distinction — Decretum of Gratian
Distinction XXXIV
GRATIAN. Part I. A bishop ought also to avoid immoderate familiarity with persons of his household. Hence Pope Nicholas to Archbishop Adalwin:
GRATIANUS. I. Pars. Domesticarum quoque personarum immoderatam familiaritatem episcopum uitare oportet. Unde Nicolaus papa Adaluino Archiepiscopo:
Friedberg, col. 125/126
C. I. A bishop ought to avoid immoderate familiarity even with female blood relatives.
It has been intimated to our ears by the report of certain faithful persons that Bishop Lanfred, who is also said to be young, is devoted to hunting. This vice entangles very many even from the clerical catalogue—Germans and Gauls, namely—in irreverence. But this man, if the matter is as we have heard, is deservedly called young, because, occupied by youthful desires, he is restrained by no gravity. For, as blessed Jerome says, we never read of a hunter who was holy. It has likewise been reported to our apostolate concerning this bishop that he maintains immoderate familiarity with a certain daughter of his and that an evil reputation has arisen against him on this account. For this matter he has been admonished and reproved by your holiness and his other fellow bishops, but has in no way amended himself. This matter is especially displeasing in this respect and renders the opinion concerning him worse and worse: that he does not obey the reasonings of your blessedness and his fellow bishops and through disobedience falls back into the fault of the first-created man. §1. Your fraternity therefore ought to summon a synodal council with your bishops and suffragans, address this bishop with salutary words, and command him by pastoral authority to remain entirely alien from hunting any beasts or birds and altogether restrain himself from immoderate familiarity with his daughter. But if he disdains to obey and, when you admonish him both to renounce hunting and to avoid immoderate association with his daughter, delays obedience, let him depart excommunicated from your college.
But if he still appears contumacious in this, he will have to cease from the ministry.
[PALEA.
C. I. Etiam consanguinearum inmoderatam familiaritatem uitare episcopum oportet.
Quorumdam relatione fidelium nostris auribus intimatum est, quod Lanfredus episcopus, qui et iuuenis esse dicitur, uenationi sit deditus, quod uitium plurimos etiam de clericali catalogo, genere dumtaxat Germanos et Gallos, irreuerentes implicat. Verum iste (si ita est, ut audiuimus) merito iuuenis dicitur, qui iuuenilibus desideriis occupatus nulla grauitate constringitur. Nam (ut B. dicit Ieronimus) uenatorem numquam legimus sanctum. Nichilominus autem de hoc episcopo relatum est apostolatui nostro, quod cum quadam filia sua immoderatam teneat familiaritatem, et ob id mala fama ei orta sit, pro qua re a sanctitate tua ceterisque coepiscopis suis ammonitus atque correptus est, sed nullatenus emendatus; que res in hoc maxime displicet, et magis ac magis de se deteriorem reddit opinionem, in quo beatitudini tuae et coepiscoporum suorum rationibus non obedit, et per inobedientiam in culpam protoplasti relabitur. §. 1. Oportet ergo fraternitatem tuam sinodale cum episcopis et suffraganeis tuis conuocare concilium, et hunc salutaribus eloquiis episcopum conuenire, atque illi pastorali auctoritate precipere, quatenus ab omnium bestiarum uel uolucrum uenatione penitus alienus existat, atque ab inmoderata filiae suae familiaritate semet omnino coherceat. Quod si parere contempserit, et tam pro uenationis declinatione quam pro inmoderata filiae suae conuersatione uitanda uobis ammonentibus obedire distulerit, a uestro collegio excommunicatus abscedat.
Quod si in hoc adhuc contumax apparuerit, a ministerio cessare debebit.
[PALEA.
Friedberg, col. 125/126
C. II. From the Council of Epaon, c. 4.
A bishop, priest, or deacon is not permitted to have dogs for hunting, hawks, or things of this kind. But if anyone among such persons has been detained repeatedly in this pleasure, if he is a bishop, let him be suspended from communion for three months; but let a deacon be suspended from every office and from communion.]
[PALEA.
