Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question II: Which state is more excellent: the state of the active life, or of the contemplative
This question is not difficult to decide; for Christ himself passed a decisive judgment in favor of the contemplative life, when those two sisters, Martha and Mary, in the presence of him who had come, were pleading their cause; the one speaking to the heart with studious silence, the other soliciting the ears of Christ with talkative ministry, saying: Lord, dost thou not care that my sister hath left me alone to serve? Speak to her therefore, that she help me. To this, however, Christ brought forth a judicial definition (as the holy Doctor says), repeating and reiterating: Martha, Martha, thou art solicitous, and art troubled about many things; but one thing is necessary: Mary hath chosen the best part, and he adds the reason of the judgment: which shall not be taken away from her; on which words the holy Doctor thus comments: One is preferred to many, because not one from many, but from one, many, as St. Augustine says, tract. 27 on John, near the end: Many are the things that were made; one is he who made them; good are the things he made, how much better is he who made them; nay, absolutely the best: and this is the part of the contemplative soul.
Quisnam status est altero praestantior, num status vitae Activae: vel e contra, Contemplativae.
Haec quaestio non difficile deciditur; ipse enim Christus pro vita contemplativa decisivam tulit sententiam, dum duae illae sorores, Martha et Maria, ad factam ipsius praesentiam, causam agerent; et una studioso silentio loqueretur ad cor; altera verboso ministerio sollicitaret ad aures Christi, dicens: Domine, non est tibi curae, quod soror mea reliquit me solam ministrare? Dic ergo illi, ut me adiuvet: Ad haec autem Christus Iudicialem (ait S. Doctor) protulit diffinitionem, replicans, et repetens: Martha, Martha, sollicita es, et turbaris circa plurima; porro unum est necessarium, Maria optimam partem elegit, subditque iudicii causam: quae non auferetur ab ea, in quae verba sic postillat S. Doctor: Praeponitur unum multis, quia non unum a multis, sed ab uno multa, ut ait D. Augustinus tract. 27. in Ioan. prope finem; Multa sunt, quae facta sunt; unus qui fecit; bona valde, quae fecit, quanto melior ille, qui fecit: imo simpliciter optimus; et haec est pars animae contemplativae.
Hence in Lamentations 3. it is said: The Lord is my portion, saith my soul, therefore will I wait for him; and in Psalm 141. I cried to thee, O Lord, and I said: Thou art my hope, my portion in the land of the living. This is the portion of those who contemplate, says St. Bonaventure, in whose person it is said, Deuteronomy 3. I will pass over, and will see this excellent land beyond the Jordan, and this goodly mountain, and Libanus.
Hinc Threnorum 3. dicitur: Pars mea dominus, dixit anima mea, propterea expectabo eum, Psalmo 141. Clamavi ad te domine, et dixi: Tu es spes mea, portio mea in terra viventium. Haec est portio contemplantium, ait D. Bonaventura, in quorum persona dicitur, Deuteron. 3. Transibo, et videbo terram hanc optimam trans Iordanem, et montem istum egregium, et Libanum.
This excellence of the contemplative life over the active is CONFIRMED by the holy Doctor from the defects of the latter, which Christ intimates by that reduplicated name: Martha, Martha, thou art solicitous, etc. For God is accustomed to repeat the name of him whom he wishes to arouse to more attentive consideration of his defects; thus in Jeremias 32. he upbraids the sinful man with a triplicated name: Earth, earth, earth, hear the word of the Lord; and in Exodus 3,1 seeing that Moses boldly drew near to see the vision of the bush which the flame had kindled and he had not yet seen, he called out to him, saying: Moses, Moses. So now he reproaches Martha for her excessive solicitude, calling her, Martha, Martha, and for this reason upbraids her for a threefold defect, as the holy Doctor pursues: namely, for solicitude in thought, for tribulation in affect, and for division in act. 1 Editor's note: the 1655 print reads 'Exodi 30.'; the scene described (Moses at the burning bush, 'Moyses, Moyses') is Exodus 3, so the chapter citation is corrected here, with the print's reading preserved in this note.
