Question — Decretum of Gratian
Question III
GRATIAN. PART I. But regular canons are forbidden by many authorities to pass to a monastery. Hence it is read in the Council of Autun assembled under Gregory VII:
GRATIANUS. I. Pars. Canonicos autem regulares ad monasterium transire multis auctoritatibus prohibetur. Unde in Concilio Educensi, congregato sub VII. Gregorio legitur:
Friedberg, col. 839/840
C. I. Regular canons ought not to become monks.
Let no abbot or monk dare to recall regular canons from the purpose of canonical profession and, drawing them to the monastic habit, receive them so that they become monks, so long as they shall have been able to find a church of their order in which, by living canonically, they can serve God and save their souls. But if they shall attempt to do this with rash daring, let them be bound by the bond of anathema.
C. I. Regulares canonici monachi fieri non debent.
Nullus abbas uel monachus canonicos regulares a proposito professionis canonicae reuocare, atque ad monasticum habitum trahendo suscipere audeat, ut monachi fiant, quamdiu ordinis sui ecclesiam inuenire quiuerint, in qua canonice uiuendo Deo seruire, et animam suam saluare possint. Quod si temerario ausu id agere temptauerint, anathematis uinculo obligentur.
Friedberg, col. 839/840
C. II. Concerning the same matter.
Likewise Pope Urban II. We command and universally forbid any canon who has professed according to the rule to become a monk unless—which may it not be—he shall have fallen publicly. But if, presuming to act contrary to our decree, he shall attempt to do so, we command that he return to the canonical order, thereafter wear a memorial cowl, and remain last in the choir. GRATIAN. But it is to be understood: unless he assumes the purpose of religion with his father’s permission. Hence Urban II writes to the Abbot of Saint-Ruf:
C. II. De eodem.
Item Urbanus Papa II. Mandamus et uniuersaliter interdicimus, ne quis canonicus regulariter professus, nisi (quod absit) publice lapsus fuerit, monachus efficiatur. Quod si decreto nostro contraire presumens agere temptauerit, ad ordinem canonicum precipimus ut redeat, et deinceps memorialem cucullam deferat, et ultimus in choro maneat. Gratian. Subaudiendum uero est, nisi cum patris sui licentia religionis propositum induerit. Unde Urbanus II. scribit Abbati sancti Rufi:
Friedberg, col. 839/840
C. III. With their father’s concession, regular canons can become monks.
We establish that no one of canonical profession, after in God’s place he has placed a man over his own head, is to dare, at the prompting of any levity or under the pretext of a stricter religion, to depart from that cloister without the permission of his father and the whole congregation. But let no abbot, bishop, or monk receive one departing without a common guarantee of letters. PART II. GRATIAN. It is asked whether monasteries which have once been dedicated can pass into dwellings of clerics or secular persons. This is forbidden in every way in the Council of Chalcedon, c. 24:
C. III. Patris sui concessione regulares canonici monachi possunt fieri.
Statuimus, ne professionis canonicae quispiam postquam Dei uice supra caput sibi hominem inposuerit, alicuius leuitatis instinctu uel districtioris religionis obtentu ex eodem claustro audeat sine patris et totius congregationis permissione recedere. Discedentem uero nullus abbatum uel episcoporum, et nullus monachorum sine communi litterarum cautione suscipiat. II. Pars. Gratian. Queritur, si monasteria, que semel dedicata sunt, possint transire in clericorum uel secularium habitacula? Quod in Calcedonensi Concilio omnibus modis prohibetur c. 24.:
Friedberg, col. 839/840
C. IV. Let places once dedicated as monasteries always remain monasteries.
Let places once dedicated as monasteries by the counsel of bishops remain monasteries perpetually, and the property pertaining to them ought to be reserved for the monasteries; nor can they afterward become secular dwellings. But those who shall have permitted this to be done are to be subject to those condemnations which have been established by the canons.
C. IV. Que semel sunt dedicata, monasteria semper perseuerent.
Que semel sunt dedicata monasteria consilio episcoporum, maneant perpetuo monasteria, et res, que ad ea pertinent, monasteriis reseruari oportet, nec posse ea ultra fieri secularia habitacula. Qui uero permiserint hec fieri, subiaceant his condempnationibus, que per canones constitutae sunt.