C. II. Ex Concilio Epaonensi c. 4.
Episcopum, presbiterum aut diaconum canes ad uenandum, aut accipitres, aut huiusmodi res habere non licet. Quod si quis talium personarum in hac uoluptate sepius detentus fuerit, si episcopus est, tribus mensibus a communione suspendatur; diaconus uero ab omni offitio et communione suspendatur ] .
[PALEA.
Friedberg, col. 125/126
C. III.
We prohibit all servants of God from hunts and woodland wanderings with dogs and from having hawks or falcons.] Part II. GRATIAN. A concubine here, however, is understood as a woman who, in the absence of legal instruments, has been united and is taken with marital affection; affection makes her a spouse, while the law names her a concubine. Concerning her it is said in the Council of Toledo [I, c. 17]:
C. III.
Omnibus seruis Dei uenationes et siluaticas uagationes cum canibus, et ut accipitres aut falcones habeant interdicimus. ] II. Pars. Gratian. Concubina autem hic ea intelligitur, que cessantibus legalibus instrumentis unita est, et coniugali affectu asciscitur; hanc coniugem facit affectus, concubinam uero lex nominat. De hac dicitur in Concilio Tolletano: [I. c. 17.]
Friedberg, col. 125/126
C. IV. One who does not have a wife is permitted to have a concubine in her place.
One who does not have a wife and has a concubine in place of a wife is not to be repelled from communion, provided that he is content with union with one woman, either a wife or a concubine.
C. IV. Qui non habet uxorem, loco illius concubinam licet habere.
Is, qui non habet uxorem, et pro uxore concubinam habet, a communione non repellatur: tamen ut unius mulieris, aut uxoris aut concubinae, sit coniunctione contentus.
Friedberg, col. 125/126
C. V. On the same matter.
Likewise Isidore, On the Difference of the Old and New Testaments. A Christian is permitted to have, I shall not say many women, but not even two at the same time; only one wife, or certainly in place of a wife, if a spouse is lacking, one concubine.
[PALEA.
C. V. De eodem.
Item Ysidorus de distantia ueteris et noui testamenti. Christiano non dicam plurimas, sed nec duas simul habere licitum est, nisi unam tantum aut uxorem, aut certe loco uxoris (si coniux deest) concubinam.
[PALEA.
Friedberg, col. 125/126
C. VI. From the sayings of Augustine in Book VII of the Homilies, homily 49.
Hear, most beloved members of Christ and sons of mother Catholic Church! Let penitents hear what I say to the competent and faithful. What I say to the faithful I say also to the competent and the penitents. Let the catechumens hear; let all hear; let all fear; let no one despise it. Let your hearing be a consolation to me, lest my grief be a testimony against you. I say to the competent: you are not permitted to fornicate; let your wives suffice for you. Let God hear if you are deaf; let the angels hear if you despise it. You are not permitted to have concubines; and if you do not have wives, you will nevertheless not be permitted to have concubines whom you afterward dismiss and take wives. So much greater will your condemnation be if you wish to have wives and concubines.]
Part III. GRATIAN. But if she was not a concubine of this kind and the age of the man in question is recognized to remove the suspicion of future incontinence, by apostolic concession he can be advanced to the order of the diaconate. Hence Pope Pelagius writes to Bishop Florentinus:
C. VI. Ex dictis Augustini in libro VII. homiliarum, homilia 49.
Audite carissimi membra Christi et matris catholicae ecclesiae filii! Quod dico competentibus et fidelibus audiant penitentes. Quod dico fidelibus, dico et competentibus, et penitentibus. Audiant catecumini, audiant omnes, omnes timeant, nemo contempnat; sit mihi in consolationem uester auditus, ne uobis sit in testimonium dolor meus. Competentibus dico, fornicari uobis non licet, sufficiant uobis uxores; audiat Deus, si uos surdi estis, audiant angeli, si uos contempnitis. Concubinas uobis habere non licet; et si non habetis uxores, tamen non licebit uobis habere concubinas, quas postea dimittatis et ducatis uxores, tanto magis dampnatio uobis erit, si uolueritis habere uxores et concubinas. ] III. Pars. Gratian. Ceterum, si non talis concubina fuerit, et etas illius, de quo agitur, futurae incontinentiae suspicionem auferre dignoscitur, apostolica concessione ad ordinem diaconatus prouehi potest. Unde Pelagius Papa scribit Florentino Episcopo:
