Doubt — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Doubt IV: On the causes excusing from restitution on the part of the thing itself
One cause is judged, namely the destruction of the thing without the fault and delay of the debtor, because he had it in his keeping, and was bound to restore the same in specie. Then the thing perished for the Lord himself, as Medina notes, quaest. 3. causa 6. Navar. cap. 17. num. 80. Valentia quaest. 6. puncto 7. And as if after a thing that was not determined for payment, although destined by you for payment, you will be bound to return it. See Valentia.
De causis excusantibus a restitutione ex parte rei.
UNA causa censetur, nempe interitus rei sine culpa, et mora eius, quia eam apud se habebat, et debebat eandem numero restituere. Tunc res Domino ipsi perit, ut notant Medina quaest. 3. causa 6. Navar. cap. 17. num. 80. Valentia quaest. 6. puncto 7. Ac si post res, quae non erat determinata solutioni, quamvis a te solutioni sit destinata, reddere teneberis. Vide Valentiam.