne despicias, si egere cognoscas. Melius enim est, ut ipse subuenias tuis, quibus pudor est ab aliis sumptum deposcere, aut alicui postulare subsidium necessitatis; non tamen illi ditiores fieri uelint, ex eo quod tu potes conferre inopibus: causam enim natura prestat, non gratia. Neque enim propterea te Deo dicasti, ut tuos diuites facias, sed ut tibi uitam perpetuam fructu boni operis adquiras, et precio miserationis peccata tua redimas. Putant parum se poscere? precium querunt tuum, uitae tuae adimere contendunt fructum, et accusant, quod eos diuites non feceris, cum te uelint illi eternae uitae fraudare mercede?
Friedberg, col. 301/302
[C. XVII.]
Likewise. Age and weakness must also be considered in giving, and sometimes modesty as well, which reveals freeborn birth, so that you give more to the aged, who can no longer seek a livelihood for themselves. Weakness of body is likewise to be assisted more readily; so too if anyone has fallen from riches into want, especially without fault of his own, but has lost what he had either through robberies, proscription, or calumnies.
[C. XVII.]
Item. Consideranda est etiam in largiendo etas atque debilitas, nonnumquam etiam uerecundia, que ingenuos prodit natales, ut senibus plus largiaris, qui sibi iam uictum non queunt querere. Similiter et debilitas corporis est promptius adiuuanda; tamen si quis ex diuitiis cecidit in egestatem, et maxime, sine uitio suo, sed aut latrociniis, aut proscriptione, aut calumpniis que habebat amisit.
Friedberg, col. 301/302
[C. XVIII.]
Likewise. It is also beautiful generosity to keep measure even in the gift to a poor person, so that you may abound for more persons, and not flow beyond measure for the sake of procuring favor. For whatever is brought forth from a pure and sincere affection is becoming: not to undertake superfluous buildings, nor to omit necessary ones. And this is especially fitting for priests: to adorn the temple of God with fitting honor, so that the hall of the Lord may shine also in its worship; to make expenditures of mercy frequent; to bestow upon strangers as much as is fitting—not superfluous things but suitable ones. Likewise: § 1. Let us therefore suffer together with the calamities of others; let us assist the necessities of others as much as we can, and sometimes more than we can. For it is better to furnish grounds for mercy and suffer ill will than to put forward inclemency. We ourselves once incurred ill will because we broke the mystic vessels in order to redeem captives.
[C. XVIII.]
Item. Pulcra etiam liberalitas est, in ipso quoque pauperis dato mensuram tenere, ut habundes pluribus, non conciliandi fauoris gratia ultra modum fluere. Quicquid enim ex affectu puro et sincero promitur, hoc est decorum: non superfluas edificationes aggredi, nec pretermittere necessarias. Et maxime sacerdotibus hoc conuenit, ornare Dei templum honore congruo, ut etiam cultu aula Domini resplendeat, inpensas misericordiae frequentare, quantum oporteat largiri peregrinis, non superfluas, sed conpetentes. Item: §. 1. Conpatiamur itaque alienis calamitatibus, necessitates aliorum quantum possumus iuuemus, et plus interdum quam possumus. Melius est enim causas prestare pro misericordia et inuidiam perpeti, quam pretendere inclementiam; nos aliquando in inuidiam incidimus, quod confregimus uasa mistica, ut captiuos redimeremus.
Friedberg, col. 301/302
[C. XIX.]
Likewise, on Luke. To each class of men Saint John the Baptist also gave a fitting response, one to all in this manner: to publicans, that they exact nothing beyond what was prescribed; to soldiers, that they commit no calumny and seek no plunder—teaching that stipends were established for military service for this reason, lest, while expenses are sought, the robber range abroad. But these and the other precepts of duties are proper to individuals; the practice of mercy is common. Therefore the precept is common to all duties, necessary to all ages, and to be rendered by all. Neither publican nor soldier is excepted, neither countryman nor townsman, rich nor poor; all in common are admonished to confer upon one who does not have. For mercy is the fullness of virtues, and therefore the form of perfect virtue has been set forth for all, that they not spare their garments and food. Nevertheless, in mercy itself a measure is to be observed according to the possibility of the human condition, so that each person does not take everything away from himself but shares what he has with the poor person.
[C. XIX.]
