Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question XIX: Whether faith is perfected by charity, as by its form
All Theologians in 3. dist. 23. together with the Master there, this having been stated, agree that Faith and the other Virtues are formed by charity; not indeed so that charity is the form of faith, either essential, as the soul is to man; or accidental, as whiteness to the Swan; for this is false, as the Saintly Doctor notes, argument 4. p. 1. with the solution added. For from things of different genera one thing does not come to be one by essence: but Faith and Charity are distinct virtues, as the Apostle has it, first Corinthians 13. Faith, Hope, Charity, these three remain. Therefore charity cannot inform Faith essentially: Nor accidentally, as the Saintly Doctor shows, ad 5. for faith, even unformed, is a virtue, abstracted even from charity, and although upon the arrival of charity and grace it is adorned, like colors by light (as the Saintly Doctor says in the body of the text), nevertheless it does not inhere in faith itself, which is not the subject of accidents, since it is a mere accident, and carries with it its potencies, and virtues, and accidents; but it comes to grace, like rain upon dry ground. Therefore charity is called the form of faith only metaphorically. See also Valencia disp. 1. question 4. p. 3. I shall treat this question again disp. 8. question 8.
An Fides perficiatur per Charitatem, tanquam per formam.
Omnes Theologi in 3. dist. 23. cum Magistro ibi, hoc effato consentiunt, Fidem, aliasque Virtutes a charitate formari; non quidem, ut charitas sit forma fidei, aut essentialis, ut anima homini; vel accidentalis, ut albedo Olori; hoc enim falsum est, ut advertit S. Doct. argumento 4. p. 1. addita solutione. Ex his enim, quae sunt diversi generis, non fit unum per essentiam: Fides autem, et Charitas sunt diversae virtutes, ut habet Apostolus prima Corinth. 13. Manent fides, Spes, Charitas, tria haec. Igitur non potest esse, ut charitas informet essentialiter Fidem: Neque accidentaliter, ut ostendit S. Doct. ad 5. nam fides, etiam informis, est virtus, abstracta etiam charitate, et quamvis adveniente charitate, et gratia ornetur, veluti colores a luce (ut ait S. Doct. in corpore) tamen non inhaeret ipsi fidei, quae non est subiectum accidentium, cum sit merum accidens, et habeat secum suas potentias, et virtutes, atque accidentia; sed advenit gratiae, sicuti pluvia terrae aridae. Igitur charitas dicitur forma fidei metaphorice tantum. Vide etiam Valentiam disp. 1. quaest. 4. p. 3. Hanc quaestionem tractabo rursus disp. 8. quaest. 8.
I assert that faith is formed by charity, that is, perfected in ordination toward merit. For it directs its act rightly toward the ultimate end.
Assero, fidem a charitate formari, idest, perfici in ordine ad meritum. Dirigit enim recte actum suum ad ultimum finem.
It is proved by St. Bonaventure first in 2. dist. 27. question 2. from first Corinthians 13. If I should have all faith, but have not charity, I am nothing.
Probatur a S. Bonav. primo in 2. dist. 27. quaest. 2. ex prima Corinth. 13. Si habuero omnem fidem, charitatem autem non habuero, nihil sum.
Then in 3. dist. 23. dub. 2. and art. 2. question 1. ad the arguments, and dist. 24. art. 2. question 2. ad arg. from the second of James. Faith without works is dead. And Opusc. on the seven gifts. On the gift of Understanding, cap. 1. from that Galat. 5. In Christ Jesus, neither does Circumcision avail anything: but Faith, which works through charity.
Deinde in 3. dist. 23. dub. 2. et art. 2. quaest. 1. ad argumenta, et dist. 24. art. 2. quaest. 2. ad arg. ex secundo Iacobi. Fides sine operibus mortua est. Et Opusc. de septem donis. De dono Intellectus, cap. 1. ex illo Galat. 5. In Christo Iesu, neque Circumcisio aliquid valet: sed Fides, quae per charitatem operatur.