CONFIRMATUR a S. Doctore haec vitae contemplativae praestantia prae activa, ex huius defectibus, quos insinuat Christus ingeminato illo nomine: Martha, Martha, sollicita es, etc. Ita enim consuevit Deus ingeminate nomen illius, quem ad defectus attentiorem considerationem vult excitare, ita Hier. 32. hominem peccatorem triplicato nomine increpat: Terra, Terra, Terra, audi sermonem Domini, et Exodi 3. videns Deus, quod audacter appropinquaret Moyses ad videndam visionem rubi, quam flamma accenderat, nec visserat, interpellavit eum dicens: Moyses, Moyses. Ita modo Martham nimiae sollicitudinis arguit, vocans eam, Martha, Martha, quam propterea ob triplicem defectum increpat, ut prosequitur S. Doctor, ob sollicitudinem scilicet in cogitatu, ob tribulationem in affectu, et divisionem in actu.
But these three things chiefly hinder a man from spiritual progress in God; wherefore Philip. 4 gives counsel: Be nothing solicitous, but in every prayer, etc. let your petitions be made known to God; and 1 Peter, last chapter: Casting all your anxiety upon him, because he hath care for you. For solicitude distracts the powers of the soul, weakens them when dispersed, and at last divides them from God, who is one and loves unity; whence St. Paul says, 1 Cor. 7: He who is with a wife is solicitous about the things of the world, and is divided; but the unmarried woman and the virgin thinketh on the things of the Lord, that she may be holy both in body and in spirit. Wherefore the Eastern Church, although it permitted clerics or priests, whose portion and study is to labor for the salvation of their neighbor, to take wives; yet we read that it was never attempted or permitted to Monks (even were they laymen); for they, having all things at once in one, ought not to abandon that one thing, as is said in Tob. 10.
HAEC autem tria hominem maxime a spirituali in Deum profectu tetrahunt; quare Philip. 4. consulitur: Nihil solliciti sitis, sed in omni oratione, etc. petitiones vestrae innotescant apud Deum, et 1. Petri, ult. Omnem sollicitudinem vestram proiicientes in eum, quoniam ipsi cura est de vobis: Sollicitudo enim vires animae distrahit, ac dispersas debilitat, tandemque a Deo dividit, qui unus est, unitatemque diligit; unde ait D. Paulus 1. Cor. 7. Qui cum uxore est sollicitus est, quae sunt mundi, et divisus est: mulier autem innupta, et virgo cogitat, quae domini sunt, ut sit sancta mente, et corpore: quamobrem Ecclesia Orientalis, licet Clericis, seu praesbyteris, quorum portio, et studium est incumbere proximi saluti promovendae, indulserit uxores ducere; id tamen Monachis, (esto essent laici) nunquam atteptum, vel permissum legimus; quippe qui omnia simul in uno habentes, non debuerunt illud unum dimittere, ut dicitur Tob. 10.
Then tribulation in affect, by which the active life is most of all molested, is dissuaded in John 14: Let not your heart be troubled; you believe in God, believe also in me; for the troubled eye is not sharp enough to see, as the holy Doctor remarks here, of which kind was what Isaias foretold of Christ, Isaias (24): He shall not be sad, nor troublesome.
DEINDE turbatio in affectu, qua vita activa plurimum molestatur, dissuadetur Ioan. 14. Non turbetur cor vestrum; creditis in Deum, et in me credite, non enim satis perspicax est ad videndum oculus turbatus, ut advertit S. Doctor hic, quale de Christo praedixit Isaias, 24. Non erit tristis, neque turbulentus.