Item super Lucam. Singulis quoque generibus hominum conueniens tribuit S. Baptista responsum unum omnibus ita: publicanis, ne ultra prescriptum exigant, militibus, ne calumpniam faciant, predam requirant; docens idcirco stipendia constituta miliciae, ne, dum sumptus queritur, predo grassetur. Sed hec et alia offitiorum precepta propria sunt singulorum, misericordia communis est usus. Ideo commune preceptum omnibus offitiis, omnibus etatibus necessaria, et ab omnibus deferenda. Non publicanus, non miles excipitur, non agricola, uel urbanus, diues et pauper, omnes in commune admonentur, ut conferant non habenti. Misericordia enim plenitudo uirtutum est, et ideo omnibus est proposita forma perfectae uirtutis, ne uestimentis alimentisque suis parcant. Misericordiae tamen ipsius pro possibilitate conditionis humanae mensura seruetur, ut non sibi unusquisque totum eripiat, sed quod habet cum paupere partiatur.
Friedberg, col. 301/302
[C. XX.]
The same. Moreover, it is God’s tradition that you feed your parents first. For if, according to the divine oracle, an insult to a parent is expiated by death, how much more hunger, which is much graver? In this place the Lord checks insolent boasting.
[C. XX.]
Idem. Ceterum Dei traditio est, ut prius pascas parentes. Nam si iuxta diuinum oraculum contumelia parentis morte luitur, quanto magis fames, que multo grauior est? Quo loco insolentem Dominus infrenat iactantiam.
Friedberg, col. 301/302
[C. XXI.]
The same, in the book On Duties. Feed one dying of hunger. For whoever is able to preserve a man by feeding him, if you have not fed him, you have killed him.
[C. XXI.]
Idem in libro de offitiis. Pasce fame morientem. Quisquis enim pascendo hominem seruare poteris, si non paueris, occidisti.
Friedberg, col. 301/302
[C. XXII.]
Likewise Jerome. One who does not have clemency and is not clothed with the inward parts of mercy and tears, although he be spiritual, has not fulfilled the law of Christ. Part VI. GRATIAN. Likewise, a bishop also ought not to be a striker, that is, one quick to vengeance. Hence Gregory writes to John, Bishop of the Corinthians, [book XI, epistle 49]:
[C. XXII.]
Item Ieronimus. Qui clementiam non habet, nec indutus est uiscera misericordiae et lacrimarum, quamuis spiritalis sit, non adinpleuit legem Christi. VI. Pars. Gratian. Similiter etiam oportet episcopum non esse percussorem, id est ad uindictam facilem. Unde Gregorius scribit Iohanni Episcopo Corintiorum: [libro XI., epist. 49.]
Friedberg, col. 303/304
C. XXIII. A bishop ought not to be quick to vengeance.
But if anything concerning any cleric comes to your ears that could justly offend you, do not readily believe it, nor let an unknown matter inflame you to vengeance; rather, in the presence of the elders of your church, the truth is to be diligently investigated, and then, if the character of the matter demands it, let canonical strictness strike the fault of the delinquent.
C. XXIII. Ad uindictam facilis episcopus esse non debet.
Si quid uero de quocumque clerico ad aures tuas peruenerit, quod te iuste possit offendere, facile non credas, nec ad uindictam te res accendat incognita; sed presentibus ecclesiae tuae senioribus diligenter ueritas est perscrutanda et tunc, si qualitas rei poposcerit, canonica districtio culpam feriat delinquentis.
Friedberg, col. 303/304
C. XXIV. Concerning a certain bishop who, before the solemnities of the masses on the Lord’s day, went to plough up someone’s harvest.
The same to Bishop Januarius, [book VII, indiction 2, epistle 1]. Such wickedness concerning your old age has come to my ears that, unless we took account of it humanely, we would strike it with a curse now fixed. For it was told to me that on the Lord’s day, before celebrating the solemnities of the masses, you went to plough up the harvest of the bearer of the present letter, and after ploughing it up you celebrated the solemnities of the masses; and after the solemnities of the masses you also did not in the least fear to uproot the boundary markers of his possession. All who hear know what penalty ought to follow this deed. We had doubts concerning so great a perversity, but our son Abbot Cyriacus, when questioned by us, declared that he had learned it to be so. And because we still spare your gray hairs, we exhort you: come to your senses at last, wretched old man, and restrain yourself from such levity of conduct and perversity of works. And the nearer you are brought to death, the more solicitous and fearful you ought to be. Indeed, a sentence of penalty ought to have been hurled at you; but because we know your simplicity together with your old age, for the present we are silent. Those, however, by whose counsel you did this, we have decreed to be excommunicated for two months, in such a way that, if any human contingency befalls them within the space of two months, they are to be deprived of the blessing of the viaticum. Henceforth, however, be cautious of their counsels. Part VII. GRATIAN. Or he is prohibited from being a striker, so that he not, namely, strike anyone with his own hands.