It is proved secondly by the reasons of the Saintly Doctor. The first is. It is certain that faith is not lost through every mortal sin, as I shall show in the following question, as defined. Therefore there remains an unformed faith, that is, without that perfection by which faith was perfected for meriting: Therefore one restored to grace again has formed faith.
Probatur secundo hic rationibus S. Doct. Prima est. Certum est, per omne peccatum mortale non amitti fidem, ut ostendam quaest. sequenti definitum. Ergo manet fides informis, idest sine ea perfectione, qua fides perficiebatur ad merendum: Ergo restitutus in gratia, rursus habet fidem formatam.
Second: Faith comes closer to grace, and charity, than nature does; But nature is perfected by grace; Therefore much more faith.
Secunda: Magis accedit fides ad gratiam, et charitatem, quam natura; Sed natura per gratiam perficitur; Ergo multo magis fides.
The third reason is: An infused habit agrees more with grace, which is infused, than acquired habits do; but acquired habits are informed by the arrival of grace, which is evident because in their use and exercise man merits: Therefore much more the habit of unformed faith is formed by grace itself supervening.
Tertia ratio est: Plus convenit habitus infusus cum gratia, quae est infusa, quam habitus acquisiti; sed habitus acquisiti per adventum gratiae informantur, quod patet, quia in eorum usu, et exercitio, homo meretur: Ergo multo magis habitus fidei informis formatur per ipsam gratiam supervenientem.
Fourth reason: Infused habits that remain in the sinner are no less vivified than merits are in justification: But these, having been deadened, revive: Therefore also THOSE.
Quarta ratio: Non minus vivificantur habitus infusi, qui remanent in delinquente, quam merita in iustificatione: Sed haec mortificata reviviscunt: Ergo et ILLI.
Fifth reason: A habit is living is nothing other than that one can merit eternal life through it: but unformed faith, upon the arrival of charity, has everything necessary for merit: Therefore, if its act is meritorious unto eternal life, it is a sign that the habit has been formed. That it has everything necessary for merit is clear, since the work is of itself good, and right, and commanded by charity. Whence St. Augustine, 15. de Trinitate, cap. 18., speaking of charity, says: As much good as it is, without which no such good things lead anyone to eternal life — this is faith, and the others, of which Augustine asserted there, that they avail nothing without charity, as the Apostle says above.
Quinta ratio: Nihil est aliud, habitum vivum esse, quam per illum vitam aeternam mereri posse: sed fides informis adveniente charitate habet omne, quod necessarium est ad meritum: Ergo, si actus eius est meritorius ad vitam aeternam, signum est, habitum esse formatum. Quod autem habeat omne, quod necessarium est ad meritum; clarum est, cum ipsum opus de se sit bonum, et rectum, et a charitate imperatum. Unde D. August. 15. de Trinitate, cap. 18. loquens de charitate ait: Quantum bonum est, sine quo ad aeternam vitam neminem bona tanta perducunt, hoc est fides, et alia, de quibus ibi August. asseruit, ea sine charitate nihil valere, ut ait Apostolus supra.
Sixth reason: Everything that is said to be dead from mere defect, or from the mere absence of something, upon that thing supervening is vivified; but unformed faith is said to be dead on account of the mere defect of grace, and of fruitful operation: Therefore upon these supervening it revives: But, when it revives, it is formed: Therefore unformed faith can become formed; and this is what is found in the Gloss upon that text of James 2. Faith without works is dead. Faith revives from works: Therefore from works it has life, and form.
Sexta ratio: Omne illud, quod dicitur esse mortuum e solo defectu, seu e sola absentia alicuius, illo superveniente vivificatur; sed fides informis dicitur mortua ob solum defectum gratiae, et operationis fructuosae: Ergo ipsis supervenientibus reviviscit: Sed, cum reviviscit, formatur: Ergo fides informis potest fieri formata; et hoc est, quod habetur in Glossa super illud Iacobi 2. Fides sine operibus mortua est. Reviviscit ex operibus fides: Ergo ex operibus habet vitam, et formam.