Friedberg, col. 127/128
C. VII. One who had children by a female slave after the death of his wife is permitted to become a deacon.
Having received the report of your fraternity, we learned that the bearer of it had indeed not experienced a second marriage, yet you indicated that he had not preserved chastity toward his former marriage. And although there are many things that the authority of canonical sublimity commands to be observed in cases of this kind, nevertheless, because the deficiency of our time, in which not only the merits but the very bodies of men have failed, does not permit the censure of that strictness to remain, and the age of the man in question is recognized to remove the suspicion of future incontinence, know that we have conceded that he can be advanced to the order of the diaconate. §1. But we command that Micina, his female slave, by whom he confessed that he had children after the passing of his wife, be handed over under your direction to any monastery to profess continence. GRATIAN. This is from a dispensation of mercy; but that passage of the Council of Orléans is understood from the rigor of discipline:
C. VII. Qui post mortem uxoris de ancilla filios habuerit diaconus fieri permittitur.
Fraternitatis tuae relatione suscepta, eius latorem secundas quidem nuptias expertum non fuisse didicimus, castitatem tamen eum priori non seruasse coniugio designasti. Et quamuis multa sint, que in huiusmodi casibus obseruari canonicae iubeat sublimitatis auctoritas: tamen quia defectus nostri temporis, quibus non solum merita, sed corpora ipsa hominum defecerunt, districtionis illius non patitur manere censuram, et etas istius, de quo agitur, futurae incontinentiae suspicionem auferre dignoscitur, ut ad diaconatus ordinem possit prouehi, concessisse nos noueris. §. 1. Micinam uero ancillam eius, de qua se post uxoris transitum filios habere confessus est, iubemus, ut tua dispositione cuicumque monasterio continentiam professura tradatur. Gratian. Hoc ex dispensatione misericordiae; ceterum ex rigore disciplinae intelligitur illud Aurelianensis Concilii:
Friedberg, col. 127/128
C. VIII. One who has known another woman besides his wife is not to be admitted to the clergy.
If any layman after his wife has known another woman of any condition, let him in no way be admitted to the clergy. Part IV. GRATIAN. Therefore, what is written concerning a mistress and prostitute in Gregory and Innocent is believed to have been established because of the expectation of future incontinence, because one who does not fear to stain himself by illicit intercourse preserves continence with difficulty. Or one who has known a mistress or prostitute with marital affection is prohibited from being ordained, either because, having been corrupted, she had lost the flower of virginity, or because she does not cease to prostitute herself although she is taken as wife. For either impediment prevents anyone from being able to attain sacred orders. Hence Pope Hilary [in the Roman Synod, c. 2] writes, saying:
C. VIII. Non admittatur ad clerum, qui preter uxorem aliam cognouerit.
Si quis de laicis post uxorem suam aliam cuiuscumque conditionis cognouerit mulierem, in clerum nullatenus admittatur. IV. Pars, Gratian. Quod ergo de pellice et meretrice apud Gregorium et Innocentium scribitur, propter spem futurae incontinentiae constitutum esse creditur, quia difficile continentiam seruat, qui se illicito concubitu maculare non metuit. Vel prohibetur ordinari, qui pellicem uel meretricem cognouerit maritali affectu, uel quia corrupta florem uirginitatis amiserat uel quia meretricari non desinit, licet in uxorem ducatur. Utrumque enim inpedimentum cuilibet prestat, quo minus ad sacros ordines pertingere ualeat. Unde Ylarius papa [in Sinodo Romana, cap. 2.] scribit, dicens:
Friedberg, col. 127/128
C. IX. One who did not take a virgin as wife is not to approach sacred orders.
Care is therefore first to be taken that no one who did not take a virgin as wife should aspire to sacred orders, as was prescribed above in the earlier acts.
