Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question XXVII: Whether demons, and the damned, are to be loved out of charity
I ASSERT that demons are not to be loved with charity. It is proved first by D. Bonaventure. Only those who are ordered to the same end of supernatural life are to be loved with Charity; but demons are not orderable to eternal life with us: Therefore. The major is certain: for where we have Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself, it is expressed that only those are to be loved with Charity who can, like us, communicate in the same good that we wish for ourselves, as D. Augustine indicates, cited by the Master dist. 28. Note, however, that this is not expressly found in St. Augustine.
ASSERO, daemones non esse charitate diligendos. PROBATUR a D. Bonav. primo. Illi tantum, qui sunt ordinati ad eundem finem vitae supernaturalem, sunt Charitate diligendi; sed daemones non sunt ordinabiles ad vitam aeternam nobiscum: Ergo. Maior est certa: nam ubi habetur: Diliges proximum sicut teipsum, exprimitur, eos solos diligendos Charitate, qui possunt, sicut et nos, in eodem bono communicare, quod nobis optamus, ut indicat D. August. apud Magistrum dist. 28. Adverte tamen, id expresse non haberi in D. Augustino.
It is proved second by the Holy Doctor from that passage Luke 10 where Christ recites the Precepts: Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with thy whole heart: and thy neighbor as thyself. But when Christ was asked, And who is my neighbor? He concludes: He who showed mercy upon him, namely upon the wounded man. Where the Gloss says: The neighbor is he upon whom mercy is bestowed, or who bestows it: But demons are not such: Therefore.
PROBATUR secundo a S. Doct. ex illo Lucae 10. ubi Christus profert Praecepta: Diliges Dominum Deum tuum ex toto corde tuo: et proximum sicut te ipsum. Interrogatus autem Christus: Et quis est meus proximus? Concludit: Qui fecit misericordiam cum illo, vulnerato scilicet. Ubi Glossa: Proximus est is, cui impenditur, vel qui impendit misericordiam: Sed daemones non sunt tales: Ergo.
Maldonatus, moreover, OBSERVES on Matthew 5 that here neighbor is designated not according to the ancient law, which declared only Jews to be neighbor, and therefore excluded the gentiles; but in the Evangelic manner, where there is no distinction of Jew or Greek: Hence that foreign Samaritan is neighbor to the man who fell among robbers, whom he helped with deeds; for he was not only neighbor to him, but also presented himself with him as Neighbor.
OBSERVAT autem Maldonatus ad 5. Matthaei, hic designari proximum, non iuxta legem antiquam, quae solos Iudaeos proximum declarabat, et ideo gentes excludebat; sed modo Evangelico, ubi non est distinctio Iudaei, neque Graeci: Ideo Samaritanus ille extraneus, est proximus illi, qui incidit in latrones, quem adiuvit operibus, hic enim non solum fuit illi proximus, sed etiam se cum illo ut Proximus exhibuit.
Neighbor, moreover, is called by MANY NAMES in Scripture. First, by kinship, Psalm 37. My friends and my neighbors drew near against me, and stood. Psalm 34. As though a neighbor, and as though our brother, so I pleased. Second, by Religion, Ecclesiasticus 15. He will exalt him among his neighbors, and in this sense the ancient law spoke, at least according to the understanding of the Jews, not including enemies, that is, Pagans. Third, by communication in nature and in the supreme end; and thus man is neighbor to man, and the good Angel is neighbor, as D. Augustine teaches, book 1. de doctrina Christiana, cap. 30. Last, neighbor is said by proof from effects, and thus even that foreign Samaritan, who showed mercy, is truly neighbor, as Christ says. This from St. Bonaventure on that text of Luke.
