Disputation — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Disputation XXX: On Witnesses
Since the whole truth of the Judgment hangs on the words of the Witnesses, the Judge ought before all else to be most well instructed in examining these with the greatest care, whose first duty in this office is to admonish the witnesses how grave and criminal a thing is the crime of falsehood; second, he is bound to commit to writing the things which they depose against or for the Accused; and if he believes them reasonably suspect, in the sifting of the truth he ought to employ every diligence, and even acuteness; yet not suggestion, or cavillation: Third, he is bound to search out all the circumstances of the fact, from which its gravity, or levity can be discerned; finally, omitting all the crimes of the witnesses themselves, except those which plead unfitness; he ought not, however, to examine Clerics, or Religious without the license of their superiors; yet once examined they are bound; These things seen, we must speak of the obligation of the witnesses themselves.
Tota Iudicii veritas e Testium dictis cum pendeat, in his apprime examinandis debet ante omnia Iudex esse optime instructus, cuius primum in hoc munere officium est testes admonere, quam graue et facinorosum sit falsitatis crimen; secundo, scriptis tenetur mandare, ea quae contra vel pro Reo, deponunt, quos si rationabiliter suspectos credat, in veritatis excussione omnem debet solertiam, etiam et argutiam adhibere; non tamen suggestionem, aut cavillationem: Tertio perscrutari tenetur omnes facti circumstantias, ex quibus gravitas eius, vel levitas dignosci queat; denique omnia ipsorum testium crimina praetermittendo, praeter ea quae inhabilitatem obtendunt; non debet autem Clericos, aut Religiosos absque superiorum licentia examinare; examinati tamen tenent; His visis, de testium ipsorum obligatione dicendum est.