Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question III: On divination by the elements, and other mixed things
The Demon has devised a thousand ways of doing harm, so that men might abuse the creatures, founded for their use. And not only did he arm the stars, as it were the Militia of Heaven, so that, fighting against God, they might prostitute to senseless lights the honor owed to the creative Majesty, but he packed the elements for our ruin. Thus he instructed the magi, so that they might hold the luminaries of heaven sacred. But first Sazoba Zoroaster the King began to worship the Sun, as Porphyry relates in de Nympharum antro. His subjects the Persians imitated him, and among the Assyrians Nemrod was adored under the name of the Sun, as Salianus relates, in the year of the world 1931. The Egyptians also, the Phoenicians, and the Greeks began to invoke the militia of heaven, as many relate, cited by Serlogus, analog. 5. sectione 5.
De Diuinatione per Elementa; et caetera Mixta.
Mille nocendi modos excogitauit Daemon, ut homines creaturis, ad usum sibi conditis, abuterentur. Neque modo astra, veluti Militiam Caeli armauit, ut contra Deum pugnantes, honorem creatrici Maiestati debitum, insensatis luminibus prostituerent, sed elementa constipauit ad nostrum exterminium. Sic autem magos instruxit, ut luminaribus Caeli sacros haberent honores. Primus autem Sazoba Zoroastres Rex Solem colere coepit, ut refert Porphirius de Nympharum antro. Eum imitati sunt subditi Persae, et inter Assyrios Nemrod, Solis nomine adoratus, ut refert Salianus, anno mundi 1931. AEgyptii etiam, Phoenices, et Graeci militiam caeli inuocare coeperunt, ut referunt multi apud Serlogum analog. 5. sectione 5.
At almost the same time among the Persians and Assyrians fire was invoked. Hence they relate that Abraham was cast into the fire, which he had refused to worship, as D. Jerome narrates in de traditionibus Hebraeis, where he mocks that fable. The cult shown to the other creatures is treated in the law in Serlogo.
Eodem fere tempore apud Persas, atque Assyrios ignis est inuocatus. Hinc referunt Abrahamum in ignem coniectum, quem noluisset colere, ut narrat D. Hyeronymus de traditionibus Hebraeis, ubi hanc fabellam ridet. Caeteris creaturis cultum exhibitum lege in Serlogo.
Therefore the Demon taught men Geomancy, so that, imprinting certain signs, points, and figures on the earth, in dust, on stones, on papers, or on other earthly bodies, they might thence attain the power of divining the future. Thus also he taught Hydromancy, so that they might impart some motion to water in a basin, and gaze into it for taking omens: in the air he created insane variations in the sounds of the winds and of the fanings, whether sharp or booming, unto musical Steromantic tones. He placed Pyromancy in observations of fire; namely, whether it was smoky or clear, etc., that they might thence predict things to come — as if indeed the green woods did not by nature exhale an obscure, turbid, and blood-colored fire, while the dry exhale a clear one, in the form of a pyramid, into the open field.
Igitur homines docuit Daemon Geomantiam, ut certa signa, puncta, et figuras in terra, puluere, lapidibus, papyris, vel aliis terrestribus corporibus, imprimentes, inde futura diuinandi vim assequerentur. Sic etiam Hydromantiam docuit, ut aquae aliquam infunderent motum in pelui, perpenderentque ad ominandum: In aëre flatus ventorum, et flabellationum sonitus varios, seu acutos, seu reboantes ad musicos tonos Steromanticos creauit insanos. Pyromantiam posuit in ignis obseruationibus; an scilicet fumosus esset, vel clarus, etc. ut inde futura praedicerent, quasi vero non vitidantia ligna a natura obscurum, turbidum, et sanguineum ignem; arida vero clarum, pyramidis in formam, in campum liberum non exhalent.
He taught men to consider many natural things for divining: in the hands the signs, lines, the vital, etc., the Mounts of Venus, of Jupiter, etc., chimerically contrived, that they might thence argue whether they were going to enjoy a happy life, a faithful wife, treacherous friends, dangers of iron, fire, and similar ravings. Indeed in the lineaments the parts beget sons like themselves, and in events altogether unlike. These lineaments accordingly are disfigured by fatness, leanness, wrinkles, etc.
