Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question II: Whether a census can lawfully be sold
I assert that it is licit to sell and buy it, unless injustice arises from some other quarter. Thus it is laid down in both Extravagants of Martin V. and Calixtus III. tit. de empt. et vendit. and repeatedly in both Laws, and it is the common opinion of the Doctors at Tanner disput. 4. quaest. 7. num. 116.
An Census possit licite vendi.
Assero, licere vendi, et emi, nisi aliunde accidat iniustitia. Ita habetur in utroque Extravaganti Martini V. et Calixti III. tit. de empt. et vendit. et passim in utroque Iure, estque communis sententia Doctorum apud Tannerum disput. 4. quaest. 7. num. 116.
It is proved, because a right which one has to receive utility from some thing is estimable by a price, just as also the right which one has to the whole thing, of which he is lord: Therefore that right can be transferred by sale.
Probatur, quia ius, quod quis habet ad percipiendam utilitatem ex re aliqua est pretio aestimabile, sicut etiam ius, quod habet ad rem totam, cuius est dominus: Ergo potest id ius transferri per venditionem.
Wherefore Medina quaest. 12. de Usuris, Soto lib. 5. quaest. 5. art. 1. Covarru. lib. 3. variar. cap. 7. and the rest refute Henry quodlib. 1. quaest. 39. and quodlib. 8. quaest. 24. and Innocent super cap. in civitate, extra. de usuris, and John Andreas there, and Salicetus in Authent. Ad haec, Cod. de usuris, who deny that a census newly to be instituted can be bought and sold, though they concede that one already instituted can be sold and bought.
Quare Medina quaest. 12. de Usuris, Soto lib. 5. quaest. 5. art. 1. Covarru. lib. 3. variar. cap. 7. et caeteri refellunt Henricum quodlib. 1. quaest. 39. et quodlib. 8. quaest. 24. et Innocentium super cap. in civitate, extra. de usuris, et Ioannem Andreaeam ibi, et Salicetum in Authent. Ad haec, Cod. de usuris, negantes, posse emi, et vendi censum de novo instituendum, licet concedant vendi, et emi posse iam institutum.
It is proved secondly by Casas, because one can bequeath the usufruct of one's own thing, as the text proves in leg. Omnium praediorum, ff. de usufructu, and leg. si quis in 20. of the same title: Therefore he can licitly sell such a usufruct: Therefore also another can licitly buy it.
Probatur secundo a Caspensi, quia potest quis legare usumfructum rei propriae, ut probat textus in leg. Omnium praediorum, ff. de usufructu, et leg. si quis in 20. eodem titulo: Ergo potest talem usumfructum licite vendere: Ergo et potest alius licite emere.