Therefore the formation of faith by grace, and charity, denotes a twofold perfection supervening. The first in ordination toward meritorious works to be done. The second, because the act of faith, by the command of charity, is referred to the ultimate end, that is, insofar as one believes on account of God, as the highest good, the act of faith pertains to the same species of rectitude to which charity itself pertains, and accordingly it is of the same species as charity itself, with this difference however, that this rectitude is essential to charity itself; but it comes to faith as an extrinsic perfection, just as light comes to colors, making them luminous and attractive, and adorned; and just as Light together with colors does not make one composite by essence, but by a certain ordination; so neither from unformed faith and grace is there made one per se, but by a certain ordination, and relation to God. This is St. Bonaventure's with St. Thomas, question 4. art. 3., whom Valencia explains, question 4. p. 3.
Igitur formatio fidei a gratia, et charitate, dicit perfectionem duplicem supervenientem. Prima in ordine ad opera meritoria facienda. Secunda, quia fidei actus per imperium charitatis refertur ad ultimum finem, hoc est, quatenus credit aliquis propter Deum, ut summum bonum, pertinet actus fidei ad eandem specie rectitudinem, ad quam ipsa charitas, ac proinde est eiusdem speciei, cuius est charitas ipsa, cum hoc tamen discrimine, quod rectitudo haec est essentialis ipsi charitati; at fidei advenit tanquam perfectio extrinseca, sicuti lux advenit, coloribus, eosque lucidos, venustosque reddit, et ornatos; et sicut Lux cum coloribus non facit unum compositum per essentiam, sed per ordinationem quandam; sic neque ex fide informi, et gratia, fit unum per se, sed per quandam ordinationem, et relationem ad Deum. Haec S. Bonan. cum D. Thom. quaest. 4. art. 3. quos explicat Valentia quaest. 4. p. 3.
You will object first. Of opposites the same account holds: But vice, and sin cannot be formed: Therefore neither can the opposite virtue be unformed, and consequently neither be formed.
Obiicies primo. Oppositorum eadem est ratio: Sed vitium, et peccatum non potest esse formatum: Ergo nec virtus opposita potest esse informis, atque adeo, nec formari.
The Saintly Doctor answers first, that the opposition is not equal in this case; for formation is a good that needs more in order to come to be than deformation, which is an imperfection. Therefore it does not follow that, if sin cannot be formed, neither can the virtue fail, and be made unformed.
Respondet primo. S. Doct. non esse in hoc parem oppositionem; nam formatio est bonum, quod pluribus indiget, ut fiat, quam deformatio, quae est imperfectio. Ideo non sequitur, quod, si peccatum non potest formari; neque virtus possit deficere, et reddi informis.
He answers secondly, that sin is taken in two ways: abstractly, and concretely. If it is taken abstractly, it is impossible that it can be formed, since it is mere malice; but if it is taken concretely, so that some act of virtue is said to be deformed from the end — as when, for example, someone abstains on account of vain glory, the abstinence itself is a fault in him — and in this way, by reason of the underlying act, or habit, it can be rectified by grace, if he abstains on account of God. In this way we say that a formed virtue becomes unformed, namely by reason of the underlying habit, since it is indifferent to the state of fault, and of grace; indeed, if it is an act of abstinence, it is good by its nature, and zealous.
Respondet secundo, peccatum dupliciter accipi: abstracte, et concrete. Si abstracte accipiatur, impossibile est, quod possit formari, cum sit mera malitia; si autem accipiatur concrete, ut dicatur aliquis actus virtutis deformatus a fine; cum quis, v. g. abstinet ob inanem gloriam, ipsa abstinentia sit ei culpa; et hoc modo, ratione actus substrati, vel habitus, potest rectificari a gratia, si propter Deum abstineat. Hoc modo dicimus, virtutem formatam, fieri informem, ratione videlicet habitus substrati, quoniam indifferens est ad statum culpae, et gratiae; imo si est actus abstinentiae, est natura sua bonus, et studiosus.