Docuit in hominibus multa naturalia considerare, ad diuinandum in manibus signa, lineas, vitalem, etc. Montes Veneris, Iouis, etc. Chimaerice confictos, ut inde argumententur, an foelicem sint sortituri vitam, uxorem fidelem, amicos infidos, pericula, ferri, ignis, et similia deliramenta. Sane in lineamentis Partes gignunt filios assimiles, et in euentibus omnino dissimiles. Haec proinde lineamenta dissultantur pinguedine, macie, laberibus, etc.
Grave also is the fact that in these times it is permitted to extend the hand of the Gypsy, that they may augur our fortune for us, as Navarrus teaches, summa, cap. 11. num. 31. Alcozer summa, cap. 14. fol. 46. Ludouicus Lopez p. p. Instruct. cap. 41. Sanchez Tom. 1. Decal. lib. 2. cap. 38. num. 47. Fagundez lib. 1. cap. 39. num. 4. in primum praeceptum Decal. — provided, however, that this be done in jest and for sport, it will not be lethally illicit, unless from the dignity of the person a scandal breaks out.
Graue etiam est, quod his temporibus permittitur manus Cingaris porrigere, ut fortunam nobis ominerentur, ut docent Nauar. summa, cap. 11. num. 31. Alcozer summa, cap. 14. fol. 46. Ludouicus Lopez p. p. Instruct. cap. 41. Sanchez Tom. 1. Decal. lib. 2. cap. 38. num. 47. Fagundez lib. 1. cap. 39. num. 4. in primum praeceptum Decal. si tamen risus, et ioci gratia id fiat, non erit lethale, nisi ex dignitate personae scandalum erumpat.
That physiognomy, however, which is a part of natural Philosophy, which from the disposition of the body, the habit and proportion of the members, conjectures with probability the affections of the mind, and a good or evil disposition of character, a keen intelligence, the temperament of the body, a firm or infirm state of health, is lawful, because from these things these can be known with probability; otherwise if these are predicted with certainty; for they cannot exhibit anything with certainty, as Delrius proves at length, lib. 4. disq. cap. 3. quaest. 4. Azorius Tom. 1. lib. 9. cap. 16. Less. lib. 2. cap. 43. d. 7. num. 45. Sanchez tom. 1. Decal. lib. 2. cap. 38. num. 44. after D. Bonaventure, in compend. Theol. veritatis, lib. 2. cap. 58., where, in favor of the nearly probable conjecture from these signs, he alleges Aristotle, Avicenna, Constantius, Philemon, Loxeus, Palaemotius, and he distinguishes excellently: and his book was published by order of Sixtus V, who issued his own Motu against vain divination, and this book was dedicated to Clement VIII. You should see that most excellent one distinguishing, from which you will receive no small pleasure. See also the last disputation of tome 3, where I discussed physiognomy at length according to the mind of the Saintly Doctor.
Physionomia tamen illa, quae est pars naturalis Philosophiae, quae ex corporis dispositione, membrorum habitudine, proportioneque, probabiliter coniicit animi affectus, et bonam, vel malam indolem, acutum ingenium, corporis temperiem, firmam, vel infirmam valetudinem, est licita, quia ex his possunt probabiliter cognosci; secus, si certo haec praedicatur; non enim possunt certo aliquid exhibere, ut late probat Delrius lib. 4. disq. cap. 3. quaest. 4. Azorius Tom. 1. lib. 9. cap. 16. Less. lib. 2. cap. 43. d. 7. num. 45. Sanchez tom. 1. Decal. lib. 2. cap. 38. num. 44. post D. Bonauent. in compend. Theol. veritatis, lib. 2. cap. 58. ubi pro probabili ex his ferme coniectura, allegat Aristotelem, Auicennam, Constantium, Philemonem, Loxeum, Palaemotium, et egregie differit: Eiusque liber cum aliis iussu Sixti V. editus est, qui Motum proprium contra inanem diuinationem edidit, et hic liber Clementi VIII. dedicatus est. Ipsum videre praeclare differentem, inde voluptatem non modicam accepturi. Videte etiam disputationem ultimam tomi 3. ubi late de phisionomia ad mentem S. Doctoris disserui.
