distinction — Decretum of Gratian
Distinction XLI
GRATIAN. Part I. Behold with what morals a priest ought to be adorned. In addition, of course, he ought to be adorned in external things, namely in habit and gait: in habit, so that he adorns himself with neither splendid nor filthy garments. For, as Jerome says, neither affected filth nor exquisite luxury produces praise, which is to be understood both of garments and of foods. Hence Augustine says in Book [III] of Christian Doctrine [c. 12]:
GRATIANUS. I. Pars. Ecce, quibus oporteat sacerdotem esse ornatum moribus. Scilicet preterea oportet illum esse ornatum in exterioribus, habitu uidelicet et incessu: habitu, ut nec fulgidis, nec sordidis se uestibus ornet. Ut enim ait Ieronimus nec affectatae sordes, nec exquisitae deliciae laudem pariunt, quod tam de uestibus, quam de cibis intelligendum est. Unde Augustinus ait in libro [III.] de doctrina Christiana: [cap. 12.]
Friedberg, col. 147/148
C. I. We ought to use foods in accordance with the morals of those with whom we live.
Whoever uses passing things more restrictively than the customs of those with whom he lives allow is either intemperate or superstitious. But whoever uses them in such a way that he exceeds the limits of the custom of the good persons among whom he dwells either signifies something or is shameful. For in all such matters it is not the use of things but lust that is at fault. §1. Therefore, what is fitting to places, times, and persons must be diligently attended to, nor should we rashly reprove disgraceful acts. For it can happen that without any fault of cupidity or voracity a wise person uses the most costly food, while a foolish person burns with a most foul flame of gluttony for the cheapest; and someone may more healthfully prefer to feed upon fish after the Lord’s manner than upon lentils after the manner of Esau, Abraham’s grandson, or upon barley after the manner of beasts of burden. For most beasts are not on that account more continent than we are because they are fed on cheaper foods. For in all matters of this kind, what we do is to be approved or disapproved not from the nature of those things we use but from the cause of using and the manner of desiring.
C. I. Pro moribus eorum, cum quibus uiuimus, alimentis uti debemus.
Quisquis rebus pretereuntibus restrictius utitur quam sese habent mores eorum, cum quibus uiuit, aut intemperans, aut supersticiosus est. Quisquis uero sic eis utitur, ut metas consuetudinis bonorum, inter quos uersatur, excedat, aut aliquid significat, aut flagitiosus est. In omnibus enim talibus non usus rerum, sed libido in culpa est. §. 1. Quid igitur locis, et temporibus, et personis conueniat, diligenter adtendendum est, nec temere flagitia reprehendamus. Fieri enim potest, ut sine aliquo uitio cupidinis uel uoracitatis preciosissimo cibo sapiens utatur, insipiens autem fedissima gulae flamma in uilissimum ardescat, et sanius quisque maluerit more Domini pisce uesci, quam lenticula more Esau, nepotis Abraham, aut hordeo more iumentorum. Non enim propterea continentiores sunt nobis pleraeque bestiae, quia uilioribus escis aluntur. Nam in omnibus huiuscemodi rebus non ex earum rerum natura, quibus utimur, sed ex causa utendi et modo appetendi uel probandum est, uel inprobandum quod facimus.
Friedberg, col. 147/148
C. II. Not food, but appetite, is at fault.
Likewise Augustine on the epistle of John. Any delicacies, if received without desire, do not harm, and cheap foods received with appetite impede the progress of abstinence. For David poured out water he had desired, and Elijah ate meat.
C. II. Non cibus, sed appetitus in culpa est.
Item Augustinus super epistolam Iohannis. Deliciae quelibet, si absque desiderio percipiantur, non officiunt, et uiles cibi appetenter accepti inpediunt profectum abstinentiae. Dauid enim aquam concupitam effudit, et Elias carnes comedit.
Friedberg, col. 149/150
C. III. The rich are not to be compelled to use certain foods contrary to the custom of their infirmity.
The same in the book On the Words of the Lord [according to Matthew c. 7, sermon V]. Let the rich not be compelled to eat the foods of the poor. Let them use the custom of their infirmity, but let them grieve that they cannot do otherwise: if they change their custom, they become ill. Let them use superfluous things; let them give necessary things to the needy. Let them use costly things; let them give cheap things to the poor.