MULTIPLICITER autem in Scriptura vocatur Proximus. Primo, cognatione, Psal. 37. Amici mei, et proximi mei adversum me appropinquaverunt, et steterunt. Psal. 34. Quasi proximum, et quasi fratrem nostrum sic complacebam. Secundo Religione, Eccles. 15. Exaltabit illum apud proximos suos, et hoc sensu loquebatur Lex antiqua, saltem secundum Iudaeorum intelligentiam, non includens inimicos, idest, Paganos. Tertio communicatione in natura, et fine supremo; et sic hominis homo, et Angelus bonus est proximus, ut docet D. August. lib. 1. de doctrina Christiana, cap. 30. Ultimo dicitur proximus probatione ex effectibus, et sic etiam extraneus ille Samaritanus, qui fecit misericordiam, est vere proximus, ut Christus ait. Haec S. Bonav. ad eum Lucae textum.
It is proved third by the Holy Doctor, because Charity is borne toward those like us, either because they are just and communicate in spiritual life, or because they can be just and capable of glory, as D. Augustine says, 8. de Trinit. cap. 6. But demons are not such: Therefore.
PROBATUR tertio a S. Doct. quia Charitas fertur in similes, vel quia iusti sunt, et communicant in vita spirituali, vel quia possunt esse iusti, et habiles ad gloriam, ut ait D. August. 8. de Trinit. cap. 6. Sed daemones non sunt tales: Ergo.
It is proved fourth by the Holy Doctor. The Church militant is a Sister conformed to the Church triumphant, and is therefore so called: Descending from heaven, Apocalypse 21. But the triumphant Court does not love demons: Therefore.
PROBATUR quarto a S. Doct. Ecclesia militans est Soror conformis triumphanti, quae ideo dicitur: Descendens de caelo, Apoc. 21. Sed Curia triumphans daemones non diligit: Ergo.
It is proved fifth, because Charity does not comprehend those who are eternally separated from the Charity of Christ. Other authors use these arguments; see Tanner disp. 2. quaest. 3. dub. 1.
PROBATUR quinto, quia Charitas non comprehendit eos, qui in aeternum sunt a Charitate Christi separati. His mediis utuntur alii, Vide Tannerum disp. 2. quaest. 3. dub. 1.
Almost all the ARGUMENTS to the contrary are solved by the Holy Doctor, granting that for natural friendship conformity in nature and in companionship suffices: But Charity means a supernatural friendship, for which demons are not fit.
ARGUMENTA in contrarium fere omnia solvit S. Doct. concedens, ad amicitiam naturalem sufficere conformitatem in natura, et convictu: Sed Charitas dicit amicitiam supernaturalem, ad quam Daemones non sunt idonei.
You will say first: Demons benefit us toward merit and glory: Therefore they are to be loved with Charity.
Dices primo: Daemones nobis prosunt ad meritum, et gloriam: Ergo Charitate sunt diligendi.
The Holy Doctor REPLIES: they benefit us against their own intention; therefore they contribute nothing to this.
RESPONDET S. Doct. proficere nobis contra intentum; ideo nihil faciunt ad hoc.
You will say second: demons contribute to the honor of God and to justice being exalted: Therefore, since Charity loves God's honor, we ought also to love demons.
Dices secundo; daemones conferunt ad Dei honorem, et iustitiam exaltandam: Ergo, cum Charitas Dei honorem diligat, debemus etiam daemones diligere.
The Holy Doctor REPLIES: this is true at most of that which contributes of itself by its own ordination. Therefore demons are indeed matter of the Divine justice worthy of praise, inasmuch as they are punished and forever deprived of beatitude; and hence we rise up to the praise of God; yet they are not objects of Charity, which requires an ordination in itself to beatitude, or at least as a means, such as the gifts of grace are.
RESPONDET S. Doct. id verum esse ad summum de eo, quod per se confert ex sui ordinatione. Igitur daemones sunt quidem materia Divinae iustitiae laudandae, quatenus puniti, et in aeternum privati beatitudine; et hinc nos ad Dei laudem insurgimus; non tamen sunt obiectum Charitatis, quod exigit ordinationem in se ad beatitudinem, aut ad minus, ut medium, sicuti sunt dona gratiae.