distinction — Decretum of Gratian
Distinction LXVIII
GRATIAN. Part I. It is asked concerning those who are ordained by men not established to have been bishops, whether they are to be consecrated again or not. That they are not to be consecrated is proved by the authority of Gregory, who, writing to John, Bishop of Ravenna, [book II, epistle 32], says:
GRATIANUS. I. Pars. Queritur de illis, qui ordinantur ab eis, quos non constat fuisse episcopos, an sint iterum consecrandi, an non? Quod uero consecrandi non sint, probatur auctoritate Gregorii, qui scribens Iohanni Episcopo Rauennati, [lib. II. epist. 32.] ait:
Friedberg, col. 253/254
C. I. One who has once been consecrated ought not to be consecrated again.
Just as one who has once been baptized ought not to be baptized again, so one who has once been consecrated cannot be consecrated again. But if anyone came to the priesthood with a slight fault, penance ought to be imposed for the fault, and yet the order is to be preserved. To the contrary, the same Gregory testifies, writing to a certain bishop:
C. I. Semel consecratus iterum consecrari non debet.
Sicut semel baptizatus iterum baptizari non debet, sic et semel consecratus iterum consecrari non potest. Sed si quis cum leui culpa ad sacerdotium uenit, pro culpa penitencia debet indici, et tamen ordo seruetur. Econtra idem Gregorius testatur scribens cuidam episcopo:
Friedberg, col. 253/254
C. II. Concerning priests who are ordained by men established not to have been bishops.
As for the priests whom you found: if those men by whom they are ordained are unknown, and it is doubtful whether those who ordained them were bishops or not, then, if the priests themselves are men of good conduct and catholic, and are instructed in the ministry of Christ and in every holy law, let them receive the blessing of the priesthood from their bishop and be consecrated, and thus let them discharge the sacred ministry. GRATIAN. Therefore, the prohibition against a consecrated person being consecrated again in the same order is to be understood of one who was consecrated by a man whom it was certain had the right of consecrating. But one who is consecrated by a man not established to have had the right of consecrating is to be consecrated again, because if that man did not have the right of consecrating, the present man received nothing of consecration from the outpouring of oil. And because he was not consecrated in that order, now, coming to consecration as though for the first time, he obtains the priestly blessing and consecration from the bishop. But if the man did have the right of consecrating, in the first anointing he obtained consecration; in the second consecration is not repeated, but only the anointing, just as one concerning whom it is doubtful whether he has been baptized or not ought to be baptized. If he had not been baptized before, he obtains the grace of baptism; but if he had been baptized, he receives nothing in the second anointing, nor does this pertain to a repetition of baptism, but to the safeguarding of salvation. This is likewise to be observed concerning churches to be consecrated. Hence in the Council of Nicaea:
C. II. De presbiteris, qui ordinantur ab eis, quos constat non fuisse episcopos.
Presbiteri, quos reperisti, si incogniti fuerint uiri illi, qui ordinantur, et dubium est, eos episcopos fuisse, an non, qui eos ordinauerunt, si bonae actionis uirique catholici sunt ipsi presbiteri, et in ministerio Christi omnique sancta lege edocti, ab episcopo suo benedictionem presbiteratus suscipiant et consecrentur, et sic ministerio sacro fungantur. Gratian. Quod ergo consecratus in eodem ordine iterum consecrari prohibetur, de eo intelligendum est, qui consecratus est ab illo, quem certum erat ius consecrandi habere. Qui autem ab illo consecratur, quem non constat ius consecrandi habuisse, iterum consecrandus est, quia si ille ius consecrandi non habuerit iste ex olei effusione nichil consecrationis accepit. Et quia in ipso ordine consecratus non erat, nunc quasi primum ad consecrationem ueniens ab episcopo sacerdotalem benedictionem et consecrationem consequitur. Si autem ius consecrandi habuerit, in prima unctione consecutus est consecrationem; in secunda uero non reiteratur consecratio, sed sola unctio, sicut de quo dubium est, an sit baptizatus an non, debet baptizari; qui si prius baptizatus non fuerat, consequitur gratiam baptismi, si autem baptizatus erat, nichil accipit in secunda unctione, nec pertinet hoc ad reiteracionem baptismi, sed ad cautelam salutis. Hoc etiam de ecclesiis consecrandis similiter obseruandum est. Unde in Niceno Concilio:
Friedberg, col. 253/254
C. III. A church once consecrated ought not to be consecrated again.
Consecration ought not to be applied again to churches once consecrated to God unless they have been burned by fire or polluted by the shedding of blood or by the seed of anyone; because, just as an infant once baptized by any priest in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit ought not to be baptized again, so too a place dedicated to God is not to be consecrated again, except for those causes that we named above, provided nevertheless that those who consecrated it held the faith of the Holy Trinity. Part II. GRATIAN. Between bishops and chorepiscopi, however, there is this difference: bishops can be ordained only in cities, while chorepiscopi can also be ordained in villages. Bishops grant canonical letters, while chorepiscopi can give only commendatory and pacific letters. Bishops have the right of consecrating; chorepiscopi confer only the lesser orders, but they cannot furnish the Levitical and priestly blessing. Bishop Leo writes as follows concerning them to all the Bishops, [epistle LXXXVI, otherwise LXXXVIII]:
C. III. Non debet iterum consecrari ecclesia semel consecrata.
Ecclesiis semel Deo consecratis non debet iterum consecratio adhiberi, nisi aut ab igne exustae, aut sanguinis effusione, aut cuiuscumque semine pollutae fuerint: quia sicut infans a qualicumque sacerdote in nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti semel baptizatus, non debet iterum baptizari, ita nec locus Deo dicatus iterum consecrandus est, nisi propter eas causas, quas superius nominauimus, si tamen fidem sanctae Trinitatis tenuerunt, qui eum consecrauerunt. II. Pars. Gratian. Inter episcopos autem et corepiscopos hec differentia est, quod episcopi non nisi in ciuitatibus, corepiscopi etiam in uicis ordinari possunt. Episcopi formatas tribuunt, corepiscopi non nisi commendaticias et pacificas dare ualent. Episcopi ius consecrandi habent, corepiscopi minores tantummodo ordines tribuunt, Leuiticam autem et sacerdotalem benedictionem prestare non ualent. De his ita scribit Leo Episcopus omnibus Episcopis: [epist. LXXXVI. al. LXXXVIII.]
Friedberg, col. 253/254
C. IV. In what respects chorepiscopi differ from bishops.
Although chorepiscopi and priests share with bishops the dispensation of many ministries, nevertheless let them know that certain things are prohibited to them, such as the consecration of priests, deacons, and virgins; the establishment, blessing, or anointing of an altar. Indeed, it is not permissible for them to erect altars or consecrate churches, nor through the imposition of hands to impart the Paraclete, the Holy Spirit, to baptized faithful or converted heretics, nor to prepare chrism, nor to sign with chrism the foreheads of the baptized, nor publicly at mass to reconcile anyone doing penance, nor to send canonical letters to anyone. [PALEA. For all these things are unlawful for chorepiscopi, who are known to correspond to the example and form of the seventy-two disciples, or for priests, who bear the same figure.] For although they have consecration, they nevertheless do not have the summit of the pontificate. Part III. GRATIAN. But these men, because of their insolence by which they usurped the offices of bishops for themselves, are today prohibited by the Church. Hence Pope Damasus says, [to the Bishops of Africa, epistle V]:
C. IV. In quibus corepiscopi ab episcopis differant.
Quamuis corepiscopis et presbiteris plurima cum episcopis ministeriorum communis sit dispensatio, quedam tamen sibi prohibita nouerint, sicut est presbiterorum et diaconorum, et uirginum consecratio, constitutio altaris, ac benedictio uel unctio. Si quidem nec erigere altaria, nec consecrare ecclesias eis licitum est, nec per inpositionem manuum fidelibus baptizatis uel conuersis hereticis paracletum Spiritum sanctum tradere, nec crisma conficere, nec crismate baptizatorum frontes signare, nec publice quidem in missa quemquam penitentem reconciliare, nec formatas cuilibet epistolas mittere. [PALEA. Hec enim omnia illicita sunt corepiscopis, qui ad exemplum et formam LXXII. discipulorum esse noscuntur, uel presbiteris, qui eandem gestant figuram. ] Quoniam, quamquam consecrationem habeant, pontificatus tamen apicem non habent. III. Pars. Gratian. Hi uero propter insolentiam suam, qua episcoporum offitia sibi usurpabant, ab ecclesia hodie prohibiti sunt. Unde Damasus papa ait: [ad Episc. Africae, epist. V.]
Friedberg, col. 255/256
C. V. The order of chorepiscopi is rejected by the holy see.
Chorepiscopi are prohibited both by this holy see and by the bishops of the whole world. For their institution is exceedingly dishonorable and exceedingly depraved, because it lacks all authority for them to presume anything from the ministry of the supreme priest. § 1. For we have learned that there are no more than two orders among the disciples of the Lord, namely, the twelve apostles and the seventy-two disciples. Whence this third has proceeded, we do not know. And what lacks reason must be rooted out. Part IV. § 2. But that those who were ordained by fewer than three bishops are not bishops is plain to all. For it was prohibited by the holy Fathers that those who were ordained by one or two bishops be called bishops. If they do not have the name, how will they have the office? Likewise Urban, [Pope II]:
C. V. Ordo corepiscoporum a sacra sede reprobatur.
Corepiscopi tam ab hac sacra sede, quam ab episcopis totius orbis prohibiti sunt. Nimis enim eorum institucio inproba, nimis est et praua, quia, ut de summo sacerdotis ministerio aliquid presumant, omni auctoritate caret. §. 1. Nam non amplius, quam duos ordines inter discipulos Domini esse cognouimus, id est duodecim apostolorum, et LXXII. discipulorum. Unde iste tertius processerit, ignoramus. Et quod ratione caret exstirpare necesse est. IV. Pars. §. 2. Quod autem episcopi non sint, qui minus quam a tribus episcopis ordinati sunt, omnibus patet. Prohibitum, est enim a sanctis Patribus, ut qui ab uno uel a duobus sunt ordinati episcopis non nominentur episcopi. Si nomen non habent, qualiter offitium habebunt? Item Urbanus. [Papa II.]
Friedberg, col. 255/256
C. VI. Bishops hold the place of the apostles in the Church.
Whose vicars bishops are in the Church, and who ought to give them this dignity, Saint Augustine shows, saying:
“In place of your fathers, sons have been born to you. The fathers who were sent are the apostles; in place of the apostles sons were born and were constituted bishops. For whence were the bishops who are throughout the whole world born today? The Church herself calls those men fathers; she herself begot them, and she herself established them in the seats of the fathers. Therefore do not think yourself deserted because you do not see Paul, because you do not see Peter, because you do not see those through whom you were born: from your offspring fatherhood has grown for you. In place of your fathers, sons have been born to you; you will constitute them princes over all the earth. The Church begot sons; she established them as princes in place of her fathers over all the earth.”
C. VI. Apostolorum in ecclesia locum tenent episcopi.
Quorum uices in ecclesia episcopi habeant, et quis eis hanc dignitatem dare debeat, S. Augustinus ostendit, inquiens:
"Pro patribus tuis nati sunt tibi filii. Patres missi sunt apostoli: pro apostolis filii nati sunt, constituti sunt episcopi. Hodie enim episcopi, qui sunt per totum mundum, unde nati sunt? Ipsa ecclesia patres illos appellat ipsa illos genuit, et ipsa illos constituit in sedibus patrum. Non te ergo putes desertam, quia non uides Paulum, quia non uides Petrum, quia non uides illos, per quos nata es: de prole tua creuit tibi paternitas. Pro patribus tuis nati sunt tibi filii: constitues eos principes super omnem terram. Filios genuit ecclesia, constituit eos pro patribus suis principes super omnem terram."
Friedberg, col. 255/256