But the physiognomy which, from the aspects of the parts of the human body, predicts prosperous and adverse events of a man, is superstitious and condemned by Sixtus V, as the cited Doctors relate, and it is detested by S. Bonaventure, loc. cit. et alibi passim.
Physionomia tamen, quae ex aspectis humani corporis partibus, prosperos, et aduersos hominis euentus praedicit, superstitiosa, et damnata est a Sixto V. ut referunt allati Doctores, eamque S. Bonau. loc. cit. et alibi passim, detestatur.
From the motions of the human body no, or a very weak, conjecture can be taken for divining things to come; for they often depend on the free will. Whence it is a superstition. So Sanchez num. 44. Valentia d. 6. quaest. 12. puncto 5. Fagundez num. 6.
Ex motibus humani corporis nulla, aut valde infirma coniectura capi potest ad futura diuinanda; pendent enim saepe a libera voluntate. Unde superstitio est. Ita Sanchez num. 44. Valentia d. 6. quaest. 12. puncto 5. Fagundez num. 6.
Similarly, to divine from fortuitous accidents is superstitious, for instance from the double encounter of the same person on the same journey; from the breaking of a strap, the spilling of salt, etc. So Sanchez num. 42. Azorius Tom. 1. lib. 5. cap. 22. quaestio unica, Fagundez num. 7.
Similiter e casibus fortuitis diuinare, est superstitiosum, puta ex bino occurfu eiusdem personae in eodem itinere; e fractione corrigiae, effusione salis, etc. Ita Sanchez num. 42. Azorius Tom. 1. lib. 5. cap. 22. quaestio unica, Fagundez num. 7.
Thus to divine contingencies from the voices of men is vain and superstitious, as Valentia notes, puncto 3. Azorius Tom. 1. lib. 9. cap. 12. — unless indeed God reveal something from them, as Gedeon, Iudic. 7., on the dream being narrated to him, predicted victory.
Sic ex hominum vocibus diuinare contingentia, vanum est, ac superstitiosum, ut notat Valentia puncto 3. Azorius Tom. 1. lib. 9. cap. 12. nisi tamen inde Deus reuelet aliqua, sicuti Gedeon Iudic. 7. enarrato sibi somnio, praedixit victoriam.
From the motion, flight, and song of birds, free events are divined superstitiously; for these natural things are determined to one thing. They have, indeed, a phantasy directed by the stars to their proper acts, their food, sleep, and prey; whence their animal spirits are excited by a change in the air, their brain is affected, so that they flee, cry out, etc., as D. Bonaventure teaches above, D. Thom. quaest. 95. art. 7. Caietanus there, Azorius tom. 1. lib. 9. cap. 15. in fine, Less. lib. 2. cap. 43. d. 7. num. 45.
E motibus, volatu, et cantu auium, superstitiose diuinantur liberi euentus; haec enim naturalia determinata sunt ad unum: Habent sane phantasiam, ab Astris directam ad proprios actus, pastum, somnum, et praedam, unde spiritus eorum animales excitantur aëris mutatione, eorum cerebrum afficitur, ut aufugiant, clament, etc. ut docent D. Bonauent. supra, D. Thom. quaest. 95. art. 7. Caietanus ibi, Azorius tom. 1. lib. 9. cap. 15. in fine Less. lib. 2. cap. 43. d. 7. num. 45.
These indeed indicate certain intemperies in the air and in the other Elements, insofar as they are accustomed to excite dispositions in the blood and the choler; whence one conjectures quarrels, wars, and seditions, but most remotely and uncertainly, as the Saintly Doctor says, and with him Fagundez num. 9. Sanchez num. 30. Valentia puncto 3. col. 2.
Haec sane indicant intemperies aliquas in aëre, et aliis Elementis, quatenus dispositiones in sanguine, et cholera excitare solent; unde rixas, bella, et seditiones coniicias, sed remotissime, et incerte, ut ait S. Doctor, et cum eo Fagundez num. 9. Sanchez num. 30. Valentia puncto 3. col. 2.