You will object secondly. No dead work can become living; faith without grace is dead, from 2. James: Therefore. The major is proved; for a work done in sin is not vivified by grace.
Obiicies secundo. Nullum opus mortuum potest fieri vivum; fides sine gratia est mortua, ex 2. Iacobi: Ergo. Maior probatur; nam opus factum in peccato, non vivificatur per gratiam.
The Saintly Doctor answers, that a dead act is not capable of life, because it has already passed away, nor does it remain in any root; but faith remains in the sinner, although unformed; therefore it can be vivified, beautified, and adorned by grace arriving; just as merits that have been deadened return unto a reward.
Respondet S. Doct. actum mortuum non esse capacem vitae, quia iam transiit, nec manet in aliqua radice; at fides in peccatore manet, licet informis; ideo potest vivificari, venustari, et adornari per gratiam advenientem; sicuti redeunt ad praemium merita mortificata.
You will object thirdly. No accident can be altered: unformed faith is an accident: Therefore it cannot be altered; but that which is formed from unformed is altered: Therefore.
Obiicies tertio. Nullum accidens potest alterari: fides informis est accidens: Ergo non potest alterari; sed quod ex informi formatur, alteratur: Ergo.
The Saintly Doctor answers, that the accident is not altered formally, but the subject is altered, and by reason of the subject also the accident; as when color is illuminated upon a wall.
Respondet S. Doct. accidens non alterari formaliter, sed alterari subiectum, et ratione subiecti etiam accidens; ut cum color illuminatur in pariete.
You will object fourthly. From things diverse in genus one thing per essence cannot come to be; but formed faith denotes one habit per essence: Therefore it is impossible that it consist also of sanctifying grace, which is diverse in genus.
Obiicies quarto. Ex his, quae sunt genere diversa, non potest fieri unum per essentiam; sed fides formata dicit habitum unum per essentiam: Ergo impossibile est, eam constare etiam ex gratia sanctificante, quae est genere diversa.
The Saintly Doctor answers, that from faith and grace there is not made one formal thing, but by ordination; just as when I say "illuminated color," I say two things, yet in the manner of one, because of this, that it is ordained to one act, namely to moving Sight; so also faith and grace denote one thing, insofar as they are ordained to a meritorious work.
Respondet S. Doct. ex fide, et gratia non fieri unum formale, sed per ordinationem; sicuti cum dico, colorem illuminatum, dico duo, per modum tamen unius, propter hoc, quia ordinatur ad unum actum, nempe ad movendum Visum; sic et fides, et gratia dicunt unum, quatenus ordinantur ad opus meritorium.
You will object fifthly. Unformed faith is transmuted by the arrival of grace only accidentally: therefore if by the arrival of grace it is made formed, it accrues to faith, as it were accidentally, that it be formed; If therefore no genus accrues to the species; faith is not a species of virtue properly so called: But this is false: Therefore also that from which it follows, namely, that the habit of unformed faith is formed by the arrival of grace.
Obiicies quinto. Fides informis per adventum gratiae transmutatur solum accidentaliter: ergo si per adventum gratiae efficitur formata, accidit fidei, ut sit formata; Si ergo nullum genus accidit speciei; fides non est species virtutis propriae dictae: Sed hoc est falsum: Ergo et illud, ex quo sequitur, videlicet, quod habitus fidei informis, per adventum gratiae formetur.
The Saintly Doctor answers, that an accidental transmutation in the genus of nature can be essential in the genus of morals, as is evident in acts, which by the mutation of some accidental circumstance change the moral being of virtue, or vice. Therefore also for faith, although it accrues to it, as it is a habit, to be formed by grace, or without it; nevertheless it is necessary and intrinsic to it in ordination toward acquiring merit, or, as it is the principle of merit: Moreover, unformed faith itself, even with grace set aside, is a habit of virtue, therefore it cannot be inferred that faith is not under its own genus of virtue.