Finally division in act, which is frequent amid the multitude of affairs, is turned aside in Ecclesiasticus 11: Son, let not thy acts be in many things; for operations, even of the animal faculties, that is, of the sensitive and vegetative part, require a gathering, and as it were an attention, of all the powers of the soul, that they may be carried out well and completely; the more intensely one power is occupied about its object, the more remissly do the other faculties operate about their proper objects; and the more a man is distracted about temporal things, the more easily and frequently does he slip from the consideration of eternal things; whence, since these inconveniences are often encountered in the active life, our Savior reproved it in Martha, that by pointing out the defect of her action he might correct its importunity, as the holy Doctor concludes in the place cited, letter D.
DENIQUE divisio in actu, quae frequens est in negotiorum multitudine, avertitur Eccl. 11. Fili ne in multis sint actus tui; cum enim operationes, etiam facultatum animalium, seu partis sensitivae, et vegetativae, requirant collectionem, et velut attentionem omnium potentiarum animae, ut bene, et complete peragantur, quo intensius una potentia occupatur circa suum obiectum, eo remissius aliae facultates operantur circa proprie obiecta, quantoque magis circa temporalia homo distrahitur, tanto facilius, et frequentius a consideratione aeternorum labitur; unde cum haec incommoda in vita activa saepe numero offendantur, eam in Martha reprehendit Salvator noster, ut per ostensionem ipsius defectus actionis importunitatem corrigeret, ut concludit S. Doctor loco cit. litt. D.
Not therefore, however (the Seraphic Doctor resumes), is the part of Martha evil; for the excess of action, the manner or excess, not the substance, is reprehended; whence Christ said: Thou art troubled about many things; for turbation extinguishes the spirit of devotion; nor, even though it be born of fervor in acting or ministering charitably, is it laudable; because Charity, in order that it may profit the neighbor, must be well ordered in itself; as the Spouse says in the Canticles, when, at the approach of the young maidens, who had often experienced the fervor of her correction, they trembled: He ordered charity in me; for having attained a placid quiet of mind, after long contemplating and marveling at the beauty of her spouse, she dismissed every troubled manner of acting, as St. Bernard expounds on the Canticles on those words.
NON propterea tamen, (resumit Seraphicus) pars Marthae mala est; actionis enim nimietas, modus, seu excessus, non substantia, reprehenditur; unde dixit Christus: Turbaris circa plurima, turbatio enim spiritum devotionis extinguit; nec, licet ex fervore agendi, vel ministrandi etiam charitative, nascatur, laudabilis est; quia Charitas, ut proximo proficiat, debet in seipsa bene ordinari; uti ait Sponsa in canticis, cum ad eius accessum Adolescentulae, saepius correptionis fervorem expertae, trepidarent; ordinavit in me Charitatem, quippe placidam mentis quietem nacta, postquam sponsi pulchritudinem diu contemplando miraretur, omnem turbide agendi modum dimisit, ut exponit S. Bernardus super Cantica. in ea verba.
It is PROVED further by the holy Doctor on the same chapter 10 of Luke, that the Contemplative life excels the active: What is more permanent, other things being equal, is more excellent. But contemplation is more permanent than action: Therefore. The major is evident; for the excellence of Charity shines forth above the other theological virtues in this, that it never falls away, but endures even in the beatific vision, at least in specific reason; but the contemplative operation begins here and remains in the future, as the Gloss has it on those words: Which shall not be taken away, etc. Therefore it is the better, the more it remains, as the Seraphic Doctor subjoins; for, as he reports there from the said Gloss: the labor of multitude passes away, and the Charity of unity remains; in figure of which, speaking of John, who bore the person of the Contemplative, the Lord says: So I will have him remain till I come, indicating that the part which Mary chose is not to be taken away but to be perfected; concerning which he says in book 3 on chapter 10 of Luke, tome 5: The fire of love, which here begins to burn, when it shall have seen him whom it loves, blazes forth more in love; and this same is prefigured in Isaias 31: Whose fire is in Sion, and his furnace in Jerusalem.