Friedberg, col. 841/842
C. V. Let a cleric who has made sacred places into common lodging houses be deposed, and a layman be excommunicated.
Likewise in the Seventh Synod, c. 13. Because certain venerable houses, both episcopal residences and monasteries, are surreptitiously taken away by certain men and have been made common lodging houses, if those who retain them are willing to restore them so that they may be restored according to their ancient state, it is well and excellent; otherwise, if they are from the sacred catalogue, we command them to be deposed, but if they are monks or laymen, to be excommunicated. For it is evident that they have been condemned by the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit and are assigned to where their worm will not die and the fire will not be extinguished, because they oppose God, who says: “Do not make my Father’s house a house of trade.” PART III. GRATIAN. It is asked concerning those who come to conversion at what time they ought to be tonsured. Concerning them Pope Gregory writes thus to Fortunatus, Bishop of Naples, [book VIII, letter 23]:
C. V. Qui loca sacra communia diuersoria fecerit, clericus deponatur, laicus excommunicetur.
Item in Sinodo VII., c. 13. Quoniam a quibusdam uiris quedam uenerabiles domus subripiuntur, tam uidelicet episcopia quam monasteria, et facta sunt communia diuersoria, si quidem uoluerint hii, qui hec retinent, reddere ea, ut secundum antiquitatem restaurentur, bene et optime; alioquin, si de sacro catalogo fuerint, hos deponi precipimus, si uero monachi uel laici, excommunicari, quos nimirum constat condempnatos esse et Patre, et Filio, et Spiritu sancto, et deputantur ubi uermis eorum non morietur, et ignis non exstinguetur, quia Deo aduersantur, qui dicit: "Nolite facere domum patris mei domum negotiacionis." III. Pars. Gratian. Queritur de his, qui ad conuersionem ueniunt, quo tempore debeant tonsurari? De his ita scribit Gregorius Papa Fortunato Episcopo Neapolitano: [lib. VIII. epist. 23.]
Friedberg, col. 841/842
C. VI. No one ought to be tonsured before he has completed two years in conversion.
Let your fraternity more strictly forbid all monasteries to dare in any way to tonsure those whom they shall have received for conversion before they have completed two years in this way of life. But during this period let their life and morals be carefully proved, lest any of them either not be content with what he desired or not hold as ratified what he chose. For since it is grave to associate untested men with services to men, who could say how much graver it is to apply the wicked to God’s service? But if a soldier wishes to be converted, before he is reported to us let no one presume for any reason to receive him without our consent. PART IV. GRATIAN. It is asked whether license to make a testament is left any longer to those who have entered a monastery. Gregory forbids this, writing thus to Januarius, Bishop of Cagliari, [book VII, indiction 2, letter 7]:
C. VI. Antequam biennium in conuersione conpleuerit, aliquis tonsurari non debet.
Monasteriis omnibus fraternitas uestra districtius interdicat, ut eos, quos ad conuersionem susceperint, prius, quam biennium in conuersatione conpleuerint, nullo modo audeant tonsorare. Sed hoc spacio uita moresque eorum sollicite conprobentur, ne quis eorum aut non sit contentus, quod uoluit, aut ratum non habeat quod elegit. Nam dum graue sit, inexpertos hominum obsequiis sociari, quis possit dicere, quanto sit grauius ad Dei seruitium inprobos applicare? Miles uero, si conuerti uoluerit, prius, quam nobis renuncietur, nullus eum sine nostro consensu qualibet presumat ratione suscipere. IV. Pars. Gratian. Queritur, si ingressis monasterium ultra relinquatur licentia testandi? Hoc Gregorius prohibet, ita scribens Ianuario Caralitano Episcopo: [lib. VII. Indict. 2. epist. 7.]
Friedberg, col. 841/842
C. VII. After entrance into a monastery, no one is left license to make a testament.
Because those entering a monastery for the sake of conversion are thereafter to have no license to make a testament, but their property is to belong to that monastery, this has been decreed by an express definition of law.
C. VII. Post monasterii ingressum nulli relinquitur licentia testandi.
Quia ingredientibus monasterium conuertendi gratia ulterius nulla sit testandi licentia, sed ut res eorum eiusdem monasterii sint, aperta legis diffinitione decretum est.
