Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question XXII: Whether a man ought to love his own body out of charity
I ASSERT that it is so. It is the common opinion of the Theologians.
An homo debeat corpus suum ex Charitate diligere.
ASSERO, ita esse. Est communis sententia Theologorum.
It is proved first by D. Bonaventure, from Ephes. 5: Husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies; but wives are to be loved out of Charity: Therefore also bodies.
Probatur a D. Bonavent. primo, ex 5. Ephes. Viri debent diligere uxores suas, sicut corpora sua, sed uxores sunt diligendae ex Charitate: Ergo et corpora.
It is proved secondly by the Holy Doctors from D. Augustine, Book 1. of de doctrina Christiana, chapter 23.
Probatur secundo a SS. DD. ex D. Augustino Lib. 1. de doctrina Christiana, capite 23.
It is proved thirdly by S. Bonaventure: everything beatifiable is lovable out of Charity: such are bodies: Therefore.
Probatur tertio a S. Bonav. omne beatificabile est Charitate diligibile: Talia sunt corpora: Ergo.
It is proved fourthly by S. Thomas. In the order of Charity kinsfolk are to be preferred to strangers, as Ambrose teaches in the Cam. Gloss on ch. 2; but kinship exists only on the part of bodies: Therefore, since our bodies are above all joined to us for this reason, they are to be loved out of Charity.
Probatur quarto a S. Doctore. In ordine Charitatis consanguinei sunt praeferendi extraneis, ut docet Ambrosius in Glossa Cam. 2. sed consanguinitas non est nisi ex parte corporum: Ergo cum maxime sint nobis hac ratione coniuncta corpora nostra, sunt Charitate diligenda.
It is explained by S. Thomas, in corpore. Charity is a weight inclining toward the highest good and perfect beatitude, and consequently makes us love everything lovable. Thus God must first be loved as blessed by essence: then the Spirits as beatifiable by participation: lastly bodies as beatifiable by the overflowing from the soul. So also Tannerus disp. 2. quaest. 3. dub. 1.
Explicatur a S. Doctore, in corpore. Charitas est pondus inclinans ad summum bonum, et perfectam beatitudinem, atque adeo facit, ut diligamus omne beabile. Sic igitur amandus Deus primo beatus per essentiam: Deinde Spiritus per participationem beabiles: ultimo corpora beabilia per redundantiam ex anima. Ita etiam Tannerus disp. 2. quaest. 3. dub. 1.
You will object first, Ioan. 12: He who loves his life shall lose it; but there it is understood as meaning animation unto life.
Obiicies primo Ioan. 12. Qui amat animam suam, perdet eam; sumitur autem ibi, prout dicit animationem ad vitam.
S. Bonaventure and D. Thomas answer that Christ urges us to hate the carnal life, not as meaning natural life, which is good, coming from God, and therefore to be loved: hence it is not lawful to kill oneself; but to hate the carnal life, as meaning the life fostered by the fire of concupiscence.
Respondet S. Bonavent. et D. Thom. Christum hortari ad odiendam vitam carnalem, non prout dicit naturalem vitam, quae est a Deo bona, atque ideo amanda: Unde non licet interficere seipsum; sed ad odiendam vitam carnalem, ut dicit vitam, concupiscentiae igne foventem.
You will object secondly. That which impedes beatitude is not to be loved out of Charity: such is the body, Galat. 5: The flesh concupisceth against the spirit. And Rom. 7: I see another law in my members, fighting against the law of my mind, etc. Whence he said: Who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
Obiicies secundo. Id, quod impedit beatitudinem, non est Charitate diligendum: tale est corpus, Galat. 5. Caro concupiscit adversus spiritum. Et Rom. 7. Sentio aliam legem in membris meis, repugnantem legi mentis, etc. Unde dicebat: Quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius.
The Holy Doctors answer that the Apostle does not reject bodily life as it is natural; for it is not an impediment to salvation for that reason, but on account of concupiscence arising from sin.
Respondent SS. DD. Apostolum non refugere vitam corporalem, ut est naturalis; neque enim ea est impedimentum ad salutem tali ratione, sed propter concupiscentiam ortam ex peccato.
You will object thirdly. Charity never falleth away, 1 Corinth. 13; therefore the things that are to be loved out of Charity do not fall away; but bodies fall: Therefore.
Obiicies tertio. Charitas nunquam excidit, prima Corinth. 13. ergo quae diligenda sunt ex Charitate, non excidunt; sed corpora cadunt: Ergo.
S. Thomas answers that bodies are destined for perpetual incorruption in beatitude: hence, although now they are sown in corruption, yet they shall rise in glory; and consequently they are to be loved out of Charity.
Respondet S. Doct. corpora ad perpetuam incorruptionem in beatitudine destinata esse: Unde, quamvis nunc seminentur in corruptione; tamen resurgent in gloria; atque adeo diligenda sunt Charitate.
You will object fourthly. That which makes lovable out of Charity is communication in the image of God: But bodies do not have the Divine image: Therefore.
Obiicies quarto. Id, quod facit diligibile ex Charitate, est communicatio in imagine Dei: Sed corpora non habent imaginem Divinam: Ergo.
S. Thomas answers that of themselves they are indeed lovable by reason of the image and the capacity for God; hence bodies, because they participate in the image and beatitude only by reason of union, are therefore to be loved secondarily.
Respondet S. Doct. per se quidem ea diligibilia esse ratione imaginis, et capacitatis Dei; unde corpora, quia solum participant, ratione unionis, imaginem, et beatitudinem, ideo secundario diligenda sunt.