C. III. Contra suae infirmitatis consuetudinem aliquibus cibis non cogantur diuites uti.
Idem in libro de uerbis Domini. [secundum Mattheum c. 7. serm. V.] Non cogantur diuites pauperum cibis uesci, utantur consuetudine infirmitatis suae, sed doleant se aliter non posse: si consuetudinem mutant, egrotant. Utantur superfluis, dent inopibus necessaria; utantur preciosis, dent pauperibus uilia.
Friedberg, col. 149/150
C. IV. Equanimity in bearing, not the use of or abstinence from food, makes righteousness.
The same in Book [II] of Questions on the Gospels [c. 11]. That the Lord says in the Gospel, “Wisdom is justified by all her children,” shows that the children of wisdom understand that righteousness lies neither in abstaining nor in eating, but in equanimity in bearing want and in temperance that is not corrupted through abundance, and in taking or not taking at the appropriate time those things whose use is not reproved, but whose coveting is. For it makes no difference at all what foods you take to relieve the necessity of the body, provided that in the kinds of foods you conform to those with whom you must live. Nor does it make much difference how much you take, since we see that the stomach of some is satiated more quickly and that they nevertheless gape ardently, intolerably, and altogether shamefully after that very little by which they are satiated; while others are indeed satiated by a somewhat larger cup, but bear want tolerably and, if at the time this is either useful or necessary, look calmly upon feasts set before them even before the hour and do not touch them. It matters more, therefore, not what or how much food someone receives in conformity with people and with his own person and according to the necessity of his health, but with how much ease and serenity of mind he goes without these things when it is either fitting or necessary to go without them, so that there may be fulfilled in the mind of the Christian what the Apostle says: “I know both how to have less and how to abound; everywhere and in all things I am instructed: both to be filled and to hunger, both to abound and to suffer want. I can do all things in him who strengthens me.”
C. IV. Equanimitas tolerandi, non usus, uel abstinentia cibi iustitiam facit.
Idem in libro [II.] questionum euangeliorum. [c. 11.] Quod dicit Dominus in euangelio: "Iustificata est sapientia ab omnibus filiis suis," ostendit filios sapientiae intelligere, nec in abstinendo, nec in manducando esse iusticiam, sed in equanimitate tolerandi inopiam, et temperancia per abundantiam non se corrumpendi, atque oportune sumendi uel non sumendi ea, quorum non usus, sed concupiscentia reprehendenda est. Non enim interest omnino, quid alimentorum sumas, ut succurras necessitati corporis, dummodo congruas in generibus alimentorum his, cum quibus tibi uiuendum est. Neque quantum sumas multum interest, cum uideamus aliorum stomachum citius saturari, et eos tamen illi ipsi paruo, quo saciantur, ardenter et intolerabiliter et omnino turpiter inhiare; alios autem plus paulo poculo saciari quidem, sed tolerabiliter inopiam perpeti, et uel ante horam positas epulas, si id in tempore aut opus sit aut necesse sit, cum tranquillitate aspicere, neque tangere. Magis ergo interest, non quid uel quantum alimentorum pro congruentia hominum atque personae suae, et pro suae ualetudinis necessitate quis accipiat, sed quanta facilitate et serenitate animi careat, cum his uel oportet, uel necesse est carere; ut illud in animo Christiani conpleatur, quod Apostolus dicit: "Scio et minus habere, scio et habundare; ubique et in omnibus inbutus sum: et saciari, et esurire, et habundare, et penuriam pati, omnia possum in eo, qui me confortat."
Friedberg, col. 149/150
C. V. Temperance in foods and garments, not looseness in them, is praised.
Likewise from the Council of Gangra [last c.]. We do not reprove frugality together with humble clothing, just as we also praise adornment that is unpainted, apart from care of the body. But we do not receive those who are dissolute and effeminate in garments and gait. Not confining piety within private houses, we honor every place built in the name of the Lord; and we receive a congregation made in the church for the common utility, and we call blessed the good works that are exercised beyond one’s means toward poor brethren according to ecclesiastical traditions, and we desire that all things conforming to the apostolic traditions and precepts of the holy Scriptures be done in the Church.