C. IX. Qui uirginem non duxit uxorem, ad sacros ordines non accedat.
Curandum ergo inprimis est, ne ad sacros ordines (sicut gestis prioribus ante prescriptum est) quisquam, qui uxorem uirginem non duxerit, aspiret.
Friedberg, col. 127/128
C. X. A twice-married man, a penitent, one impaired in body, one ignorant of letters, or one bound to the curia or to a condition is not to be made a cleric.
Likewise Gregory, prelate of the city of Rome, to the bishop of Squillace [Book II, epistle 25]. We command you never to perform illicit ordinations or permit a twice-married man, one who did not obtain a virgin as wife, one ignorant of letters, one impaired in any part of the body, a penitent, or one bound to the curia or to any condition to approach sacred orders. But if you find any persons of this kind, do not dare to promote them.
C. X. Bigamus, uel penitens, corpore uitiatus, litteras ignorans, curiae uel conditioni obnoxius, clericus non fiat.
Item Gregorius urbis Romae Presul Scillacino Episcopo. [lib. II. epist. 25.] Precipimus, ne umquam illicitas ordinationes facias, nec bigamum aut qui uirginem sortitus non est uxorem, aut ignorantem litteras, uel qualibet parte corporis uitiatum, uel penitentem, uel curiae aut cuilibet conditioni obnoxium, ad sacros ordines permittas accedere: sed si quos huiusmodi repereris, non audeas promouere.
Friedberg, col. 127/128
C. XI. One whose wife is plainly established to have committed adultery is not to be made a priest.
Likewise in the Council of Neocaesarea [c. 8]. If anyone’s wife is plainly proved to have committed adultery while he was a layman, he cannot be admitted to ecclesiastical ministry. But if she committed adultery when he was already established in the clerical state, he ought to dismiss her after giving a repudiation. But if he wishes to retain her companionship, he cannot enjoy the ministry he received.
C. XI. Non fiat sacerdos, cuius euidenter uxorem constat adulterium admisisse.
Item in Neocesariensi Concilio. [cap. 8.] Si cuius uxorem adulterium commisisse, cum esset laicus, euidenter fuerit comprobatum, hic ad ministerium ecclesiasticum admitti non potest. Quod si in clericatu eo iam constituto adulterauit, dato repudio dimittere eam debet. Si uero retinere eius consortium uelit, non potest suscepto ministerio perfrui.
Friedberg, col. 127/128
C. XII. On the same matter.
Likewise from the Council of Pope Martin. If the wife of a layman has been caught in adultery, a man of this kind is in no way to be brought to ecclesiastical ministry. But if the wife of any cleric commits adultery after his ordination, let him dismiss her. If, however, he wishes to remain with her, let him be excluded from the ministry. GRATIAN. By the foregoing authorities, twice-married men and those who did not obtain virgins as wives are prohibited from sacred orders. But it is asked: if anyone before baptism took a widow as wife, is he on that account to be prohibited from sacred orders? Concerning these things Pope Innocent writes thus to Victricius, bishop of Rouen [epistle II, cc. 5 and 6]:
C. XII. De eodem.
Item ex Concilio Martini papa. Si laici uxor in adulterio fuerit deprehensa, hic talis ad ministerium ecclesiasticum nullo modo adducatur. Si autem post ordinationem alicuius clerici uxor adulterata fuerit, dimittat eam. Si autem cum ipsa uoluerit permanere, a ministerio alienus sit. Gratian. Premissis auctoritatibus bigami et qui uirgines non sunt sortiti uxores a sacris ordinibus prohibentur. Sed queritur, si quis ante baptisma uiduam duxerit uxorem, an propterea sit prohibendus a sacris ordinibus? De his ita scribit Innocentius Papa Victricio Rotomagensi Episcopo: [epist. II. cap. 5. et 6.]