Hence it reads in the Council of Agde:
C. XXIV. De quodam episcopo, qui ante missarum solempnia, die dominico ad exarandam messem cuiusdam profectus est.
Idem Ianuario Episcopo. [lib. VII. Indict. 2. epist. 1.] Tanta nequitia ad aures meas de tua senectute peruenit, ut eam, nisi humanitus pensaremus, fixa iam maledictione feriremus. Dictum quippe est mihi, quod dominicorum die, priusquam missarum solempnia celebrare, ad exarandam messem latoris presentium perrexisti, et post exarationem eius missarum solempnia celebrasti; post missarum solempnia etiam terminos possessionis illius eradicare minime timuisti. Quod factum que pena debeat sequi, omnes, qui audiunt, sciunt. Dubii autem de tanta peruersitate fueramus, sed filius noster Cyriacus abbas a nobis requisitus, ita se cognouisse perhibuit. Et quia adhuc canis tuis parcimus, hortamur, aliquando resipisce miser senex, atque a tanta leuitate morum et operum peruersitate compescere. Et quanto morti uicinior efficeris, tanto sollicitior atque timidior esse debes. Et quidem penae sententia in te fuerat iaculanda; sed quia simplicitatem tuam cum senectute cognouimus, interim tacemus. Eos uero, quorum consilio hoc egisti, in duobus mensibus excommunicatos esse decreuimus: ita ut, si quid eis intra duorum mensium spatium humanitus euenerit, benedictione uiatici priuentur. Deinceps autem ab eorum consiliis cautus existe. VII. Pars. Gratian. Vel percussor esse prohibetur, ne uidelicet propriis manibus aliquem cedat.
Unde in Agatensi Concilio legitur:
Friedberg, col. 303/304
C. XXV. A bishop is not permitted to strike anyone with his own hands.
A bishop is not permitted to strike anyone with his own hands. For this ought to be foreign to a priest. Part VIII. GRATIAN. A bishop is also prohibited from being desirous of shameful gain, lest by any dishonorable business he seek a livelihood or other necessities for himself. This ought to be understood generally concerning all persons bound to divine worship, that is, clerics and monks. Hence it reads in the Council of Chalcedon, [c. 3]:
C. XXV. Non liceat episcopo propriis manibus aliquem cedere.
Non liceat episcopo manibus suis aliquem cedere. Hoc enim alienum a sacerdote esse debet. VIII. Pars. Gratian. Prohibetur etiam episcopis turpis lucri esse cupidus, ne aliquo inhonesto negotio uictum uel cetera necessaria sibi querat. Quod generaliter de omnibus diuino cultui mancipatis, id est clericis et monachis, intelligi oportet. Unde in Calcedonensi Concilio [cap. 3.] legitur:
Friedberg, col. 303/304
C. XXVI. Those numbered among the clergy are not to serve shameful gains.
It has come to the holy synod that, among those numbered among the clergy, certain persons, for the sake of shameful gain, undertake leases of the possessions of others and the causes of secular persons, and through idleness separate themselves from sacred offices, but run to the houses of secular persons and undertake the administration of their property for the sake of avarice. Therefore the holy and great synod has decreed that henceforth none of these—that is, bishop, cleric, or monk—may lease possessions or become involved in secular administrations, except perhaps those who by the laws are drawn into inexcusable guardianships or curatorships of minors, or one to whom the bishop of the city itself has committed the government of ecclesiastical property, and of orphans and widows who are without defense, or of those persons who especially need ecclesiastical aid, for the fear of God. But if anyone transgresses these precepts, let him be subject to ecclesiastical correction.
C. XXVI. Qui connumerantur in clero, turpibus non deseruiant lucris.
Peruenit ad sanctam sinodum, quia de his qui in clero connumerantur, quidam propter turpis lucri gratiam aliorum possessionum conductiones, et causas secularium suscipiunt, et a sacris offitiis se per desidiam separant, ad domos autem secularium concurrunt, et substantiarum eorum gubernationes auaritiae causa suscipiunt. Decreuit igitur sancta et magna sinodus, neminem horum deinceps, hoc est episcopum, siue clericum, aut monachum, conducere possessiones, aut misceri secularibus procurationibus posse, nisi forte, qui legibus ad minorum etatum tutelas siue curationes inexcusabiles attrahuntur, aut cui ipsius ciuitatis episcopus ecclesiasticarum rerum commiserit gubernacula, et orphanorum atque uiduarum, que indefensae sunt, aut earum personarum, que maxime ecclesiastico indigent amminiculo propter timorem Dei. Si quis uero transgressus fuerit hec precepta, ecclesiasticae correctioni subiaceat.
Friedberg, col. 303/304