Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica

Question IV: Whether, besides sacrifice, first fruits are to be offered

English · Latin · Both

1.

Although the oblations of first-fruits commanded in the Old Law were figurative, and therefore abrogated at this time, yet insofar as something was given to God out of Religion they were not abrogated; and therefore even at this time they can be offered to God, as D. Thom. says here, and Valentia disp. 6. quaest. 4. p. 4. The reason is given by S. Bonav. in 4. dist. 1. p. 1. quaest. 3.: because these are offered to God as due to the Creator, Benefactor, and Giver of all things; therefore they were offered from the instinct of nature even by those who did not acknowledge the figures, and now also they ought to endure for this reason, that we are bound to acknowledge God as the giver of all things.

2.

This rite Gregory VII approves in cap. 11 Omnis de consecr. dist. 1., saying: Let every Christian take care to offer something at the solemnities of the Mass.

3.

Nauar. Man. cap. 13. num. 19. and Sylvest. verbo decima say that where there is the custom of offering at Mass, it suffices if the greater part of the people offer, and therefore he does not sin who once or twice does not offer, unless he omits it out of contempt, or is the cause that the greater part of the people do not offer.

4.

D. Thom. also notes art. 1. ad 3., with Cajetan, that although the one who is unwilling to make oblations should be punished by a superior, yet the priest, to whom those oblations were to be made, ought not to deny him the sacraments.

5.

These oblations accrue to the Rector of the Church. So Sylvest. loc. cit. and Valentia here, following D. Thom. art. 2. The things offered, moreover, must be good, not vitiated. See Cajetan and Valentia. But this is so provided other things are also guarded against, namely that the things be not by the natural precept owed to others, for instance for the use of poor parents; or that they come from base gain. Hence nothing is to be offered from the wages of a brothel, as D. Thom. notes art. 3., commonly with D. Bonav. in 4. dist. 15. p. 2. art. 2. quaest. 1.; for this was commanded even in Deuter. 23.

6.

Moreover, all Theologians and Canonists, as cited by Suar. tract. 1. l. 1. cap. 8. num. 14, assert that in the Church of grace the precept of offering first-fruits to God is broad in scope. See C. Revertimini 16. quaest. 1. and Greg. VII. cap. decimas 16. quaest. 7.