Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question XXXVI: Whether one neighbor is to be loved more than another
I assert it. It is proved by St. Thomas, because the order of love is attended to according to the principle of goodness. Therefore he who is more conjoined to a more lovable goodness is more lovable; but some neighbors are nearer to God, and to us, than others. The Holy Doctor uses this reason also at the place cited, and Valent. disp. III q. IV p. IV, Fusiens. lib. III c. 9, and others.
Assero. Probatur a D. Thom. quia ordo dilectionis attenditur iuxta principium bonitatis. Igitur qui magis bonitati amabiliori est coniunctus, est magis amabilis; aliqui autem proximi sunt aliis viciniores Deo, et nobis. Hac ratione utitur etiam S. D. loc. cit. et Valent. disp. III. q. IV. p. IV. Fusiens. lib. III. c. 9. et alii.
First indeed, by a greater love objectively the better one is to be loved more. So St. Thomas art. 7. For he who is better is more conjoined with the principal object of charity, which is God, and has more good in himself. We can nevertheless wish a greater good for another, for instance a kinsman, than that which another has.
Primo quidem dilectione maiori obiective melior magis est diligendus. Ita D. Thom. art. 7. Nam qui est melior, est magis coniunctus cum obiecto praecipuo charitatis, quod est Deus, et plus boni in se habet. Possumus tamen alteri, puta consanguineo, optare maius bonum illo, quod alius habet.
Secondly. By a greater appreciative love, he is to be loved more who is more conjoined either to God, or to the one loving him, or to both: but if one be better, the other more conjoined to me, the latter is to be loved more as regards those goods by which he is conjoined to me; hence in I Tim. V: If any man have not care of his own, and especially of those of his house, he hath denied the faith: And it is the opinion of St. Augustine lib. I doct. Christ. c. 28.
Secvndo. Maiori dilectione appretiativa ille magis diligendus, qui vel Deo, vel diligenti ipsi, vel utrique est coniunctior: At si alter sit melior, alter mihi coniunctior, is diligendus magis quoad ea bona, quibus est mihi coniunctus; unde prima Timot. V. Si quis suorum, maxime domesticorum, curam non habet, fidem negavit: Et est sententia D. August. lib. I. doct. Christ. c. 28.
It is proved also by the reason of St. Bonaventure brought forward in q. XXX. Every motion takes its intensity, and as it were its weight, by which it tends toward the term, from its own principle, especially from that from which it proceeds; therefore the motion of charity too is borne with a greater as-it-were weight toward that which is more conjoined to the principle from which that motion of love proceeds; namely to the one loving himself.
Probatur etiam ratione D. Bonav. allata q. XXX. Omnis motus accipit intentionem suam, et quasi pondus, quo tendit in terminum ex ipso sui principio, praecipue, a quo scilicet procedit; ergo et charitatis motus maiori quasi pondere fertur in illud, quod est coniunctius principio illi, a quo procedit is dilectionis motus; scilicet ipsi diligenti.
Hence you have that those conjoined in all things are to be loved more than strangers, even if they be better, other things being equal; for as regards spiritual goods, those are to be loved more who are conjoined in grace, as spiritual sons, or spiritual parents.
Hinc habes, coniunctos quoad omnia, magis diligendos, quam extraneos, etiam si sint meliores, caeteris paribus; nam quoad bona spiritualia magis diligendi sunt, qui sunt coniuncti in gratia, ut filii spirituales, vel parentes spirituales.