Question — Decretum of Gratian
Question X
GRATIAN. Concerning a woman who passes to a second marriage, it is rightly asked whether she remains in the same affinity with the blood relatives of her former husband, or whether offspring received from the second marriage can be joined to the blood relatives of the former husband. Gregory writes as follows concerning these matters to Venerius, Bishop of Cagliari:
GRATIANUS. De ea autem, que ad secundas nuptias transit, utrum in eadem affinitate consanguineorum prioris uiri remaneat, an soboles ex secundis nuptiis suscepta consanguineis prioris uiri copulari possit, merito queritur. De his ita scribit Gregorius Venerio, Caralitano Episcopo:
Friedberg, col. 1285/1286
C. I. Affinity is not erased in the survivor.
Beloved brother, I render the thanks I owe to the diligent sagacity of your fraternity. Because you asked what you ought, you made me joyful. Hence I respond calmly to the matters asked. You resolved to consult the Apostolic See whether a woman joined by the marriage bond to a man who is a stranger pertains to his kin; whether, if he dies, the kinship remains; whether under another husband the names of kinship are dissolved; or whether offspring received can lawfully pass into union with the kin of the former husband.
For the word of God is powerful and strong, durable, persevering, and immutable—not momentary, not transitory. For the Truth itself, who is God and the Word of God, says: “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.” Before God appeared in the flesh among human beings, Adam said by his inspiration: “Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and cleave to his wife, and the two shall be in one flesh.” Then, when Truth arose from the earth into the earth and appeared visibly in humanity, he was asked whether it was lawful for a man to leave his wife. Prohibiting this, he forbade it, unless perhaps fornication excluded the marital union. Hence he immediately brought forward the very same sentence which, remaining with the Father before the ages, the Word had inspired in Adam, himself confirming what the first human being himself uttered: “Therefore a man shall leave father and mother and cleave to his wife, and the two shall be in one flesh.” If they become one flesh, how can anyone related to one pertain to that one without pertaining to the other? It must be believed that this can by no means occur.
Moreover, when one has died, affinity is not erased in the survivor, nor can another conjugal union dissolve the affinity of the former union. Nor is it pleasing for the offspring of another union to pass into fellowship with the affinity of the former husband, because the word of the Lord is powerful and strong and, as the Prophet said when speaking, “The word of the Lord shall stand forever.” And another Prophet says: “Because he spoke, and they were made; he commanded, and they were created. He established them forever and unto the age of the age; he placed a command, and it shall not pass away.” For after the word and command he made two one flesh—that is, male and female—who has not ceased to make the innumerable multitude of either sex one with himself, as the Truth said through himself: “I ask not only for these, but also for those who will believe in me through their word, that they may be one, as you, Father, are in me and I in you, that they too may be one in us.”
Therefore, if anyone with sacrilegious and rash daring seeks to extinguish relationship in the deceased, or to dissipate it under the name of another affinity, or believes that offspring received from another union is lawfully joined to the relationship of the former one, that person denies that God’s word is powerful and strong; and one who seeks to dissolve it so easily or swiftly does not believe that God’s word remains forever.
Mix earth from four places separated from one another by a great interval; when it has been mixed and glued together, fashion a body of whatever shape or size you wish. Will there be any human ingenuity capable of separating those four parts from one another so that each can be recognized by itself? Thus, from four grandparents two are formed into one, and from two one joint creation is made. You can gather this likeness from the four elements from which the human being was jointly created, if you assign each of their kinds—which is divided into many divisions—through parts distinct from one another. The same occurs in metals; this is also proved in liquids; a painter pursues it in colors by the art of mixing colors, fashioning bodies from visible pigments.