PROBATUR adhuc a S Doctore ad idem c. 10. Luce, Vitam Contemplativam praecellere activae: Quod est permanentius, caeteris paribus, est praestantius: Atqui contemplatio permanentior est actione: Ergo. Maior patet, nam Charitatis praestantia in eo prae caeteris virtutibus Theologicis lucet, quod nunquam excidat, sed etiam in visione beatifica, in ratione saltem specifica, duret: Sed Contemplativa operatio hic incipit, et in futuro permanet; ut habet Glossa in ea verba: Quae non auferetur, etc. Ergo eo est melior, quo manentior, ut subdit Seraphicus Doctor, nam ut ibi ex dicta Glossa refert: transit labor multitudinis, et remanet Charitas unitatis, in cuius figuram de Ioanne, gerente personam Contemplativi, ait dominus: Sic eum volo manere, donec veniam, indicans partem, quam elegit Maria, non auferendam, sed perficiendam, de qua ait lib. 3. in cap. 10. Lucae tom. 5. Amoris ignis, qui hic ardere inchoat, cum ipsum, quem amat, viderit, in amore amplius ignescit, id ipsum praefiguratur Isaia 31. Cuius ignis est in Sion, et caminus in Ierusalem.
It is PROVED lastly by St. Bonaventure in the same place, where in three little words he concludes all the reasons which Suarez there (in the place cited, chapter 6) deduces at length, saying: The Contemplative life is simply more to be desired, as being the better, both because it is more secure, and because it is sweeter, and because it is more stable. The Seraphic Doctor nevertheless concludes that the active life is not on that account to be despised: both because it is prior; and because it is more penal; and because it is more fruitful; for it avails for itself and for others, in which nonetheless the contemplative life prevailest over it for itself and for others; for the latter does not impede, nay rather promotes, the salvation of others; for whether one be a Prelate or a preacher, in order to rule well and preach well to himself and others, it is necessary that he not neglect Contemplation; whence St. Gregory says of both lives, book VI Morals, chapter 18, quoted by the Seraphic Doctor in the place cited: Great are the merits of the active life, but greater those of the Contemplative.
PROBATUR ultimo a S. Bonavent. eodem loco, ubi tribus verbulis concludit omnes rationes, quas fuse deducit Suarez loco cit. cap. 6. dum ait: Vita Contemplativa simpliciter est magis desideranda tanquam ea, quae est melior, Tum quia securior, Tum quia suavior, tum qui stabilior: Concludit tamen Seraphicus, non ideo despiciendam esse activam, tum quia anterior; tum quia poenalior; tum quia foecundior, valet enim sibi, et aliis, cui nihilominus pro se, et pro aliis praevalet contemplativa: Haec enim non impedit, imo promovet aliorum salutem; sive enim Praelatus sit, sive praedicator, ut sibi et aliis bene praesit, et praedicet; necesse est, ut Contemplationem non deferat; unde de utraque vita ait D. Gregorius, lib. VI. Moral. cap. 18. apud Seraphicum, loco cit. Magna sunt activae merita, sed Contemplativae potiora.
YOU WILL OBJECT: to what purpose, then, is the life that is only active, if even in Prelates and preachers the Contemplative life takes its place: for prelature and preaching are external actions principally ordered to the neighbor.
OBIICIES; ad quid ergo vita sola activa, si etiam in Praelatis, et praedicatoribus Contemplativa eius vices obeat: nam Praelatio, et praedicatio sunt actiones externae, ad proximum principaliter ordinatae.
The holy Doctor ANSWERS in the place cited, letter D, and with him Suarez in the said chapter 6, that spiritual exercises, such as those of Prelates and Preachers, since they have a connection with contemplation, as being as it were its acts and effects, suppose it as their origin; for preaching is nothing else than the internal contemplation of truth described outwardly in words and gestures; whence spiritual men must sometimes go out and sometimes go in, now ascend, presently descend, as in that vision of Jacob, Gen. 28, the angels ascended and descended, at once contemplating God and aiding men. But that life which is purely active obtains the greater, or more proper, part of itself in bodily exercises, as in assisting the sick, visiting widows, succoring the bodily necessities of the poor. Now these actions, although they require proceeding from an intention and some consideration, do not properly require contemplation, such as will be described below in question 5; otherwise no action would be good or meritorious which did not suppose contemplation.