Friedberg, col. 127/128
C. XIII. One who took a widow as wife, whether before or after baptism, is not to be admitted to the clergy.
If anyone, although a layman, took a widow as wife, whether before baptism or after baptism, let him not be admitted to the clergy, because he appears excluded by the same defect. For crimes are forgiven in baptism; the partnership of a wife already received is not relaxed. §1. But if the woman taken before baptism is not thought to be counted as a wife, then neither are the children begotten before baptism to be held as children. GRATIAN. Twice-married men are also prohibited from every order of the clerical state, according to that passage of Ambrose [epistle LXXXII] to the people of Vercelli:
C. XIII. Qui ante baptisma, seu post baptisma uiduam uxorem duxerit, non admittatur ad clerum.
Si quis uiduam (licet laicus) duxerit uxorem, siue ante baptismum, siue post baptismum, non admittatur ad clerum, quia eodem uitio uidetur exclusus. In baptismate enim crimina dimittuntur, non acceptae uxoris consortium relaxatur. §. 1. Quod si non putatur uxor esse computanda, que ante baptismum ducta est, ergo nec filii, qui ante baptismum geniti sunt, pro filiis habeantur. Gratian. Prohibentur etiam bigami a quolibet ordine clericatus, iuxta illud Ambrosii [epist. LXXXII.] ad Vercellenses.
Friedberg, col. 129/130
C. XIV. One who obtains a second marriage is not to become a cleric.
Let us recognize that not only did the Apostle establish this concerning a bishop and priest, but the fathers also added in the deliberation of the Nicene Council that no one who had obtained a second marriage ought to be a cleric. Part V. GRATIAN. Likewise, husbands of widows, female slaves, or prostitutes cannot become clerics. Hence it is read in the Canons of the Apostles [c. 18]:
C. XIV. Qui secunda coniugia sortitur, clericus non fiat.
Cognoscamus, non solum de episcopo et presbitero Apostolum statuisse, sed etiam Patres in concilii Niceni tractatu addidisse, clericum quemquam non debere esse, qui secunda coniugia sit sortitus. V. Pars. Gratian. Similiter etiam uiduarum mariti, uel ancillarum, uel meretricum, clerici fieri non possunt. Unde in canonibus Apostolorum [c. 18.] legitur:
Friedberg, col. 129/130
C. XV. One who takes as wife a woman bound to public spectacles, a woman cast out, or a female slave is not to become a deacon.
If anyone receives a widow or a woman cast out, or a prostitute, or a female slave, or any one of those who are bound to public spectacles, he cannot be a bishop, priest, or deacon, or from the number of those who serve in the sacred ministry. Part VI. GRATIAN. Jerome [epistle CXXVIII] to Fabiola, On the Priestly Vestment, shows who is a widow, a woman cast out, or a prostitute, saying:
C. XV. Spectaculis publicis mancipatam, uel eiectam, uel ancillam ducens uxorem, diaconus non fiat.
Si quis uiduam aut eiectam acceperit, aut meretricem, aut ancillam, uel aliquam de his, que publicis spectaculis mancipantur, non potest esse episcopus, aut presbiter, aut diaconus, aut ex eorum numero, qui ministerio sacro deseruiunt. VI. Pars. Gratian. Que autem sit uidua, que eiecta, uel meretrix, Ieronimus [epist. CXXVIII.] ad Fabiolam de ueste sacerdotali ostendit dicens:
Friedberg, col. 129/130
C. XVI. Who is a widow, a woman cast out, or a prostitute.
A widow is one whose husband has died. A woman cast out is one who is expelled while her husband is living. A prostitute is one who lies open to the lust of many. Part VII. GRATIAN. But afterward, condescending to the deficiency of the times, Pope Martin permitted them to be established in the lesser orders, saying:
C. XVI. Que sit uidua, uel eiecta, uel meretrix.
Vidua est, cuius maritus mortuus est. Eiecta, que a marito uiuente proicitur. Meretrix, que multorum libidini patet. VII. Pars. Gratian. Sed postea temporum defectui condescendens Papa Martinus in minoribus ordinibus eos constitui permisit, dicens:
Friedberg, col. 129/130
C. XVII. A subdeacon who takes a second wife is to be numbered among readers or ostiaries.
If a subdeacon takes a second wife, let him be held among readers or ostiaries, yet so that he does not read the Apostle. GRATIAN. Nevertheless, when necessity requires, twice-married men can be promoted as far as the subdiaconate.
