Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question XXI: Whether, and how, faith is a virtue
The MASTER sent. 3. dist. 23., D. Thom. here, Albertus in 3. dist. 23. art. 5., Richard. art. 4. quaest. 1., and almost all the other Theologians, with whom D. Bonav. also is commonly cited, say that faith formed by charity is a true virtue, because it renders its acts perfect toward God: but that unformed faith is not simply a virtue, because it does not render its act perfect — with which D. August. lib. 4. cont. Iulianum cap. 3. seems to smile. See Pasqualigum disp. 36. sect. 2., Lugum disp. 15. sect. 2., Merac. disp. 22. sect. 1., Morandum tract. un. quaest. 12.
MAGISTER sent. 3. dist. 23. D. Thom. hic Albertus in 3. dist. 23. art. 5. Richard. art. 4. quaest. 1. et alii fere Theologi, quibuscum allegatur communiter etiam D. Bonav. dicunt, fidem, charitate formatam, esse veram virtutem, quia reddit actus suos perfectos ad Deum: at vero fidem informem non esse simpliciter virtutem, quia non reddit actum suum perfectum, quibus videtur arridere D. August. lib. 4. cont. Iulianum cap. 3. Vide Pasqualigum disp. 36. sect. 2. Lugum disp. 15. sect. 2. Merac. disp. 22. sect. 1. Morandum tract. un. quaest. 12.
I ASSERT first; that Faith not formed by charity is most properly a virtue.
ASSERO primo; Fidem, charitate non formatam, esse propriissime virtutem.
It is PROVED by D. Bonav. first from D. Augustine de vera innocentia, asserting it so.
PROBATUR a D. Bonav. primo ex D. Augustino de vera innocentia, ita asserente.
SECONDLY, because about difficult things an art, or virtue, is necessary to the rational mind, from 2. Ethic. cap. 3.; but the articles of faith are difficult to believe, and are believed by sinners; therefore for this the art, or virtue, that is necessary is conferred on them. Not art: Therefore the virtue of faith.
SECUNDO, quia circa difficilia, necessaria est menti rationali ars, aut virtus ex 2. Ethic. cap. 3. sed articuli fidei sunt creditu difficiles, et creduntur a peccatoribus; ergo eis ad hoc necessaria, confertur ars, vel virtus. Non ars: Ergo virtus fidei.
THIRDLY. It is more difficult to believe the articles than to be held back from lust, but for this a virtue is necessary. Therefore also for that; and sinful man believes through unformed faith: therefore this is a virtue.
TERTIO. Difficilius est credere articulos, quam contineri a libidine, sed ad hoc necessaria est virtus. Ergo et ad illud; sed homo etiam peccator credit per fidem informem: ergo haec est virtus.
FOURTHLY. What is essentially opposed to vice and sin is a virtue; but the act of unformed faith is directly and essentially opposed to the vice of heresy and of infidelity: Therefore.
QUARTO. Quod essentialiter opponitur vitio, et peccato, est virtus; sed actus fidei informis directe, et essentialiter opponitur vitio haeresis, et infidelitatis: Ergo.
FIFTHLY. To what the specific ratio belongs, the generic belongs too; but to unformed faith belongs the specific ratio of faith, which is to captivate the intellect into the obedience of Christ: therefore also the generic ratio of virtue. Hence therefore S. Doct. deduces, and with him the rest, that unformed faith is a virtue essentially, though imperfect, because it has not the perfect operation through the defect of the extrinsic, that is, of charity, which makes one for merit — one, I say, physically accidental, but morally essential. And in this way also Cajetan and Aragon. speak, ad art. 4. D. Thomae.
QUINTO. Cui convenit ratio specifica, convenit et generica, sed fidei informi convenit ratio specifica fidei, quae est captivare intellectum in obsequium Christi: ergo et ratio generica virtutis. Hinc igitur deducit S. Doct. et cum eo caeteri, fidem informem esse virtutem essentialiter, tamen imperfectam, quia non habet perfectam operationem ex defectu extrinseci, idest charitatis, quacum facit unum ad meritum, unum inquam physice accidentale, sed moraliter essentiale. Et hoc modo loquuntur etiam Caietanus, et Aragon. ad art. 4. D. Thomae.
I ASSERT secondly, in this sense, that unformed faith is not a perfect virtue.
ASSERO secundo, hoc sensu, fidem informem non esse perfectam virtutem.
It is PROVED by D. Bonav. first, because it is called dead in Iacobi primo, in the sense given in quaest. 20.
PROBATUR a D. Bonav. primo, quia dicitur mortua Iacobi primo, sensu dicto quaest. 20.
SECONDLY, because the perfect virtue is that which operates well and perfectly, from D. August. in the Master dist. 23.
SECUNDO, quia virtus perfecta est, quae bene, perfecteque operatur ex D. August. apud Magistrum dist. 23.
Yet S. Doct. NOTES ad 4. that the ratio of unformed faith in a faithful sinner is not the same as that of partial faith in a heretic, who believes only some articles; for the latter falls short of the essence, since it has not the formal ratio, that is, the assent rendered to the articles under the ratio of the first truth speaking; for by denying even one attribute of God, it already denies God to be truthful.