Respondet S. Doct. transmutationem accidentalem in genere naturae, posse esse essentialem in genere moris, ut patet in actibus, qui per mutationem alicuius circumstantiae accidentalis mutant esse morale virtutis, aut vitii. Igitur et fidei, licet accidat, prout est habitus, esse formatam gratia, vel sine ea; tamen est ei necessarium, et intrinsecum in ordine ad meritum acquirendum, seu, ut est principium meriti: Praeterea ipsa fides informis, etiam gratia circumscripta, est habitus virtutis, ideo non potest inferri, quod fides non sit sub proprio genere virtutis.
You will object sixthly. As the soul is infused into the body; so also grace into the soul; but the soul, arriving, carries with it its potencies: therefore also grace its habits of the virtues: therefore also formed faith: Therefore formed faith is not the same as that which was previously in the soul: therefore no faith that pre-exists unformed is informed.
Obiicies sexto. Sicut infunditur anima in corpus; ita et gratia in animam; sed adveniens anima secum fert suas potentias: ergo et gratia suos habitus virtutum: ergo et fidem formatam: Ergo fides formata non est eadem cum illa, quae prius erat in anima: ergo non informatur aliqua fides, quae praeexisteret informis.
The Saintly Doctor answers, by denying the parity; for the virtues are not Potencies of grace, through which it operates, but they differ really, as he shows in 2. dist. 27. question 2. nor does grace come into the soul as the soul into the body with its potencies; for then, grace receding, the virtues would also recede, which is heretical. Furthermore the Saintly Doctor gives another, more fitting similitude. As rain watering the earth makes the herb germinate, but when it dries in the heat, the rain returning again does not make that herb germinate; but makes the germinated one grow green; so also grace carries with it the Virtues, but when these have dried up in the heat of mortal sin, the rain of grace returning again does not reproduce the infused virtues; but bathes them in verdure. That however the Seminaries of the virtues are in the soul, the Saintly Doctor proves from St. Augustine and Bernard. Therefore charity adorns the virtues, and gives them verdure for bearing fruit. For faith is thus called living, because it flowers, and yields the fruits of merit, and without charity it is without flowers, and buds, and thus is called dead, even if it be green in the root, in the manner in which plants in winter are said to be dead, as St. Bonaventure teaches, whom Caspens imitates, disp. 4 sect. 2. St. Gregory uses the same similitude, 6. Moral. cap. 8. cited in St. Bonaventure, sermon 3. Dom. 23. after Pentecost.
Respondet S. Doct. negando paritatem; nam virtutes non sunt Potentiae gratiae, per quas operetur, sed differunt realiter, ut ostendit in 2. dist. 27. quaest. 2. neque venit gratia in animam, sicut anima in corpus cum suis potentiis; tunc enim recedente gratia, recederent et virtutes, quod est haereticum. Aliam porro similitudinem aptiorem dat S. Doct. Sicut pluvia rigans terram facit germinare herbam, hac vero aestu arescente, iterum rediens pluvia non facit germinare herbam illam; sed germinatam facit virescere; sic et gratia fert secum Virtutes, illis autem arescentibus ardore peccati mortalis, rursus rediens pluvia gratiae, non reproducit virtutes infusas; sed eas virore perfundit. Quod autem Seminaria virtutum sint in anima, probat S. Doct. ex D. August. et Bernardo. Igitur charitas exornat virtutes, datque eis virorem ad fructificandum. Sic enim dicitur fides viva, quia floret, et fructificat merita, et sine charitate est sine floribus, fondibus, et ita dicitur mortua, etiamsi in radice vireat, ad modum, quo plantae in hyeme dicuntur mortuae, ut docet S. Bonav. quem imitatur Caspens. disp. 4 sect. 2. eadem similitudine utitur D. Gregorius 6. Moral. cap. 8. apud D. Bonav. serm. 3. Dom. 23. post Pentecost.