C. V. Temperantia ciborum et uestium, non dissolutio eorum laudatur.
Item ex Concilio Gangrensi. [c. ultimo.] Parsimoniam cum ueste humili non reprobamus, sicut etiam ornatum preter corporis diligentiam infucatum laudamus. Dissolutos autem et fractos uestibus et incessu non recipimus; pietatem in priuatis domibus non concludentes, omnem locum in nomine Domini edificatum honoramus; et congregationem in ecclesia factam ad utilitatem communem recipimus, et bona opera, que supra uires in fratres pauperes exercentur, secundum ecclesiasticas traditiones beatificamus, et omnia, que conueniunt tradicionibus apostolicis et sanctarum scripturarum preceptis, in ecclesia fieri exoptamus.
Friedberg, col. 149/150
C. VI. Vices often insinuate themselves under the appearance of virtues.
Likewise Gregory [to John of Constantinople, Book I of the Register, epistle 24]. Vices often falsely claim to be virtues, so that stinginess wishes to appear as frugality, prodigality as generosity, cruelty as zeal for justice, and laxity as piety.
C. VI. Sub specie uirtutum sepe se uicia ingerunt.
Item Gregorius. [Iohanni Constantinopolitano, lib. I. Reg. epist. 24.] Sepe uicia esse se uirtutes mentiuntur, ut tenacia parsimonia, effusio largitas, crudelitas zelus iusticiae, remissio pietas uelit uideri.
Friedberg, col. 149/150
C. VII. Episcopal authority is sought by merits of faith and life, not by riches.
Likewise from the Fourth Council of Carthage [c. 15]. Let a bishop have cheap household goods, a poor table and sustenance, and let him seek the authority of his dignity by faith and the merits of life. §1. Let him also have a small lodging not far from the church.
C. VII. Meritis fidei et uitae, non diuitiis episcopalis auctoritas queritur.
Item ex Concilio Cartaginensi IV. [c. 15.] Episcopus uilem supellectilem, et mensam ac uictum pauperem habeat, et dignitatis suae auctoritatem fide et uitae meritis querat. §. 1. Hospiciolum quoque non longe ab ecclesia habeat.
Friedberg, col. 149/150
[C. VIII.]
Likewise from the same [c. 45]. Let a cleric prove his profession even by his habit and gait, and therefore let him seek adornment neither in garments nor in shoes. GRATIAN. Therefore, just as we are admonished in foods to observe the customs of those with whom we live, so this is also to be understood concerning clothing. For, as is said elsewhere: “Whoever, despising those with whom he lives, seeks for himself finer or more austere clothing or food than the rest is either intemperate toward himself or superstitious.” A priest ought, however, to be adorned in gait, so that by the gravity of his journey he may show the maturity of his mind. For disorderedness of the body, as Augustine says, indicates the quality of the mind. Hence that historian, when he described the mutability of the man whose conscience, stirred by cares, was laying waste his mind, indicated this also among the other noteworthy things: “His gait was now swift, now slow.”
[C. VIII.]
Item ex eodem. [c. 45.] Clericus professionem suam etiam habitu et incessu probet, et ideo nec uestibus, nec calciamentis decorem querat. Gratian. Sicut ergo in cibis mores eorum, cum quibus uiuimus, obseruare monemur, sic et de indumentis intelligendum est. Ut enim alibi dicitur: "quisquis contemptis his, cum quibus uiuit, lautiora sibi uel austeriora pre ceteris indumenta uel alimenta querit, aut intemperans sui est, aut supersticiosus." Incessu autem debet esse sacerdos ornatus, ut grauitate itineris mentis maturitatem ostendat. Incompositio enim corporis (ut Augustinus ait) qualitatem indicat mentis. Unde istoriographus ille, cum mutabilitatem eius describeret, cuius conscientia excita curis uastabat mentem, inter cetera etiam hoc notabile indicauit: "Incessus eius modo citus modo tardus".
Friedberg, col. 149/150