Friedberg, col. 841/842
C. VIII. After entrance into a monastery, all things are to be conferred upon that monastery.
Likewise Gregory to Cyprian the Deacon, [book III, letter 6]. It has been reported to us that a woman named Petronilla, born in the province of Lucania, was converted through the exhortation of Bishop Agnellus and specially conferred by title of gift upon that same monastery which she entered all her property which she could possess, although it could have belonged to her by right. GRATIAN. To the contrary Paul, the first hermit, left his colobium in his testament to Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria, but his tunic to blessed Antony. But it is one thing concerning those who, after entering a monastery, handed over themselves and their property; another concerning those who, leading a solitary life, handed themselves over to no church. The former cannot give to anyone the things once handed over; the latter can freely make a testament concerning things offered to no one.
C. VIII. Post ingressum monasterii eidem monasterio omnia sunt conferenda.
Item Gregorius Cipriano Diacono. [lib. III. epist. 6.] Perlatum est ad nos Petronillam nomine, de prouincia Lucania progenitam, per exhortationem Agnelli episcopi fuisse conuersam, resque suas omnes, quas habere potuit, licet iure sibi potuissent conpetere, tamen eidem monasterio, in quod ingressa est, etiam specialiter donationis titulo contulisse. Gratian. Econtra Paulus primus heremita in testamento colobium suum Athanasio Alexandrino episcopo reliquit, tunicam uero B. Antonio. Sed aliud est de his, qui monasterium ingressi se et sua tradiderunt: aliud de his, qui solitariam uitam ducentes se nulli ecclesiae tradiderunt. Illi semel tradita nulli tradere possunt: isti nulli oblata libere testari ualent.
Friedberg, col. 841/842
[C. IX.] Likewise a new constitution.
“If any woman or man shall have chosen the monastic life and entered a monastery, with no children existing, we command that his or her property belong to the monastery which they enter. § 1. But if a person who has children enters a monastery before disposing of his or her property among them, let it afterward be lawful to divide it among them, with the lawful portion of none diminished, and what shall not have been given to them will belong to the monastery. § 2. But if the person shall wish to divide the whole substance among the children, let that person, counted among the children, retain a share for himself or herself which ought to belong to the monastery. § 3. But if the person shall die after entry before dividing it among them, let the children receive their lawful portion, with the remaining substance belonging to the monastery.” Constitution 5 in collection 1. § 4. “But now, since by becoming a monk he is regarded by that very act as having offered all his property, if he did not make a testament beforehand, the law thereafter disposes of it when his judgment has ceased, so that if he has children upon whom by any title of gift he conferred either nothing or less than their lawful portion, so much is to be deducted from the substance destined for the monastery that nothing unjust occurs concerning the children.”
[C. IX.] Item constitutio noua.
"Si qua mulier aut uir monasticam elegerit uitam, et intrauerit monasterium, liberis non extantibus, monasterio, quod ingrediuntur, res eius conpetere iubemus. §. 1. Sed si persona liberos habens ante, quam de rebus suis inter eos disponat, monasterium intret, liceat ei postea inter eos diuidere, legitima nulli diminuta, et quod eis non dederit monasterio conpetet. §. 2. Sed si omnem substantiam inter filios diuidere uoluerit, sua persona filiis connumerata partem sibi retineat, que monasterio conpetere debeat. §. 3. Sed si post ingressum moriatur, ante, quam inter eos diuidat, filii legitimam percipiant, reliqua substantia monasterio conpetente." Constitutione 5. in collatione 1. §. 4. "Nunc autem, cum monachus factus esset, hoc ipso res suas omnes obtulisse uideatur, si prius testatus non sit, exinde, iudicio eius cessante, lege disponitur, ut si liberos habet, in quos aut nichil, aut minus legitima portione quoquo donandi titulo contulerit, eatenus substantiae monasterio destinatae detrahantur, ne quid contingat circa liberos iniquum."
Friedberg, col. 841/842
[C. X.]
Likewise from Novel [CXXIII]. “It is not lawful for parents to exclude children who have become monks from their inheritance, or for children to exclude their parents, although while they were laypersons they fell into a cause of ingratitude.” Likewise: § 1. “It is not lawful for parents to drag from a monastery their children who have passed to the solitary life.”
[C. X.]
Item ex Nouella. [CXXIII.] "Non liceat parentibus liberos, uel liberis parentes ab hereditate sua repellere monachos factos, quamuis, dum laici fuerant, in causam ingratitudinis inciderunt." Item: §. 1. "Non liceat parentibus liberos suos ad solitariam uitam transeuntes abstrahere de monasterio."
Friedberg, col. 843/844