C. I. Affinitas in superstite non deletur.
Fraternitatis uestrae studiosae sagacitati, frater amande, quas debeo refero grates. Quoniam quesisti que debuisti, iocundum me reddidisti. Unde placide ad inquisita respondeo. Sedem apostolicam consulere decreuisti, si mulier copula nuptiali extraneo uiro coniuncta cognationi eius pertineat, si eo defuncto cognatio maneat, uel si sub altero uiro cognationis uocabula dissoluantur, uel si susceptae soboles possunt legitime ad prioris uiri cognationis transire copulam. Est enim uerbum Dei ualidum et forte, et durabile, et perseuerabile, et inmutabile, non momentaneum, non transitorium. Ait enim per se ipsa ueritas, que Deus est et uerbum Dei est: "Celum et terra transibunt, uerba autem mea non transibunt." Ante, quam Deus in carne appareret inter homines, eo inspirante dixit Adam: "Quamobrem relinquet homo patrem suum et matrem, et adherebit uxori suae, et erunt duo in carne una." Deinde cum ueritas oriretur de terra in terram, et uisibilis appareret in humanitate, interrogatus est, si licitum esset homini uxorem relinquere. Quod prohibens uetuit, nisi forte fornicatio excluderet maritalem copulam. Unde statim protulit in medium eandem ipsam sentenciam, quam ante secula manens cum Patre uerbum inspirauerat Adae, ipse confirmans quod ipse primus protulit homo: "Quamobrem relinquet homo patrem et matrem, et adherebit uxori suae, et erunt duo in carne una." Si una caro fiunt, quomodo potest aliquis eorum propinquus uni pertinere nisi pertineat alteri? Hoc minime fieri posse credendum est. Porro uno defuncto in superstite affinitas non deletur, nec alia copula coniugalis affinitatem prioris copulae soluere ualet. Sed neque alterius coniunctionis soboles placet ad affinitatis prioris uiri consortium transire, pro eo, quod uerbum Domini ualidum est et forte, et, ut inquiens dixit Propheta: "Verbum Domini stabit in eternum." Et alius Propheta: "Quoniam ipse dixit, et facta sunt, ipse mandauit, et creata sunt; statuit ea in eternum, et in seculum seculi; preceptum posuit, et non preteribit." Nam post uerbum atque preceptum effecit duo carnem unam (id est masculum et feminam), qui innumeram multitudinem utriusque sexus non destitit unum facere secum, sicut per se ueritas dixit: "Non pro his rogo tantum, sed etiam pro his, qui credituri sunt per uerbum eorum in me, ut unum sint, sicut tu Pater in me, et ego in te, ut et ipsi in nobis unum sint." Si quis ergo sacrilego et temerario ausu in defuncto querit propinquitatem exstinguere, uel sub altero affinitatis uocabulo dissipare, uel susceptam sobolem alterius copulae propinquitati prioris credit legitime sociari, hic negat Dei uerbum ualidum esse et forte, et qui tam facile uel tam uelociter querit dissoluere, hic non credit uerbum Dei in eternum manere. Confice terram ex quatuor locis magna intercapedine a se distantibus, confecta et conglutinatam finge cuiuscumque figurae uel inmensitatis corpus uolueris, numquid erit humanum ingenium, quod ipsas quatuor partes ab inuicem ualeat segregare, ut unaqueque per se possit agnosci? Sic a quatuor auis duo conficiuntur in unum, et de duobus fit una concreatio. Hanc similitudinem de quatuor elementis, unde homo concreatus est, colligere potes, si eorum unamquamque speciem, que in multis diuisionibus partita est, per discretas inter se assignaueris partes. Fit idem in metallis; hoc etiam in liquoribus probatur in coloribus pictor prosequitur, arte colores admiscendo, ex uisibilibus fucis corpora fingens.
Friedberg, col. 1285/1286
C. II. Offspring begotten from a second marriage ought not to be joined to the blood relatives of the former husband.
Likewise Innocent. If anyone’s paternal or maternal uncle dies while married, and his wife afterward takes another man and begets sons or daughters by him, we prohibit union with these persons in every way, because man and woman are one flesh.
C. II. Soboles ex secundis nuptiis genita consanguineis prioris uiri copulari non debet.
Item Innocentius. Si cuius patruus uel auunculus uxoratus obierit, et illa uirum alium postea duxerit, filios filiasue ex illo genuerit, cum his modis omnibus conmisceri prohibemus, quia uir et mulier una caro est.
Friedberg, col. 1287/1288
[C. III.]
Likewise from a Roman Synod. If any woman passes to a second marriage and begets offspring from it, the offspring can in no way enter into union with the kindred of the former husband.
[PALEA.
[C. III.]
Item ex Romana Sinodo. Si qua mulier ad secundas nuptias transierit, et ex eis sobolem genuerit, nullo modo potest ad consortium cognationis prioris uiri pertingere.
[PALEA.
Friedberg, col. 1287/1288
C. IV. On the same matter.
Likewise Pope Hyginus. If any woman passes to a second marriage and has offspring from it, that offspring cannot join itself to the kindred of the former husband down to the fourth generation.]
[PALEA. Hence Pope Innocent:
C. IV. De eodem.
Item Higinus Papa. Si qua mulier transierit ad secundas nuptias, et ex eis prolem habuerit, ipsa proles non potest se copulare cognationi prioris uiri usque ad quartam generationem. ] [PALEA. Unde Innocentius Papa:
Friedberg, col. 1287/1288
C. V. On the same matter.
If any woman passes to a second marriage and begets sons and daughters by the second husband, the holy Roman Synod has altogether prohibited that the daughters ought to be joined to the grandsons of the former husband.]
C. V. De eodem.
Si qua mulier ad secundas transierit nuptias, et filios et filias ad secundum maritum genuerit, debere eas nepotibus prioris mariti coniungi, sancta Romana sinodus prorsus inhibuit. ]
Friedberg, col. 1287/1288