RESPONDET S. Doctor loco cit. litt. D. et cum eo Suarez dicto cap. 6. exercitia spiritualia, qualia sunt Praelatorum, et Praedicatorum, cum habete connexionem cum contemplatione, ut sint velut eius actus, et effectus, ac proinde eam tanquam suam originem supponere: Praedicatio enim nihil est aliud, quam interna veritatis contemplatio, foris verbis, et gestibus descripta; unde viros spirituales oportet aliquando egredi, aliquandoque ingredi, modo ascendere, mox descendere, uti in visione illa Iacob, Gen. 28. angeli ascendebant, et descendebant, contemplando simul Deum, et hominibus subveniendo: Vita autem illa, quae pure activa est, potiorem, seu propriorem sui partem in exercitiis obtinet corporalibus, ut aegris assistendo, viduas visitando, corporalibus inopum necessitatibus succurrendo: Hae autem actiones, licet requirant procedere ex intentione, et aliquali consideratione; non tamen proprie contemplationem, qualis infra quaest. 5. describetur, requirunt, alias nulla actio esset bona, seu meritoria, quae contemplationem non supponeret.
We conclude, however, with the holy Doctor, 1 part of the Cen(tury), sect. 46, that both lives, in order to be perfect, must affect, occupy, or engage the three powers of the soul, so that with respect to these, each one has three properties, in which the one exceeds the other, not by an excess of excellence, but of exclusion; so that the one excludes the other as to act, which is true only in those who cultivate either the active or the contemplative life alone; but not in those leading the mixed life, as I shall say below in the following question.
Concludimus tamen cum S. Doctore 1. parte centil. sect. 46. utramque vitam, ut perfecta sit, debere afficere, officere, seu occupare tres animae potentias, ita ut respectu harum, unaquaeque tres habeat proprietates, in quibus altera ab altera exceditur, non excessu excellentiae, sed exclusionis; ita ut una alteram quoad actum excludat, quod verum est in his solum, qui vitam vel activam, vel contemplativam tantum colunt; non autem in agentibus vitam mixtam, ut infra dicam, quaest. sequenti.
¶ The FIRST property of the active life is sedulous diligence of public utility and necessity; and this occupies the Rational power, whose office it is to consider how and why it should issue forth into action.
¶ PRIMA vitae activae proprietas est utilitatis et necessitatis publicae sedula diligentia; et haec vim Rationalem occupat, cuius est considerare, quomodo, et quare in actionem prodeat.
The SECOND is charity toward the neighbor, by compassionating his misery; and this holds the place in the Concupiscible.
SECUNDA est erga proximum charitas, compatiendo eius miseriae, et haec in Concupiscibili locum obtinet.
The THIRD is fruitfulness of good works in acting, by persevering patiently unto the end; and this continually kindles the Irascible toward arduous things.
TERTIA est bonorum operum in agendo fecunditas, patienter usque ad finem perseverando, et haec Irascibilem continuo ad ardua accendit.
But of the CONTEMPLATIVE life the first property is the intuition of supernal beauty with delight, and this affects the Rational.
CONTEMPLATIVAE vero prima proprietas est supernae pulchritudinis intuitus cum delectatione, quae afficit Rationalem.
The SECOND is repose with serenity and security, and this pacifies the Irascible.
SECUNDA est quies cum serenitate, et securitate, quae Irascibilem pacificat.
The THIRD is cleanness of heart, with the gust of supernal goodness, whereby the Concupiscible is delighted.
TERTIA est cordis munditia, cum bonitatis supernae gustu, quo Concupiscibilis iucundatur.