Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question V: On the vices opposed to fortitude
Three vices opposed to fortitude are enumerated: Timidity, Fearlessness (intimiditas), and Audacity.
De Vitiis Fortitudini oppositis.
Tria vitia fortitudini opposita numerantur, Timiditas, Intimiditas, et Audacia.
As to Fear, it is then inordinate when the appetite absolutely flees those things which reason dictates are to be endured. So S. Thomas.
Quoad Timorem, tunc est inordinatus, quando appetitus absolute refugit ea, quae ratio dictat esse sustinenda. Ita S. Thomas.
Here is condemned that fear which is inordinate concerning the dangers of death, when on this account one abandons the faith, or those things which fortitude commands to be pursued. Of these it is said Apocal. 21. But the fearful, etc. their part shall be in the pool, etc.
Hic damnatur timor, qui est inordinatus circa pericula mortis, dum ex hoc relinquit fidem, vel ea, quae fortitudo praecipit prosequenda. De his dicitur Apocal. 21. Timidis autem, etc. pars illorum erit in stagno, etc.
Fearlessness (intimiditas) is the vice by which things to be feared are not feared. Thus of the Celts Aristotle says 3. Eth. cap. 7. They fear nothing on account of foolishness, and there he opposes this to Fortitude.
Intimiditas est vitium, quo non timentur timenda. Sic de Celtis ait Aristoteles 3. Eth. cap. 7. Nil eos timere propter stultitiam, Ibi hanc Fortitudini opponit.
But it exceeds and inclines to the extreme. Of these Prov. 14. The wise man feareth, and declineth from evil: the fool leapeth over, and confideth.
Excedit autem, et ad extremum declinat. De his Prov. 14. Sapiens timet, et declinat a malo: Stultus transilit, et confidit.
Audacity is an excess in undergoing and invading dangers, as D. Thomas says quaest. 127. art. 1., according to Aristotle 2. Ethic. capite 7. et lib. 3. cap. 7.
Audacia est excessus in periculis subeundis, et invadendis, ut ait D. Thom. quaest. 127. art. 1. iuxta Aristotelem 2. Ethic. capite 7. et lib. 3. cap. 7.
It differs from fearlessness; for this does not estimate the dangers, as if in respect of the one acting there were none, or they were not evils; but Audacity, or rashness, attacks dangers rashly on account of excessive overconfidence.
Differt ab intimiditate, haec enim non aestimat pericula, quasi vero respectu operantis nulla sint, aut mala non sint: Audacia vero, seu temeritas, ob nimiam praefidentiam, temere aggreditur pericula.
It is said to have the vice in the opposite extreme, namely, Cowardice (ignavia), as is gathered from Aristotle loc. cit., namely, when one does not dare what he ought, and when he ought.
Habere dicitur vitium in alio extremo oppositum, nempe, Ignaviam, ut colligitur ex Aristotele loc. cit. cum scilicet non audet, quod debet, et cum debet.
Commonly, however, these sins are not judged distinct from the sins which follow from them, or to which they are ordered.
Communiter tamen haec peccata non censentur distincta a peccatis, quae ex eisdem consequuntur, sive ad quae ordinantur.