Hence Pope Martin says:
C. XVII. Inter lectores uel hostiarios deputetur subdiaconus, secundam ducens uxorem.
Si subdiaconus secundam uxorem duxerit, inter lectores uel hostiarios habeatur, ita ut Apostolum non legat. Gratian. Necessitate tamen exigente bigami usque ad subdiaconatum possunt promoueri.
Unde Martinus Papa ait:
Friedberg, col. 129/130
C. XVIII. One who takes a widow as wife can become a subdeacon.
If a reader takes the widow of another as wife, let him remain in the readership, or, if there is necessity, let him become a subdeacon, but nothing above it. Likewise also if he is twice-married. Part VIII. GRATIAN. Those who are prohibited from their own marriages are also forbidden to be present at wedding banquets. Hence it is read in the Council of Agde [c. 39]:
C. XVIII. Viduam ducens uxorem, subdiaconus fieri potest.
Lector, si uiduam uxorem alterius acceperit, in lectoratu permaneat, aut si necessitas fuerit, subdiaconus fiat, nichil autem supra. Similiter et si bigamus fuerit. VIII. Pars. Gratian. Quibus autem propria coniugia prohibentur, interdicitur etiam nuptialibus conuiuiis interesse. Unde in Agatensi Concilio [cap. 39.] legitur:
Friedberg, col. 129/130
C. XIX. Priests ought not to be present at wedding banquets.
Priests, deacons, subdeacons, or those thereafter who do not have license to take wives are also to avoid the banquets of others’ weddings and not mingle with those assemblies where amorous and shameful songs are sung or obscene movements of bodies are displayed in choruses and dances, lest hearing and sight deputed to the sacred mysteries be polluted by the contagion of shameful spectacles and words. Part IX. GRATIAN. A widow, however, is to be understood as one who after the solemn covenant of marriage was separated from her husband by the intervention of death. But if before they come together they are divided from one another by fatal necessity, although she is called a wife by reason of the betrothal, nevertheless after the death of the betrothed she is not called a widow, even if she was led into his house and veiled with him; nor is anyone prohibited from sacred orders by union with her. Hence Pope Pelagius writes:
C. XIX. Nuptiarum conuiuiis presbiteri interesse non debent.
Presbiteri, diacones, subdiacones uel deinceps, quibus ducendi uxores licentia non est, etiam alienarum nuptiarum euitent conuiuia, nec his cetibus misceantur, ubi amatoria cantantur et turpia, aut obsceni motus corporum choris et saltacionibus efferuntur, ne auditus et obtutus sacris misteriis deputatus turpium spectaculorum atque uerborum contagione polluantur. IX. Pars. Gratian. Vidua uero intelligenda est, si post solempne fedus nuptiarum morte interueniente a uiro suo diuisa fuerit. Ceterum si antequam conueniant fatali necessitate ab alterutro diuisi fuerint, licet ex sponsalibus uxor sit appellata, non tamen post mortem sponsi, et si in proprio sit ducta, et cum eo uelata, uidua appellatur, nec ex eius copula a sacris ordinibus aliquis prohibetur. Unde Pelagius Papa scribit:
Friedberg, col. 129/130
C. XX. One who took as wife a woman veiled with another but not married to him is not prohibited from becoming a priest.
Let no obstacle be generated in promoting the cleric Valentinus, to whom a woman who was previously veiled with another but not married to him, and who remained a virgin, was joined by a conjugal bond after the death of the betrothed with whom she had been veiled, because she received the veil a second time; for, insofar as pertains to this article, there is nothing in the canonical enactments that stands against him.
C. XX. Qui cum alio uelatam, non tamen illi nuptam, uxorem duxit, sacerdos fieri non prohibetur.
Valentino clerico, cui mulier cum alio ante uelata, non tamen illi nupta, sed uirgo permanens, post mortem eius, cum quo uelata erat sponso, coniugali est copula sociata, quia iterum uelamen accepit, nullum in promouendo generetur obstaculum, quia nichil est (quantum ad hunc articulum pertinet) quod ei de canonicis obuiet constitutis.
Friedberg, col. 129/130