ADVERTIT tamen S. Doct. ad 4. non esse eandem rationem fidei informis in peccatore fideli, et fidei partialis in haeretico, qui aliquos articulos tantum credit; nam haec deficit ab essentia, cum non habeat rationem formalem, idest assensum exhibitum articulis sub ratione primae veritatis dicentis; nam tantum unum Dei affectum negans, iam negat Deum veracem.
S. Doct. SOLVES some arguments in quaest. 1. The first is: the extremes and the mean are in the same genus; for the mean shares the nature of the extremes. But faith is a mean between opinion and science, as Hugh says: therefore it is in the same genus with the extremes: but science and opinion are not virtues: Therefore neither is faith.
ALIQUA argumenta solvit S. Doct. quaest. 1. Primum est in eodem genere sunt extrema, et medium; nam medium participat naturam extremorum. Sed fides est medium inter opinionem, et scientiam, ut ait Hugo: ergo in eodem genere est cum extremis: sed scientia, et opinio non sunt virtutes: Ergo neque fides.
S. Doct. RESPONDS first, that faith is a mean between these as to certitude, but it is not on that account necessary that it be in the same proximate genus with the extremes.
RESPONDET S. Doct. primo, fidem esse medium inter haec, quoad certitudinem, non est autem ob id necesse, ut sit in eodem genere proximo, cum extremis.
He RESPONDS secondly, that the MAJOR is false in morals, for the mean is often a virtue, and the extremes are vices.
RESPONDET secundo, Maiorem esse falsam in moralibus, nam medium saepe est virtus, et extrema sunt vitia.
You OBJECT secondly. Habits are distinguished by acts, and acts by objects. Now virtue and science are distinguished in this, from Aristotle 6. Metaph. t. 8., that virtue is about the good, and science about the true. But faith is about the true under the ratio of the true: Therefore it is not a virtue. The MINOR is proved, because the act of faith is to assent to the first truth.
OBIICIES secundo. Habitus distinguuntur per actus, et actus per obiecta. In hoc autem distinguitur virtus, et scientia ex Aristotele 6. Metaph. t. 8. quod virtus est in bonum, et scientia in verum. Sed fides est in verum sub ratione veri: Ergo non est virtus. Minor probatur, quia actus fidei est assentiri primae veritati.
S. Doct. RESPONDS that the true is the object of faith as salutary unto eternal life; for since it is obscure truth, it demands another habit diverse from science; and because it is health-giving, it therefore orders directly to salvation, and so has the ratio of virtue, because it regards obscure truth, captivating the intellect, and orders it freely to salvation; therefore it is a virtue.
RESPONDET S. Doct. verum esse obiectum fidei, ut salubre ad vitam aeternam, quia enim est verum obscurum, exigit alium habitum diversum a scientia; et quia est salutiferum, ideo directe ad salutem ordinat, et ideo habet rationem virtutis, quia respicit veritatem obscuram captivando intellectum, et illum ordinat ad salutem libere; ideo est virtus.
You OBJECT thirdly. It is blameworthy in a rational man to will anything without reason; but faith does not require reason: Therefore.
OBIICIES tertio. Vituperabile est homini rationali, velle aliquid sine ratione; sed fides non requirit rationem: Ergo.
S. Doct. responds that the MAJOR is false, where authority supplies the reason; now faith believes God revealing, even if the object be obscure, and this indeed is praiseworthy and reasonable.
Respondet S. Doct. falsam maiorem, ubi authoritas supplet rationem; nunc autem fides credit Deo revelanti, etiamsi obiectum sit obscurum, et hoc quidem est laudabile, et rationabile.
You OBJECT fourthly. The nobler the ratio an act has, the nearer it is to virtue: Therefore to believe by compelling reason looks more to virtue than to believe without reason; but necessary assent is not a virtue: Therefore much less will faith, which assents supported by no reason, be a virtue.
OBIICIES quarto. Quanto aliquis actus habet rationem nobiliorem, tanto est virtuti vicinior: Ergo credere per rationem cogentem plus spectat ad virtutem, quam credere absque ratione; at assensus necessarius non est virtus: Ergo multo minus fides, quae nulla ratione nixa assentitur, erit virtus.
S. Doct. RESPONDS by denying the MAJOR, if we speak of credulity resting on natural reason, which often deceives; and so it is more to the purpose to believe without reason the first truth revealing, even if those things seem irrational. For many things have been revealed that are contrary to philosophy, as altogether to live continent, to beg, etc. Likewise to believe one essence in three Persons: two natures with one subsistence, etc.
RESPONDET S. Doct. negando Maiorem si loquamur de credulitate nixa ratione naturali, quae saepe fallit, itaque studiosius est credere absque ratione veritati primae revelanti, etiamsi ea videantur irrationalia. Multa enim sunt revelata, quae contraria sunt philosophiae, ut omnino continere, mendicare, etc. Similiter credere unam essentiam in tribus Personis: Duas naturas cum una subsistentia, etc.